钻完井电气化“电代油”技术助力油气行业实现“双碳”目标

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2022.05.001

油气藏评价与开发 ›› 2022, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (5): 703-710.doi: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2022.05.001

• 专家论坛 • 下一篇

钻完井电气化“电代油”技术助力油气行业实现“双碳”目标

张烈辉¹(),张安安¹(),陈怡男¹,丁宁¹,李海²,曲广龙¹,王涛³,姚少彬³

1.西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室,四川成都 610500
2.中国石油西南油气田分公司,四川成都 610056
3.中国石油昆仑能源有限公司,四川成都 610065

收稿日期:2021-12-07 出版日期:2022-10-26 发布日期:2022-09-27
通讯作者: 张安安 E-mail:zhangliehui@vip.163.com;2564764@qq.com
作者简介:张烈辉（1967—）,男,博士,教授,本刊第二届编委会委员,现主要从事复杂油气藏渗流理论、试井及数值模拟方向的教学及科研工作。地址：四川省成都市新都区新都大道8号,邮政编码：610500。E-mail： zhangliehui@vip.163.com
基金资助:
中央引导地方科技发展专项“电能与LNG一体化输送的复合能源管道交互耦合机理及其多能流协同化理论研究”(2021ZYD0042);西南石油大学自然科学“揭榜挂帅”项目“数据与模型融合驱动的海洋综合能源系统脐带缆状感知关键技术研究”(2021JBGS06)

Electricity substitution technology of drilling and completion electrification promote petroleum and gas industry to achieve “carbon peak and neutrality” targets

ZHANG Liehui¹(),ZHANG An’an¹(),CHEN Yi’nan¹,DING Ning¹,LI Hai²,QU Guanglong¹,WANG Tao³,YAO Shaobin³

1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China
2. PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gasfield Company, Chengdu, Sichuan 610056, China
3. PetroChina Kunlun Energy Company Limited, Chengdu, Sichuan 610065, China

Received:2021-12-07 Online:2022-10-26 Published:2022-09-27
Contact: ZHANG An’an E-mail:zhangliehui@vip.163.com;2564764@qq.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近年来,国内外对于油气勘探开发的脱碳化技术愈发重视,油气能源行业结构转型是中国实现“双碳”目标的必然途径之一。为油气行业改革加速实现“双碳”目标,以中国石油西南油气田分公司勘探开发“电代油”技术项目为研究对象,通过剖析油气能源技术的改革方向与路径,对比了项目实施前后在环境污染及能源消耗等方面的变化,着重阐述钻完井电气化改造的必要性及优势。分析并总结了项目实践过程中的重难点,提出了制约“电代油”技术发展的关键技术及未来展开相关研究的突破口,为“双碳”目标下“电代油”技术在油气勘探开发中的应用提供了参考。

关键词: 钻完井电气化, “电代油”技术, “双碳”目标, 智能电站, 碳排放

Abstract:

In recent years, extensive attention has been paid to the decarbonization of petroleum and gas exploration and related technologies at home and broad. The structural transformation of the energy industry of the oil and gas is one of the inevitable ways for China to achieve the “carbon peak and neutrality” targets. Under the prerequisite of energy reform to accelerate the achievement of the targets, the energy reform direction and pathway for the oil and gas technology have been analyzed. Taking the project of the electricity substitution technology in the PetroChina Southwest Oil and Gasfield Company as an example, the changes in terms of environmental pollution and energy consumption before and after the implementation of the project are compared. Then, it focuses on the necessity of the drilling and completion electrification transformation and the advantages of the drilling and completion are emphasized. Based on the analyses and summary of the key and difficulties in the practice process, the key technologies that restrict the development of electricity substitution technology and the breakthrough points of the future researches are put forward, which provides reference for the application of “electricity substitution” technology in oil and gas exploration and development under the “dual-carbon” targets.

Key words: drilling and completion electrification, “electricity substitution” technology, “carbon peak and neutrality” targets, smart power substation, carbon emission

中图分类号:

TE13

张烈辉,张安安,陈怡男,丁宁,李海,曲广龙,王涛,姚少彬. 钻完井电气化“电代油”技术助力油气行业实现“双碳”目标[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(5): 703-710.

ZHANG Liehui,ZHANG An’an,CHEN Yi’nan,DING Ning,LI Hai,QU Guanglong,WANG Tao,YAO Shaobin. Electricity substitution technology of drilling and completion electrification promote petroleum and gas industry to achieve “carbon peak and neutrality” targets[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 703-710.

图/表 5

图1

图2

表1

表2

图3

参考文献 28

[1]	杨宇, 于宏源, 鲁刚, 等. 世界能源百年变局与国家能源安全[J]. 自然资源学报, 2021, 35(11):2803-2820. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20201119
	YANG Yu, YU Hongyuan, LU Gang, et al. Interview on the unprecedented changes of energy geopolitics and national energy security[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(11): 2803-2820. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20201119
[2]	McKinsey & Company. Global energy perspective 2021[R/OL]. (2021-01-12)[2021-12-07]. https://ishare.iask.sina.com.cn/f/12D4cjF30fOv.html.
[3]	罗佐县. 碳中和激活多领域天然气需求潜力[J]. 能源, 2020, 142(11):30-32.
	LUO Zuoxian. Neutralization potential of natural gas demand[J]. Energy, 2020, 142(11): 30-32
[4]	肖潇, 肖溢. 中国的海外能源战略差异化研究——以中东和东盟LNG进口为例[J]. 科技经济市场, 2016, 21(5):194-197.
	XIAO Xiao, XIAO Yi. China’s overseas energy strategy: Taking LNG imports from the Middle East and ASEAN as examples[J]. KEJI JINGJI SHICHANG, 2016, 21(5): 194-197.
[5]	帅石金, 唐韬, 赵彦光, 等. 柴油车排放法规及后处理技术的现状与展望[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2012, 3(3):200-217.
	SHUAI Shijin, TANG Tao, ZHAO Yanguang, et al. State of the art and outlook of diesel emission regulations and aftertreatment technologies[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy, 2012, 3(3): 200-217.
[6]	权春锋. 柴油机尾气处理技术发展分析[J]. 汽车实用技术, 2020, 24(8):82-84.
	QUAN Chunfeng. Development analysis of diesel engine exhaust treatment technology[J]. Automobile Applied Technology, 2020, 24(8): 82-84.
[7]	KELLENS K, DEWULF W, OVERCASH M, et al. Methodology for systematic analysis and improvement of manufacturing unit process life-cycle inventory (UPLCI)—CO₂PE! initiative (cooperative effort on process emissions in manufacturing). Part 1: Methodology description[J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2012, 17(1): 69-78. doi: 10.1007/s11367-011-0340-4
[8]	韩勇, 任艳辉, 张悦, 等. 石油钻井机械“电代油”配套技术研究[J]. 中国设备工程, 2020,(4):190-192.
	HAN Yong, REN Yanhui, ZHANG Yue, et al. Researching on electric drilling machinery technology[J]. China Plant Engineering, 2020, 36(4): 190-192.
[9]	PAPAGIANNAKIS R, KRISHNAN S, RAKOPOULOS D, et al. A combined experimental and theoretical study of diesel fuel injection timing and gaseous fuel/diesel mass ratio effects on the performance and emissions of natural gas-diesel HDDI engine operating at various loads[J]. Fuel, 2017, 202: 675-687. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.05.012
[10]	GIACHINO A. PRIVATE EQUITY ENERGY BETS BURN INVESTORS[R/OL]. (2021-04-22) [2021-12-07]. https://pestakeholder.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/PESP_Report_PrivateEnergy_March2021-v4-2.pdf.
[11]	JOHNSON D, HELTZEL R, NIX A. Trends in unconventional well development—methane emissions associated with the use of dual fuel and dedicated natural gas engines[J]. Energy Technology, 2015, 2(12): 988-995. doi: 10.1002/ente.201402088
[12]	张东科, 李树生, 蔚富海, 等. 双燃料发动机的研制开发及其应用[C]// 中国内燃机学术年会暨测试技术分会,油品与清洁燃料分会和吉林省内燃机学会联合学术年会, 2012. ZHANGDongke, LIShusheng, WEIFuhai, et al. Development and application of dual fuel engine[C]// Chinese Society Internal Combustion Engine Academic & testing technology annual conference, Oil products and clean fuels & Jilin internal combustion engine society joint academic annual meeting, 2012.
[13]	王京龙. 气体钻井安全监控系统在胜利油田的应用[J]. 中小企业管理与科技(下旬刊), 2011, 4(6):213.
	WANG Jinglong. Application of gas drilling safety monitoring system in Shengli Oilfield[J]. Management & Technology of SME, 2011, 4(6): 213.
[14]	HUNTINGTON H G, BHARGAVA A, DANIELS D, et al. Key findings from the core North American scenarios in the EMF34 intermodel comparison[J]. Energy Policy, 2020, 144: 111599. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111599
[15]	蒋合艳, 陆俊康, 武卫卫, 等. 电驱动钻机气控系统的优化设计[J]. 液压气动与密封, 2019, 39(11):35-39.
	JIANG Heyan, LU Junkang, WU Weiwei, et al. Optimization design of pneumatic control system of electric drive drilling rig[J]. Hydraulics Pneumatics & Seals, 2019, 39(11): 35-39.
[16]	刘志强, 宋朝阳, 程守业, 等. 我国反井钻机钻井技术与装备发展历程及现状[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2021, 49(1):32-65.
	LIU Zhiqiang, SONG Zhaoyang, CHEN Shouye, et al. Development history and status quo of raise boring technologies and equipment in China[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2021, 49(1): 32-65.
[17]	王代华, 万小宏, 李国孝, 等. 电驱动钻机控制系统配置方案探讨[J]. 石油机械, 2001, 29(9):53-56.
	WANG Daihua, WAN Xiaohong, LI Guoxiao, et al. Discussion on configuration scheme of electric drive drilling rig control system[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2001, 29(9): 53-56.
[18]	张健, 周霞, 刘旭, 等. 机械钻机电代油节能减排效果测试方法研究[J]. 钻采工艺, 2020, 43(5):82-83. doi: 10.3969/J. ISSN.1006-768X.2020.05.23
	ZHANG Jian, ZHOU Xia, LIU Xu, et al. Research on energy-saving and emission reduction effect test of replacing oil by electricity in machinery drilling rig[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2020, 43(5): 82-83. doi: 10.3969/J. ISSN.1006-768X.2020.05.23
[19]	王彤, 李丹, 李春秋. 油田钻机驱动“以电代油”的应用及效益[J]. 电力需求侧管理, 2014, 16(5):37-38.
	WANG Tong, LI Dan, LI Chunqiu. Application and benefit of "replacing oil with electricity" in oilfield drilling rig drive[J]. Power Demand Side Management, 2014, 16(5): 37-38.
[20]	邢洁, 宋男哲, 李婉婷, 等. 基于STIRPAT模型的黑龙江省“十四五”期间碳强度目标研究[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2021, 46(8):77-81.
	XING Jie, SONG Nanzhe, LI Wanting, et al. Study on the carbon intensity reduction target in Heilongjiang Province during the 14th Five-Year Plan Period based on STIRPAT model[J]. Environmental Science and Management, 2021, 46(8): 77-81.
[21]	朱发根, 单葆国, 马丁, 等. 基于CO₂减排目标的2050年全球能源需求展望[J]. 中国电力, 2016, 49(3):34-38.
	ZHU Fagen, SHAN Baoguo, MA Ding, et al. Global energy demand prospect based on CO₂ emission reduction target in 2050[J]. Electric Power, 2016, 49(3): 34-38.
[22]	翁琳, 陈剑波. 光伏系统基于全生命周期碳排放量计算的环境与经济效益分析[J]. 上海理工大学学报, 2017, 39(3):282-288.
	WENG Lin, CHEN Jianbo. Environment and economic analysis on carbon dioxide emissions calculation in the life cycle of a photovoltaic system[J]. Journal of University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 2017, 39(3): 282-288.
[23]	贺甲元, 程洪, 向红, 等. 塔河油田碳酸盐岩储层暂堵转向压裂排量优化[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2021, 43(2):233-238.
	HE Jiayuan, CHENG Hong, XIANG Hong, et al. Optimizing the displacement of temporary plugging and diversion fracturing of the carbonate reservoirs in Tahe Oilfield[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2021, 43(2): 233-238.
[24]	孙惠娟, 蒙锦辉, 彭春华. 风-光-水-碳捕集多区域虚拟电厂协调优化调度[J]. 电网技术, 2019, 43(11):4040-4049.
	SUN Huijuan, MENG Jinhui, PENG Chunhua. Coordinated optimization scheduling of multi-region virtual power plant with wind-power-photovoltaic-hydropower-carbon capture units[J]. Power System Technology, 2019, 43(11):4040-4049.
[25]	ZHANG N, HU Z, DAI D, et al. Unit commitment model in smart grid environment considering carbon emissions trading[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2015, 7(1): 420-427. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2015.2401337
[26]	郭尊, 李庚银, 周明. 计及碳交易机制的电-气联合系统快速动态鲁棒优化运行[J]. 电网技术, 2020, 44(4):1220-1228.
	GUO Zun, LI Gengyin, ZHOU Ming. Fast and dynamic robust optimization of integrated electricity-gas system operation with carbon trading[J]. Power System Technology, 2020, 44(4): 1220-1228.
[27]	张斌, 李磊, 邱勇潮, 等. 电驱压裂设备在页岩气储层改造中的应用[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(5):50-57.
	ZHANG Bin, LI Lei, QIU Yongchao, et al. Application of electric drive fracturing equipment in shale gas reservoir stimulation[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(5): 50-57.
[28]	童征, 展恩强, 刘颖, 等. 国内电驱压裂经济性和制约因素分析[J]. 国际石油经济, 2020, 28(7):53-62.
	TONG Zheng, ZHAN Enqiang, LIU Ying, et al. Analysis of economy and constraints of electric-powered fracturing application in China[J]. International Petroleum Economics, 2020, 28(7): 53-62.

实施阶段	环境、社会影响	生产效率
实施阶段	环境、社会影响	电力公司	油气田公司
项目实施前	存在废气排放,噪音大（120 dB左右）,周边居民投诉阻工	无增量电量销售	①钻井无法全天候施工,日均压裂2段,无法保障页岩气快速大规模生产; ②阻工现象频繁
项目实施后	降低碳排放,噪音小（60 dB左右）,企地关系和谐	①无需投资末端电网,便可完善地方电网结构; ②无需承担线损,“十四五”增量电量预计达45.5×10⁸ kW·h	①钻井24 h全天候作业,日均压裂4段,页岩气开发效率大幅提升; ②促进地方和企业和谐发展

统计对象	售电量（10⁴ kW·h）	CO₂减排量（t）	SO₂减排量（t）	氮氧化物减排量（t）	替代柴油量（t）	标煤减少量（t）
单井全电驱	350	1 225	11	3	972	471
项目累计	62 055	217 193	2 005	585	172 375	83 536
“十四五”期间累计	455 000	1 592 500	14 700	4 288	1 263 889	612 500

钻完井电气化“电代油”技术助力油气行业实现“双碳”目标

Electricity substitution technology of drilling and completion electrification promote petroleum and gas industry to achieve “carbon peak and neutrality” targets

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	薛宇泽, 张玉贵, 麻银娟, 薛超. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南缘岩溶热储对井回灌示踪试验 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(6): 757-764.
[2]	糜利栋,曾大乾,刘华,张广权,张俊法. 中国石化地下储气库一体化综合平台研发与应用 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(6): 781-788.
[3]	杨宇,徐启林,刘荣和,黄东杰,颜平,王建猛. 枯竭气藏CO₂封存中的相平衡规律研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(3): 280-287.
[4]	聂云丽, 高国忠. 基于随机森林的页岩气“甜点”分类方法 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(3): 358-367.
[5]	刘叶轩,刘向君,丁乙,周鑫,梁利喜. 考虑隔层影响的页岩油储层可压性评价方法 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(1): 74-82.
[6]	马东民,王馨,滕金祥,季长江,邵凯,郑超,伋雨松,惠鹏. 镜煤和暗煤与甲烷界面作用实验研究——以民和盆地低阶煤为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(4): 556-563.
[7]	陈倩倩. 南华北盆地海陆过渡相页岩特征及勘探层位优选——以通许地区上古生界为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(4): 690-697.
[8]	马林,蒋夏妮,龚劲松. 优质页岩气储层测井特征分析 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(3): 445-454.
[9]	何发岐,徐兵威,邵隆坎. 再论油气勘探开发哲学和创新性思维——纪念“中国陆上第一口油井”延1井 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(2): 265-273.
[10]	张金川,陶佳,李中明,杨圆圆,王东升,张栋,李谦超,武向真,牛嘉亮,赵星旭,郎岳. 中国页岩剖面区域分布及其页岩气地质意义 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1): 29-46.
[11]	王永诗,唐东. 咸化断陷湖盆典型页岩剖面地质特征——以东营凹陷为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1): 181-191.
[12]	李浩涵,包书景,张焱林,段轲,陈科,周志,宋腾,李飞. 鄂西地区下震旦统陡山沱组二段剖面特征及页岩气地质意义 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1): 171-180.
[13]	湛小红,陈学辉,刘超,何文斌,张志平. 重庆武隆五峰组—龙马溪组一段天生剖面特征研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1): 150-159.
[14]	高玉巧,刘娜娜,张培先,何贵松,高全芳. 重庆市綦江区页岩地质特征及其对页岩气勘探的启示 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1): 119-129.
[15]	区舫,杨辉廷,黄晓兵. X气田飞仙关组礁滩相储层测井解释方法应用 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(5): 744-752.