基于聚合物驱的多级非均相调驱研究

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2020.06.014

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to solve the problems of serious heterogeneity, breakthrough of injected water along high permeability zone, low recovery percent of reserves and limited EOR capability of water flooding in the middle and low permeability fault-block reservoir of Wang-17 Block in Wangji Oilfield, the EOR technology of chemical flooding has been studied, and polymer and preformed particle gel（PPG） have been evaluated and screened. The slug structure, oil displacement efficiency and diversion rate of heterogeneous oil displacement system formed by compounding have been evaluated by physical simulation technology. And the slug volume and structure have been optimized by numerical simulation technology. It is confirmed that multi-stage heterogeneous profile control and slug polymer flooding can improve the recovery rate in Wang-17 Block by 8.25 percentage points. The field application has achieved initial results. This technology has been used for reference and popularized in the polymer flooding project of B238 Block in Xiaermen Oilfield.

Key words: polymer flooding, multi-stage slug, heterogeneous flooding, physical simulation, numerical simulation optimization

CLC Number:

TE357

ZHANG Xiaojing,LU Jun,ZHANG Zhuo,LIANG Limei,GUO Linlin. Research on multi-stage heterogeneous flooding based on polymer flooding[J].Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(6): 90-95.

Figures/Tables 6

Fig. 1

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

References 20

[1]	孙焕泉, 曹绪龙, 李振泉, 等. 非均相复合驱油技术[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016.
	SUN H Q, CAO X L, LI Z Q, et al. The heterogeneous phase combination flooding used in enhanced oil recovery[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2016.
[2]	曹绪龙. 非均相复合驱油体系设计与性能评价[J]. 石油学报(石油加工), 2013,29(1):115-121. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8719.2013.01.019
	CAO X L. Design and performance evaluation on the heterogeneous combination flooding system[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica(Petroleum Processing Section), 2013,29(1):115-121. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8719.2013.01.019
[3]	孙焕泉. 胜利油田三次采油技术的实践与认识[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2006,33(3):262-266.
	SUN H Q. Practice and understanding of tertiary recovery in Shengli Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2006,33(3):262-266.
[4]	任亭亭, 宫厚健, 桑茜, 等. 聚驱后B-PPG与HPAM非均相复合驱提高采收率技术[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015,30(5):54-58.
	REN T T, GONG H J, SANG Q, et al. Enhanced oil recovery by HPAM/B-PPG heterogeneous composite flooding after polymer flooding[J]. Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2015,30(5):54-58.
[5]	侯健, 吴德君, 韦贝, 等. 非均相复合驱非连续相渗流特征及提高驱油效率机制[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019,43(5):128-135.
	HOU J, WU D J, WEI B, et al. Percolation characteristics of discontinuous phase and mechanisms of improving oil displacement efficiency in heterogeneous composite flooding[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2019,43(5):128-135.
[6]	崔晓红. 新型非均相复合驱油方法[J]. 石油学报, 2011,32(1):122-126.
	CUI X H. A study on the heterogeneous combination flooding system[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2011,32(1):122-126.
[7]	陈晓彦. 非均相驱油剂应用方法研究[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2009,31(5):85-88.
	CHEN X Y. Method study for application of heterogeneous oil displacement agent[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2009,31(5):85-88.
[8]	陈晓彦. 非均相复合驱油体系驱替特征研究[J]. 精细石油化工进展, 2009,10(11):1-4.
	CHEN X Y. Study on displacement characteristics of new immiscible flooding system[J]. Advances in Fine Petrochemicals, 2009,10(11):1-4.
[9]	刘煜. 黏弹性颗粒驱油剂调驱性能的室内研究[J]. 承德石油高等专科学校学报, 2013,15(3):5-9.
	LIU Y. Flooding property of preformed particle gel[J]. Journal of Chengde Petroleum College, 2013,15(3):5-9.
[10]	王健. 化学驱物理化学渗流理论与应用[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2008.
	WANG J. Theory and application of physicochemical percolation in chemical flooding[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2008.
[11]	李宗阳, 王业飞, 曹绪龙, 等. 新型耐温抗盐聚合物驱油体系设计评价及应用[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019,26(2):106-112.
	LI Z Y, WANG Y F, CAO X L, et al. Design evaluation and application of a novel temperature-resistant and salt-tolerant polymer flooding system[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019,26(2):106-112.
[12]	吴亚红, 姜祖明, 李振泉, 等. 黏弹性颗粒驱油剂的流变特性[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2015,22(4):87-92.
	WU Y H, JIANG Z M, LI Z Q, et al. Rheological properties of branched-preformed particle gel[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2015,22(4):87-92.
[13]	孙焕泉, 王涛, 肖建洪, 等. 新型聚合物微球逐级深部调剖技术[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2006,13(4):77-79.
	SUN H Q, WANG T, XIAO J H, et al. Novel technique of in-depth profile control step by step by polymer microspheres[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2006,13(4):77-79.
[14]	许洪星, 蒲春生, 许耀波. 预交联凝胶颗粒调驱研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2013,13(1):160-165.
	XU H X, PU C S, XU Y B. Study on preformed particle gel for profile control and flooding[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2013,13(1):160-165.
[15]	袁士义. 聚合物地下交联调剖数学模型[J]. 石油学报, 1991,12(1):49-59.
	YUAN S Y. A mathematical model of high permeability channel blockage in a heterogeneous reservoir by in-situ polymer gelation process[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 1991,12(1):49-59.
[16]	曹伟东, 戴涛, 于金彪, 等. 非均相复合驱数值模拟方法研究与应用[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016,37(4):606-611. doi: 10.11743/ogg20160419
	CAO W D, DAI T, YU J B, et al. A numerical simulation method of heterogeneous combination flooding[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016,37(4):606-611. doi: 10.11743/ogg20160419
[17]	孙焕泉. 聚合物驱后井网调整与非均相复合驱先导试验方案及矿场应用:以孤岛油田中一区Ng3单元为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2014,21(2):1-4.
	SUN H Q. Application of pilot test for well pattern adjusting heterogeneous combination flooding after polymer flooding-case of Zhongyiqu Ng3 block, Gudao oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2014,21(2):1-4.
[18]	张贤松, 郭兰磊, 屈智坚, 等. 孤岛油田中一区聚合物驱先导试验效果评价及驱油特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 1996,23(6):54-57.
	ZHANG X S, GUO L L, QU Z J, et al. The effectiveness evaluation and displacement characteristics analysis of polymer flooding pilot test in Zhong-1 unit of Gudao oil field[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1996,23(6):54-57.
[19]	姜颜波. 聚合物驱后油藏井网重组与化学驱复合增效技术[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2014,28(1):91-93.
	JIANG Y B. Compound efficiency enhancement technology of well pattern reorganization and chemical flooding after polymer flooding[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2014,28(1):91-93.
[20]	隋军, 廖广志, 牛金刚. 大庆油田聚合物驱油动态特征及驱油效果影响因素分析[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 1999,18(5):17-20.
	SUI J, LIAO G Z, NIU J G. Dynamic performance and interference factor analysis of oil displacement result in polymer flooding of Daqing Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 1999,18(5):17-20.

配方	岩心种类	空气渗透率/μm²	孔隙度/ %	水驱采收率/%	水驱分流率/%	化学驱分流率/%	后续水驱分流率/%	最终采收率/%	采收率提高百分点
0.6PV（P）	低渗岩心	0.257	18.66	25.85	2	10 ~ 85	2	56.13	30.28
	高渗岩心	0.498	22.76	67.17	98	85 ~ 90	98	76.64	9.47
	并联岩心			49.10				67.00	17.90
0.1PV（PPG/P）+0.4PV（P）+ 0.1PV（PPG/P）	低渗岩心	0.204	16.35	31.03	3	20 ~ 30	2	55.13	24.10
	高渗岩心	0.569	23.15	42.08	97	70 ~ 80	98	63.79	21.71
	并联岩心			36.96				59.77	22.81
0.1PV（PPG/P）+0.2PV（P）+0.05PV（PPG/P）+0.2PV（P）+0.05PV（PPG/P）	低渗岩心	0.213	16.81	17.31	2	35 ~ 40	15	59.87	42.56
	高渗岩心	0.654	25.09	39.44	98	60 ~ 65	85	63.01	23.57
	并联岩心			32.04				61.96	29.92

注入段塞（PV）	增油量/ 10⁴t	聚合物量/ t	采收率提高百分点	吨聚增油/ （t·t^-1）	综合指标
0.3	3.19	706	4.15	45.2	1.88
0.4	4.36	941	5.67	46.3	2.63
0.5	5.28	1 176	6.87	44.9	3.09
0.6	5.58	1 411	7.26	39.6	2.87
0.7	5.65	1 646	7.35	34.3	2.52

前置段塞（PV）	累积增油/10⁴t	采收率提高百分点
0.03	5.32	6.92
0.04	5.48	7.13
0.05	5.63	7.32
0.06	5.71	7.42
0.07	5.75	7.48
0.08	5.79	7.53

分类	前置段塞（PV）	主体段塞（PV）	后置段塞（PV）
不组合	0.05	0.4（P）	0.05
不组合	0.05	0.4（PPG/P）	0.05
一次组合（一级）	0.05	0.19（P）+0.02（PPG/P）+0.19（P）	0.05
	0.05	0.18（P）+0.04（PPG/P）+0.18（P）	0.05
	0.05	0.17（P）+0.06（PPG/P）+0.17（P）	0.05
	0.05	0.16（P）+0.08（PPG/P）+0.16（P）	0.05
	0.05	0.15（P）+0.10（PPG/P）+0.15（P）	0.05
二次组合（二级）	0.05	0.13（P）+0.01（PPG/P）+0.13（P）+0.01（PPG/P）+0.12（P）	0.05
	0.05	0.12（P）+0.02（PPG/P）+0.12（P）+0.02（PPG/P）+0.12（P）	0.05
	0.05	0.12（P）+0.03（PPG/P）+0.11（P）+0.03（PPG/P）+0.11（P）	0.05
	0.05	0.11（P）+0.04（PPG/P）+0.11（P）+0.04（PPG/P）+0.10（P）	0.05
	0.05	0.10（P）+0.05（PPG/P）+0.10（P）+0.05（PPG/P）+0.10（P）	0.05

主体段塞组合方式		累增油/ 10⁴t	采收率提高百分点	干粉用量/ t	吨聚增油/ （t·t^-1）	综合指标
级数	尺寸（PV）	累增油/ 10⁴t	采收率提高百分点	干粉用量/ t	吨聚增油/ （t·t^-1）	综合指标
不组合	聚合物驱	5.94	7.72	1 439	41.3	3.2
不组合	非均相	7.38	9.71	2 138	34.9	3.4
一次组合（一级）	0.02（非均相）	6.10	7.93	1 466	41.6	3.3
	0.04（非均相）	6.22	8.09	1 494	41.7	3.4
	0.06（非均相）	6.28	8.16	1 521	41.3	3.4
	0.08（非均相）	6.31	8.20	1 548	40.7	3.3
	0.10（非均相）	6.32	8.22	1 576	40.1	3.3
二次组合（二级）	0.02（非均相）	6.21	8.08	1 466	42.4	3.4
	0.04（非均相）	6.34	8.25	1 494	42.5	3.5
	0.06（非均相）	6.40	8.32	1 521	42.1	3.5
	0.08（非均相）	6.43	8.36	1 548	41.5	3.5
	0.10（非均相）	6.44	8.38	1 576	40.9	3.4

Research on multi-stage heterogeneous flooding based on polymer flooding

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 20

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	HU Depeng. Injection-production features of polymer flooding for horizontal wells and influencing factors of development effects for well groups [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 809-815.
[2]	FAN Xibin,PU Wanfen,SHAN Jiangtao,DU Daijun,QIN Jianhua,GAO Yang. Feasibility of enhanced oil recovery by CO₂ huff-n-puff in tight conglomerate reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 831-836.
[3]	YAN Jianli,YAN Guanshan,GU Zhimeng,BIE Mengjun,ZHANG Zhenjie. Selection of fracturing wells and layers of Bohai J Oil Field in the late stage of high water cut and its application [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(5): 736-743.
[4]	XU Jianping,YUAN Yuanda,XIE Qing,WEI Xuegang,FENG Zhen. Advance in application of molecular dynamics simulation in polymer flooding [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(3): 414-421.
[5]	HUANG Bo,LEI Lin,TANG Wenjia,XU Ningwei,XIONG Wei. Stimulation mechanism of self suspension proppant in sand-carrying fracturing by water [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(3): 459-464.
[6]	LU Jun,ZHANG Zhuo,YANG Lisheng,GUO Linlin,ZHANG Xiaojing. Adaptability of heterogeneous flooding system to low-medium permeability reservoirs [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(6): 17-23.
[7]	YU Meng,TIE Leilei,LI Xiang,ZHANG Bo,LIU Wenhui,CHANG Zhen. Experiments on adaptability of polymer flooding for medium-high permeability reservoir in Bohai Oilfield [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(6): 40-45.
[8]	XU Hui,ZHU Yangwen,SONG Min,PANG Xuejun,SUN Xiuzhi. Study on oil displacement performance of temperature sensitive polymer [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(6): 53-57.
[9]	ZHANG Lei,JIA Lan,ZHANG Daolian. Developing technical countermeasures in the late stage of polymer flooding in small fault block reservoirs with strong edge water [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(6): 72-77.
[10]	WANG Zhengxin,ZHANG Lianfeng,YANG Lu,LIU Yanhua,LU Jun,ZHANG Zhuo. Heterogeneous combination flooding system for reservoir after polymer flooding in Shuanghe Oil Filed [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(6): 78-84.
[11]	ZHANG Nan,LU Xiangguo,LIU Jinxiang,GE Song,LIU Yigang,ZHANG Yunbao,LI Yanyue. Physical simulation experiment study on effect of profile modification in Bohai LD5-2 reservoir [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(4): 119-124.
[12]	LI Xiaogang,SHU Dongkun,ZHANG Ping,YANG Zhaozhong. Physical simulation of proppant transportation in artificial fractures of coal seam [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(4): 39-44.
[13]	WANG Zhiyuan,ZHANG Liehui,TAN Long,ZHANG Chaoliang,TANG Hongming. Study on mechanism and controlling factors of polymer flooding in conglomerate reservoir [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(3): 109-114.
[14]	ZHANG Yunbao,LU Xiangguo,LIU Yigang,LI Yanyue,CAO Weijia,BAO Wenbo. Technical index evaluation of transport ability of profile control and displacement agents [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(3): 96-103.
[15]	ZHU Shijie,SHI Leiting,ZHANG Jian,LI YanLi,WANG Gang,XUE Xinsheng,YE Zhongbin. Application method of determining polymer injection timing with relative permeability curves [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(2): 128-134.