前置液阶段的支撑剂段塞降低页岩储层压裂摩阻实验研究

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2020.01.012

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to solve the problem that the injection pressure of shale reservoir in Fuling area is too high in the early stage of hydraulic fracturing, researches on the resistance reduction based on proppant slug technology was carried out. By using the previous self-developed jet device and target, a set of physical simulation method for reducing fracture resistance in near well by grinding perforation with proppant slug was established and the orthogonal experiment was carried out. For the on-site needs, fore-tail pressure drop and average pressure drop rate are established to characterize the experimental results, and then analyzed accordingly. The results show that the influence of various factors on the resistance reduction effect from large to small is in the following orders: sand ratio, particle size, number of slugs（grinding time） and proppant type. The effect of reducing resistance of quartz sand is better than that of ceramsite. Drag reduction increases with the thickening of proppant particle size and the increase of sand ratio, and decreases at first and then increases with the prolongation of grinding time. Based on the results of orthogonal experiment, the optimal operating parameters of quartz sand with particle size of 40/70 mesh, sand ratio of 9 % and grinding time of 9 min are selected. On this condition, the optimal friction reduction effect of pressure drop rate of 0.439 MPa/min and head-tail pressure drop of 1.04 MPa are obtained. The experimental study provides a certain reference for the construction design of hydraulic fracturing of shale reservoir.

Key words: shale, perforation, friction reduction, tortuous fracture, proppant slug, hydraulic fracturing

CLC Number:

TE357

YANG Zhaozhong,GAO Chenxuan,LI Xiaogang,LIU Jinxuan,LIAO Zijia. Laboratory study on reducing fracturing friction of shale reservoir by proppant slug during pad[J].Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(1): 77-83.

Figures/Tables 13

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Table 1

Table 2

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Table 3

Table 4

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

References 17

[1]	CRUMP J B, CONWAY M W . Effects of perforation-entry friction on bottomhole treating analysis[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1988,40(8):1041-1048.
[2]	LORD D L. Study of perforation friction pressure employing a large-scale fracturing flow simulator[C]// paper SPE-28508-MS presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 25-28 September 1994, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
[3]	陈志雄 . 斜井压裂砂堵原因分析及解决办法[J]. 油气井测试, 2003,12(3):36-37.
	CHEN Z X . The sand slug analysis and resolving method during fracturing in slant well[J]. Well Testing, 2003,12(3):36-37.
[4]	SMITH C G, KHIAT S, AL-BADRAOUI D. An effective technique to reduce bottomhole friction pressure during hydraulic fracturing treatments[C]// paper SPE-112422-MS presented at the SPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, 13-15 February 2008, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA.
[5]	郭大立, 计勇, 许江文 , 等. 分析近井筒效应的新模型及方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2012,34(5):177-182.
	GUO D L, JI Y, XU J W , et al. Research on the new model and method of analyzing near-wellbore effects[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2012,34(5):177-182.
[6]	龚迪光, 曲占庆, 郭天魁 , 等. 径向井水力压裂摩阻影响因素与计算公式[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2016,33(3):102-106.
	GONG D G, QU Z Q, GUO T K , et al. Factors affecting friction loss of hydraulic fracturing in ultra-short radius radial wells and the calculating equation thereof[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2016,33(3):102-106.
[7]	LONG G B, LIU S X, XU G S , et al. A perforation-erosion model for hydraulic-fracturing applications[J]. SPE Production & Operations, 2018 , 33(4):770-783.
[8]	幸雪松, 陈彬, 张彬奇 , 等. 渤海套管井多层压裂充填管柱沿程摩阻修正与应用[J]. 钻采工艺, 2019,42(5):49-51.
	XING X S, CHEN B, ZHANG B Q , et al. Friction drag correction for multi fracturing-gravel packing string used in cased holes at Bohai[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2019,42(5):49-51.
[9]	周仲建, 于世虎, 张晓虎 . 页岩气用复合增效压裂液的研究与应用[J]. 钻采工艺, 2019,42(4):89-92.
	ZHOU Z J, YU S H, ZHANG X H . R & D of composite synergistic fracturing fluid for shale gas and application[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2019,42(4):89-92.
[10]	梁兵, 郭建春, 党勇杰 , 等. 水力压裂过程中近井摩阻分析[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2006,20(1):74-75.
	LIANG B, GUO J C, DANG Y J , et al. An analysis of entry friction during hydraulic fracturing[J]. Henan Petroleum, 2006,20(1):74-78.
[11]	宋燕高, 赵素惠, 王兴文 , 等. 深层气藏压裂改造降低施工摩阻技术[J]. 特种油气藏, 2012,19(2):123-125.
	SONG Y G, ZHAO S H, WANG X W , et al. Friction resistance reduction technology for fracturing deep gas reservoirs[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2012,19(2):123-125.
[12]	刘炜, 刘觐瑄, 华继军 , 等. 水力压裂摩阻类型及降阻措施[J]. 石化技术, 2019,26(1):69.
	LIU W, LIU J X, HUA J J , et al. Friction types of hydraulic fracturing and measures for reducing friction[J]. Petrochemical Industry Technology, 2019,26(1):69.
[13]	彭鹏 . 煤层气水平井水力喷射工艺的室内研究[D]. 成都:西南石油大学, 2016.
	PENG P . Laboratory study on horizontal well hydraulic spraying technology of coalbed methane[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2016
[14]	张建涛, 陈小新, 潘卫东 , 等. 水力压裂中近井筒效应分析及支撑剂段塞技术在中原油田的应用[J]. 钻采工艺, 2004,27(5):37-39.
	ZHANG J T, CHEN X X, PAN W D , et al. Near-wellbore effects analysis in hydraulic fracturing and applications of proppant slugs technique in Zhongyuan Oilfield[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2004,27(5):37-39.
[15]	师斌斌, 薛政, 马晓云 , 等. 页岩气水平井体积压裂技术研究进展及展望[J]. 中外能源, 2017,22(6):41-49.
	SHI B B, XUE Z, MA X Y , et al. Review and preview of stimulated reservoir volume technology of horizontal wells for shale gas[J]. Sino-Global Energy, 2017,22(6):41-49.
[16]	李根生 . 水力喷射压裂理论与应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011.
	LI G S. Theory and application of hydrajet-fracturing[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2011.
[17]	张永利, 于鸿椿, 何翔 . 磨料两相射流理论及在油井增产中的应用[M]. 沈阳: 东北大学出版社, 2010.
	ZHANG Y L, YU H C, HE X. Abrasive two-phase jet theory and its application in oil well stimulation[M]. Shenyang: Northeastern University Press, 2010.

水平	因素
水平	支撑剂类型	粒径/目	砂比/%	打磨时间/min
1	石英砂	70/140	3	3
2	陶粒	80/120	6	6
3		40/70	9	9

组别	支撑剂类型	粒径/目	砂比/%	打磨时间/min
实验1	石英砂	70/140	3	3
实验2	石英砂	80/120	6	6
实验3	石英砂	40/70	9	9
实验4	陶粒	70/140	6	9
实验5	陶粒	80/120	9	3
实验6	陶粒	40/70	3	6
实验7	石英砂	70/140	9	6
实验8	石英砂	80/120	3	9
实验9	石英砂	40/70	6	3

组别	压降速率/（MPa·min^-1）	首尾压降/MPa
实验1	0	0
实验2	0.125	0.48
实验3	0.439	1.04
实验4	0.096	0.54
实验5	0.209	0.67
实验6	0.034	0.31
实验7	0.168	0.46
实验8	0.044	0.33
实验9	0.193	0.77

表征参数	压降速率/（MPa·min^-1）				首尾压降/MPa
表征参数	均值1	均值2	均值3	极差	均值1	均值2	均值3	极差
支撑剂	0.162	0.113		0.049	0.513	0.507		0.006
粒径	0.088	0.126	0.222	0.134	0.333	0.493	0.707	0.374
砂比	0.026	0.138	0.272	0.246	0.213	0.597	0.723	0.510
时间	0.134	0.109	0.193	0.084	0.480	0.417	0.637	0.220

Laboratory study on reducing fracturing friction of shale reservoir by proppant slug during pad

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 17

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	YAO Hongsheng, WANG Wei, HE Xipeng, ZHENG Yongwang, NI Zhenyu. Development practices of geology-engineering integration in complex structural area of Nanchuan normal pressure shale gas field [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 537-547.
[2]	LI Jingchang, LU Ting, NIE Haikuan, FENG Dongjun, DU Wei, SUN Chuanxiang, LI Wangpeng. Confidence evaluation of fractures seismic detection in shale gas formations on WY23 Pad in Weirong [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 614-626.
[3]	XIA Haibang, HAN Kening, SONG Wenhui, WANG Wei, YAO Jun. Pore scale fracturing fluid occurrence mechanisms in multi-scale matrix-fracture system of shale gas reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 627-635.
[4]	HOU Dali, HAN Xin, TANG Hongming, GUO Jianchun, GONG Fengming, SUN Lei, QIANG Xianyu. Primary research on expression of kerogen in Longmaxi Shale and its adsorption characteristics [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 636-646.
[5]	HAN Kening, WANG Wei, FAN Dongyan, YAO Jun, LUO Fei, YANG Can. Production forecasting for normal pressure shale gas wells based on coupling of production decline method and LSTM model [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 647-656.
[6]	ZHANG Jiawei, LIU Xiangjun, XIONG Jian, LIANG Lixi, REN Jianfei, LIU Baiqu. Discrete element simulation study on fracture propagation law of dual well synchronous fracturing [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 657-667.
[7]	XUE Gang, XIONG Wei, ZHANG Peixian. Genesis analysis and effective development of normal pressure shale gas reservoir: A case of Wufeng-Longmaxi shale gas reservoir in southeast margin of Sichuan Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 668-675.
[8]	LOU Zhanghua, ZHANG Xinke, WU Yuchen, GAO Yuqiao, ZHANG Peixian, JIN Aimin, ZHU Rong. Fluid response characteristics of shale gas preservation differences in Nanchuan and its adjacent blocks in Sichuan Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 451-458.
[9]	HU Zhijian, LI Shuxin, WANG Jianjun, ZHOU Hong, ZHAO Yulong, ZHANG Liehui. Productivity evaluation of multi-stage fracturing horizontal wells in shale gas reservoir with complex artificial fracture occurrence [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 459-466.
[10]	LIN Hun, SUN Xinyi, SONG Xixiang, MENG Chun, XIONG Wenxin, HUANG Junhe, LIU Hongbo, LIU Cheng. A model for shale gas well production prediction based on improved artificial neural network [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 467-473.
[11]	LIU Honglin,ZHOU Shangwen,LI Xiaobo. Application of PCA plus OPLS method in rapid reserve production rate prediction of shale gas wells [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 474-483.
[12]	LU Bi,HU Chunfeng,MA Jun. Influencing factors and countermeasures of inter-well interference of fracturing horizontal wells in Nanchuan shale gas field [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 330-339.
[13]	QIU Xiaoxue,ZHONG Guanghai,LI Xiansheng,CHEN Meng,LING Weitong. CFD simulation of flow characteristics of shale gas horizontal wells with different inclination [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 340-347.
[14]	LI Xiaogang, HE Jiangang, YANG Zhaozhong, YI Liangping, HUANG Liuke, DU Bodi, ZHANG Jingqiang. Fracture characteristics based on discrete element method [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 348-357.
[15]	NIE Yunli, GAO Guozhong. Classification of shale gas “sweet spot” based on Random Forest machine learning [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 358-367.