基于构造约束的逐层网格层析速度建模技术在南川地区的应用

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2020.01.003

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

南川地区地表灰岩大面积出露,地震资料信噪比较低,且地下构造复杂、地层倾角较陡,属于典型的地表地下双复杂地震地质条件。单一的速度建模方法无法获取准确的速度模型,进而影响地震成像精度,难以有效指导该区水平井钻探工作。针对这一问题,通过分析层位层析和网格层析两种速度建模方法的优缺点,结合南川地区的实际资料特征,在构造约束的基础上进行逐层网格层析速度反演,即通过拾取纵向速度变化比较明显的地震标志层,由浅至深逐层约束网格层析反演,较好地解决了该区地表地下双复杂地震地质条件对速度反演的影响,为叠前深度偏移提供了较高精度的深度域速度模型。通过实际应用,对南川工区地震资料的成像精度改善明显,基本满足了该区页岩气勘探对地震资料的需求。

关键词: 南川地区, 构造约束, 速度建模, 网格层析, 叠前深度偏移

Abstract:

All the reasons that the surface limestone is exposed in a large area, the signal-to-noise ratio of seismic data is low, the underground structure is complex, and the dip angle of strata is steep make Nanchuan area to be a typical double-complex seismic geological condition of surface and underground. As the single velocity modeling method cannot obtain the accurate velocity models, it in turn affects the seismic imaging accuracy and is difficult to effectively guide horizontal well drilling in this area. In order to solve this problem, the velocity inversion of layer by layer grid tomography is carried out on the basis of structural constraints by analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of two kinds of velocity modeling methods, such as horizon chromatography and grid tomography, and combined with the actual data characteristics of Nanchuan area. That is, by picking up the seismic landmark layer with obvious longitudinal velocity variation and layer-by-layer constrained grid tomographic inversion from shallow to deep, the effect of surface and subsurface complex seismic geological conditions on velocity inversion is better reduced, and a higher precision depth domain velocity model is provided for the front depth offset . Through practical application, the imaging accuracy of seismic data in Nanchuan work area is improved obviously and basically meets the demand of shale gas exploration in this area.

Key words: Nanchuan area, structural constraint, velocity modeling, grid tomographic, prestack depth migration

中图分类号:

P631

任俊兴,孟庆利,杨帆. 基于构造约束的逐层网格层析速度建模技术在南川地区的应用[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(1): 17-21.

REN Junxing,MENG Qingli,YANG Fan. Application of structural constraint grid tomography velocity modeling in Nanchuan area[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(1): 17-21.

图/表 7

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

参考文献 17

[1]	秦宁, 李振春, 杨晓东 , 等. 自动拾取的成像空间域走时层析速度反演[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2012,47(3):392-398.
	QIN N, LI Z C, YANG X D , et al. Image domain travel-time tomography velocity inversion based on automatic picking[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2012,47(3):392-398.
[2]	罗勇, 张龙, 马俊彦 , 等. 复杂构造地震叠前深度偏移速度模型构建及效果[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2013,34(5):576-579.
	LUO Y, ZHANG L, MA J Y , et al. The pre-stack depth migration velocity model for complex geological structure in southern margin of Junggar Basin: Modeling and effect[J]. Xingjiang Petroleum Geology, 2013,34(5):576-579.
[3]	肖艳玲, 杨晓海, 胡正舟 . 叠前深度偏移网格层析速度反演技术在西湖背斜的应用[J]. 新疆地质, 2015,33(4):562-565.
	XIAO Y L, YANG X H, HU Z Z . Application of grid tomography in XiHu Anticline[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2015,33(4):562-565.
[4]	张宇, 闫更平, 王林 , 等. 塔中M工区低信噪比地震资料处理技术对策[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2017,7(1):14-19.
	ZHANG Y, YAN G P, WANG L , et al. Treatment technologies and countermeasure of low signal-to-noise ratio seismic data in M block of mid-Tarim area[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2017,7(1):14-19.
[5]	王海涛, 寇祖豪, 张烈辉 , 等. 高含硫复合气藏试井解释模型研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2018,8(6):24-27.
	WANG H T, KOU Z H, ZHANG LH , et al. Research on well test interpretation model for composite gas reservoir with high sulfur[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018,8(6):24-27.
[6]	马彦彦, 李国发, 张星宇 , 等. 叠前深度偏移速度建模方法分析[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2014,49(4):687-693.
	MA Y Y, LI G F, ZHANG X Y , et al. Strategy of velocity model building in prestack depth migration[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2014,49(4):687-693.
[7]	金晓波 . 南川区块断层精细解释研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2018,8(4):6-10.
	JIN X B . Study on the fine fault interpretation in Nanchuan district[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018,8(4):6-10.
[8]	袁刚, 冯心远, 蒋波 , 等. 约束层析反演及其在地震速度计算中的应用[J]. 石油物探, 2013,52(1):55-58.
	YUAN G, FENG X Y, JIANG B , et al. Constrained tomography inversion and its application in seismic velocity computation[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2013,52(1):55-58.
[9]	黄光南, 刘洋, TRYGGVASON A, 等. 变网格间距速度层析成像方法[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2013,48(3):379-389.
	HUANG G N, LIU Y, TRYGGVASON A , et al. Variable grid spacing velocity tomography[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2013,48(3):379-389.
[10]	谷巍巍, 杨锴, 王潇 . 二维VTI介质qP波斜率层析方法[J]. 石油物探, 2019,58(6):828-836.
	GU W W, YANG K, WANG X . 2D qP-wave slope tomography in VTI media[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2019,58(6):828-836.
[11]	黄鹏, 殷厚成, 薛维忠 , 等. 山前带复杂浅表层建模研究[J]. 石油物探, 2019,58(6):837-845.
	HUANG P, YIN H C, XUE W Z , et al. Modeling of complex near-surface in piedmont zone[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2019,58(6):837-845.
[12]	杨勤勇, 郭恺, 李博 , 等. TTI各向异性地震成像技术及其在页岩气勘探中的应用[J]. 石油物探, 2019,58(6):882-889.
	YANG Q Y, GUO K, LI B , et al. Application of TTI anisotropic seismic imaging in shale gas exploration[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2019,58(6):882-889.
[13]	郭颂, 王华忠, 胡江涛 . 基于非平稳滤波算子的成像域最小二乘偏移[J]. 石油物探, 2019,58(3):404-411.
	GUO S, WANG H Z, HU J T . Least-squares migration in image domain using nonstationary matching filter[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2019,58(3):404-411.
[14]	陈爱琼, 周霞, 朱海东 , 等. 地震走时层析成像反演在速度模型中的应用[J]. 长江大学学报(自然科学版), 2011,8(6):41-43.
	CHEN A Q, ZHOU X, ZHU H D , et al. Application of seismic traveltime tomography inversion in velocity model[J]. Journal of Yangtze University(Natural Science Edition), 2011,8(6):41-43.
[15]	李来林, 吴清岭, 何玉前 . 叠前深度成像技术及其应用[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2004,23(5):110-112.
	LI L L, WU Q L, HE Y Q . Technology and application of prestack depth migration[J]. Petroleum Geology Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2004,23(5):110-112.
[16]	WANG B PANN K. , Model-based interpretation of focusing panels for depth focusing analysis[C]// paper SEG-1998-1596 presented at the 1998 SEG Annual Meeting, 13-18 September 1998, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
[17]	马在田 . 论反射地震偏移成像[J]. 勘探地球物理进展, 2002,25(3):1-5.
	MA Z T . On reflection seismic migration imaging[J]. Pregress in Exploration Geophysics, 2002,25(3):1-5.