威荣深层页岩气储层精细评价方法及应用

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2021.02.005

Abstract

Abstract:

The problems of strong longitudinal heterogeneity and difficulties in fine evaluation exist in shale reservoirs from the Wufeng Formation to the first member of Longmaxi Formation in Weirong Shale Gas Field. Therefore, TOC content, gas content, proportion of organic pores, brittle mineral content, clay mineral content, brittleness index and horizontal stress difference coefficient are selected as the key parameters for the shale gas reservoir evaluation, and the gray correlation analysis method is applied to quantitatively characterize reservoir quality based on the characteristics of Weirong deep shale gas reservoirs and their main influencing factors. The results show that: ①By calculating the correlation between evaluation parameters and reservoir quality, it is clear that gas content is the primary parameter to indicate high-quality reservoir. ②By calculating the comprehensive evaluation index of reservoir quality(Q), the reservoir can be divided into four levels, among which the A-level one is mainly bio-siliceous shale and calcium-bearing-clay-siliceous shale, consisting with the target window position of the current horizontal wells, and the research results are in good agreement with development practices. This method realizes the fine evaluation of reservoir quality under the influence of multiple factors, provides the basis for the objective evaluation of high-quality shale reservoirs, and has reference significance for the evaluation and development of similar gas reservoirs.

Key words: Weirong Shale Gas Field, deep shale gas, reservoir evaluation, grey correlation analysis, comprehensive evaluation index

CLC Number:

TE121

ZHOU Hua,WEI Limin,WANG Tong,WANG Yan,PANG Heqing,ZHANG Tiancao. Evaluation method of Weirong deep shale gas reservoir and its application[J].Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(2): 176-183.

Figures/Tables 9

Table 1

Fig.1

Fig.2

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Fig. 3

References 26

[1]	纪友亮. 油气储层地质学[M]. 青岛: 中国石油大学出版社, 2019.
	JI Youliang. Petroleum reservoir geology[M]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum Press, 2019.
[2]	于炳松. 页岩气储层的特殊性及其评价思路和内容[J]. 地学前缘, 2012,19(3):252-258.
	YU Bingsong. Particularity of shale gas reservoir and its evaluation[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012,19(3):252-258.
[3]	朱华, 姜文利, 边瑞康, 等. 页岩气资源评价方法体系及其应用——以川西坳陷为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2009,29(12):130-134. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2009.12.037
	ZHU Hua, JIANG Wenli, BIAN Ruikang, et al. Shale gas assessment methodology and its application: A case study of the western Sichuan Depression[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2009,29(12):130-134. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2009.12.037
[4]	唐颖, 邢云, 李乐忠, 等. 页岩储层可压裂性影响因素及评价方法[J]. 地学前缘, 2012,19(5):356-363.
	TANG Ying, XING Yun, LI Lezhong, et al. Influence factors and evaluation methods of the gas shale fracability[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012,19(5):356-363.
[5]	郭少斌, 黄磊. 页岩气储层含气性影响因素及储层评价——以上扬子古生界页岩气储层为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2013,35(6):601-606. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201306601
	GUO Shaobin, HUANG Lei. Gas-bearing influential factors and evaluation of shale gas reservoir: A case study of Paleozoic shale gas reservoir in Upper Yangtze region[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2013,35(6):601-606. doi: 10.11781/sysydz201306601
[6]	熊亮, 魏力民, 史洪亮. 川南龙马溪组储层分级综合评价技术及应用——以四川盆地威荣页岩气田为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2019,39(S1):60-65.
	XIONG Liang, WEI Limin, SHI Hongliang. Comprehensive evaluation technology and application of shale gas reservoir in Longmaxi Formation in Southern Sichuan: A case study of Weirong Shale Gas Field in Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019,39(S1):60-65.
[7]	魏力民, 王岩, 张天操, 等. 四川盆地南部深层页岩储层地质模型的建立[J]. 天然气工业, 2019,39(S1):66-70.
	WEI Limin, WANG Yan, ZHANG Tiancao, et al. Establishment of geological model of deep shale reservoirs in the southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019,39(S1):66-70.
[8]	焦方正. 页岩气“体积开发”理论认识,核心技术与实践[J]. 天然气工业, 2019,39(5):1-14.
	JIAO Fangzheng. Theoretical insights, core technologies and practices concerning “volume development” of shale gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019,39(5):1-14.
[9]	武恒志, 熊亮, 葛忠伟, 等. 四川盆地威远地区页岩气优质储层精细刻画与靶窗优选[J]. 天然气工业, 2019,39(3):11-20.
	WU Hengzhi, XIONG Liang, GE Zhongwei, et al. Fine characterization and target window optimization of high-quality shale gas reservoirs in the Weiyuan area, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019,39(3):11-20.
[10]	中华人民共和国国家能源局. NB/T 14001-2015 页岩气藏描述技术规范[S]. 北京: 中国电力出版社, 2016.
	National Energy Administration of the People’s Republic of China. NB/T 14001—2015 Technical Specification for Shale Gas Reservoir Description[S]. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, 2016.
[11]	涂乙, 邹海燕, 孟海平, 等. 页岩气评价标准与储层分类[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2014,35(1):153-158. doi: 10.11743/ogg20140120
	TU Yi, ZOU Haiyan, MENG Haiping, et al. Evaluation criteria and classification of shale gas reservoirs[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2014,35(1):153-158. doi: 10.11743/ogg20140120
[12]	郭英海, 赵迪斐. 微观尺度海相页岩储层微观非均质性研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2015,44(2):300-307.
	GUO Yinghai, ZHAO Difei. Analysis of micro-scale heterogeneity characteristics in marine shale gas reservoir[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2015,44(2):300-307.
[13]	蒋廷学, 卞晓冰. 页岩气储层评价新技术——甜度评价方法[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2016,44(4):1-6.
	JIANG Tingxue, BIAN Xiaobing. The novel technology of shale gas play evaluation: sweetness calculation method[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016,44(4):1-6.
[14]	乔辉, 贾爱林, 贾成业, 等. 页岩气储层关键参数评价及进展[J]. 地质科技情报, 2018,37(2):157-164.
	QIAO Hui, JIA Ailin, JIA Chengye, et al. Research progress in key parameters of shale gas reservoir evaluation[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2018,37(2):157-164.
[15]	赵云胜, 龙昱, 赵钦球, 等. 灰色系统理论在地学中的应用研究[M]. 武汉: 华中理工大学出版社, 1997.
	ZHAO Yunsheng, LONG Yi, ZHAO Qinqiu, et al. Research on application of grey system theory in earth science[M]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science & Technology Press, 1997.
[16]	詹泽东, 郭科, 李祖友, 等. 灰色系统在构造建模中的应用[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2015,42(1):98-103.
	ZHAN Zedong, GUO Ke, LI Zuyou, et al. Application of grey system in structure modeling[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology: Sci & Technol Ed, 2015,42(1):98-103.
[17]	詹泽东, 周桦, 郭莉霞, 等. 基于灰色关联度的气井主控因素定量描述[J]. 工业安全与环保, 2015,41(9):55-57.
	ZHAN Zedong, ZHOU Hua, GUO Lixia, et al. The modeling and application of the key factors of controlling production of gas well based on gray correlation[J]. Industrial Safety and Environmental Protection, 2015,41(9):55-57.
[18]	蒋裕强, 董大忠, 漆麟, 等. 页岩气储层的基本特征及其评价[J]. 天然气工业, 2010,30(10):7-12. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2010.10.002
	JIANG Yuqiang, DONG Dazhong, QI Lin, et al. Basic features and evaluation of shale gas reservoirs[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2010,30(10):7-12. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2010.10.002
[19]	姜在兴, 张文昭, 梁超, 等. 页岩油储层基本特征及评价要素[J]. 石油学报, 2014,35(1):184-196.
	JIANG Zaixing, ZHANG Wenzhao, LIANG chao, et al. Characteristics and evaluation elements of shale oil reservoir[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2014,35(1):184-196.
[20]	王汉青, 陈军斌, 张杰, 等. 基于权重分配的页岩气储层可压性评价新方法[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2016,44(3):88-94.
	WANG Hanqing, CHEN Junbin, ZHANG Jie, et al. A new method of fracability evaluation of shale gas reservoir based on weight allocation[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016,44(3):88-94.
[21]	方辉煌, 汪吉林, 宫云鹏, 等. 基于灰色模糊理论的页岩气储层评价——以重庆南川地区龙马溪组页岩为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016,28(5):76-81.
	FANG Huihuang, WANG Jilin, GONG Yunpeng, et al. Evaluation of shale gas reservoirs based on gray fuzzy theory: A case study from Longmaxi Formation in Nanchuan area, Chongqing[J]. Lithologic reservoirs, 2016,28(5):76-81.
[22]	沈骋, 任岚, 赵金洲, 等. 页岩储集层综合评价指标及其应用——以四川盆地东南缘焦石坝地区奥陶系五峰组—志留系龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017,44(4):649-658.
	SHEN Cheng, REN Lan, ZHAO Jinzhou, et al. A comprehensive evaluation index for shale reservoirs and its application: A case study of the Ordovician Wufeng Formation to Silurian Longmaxi Formation in southeastern margin of Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017,44(4):649-658.
[23]	TIAN H, PAN L, XIAO X, et al. A preliminary study on the pore characterization of Lower Silurian black shales in the Chuandong Thrust Fold Belt, southwestern China using low pressure N₂ adsorption and FE-SEM methods[J]. Marine & Petroleum Geology, 2013,48:8-19.
[24]	LÖHR S C, BARUCH E T, HALL P A, et al. Is organic pore development in gas shales influenced by the primary porosity and structure of thermally immature organic matter?[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2015,87(3):119-132. doi: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2015.07.010
[25]	刘思峰, 党耀国, 方志耕, 等. 灰色系统理论及其应用(第五版)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010: 62-104.
	LIU Sifeng, DANG Yaoguo, FANG Zhigeng, et al. Grey system theory and its application[M]. 5th edition. Beijing: Science Press, 2010: 62-104.
[26]	ROSS D J K, BUSTIN R M. Characterizing the shale gas resource potential of Devonian-Mississippian strata in the Western Canada sedimentary basin: application of an integrated formation evaluation[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2009,92(1):87-125. doi: 10.1306/09040707048

评价分类	评价参数
	TOC（%）		含气量（m³/t）		孔隙度（%）		脆性矿物含量（%）		黏土矿物含量（%）		层理缝
	中国石化	中国石油	中国石化	中国石油	中国石化	中国石油	中国石化	中国石油	中国石化	中国石油	中国石化
Ⅰ类	≥4	≥3	≥4	≥3	≥6	≥5	≥50	≥55	≤30	≤30	发育—极发育
Ⅱ类	2 ~ 4	2 ~ 3	2 ~ 4	2 ~ 3	4 ~ 6	3 ~ 5	40 ~ 50	45 ~ 55	30 ~ 50	30 ~ 40	较发育
Ⅲ类	<2	1 ~ 2	<2	1 ~ 2	2 ~ 4	2 ~ 3	<40	30 ~ 45	>50	40 ~ 60	欠发育

储层类型		TOC（N=5）（%）	含气量（N=5）（m³/t）	有机孔占比（N=5）（%）	脆性矿物含量（N=5）（%）	黏土矿物含量（N=5）（%）	脆性指数（N=4）（%）	水平应力差异（N=4）系数
黏土质页岩储层	范围平均	1.05 ~ 1.47 1.20	2.32 ~ 2.98 2.65	8.7 ~ 11.6 10.00	42.37 ~ 46.89 43.70	50.97 ~ 52.49 51.80	20.7 ~ 28.5 25.90	0.15 ~ 0.28 0.20
硅质-钙质- 黏土质页岩储层	范围平均	2.62 ~ 3.52 2.90	6.98 ~ 7.99 7.35	13.2 ~ 20.6 15.00	61.39 ~ 64.59 62.40	33.03 ~ 33.76 33.50	41.5 ~ 46.5 44.30	0.08 ~ 0.23 0.17
硅质-黏土质页岩储层	范围平均	2.41 ~ 3.61 3.00	6.34 ~ 7.78 7.18	17.9 ~ 25.6 20.30	47.40 ~ 60.16 52.35	32.22 ~ 47.95 42.10	33.9 ~ 42.0 38.90	0.07 ~ 0.20 0.15
黏土质-硅质页岩储层	范围平均	1.20 ~ 5.29 3.40	8.51 ~ 13.31 12.18	20.7 ~ 61.6 38.80	55.94 ~ 60.71 59.20	32.59 ~ 38.45 35.60	43.6 ~ 59.1 51.10	0.10 ~ 0.28 0.19
生物硅质页岩储层	范围平均	3.23 ~ 5.31 4.60	9.11 ~ 12.76 11.48	42.6 ~ 78.8 69.70	71.73 ~ 76.39 74.20	14.59 ~ 20.43 18.30	32.3 ~ 50.5 42.05	0.05 ~ 0.25 0.16
含钙-黏土质- 硅质页岩储层	范围平均	2.98 ~ 5.55 4.80	6.74 ~ 11.31 10.00	35.67 ~ 62.15 59.80	60.76 ~ 69.61 64.70	27.38 ~ 34.28 30.00	39.4 ~ 54.8 49.95	0.09 ~ 0.24 0.17
钙质-黏土质- 硅质页岩储层	范围平均	1.74 ~ 5.10 3.90	4.61 ~ 10.29 7.79	27.36 ~ 57.29 49.80	62.69 ~ 72.67 67.10	25.19 ~ 31.73 28.70	44.9 ~ 51.6 47.40	0.07 ~ 0.21 0.15

母序列	子序列的灰色关联度
母序列	TOC	含气量	有机孔占比	脆性矿物含量	黏土矿物含量	脆性指数	水平应力差异系数
TOC	1.000 0	0.844 4	0.747 7	0.785 1	0.571 3	0.722 8	0.452 7
含气量	0.849 8	1.000 0	0.755 3	0.747 3	0.606 4	0.757 7	0.477 6
有机孔占比	0.747 3	0.747 2	1.000 0	0.690 2	0.679 7	0.624 8	0.563 3
脆性矿物含量	0.784 8	0.738 4	0.690 2	1.000 0	0.501 3	0.853 0	0.390 6
黏土矿物含量	0.491 8	0.518 0	0.609 4	0.421 3	1.000 0	0.414 1	0.548 9
可压裂指数	0.731 7	0.757 7	0.634 9	0.858 9	0.504 1	1.000 0	0.388 3
水平应力差异系数	0.463 8	0.477 6	0.573 5	0.402 5	0.633 3	0.388 3	1.000 0
平均值	0.724 2	0.726 2	0.715 9	0.700 8	0.642 3	0.680 1	0.545 9

母序列	子序列的权重系数
母序列	TOC	含气量	有机孔占比	脆性矿物含量	黏土矿物含量	脆性指数	水平应力差异系数
TOC	0.195 2	0.164 8	0.145 9	0.153 2	0.111 5	0.141 1	0.088 3
含气量	0.163 6	0.192 5	0.145 4	0.143 9	0.116 7	0.145 9	0.092 0
有机孔占比	0.147 9	0.147 9	0.197 9	0.136 6	0.134 5	0.123 7	0.111 5
脆性矿物含量	0.158 3	0.148 9	0.139 2	0.201 7	0.101 1	0.172 0	0.078 8
黏土矿物含量	0.122 8	0.129 4	0.152 2	0.105 2	0.249 8	0.103 4	0.137 1
可压裂指数	0.150 1	0.155 4	0.130 2	0.176 2	0.103 4	0.205 1	0.079 6
水平应力差异系数	0.117 7	0.121 2	0.145 6	0.102 2	0.160 8	0.098 6	0.253 9

储层类型	不同母序列条件下的储层品质综合评价指标
储层类型	TOC	含气量	有机孔占比	脆性矿物含量	黏土矿物含量	脆性指数	水平应力差异系数
黏土质页岩储层	0.300 0	0.296 2	0.273 4	0.334 3	0.227 7	0.339 4	0.232 7
硅质-钙质-黏土质页岩储层	0.546 3	0.542 3	0.498 2	0.577 4	0.459 2	0.583 3	0.415 7
硅质-黏土质页岩储层	0.510 1	0.505 1	0.465 9	0.532 3	0.411 0	0.537 4	0.386 3
黏土质-硅质页岩储层	0.682 4	0.686 5	0.637 6	0.703 1	0.566 6	0.712 2	0.516 1
生物硅质页岩储层	0.840 9	0.834 7	0.816 0	0.852 2	0.755 6	0.846 3	0.677 3
含钙-黏土质-硅质页岩储层	0.765 6	0.754 9	0.729 9	0.774 9	0.654 9	0.772 4	0.598 5
钙质-黏土质-硅质页岩储层	0.683 7	0.673 7	0.653 2	0.704 2	0.595 3	0.701 9	0.541 4

Evaluation method of Weirong deep shale gas reservoir and its application

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 26

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

储层类型	分布	综合评价指标		储层品质等级
储层类型	分布	区间值	中值	储层品质等级
黏土质页岩储层	⑤—⑨	0.23 ~ 0.34	0.29	D
硅质-钙质-黏土质页岩储层	3³—4	0.42 ~ 0.58	0.52	B—C
硅质-黏土质页岩储层	3²	0.39 ~ 0.54	0.48	B—C
黏土质-硅质页岩储层	3^1-2	0.52 ~ 0.71	0.64	B
生物硅质页岩储层	3^1-1	0.68 ~ 0.85	0.80	A
含钙-黏土质-硅质页岩储层	2	0.60 ~ 0.77	0.72	A
钙质-黏土质-硅质页岩储层	1¹	0.54 ~ 0.70	0.65	B

[1]	TAO Jinyu,SHEN Baojian,HU Zongquan,PAN Anyang. Pore characteristics and evaluation of shale reservoir in Lower Carboniferous Luzhai Formation, northern part of middle Guangxi Depression [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(3): 437-444.
[2]	ZHU Huashu,WANG Xiyong,XU Xiaoling,GUO Zhiliang,HUANG Hechun. Extendability limit of engineering drilling in long horizontal section of Weirong deep shale gas [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(3): 506-514.
[3]	DU Yang,NI Jie,LEI Wei,ZHOU Xingfu,LI Li,BU Tao. Optimum time of tubing installation in deep shale gas wells of Weirong [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(3): 526-533.
[4]	OU Fang,YANG Huiting,HUANG Xiaobing. Application of logging interpretation method for reef shoal reservoir in Feixianguan Formation of X Gas Field [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(5): 744-752.
[5]	ZHAO Yong,LI Nanying,YANG Jian,CHENG Shisheng. Optimization of deep shale gas well spacing based on geology-engineering integration: A case study of Weirong Shale Gas Field [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(3): 340-347.
[6]	HE Zhiliang,NIE Haikuan,JIANG Tingxue. Challenges and countermeasures of effective development with large scale of deep shale gas in Sichuan Basin [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(2): 135-145.
[7]	XIONG Liang,PANG Heqing,ZHAO Yong,WEI Limin,ZHOU Hua,CAO Qian. Micro pore structure characterization and classification evaluation of reservoirs in Weirong Deep Shale Gas Field [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(2): 154-163.
[8]	YANG Jian,ZHAN Guowei,ZHAO Yong,REN Chunyu,QU Chongjiu. Characteristics of supercritical adsorption and desorption of deep shale gas in South Sichuan [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(2): 184-189.
[9]	Guo Tonglou. Progress and research direction of deep shale gas exploration and development [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(1): 1-6.
[10]	Wang Xingwen,Lin Yongmao,Miao Weijie. Volume fracturing technology of deep shale gas in southern Sichuan [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(1): 102-108.
[11]	Ge Zhongwei,Ouyang Jiasui,Wang Tong,Zhou Jing,Guo Weixingi,Jin Lichao. Reservoir characteristics and enrichment rule of Yongchuan Deep Shale Gas Field [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(1): 29-37.
[12]	Zhong Wenjun,Xiong Liang,Li Hong,Dong Xiaoxia,Zhou Jing. Application of log evaluation technology in Weirong Deep Shale Gas Field [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(1): 38-46.
[13]	Long Zhangliang,Zhong Jingmin,Hu Yongzhang,Wen Zhentao,Li Hui,Zeng Xianwei. Application of geomechanics in deep shale gas development in Yongchuan [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(1): 72-80.
[14]	Wang Haoyu,Xiong Liang,Shi Hongliang,Dong Xiaoxia,Wei Limin,Jian Wanhong. Testing and selection techniques of horizontal wells in Weirong Shale Gas Field [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(1): 86-94.
[15]	Du Yang,Lei Wei,Li Li,Zhao Zhejun,Ni Jie,Liu Tong. Post-frac production control and drainage technology of deep shale gas wells [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(1): 95-101.