新型两性非离子型泡排剂在下古气藏的试验与应用

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2022.02.008

Abstract

Abstract:

The formation water of Lower Palaeozoic gas reservoir in Daniudi Gas Field is high-salinity and acidity, and downhole throttling technology is mostly used. Thus, the amphoteric foaming agents widely used in gas fields has poor foaming and foam stabilization performance, and this cannot meet the demand for high-efficiency and low-cost drainage gas recovery. Although dozens of foaming agents have been formed internationally, there is no reports about foaming agents developed for the characteristics of Lower Palaeozoic reservoir of Daniudi Gas Field. Considering the fluid and process characteristics of Lower Palaeozoic reservoir, and the influence of high-salinity formation water, the sensitivity to pH and the stability of foam passing through the choke, to construct a new type amphoteric-nonionic compound foaming agent with sulfonated AEO₃ and lauramide propyl phosphobetaine as the main agent, coconut oil fatty acid monoethanolamide as the foaming aid, and sapindus extract as the foam stabilizer. The indoor evaluation shows that the amphoteric-nonionic composite foaming agent has strong foaming, stabilizing-foam, secondary foaming and liquid-carrying ability under high-salinity and acidic; after the field test application, the well drainage capacity improved, the pressure difference with tubing to casing decreased, and the gas production increased. It is shown that its application effect and economic benefits prospects are good. The amphoteric-nonionic composite foaming agent fills the void of the foaming agent for Lower Palaeozoic gas reservoir in Daniudi Gas Field, improving the technical problems of insufficient liquid-carrying, and has the value of popularization and application.

Key words: Daniudi Gas Field, Lower Palaeozoic gas reservoir, amphoteric-nonionic compound foaming agent, anti-mineralization, secondary foaming

CLC Number:

TE357

YANG Bing,ZHANG Tailai,LI Jia,ZHAO Jianjun,WANG Chengfeng. Test and application of new amphoteric-nonionic foaming agents in Lower Palaeozoic gas reservoir[J].Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(2): 329-336.

Figures/Tables 9

Table1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Table2

Table 3

Table4

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Table 5

References 28

[1]	王传磊. 大牛地气田增压集输工艺技术研究[D]. 东营:中国石油大学(华东), 2014.
	WANG Chuanlei. Research on the technology of supercharged gathering and transportation progress in Daniudi Gas Field[D]. Dongying: China University of Petroleum (East China), 2014.
[2]	储铭汇. 致密碳酸盐岩储层复合缝网酸压技术研究及矿场实践--以大牛地气田下古生界马五₅碳酸盐岩储层为例[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2017, 39(2):237-243.
	CHU Minghui. Study on composite fracture-network acid fracturing technology for tight carbonate reservoirs and its field application: A case study on Mawu5 carbonate reservoir of Lower Paleozoic in Daniudi Gasfield[J]. Oil Drilling and Production Technology, 2017, 39(2): 237-243.
[3]	唐明远. 大牛地气田奥陶系风化壳马五5亚段储层特征研究[D]. 成都:西南石油大学, 2017.
	TANG Mingyuan.Study on the formation characteristics of the weathered Ma 5 layer of Ordovician system in Daniudi Gas Field[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2017.
[4]	王海坤, 马献珍, 李刘宝, 等. 南北并进,直指千万吨！[J]. 中国石油石化, 2021, 24(12):48-49.
	WANG Haikun, MA Xianzhen, LI Liubao, et al. North and South go hand in hand, pointing to ten million tons![J]. China Petroleum and Petrochemical, 2021(12): 48-49.
[5]	陈克全. 大牛地气田水平井生产制度与采气工艺研究[D]. 东营:中国石油大学(华东), 2016.
	CHEN Kequan. Research on the production system and the gas production process of the horizontal well in the Daniudi Gas Field[D]. Dongying: China University of Petroleum (East China), 2016.
[6]	覃伟, 李仲东, 郑振恒, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田地层水特征及成因分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2011, 23(5):115-120.
	QIN Wei, LI Zhongdong, ZHENG Zhenheng, et al. Characteristics and genesis of formation water in Daniudi Gas Field, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2011, 23(5): 115-120.
[7]	魏凯. 大牛地气田下古生界含硫气井清防垢剂的研制[J]. 天然气技术与经济, 2021, 15(2):21-26.
	WEI Kai. Developing scale removing and inhibiting agent for the Lower Paleozoic sour gas wells, Daniudi gasfield[J]. Natural Gas Technology and Economy, 2021, 15(2): 21-26.
[8]	BLUESTEIN R, HITTON L. Amphoteric surfactants[M]. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1982.
[9]	HASAN A R, KABIR C S. A study of multiphase flow behavior in vertical wells[J]. SPE Production Engineering, 1988, 3(2): 263-272. doi: 10.2118/15138-PA
[10]	JELINEK W, SCHRAMM L L. Improved production from mature gas wells by introducing surfactants into wells[C]// Paper IPTC-11028-MS presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Doha, Qatar, November 2005.
[11]	DINO D J, HOMACK A. Use of high purity imidazoline based amphoacetate surfactant as foaming went in oil wells: EP96912193.8U[P]. 2001-07-18.
[12]	PRICE B P, GOTHARD B. Foam assisted lift-importance of selection and application[C]// Paper SPE-106465-MS presented at the Production and Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, U.S.A., March 2007.
[13]	彭年穗. 气井泡沫排液中的起泡剂[J]. 油田化学, 1989, 6(1):84-89.
	PENG Nianhui. The foaming agents for removing water from gas wells[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 1989, 6(1): 84-89.
[14]	JING Y. High performance foams for unloading gas well: US7422064[P]. 2007-03-05.
[15]	KOCZO K, TSELINIK O, FALK B, et al. Aqueous foaming compositions with high tolerance to hydrocarbons: US8524641[P]. 2013-09-03.
[16]	ZIKA H T. Surfactant composition: US3746096[P]. 1973-07-17.
[17]	NGUYEN D T, HUANG F. Quatenary foamers for downhole injection: US8746341[P]. 2014-06-10.
[18]	TURNER R G, HUBBARD M G, DUKLER A E. Analysis and prediction of minimum flow rate for the continuous removal of liquids from gas wells[J]. Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology, 1969, 21(11): 1475-1482.
[19]	LEA J F, NICKENS H V. Solving gas-well liquid-loading problems[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2004, 56(4): 30-36.
[20]	张成斌, 米伟伟, 井文超, 等. 延安气田排水采气工艺实践[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2019, 42(4):121-126.
	ZHANG Chengbin, MI Weiwei, JING Wenchao, et al. Practice on drainage gas recovery used in Yan’an gasfield[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2019, 42(4): 121-126.
[21]	周际永, 伊向艺, 卢渊. 国内外排水采气工艺综述[J]. 太原理工大学学报, 2005(S1):44-45.
	ZHOU Jiyong, YI Xiangyi, LU Yuan. Summary of domestic and foreign drainage gas recovery technology[J]. Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology, 2005(S1): 44-45.
[22]	徐慧芬. L-抗坏血酸硬脂酸酯的酶法制备新工艺及表面活性性质研究[D]. 无锡:江南大学, 2016.
	XU Huifen. L-ascorbyl stearate: The novel enzymatic process to prepare it and its colloid properties[D]. Wuxi: Jiangnan University, 2016.
[23]	王钰璠, 谢荣锦. 椰油酸单乙醇酰胺的合成与应用[J]. 精细石油化工进展, 2002, 3(5):1-4.
	WANG Yufan, XIE Rongjin. Synthesis and application of coconut fatty acid monoethanolamide[J]. Advances in Fine Petrochemicals, 2002, 3(5): 1-4.
[24]	LYU Z G, WANG L, DENG S F, et al. China shale gas exploration: early Sichuan Basin Longmaxi Shale Gas stimulation and completion case study[C]// paper SPE-166746-MS presented at the SPE Middle East Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, 7-9October 2013, Dubai, UAE.
[25]	刘慧. 高温高压条件下泡排剂评价方法[J]. 实验室研究与探索, 2020, 39(7):24-27.
	LIU Hui. Research on evaluation methods of foaming agent under high temperature and high pressure[J]. Research and Exploration in Laboratory, 2020, 39(7): 24-27.
[26]	刘佩. 神木气田耐油耐盐泡排剂的研制及性能评价[D]. 西安:陕西科技大学, 2019.
	LIU Pei. Development and performance evaluation of oil-resistant and salt-tolerant foam drainage agent in Shenmu Gas Field[D]. Xi’an: Shaanxi University of Science and Technology, 2019.
[27]	ARRIETA V V, TORRALBA A O, HERNANDEZ P C, et al. Case history: Lessons learned from retrieval of coiled tubing stuck by massive hydrate plug when well testing in an ultradeepwater gas well in Mexico[J]. SPE Production and Operations, 2011, 26(4): 337-342. doi: 10.2118/140228-PA
[28]	田巍, 杜利, 王明, 等. 井筒积液对储层伤害及产能的影响[J]. 特种油气藏, 2016, 23(2):124-127.
	TIAN Wei, DU Li, WANG Ming, et al. Effect of liquid loading on reservoir and productivity[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2016, 23(2): 124-127.

气藏	地层水性质									节流工艺
气藏	K⁺+Na⁺ （mg/L）	Ca²⁺ （mg/L）	Mg²⁺ （mg/L）	SO₄^2- （mg/L）	HCO₃^- （mg/L）	Cl^- （mg/L）	矿化度（g/L）	pH	水型	节流工艺
上古	4 147~14 435	1 236~13 721	66~1 028	0~291	223~1 023	7 621~52 678	14~79	6.0~6.2	CaCl₂	站内节流
下古	10 752~16 652	40 409~59 088	7 447~8 999	2 266~2 675	590~876	88 147~155 201	150~260	4.8~5.4	CaCl₂	井下节流

pH	矿化度（g/L）	起泡高度（mm）	稳泡高度（mm）	携液量（mL）	样液总体积（mL）	携液率（%）
5	50	158	155	345	400	86.3
	100	154	148	346	400	86.5
	150	157	150	342	400	85.5
	200	156	150	345	400	86.3
	250	155	150	343	400	85.8
	300	153	145	335	400	83.8

矿化度（g/L）	pH	起泡高度（mm）	稳泡高度（mm）	携液量（mL）	样液总体积（mL）	携液率（%）
250	7	160	155	355	400	88.8
	5	155	150	343	400	85.8
	3	142	138	320	400	80.0
	1	108	78	232	400	58.0

泡排剂	演示装置	携液量（mL）	样液总体积（mL）	携液率（%）
两性泡排剂	直井演示装置	785	1 000	78.5
两性泡排剂	井下节流器演示装置	390	1 000	39.0
新型泡排剂	直井演示装置	845	1 000	84.5
新型泡排剂	井下节流器演示装置	805	1 000	80.5

对比项目	试验前	试验稳定期间	试验后
对比项目	5月11日—5月17日	5月28日—6月14日	6月15日—6月21日
泡排剂	两性泡排剂	新型泡排剂	两性泡排剂
加注周期	每天一次	每天一次	每天一次
加注量（L）	5	5	5
药水比例	1∶10	1∶10	1∶10
产气量（m³/d）	532~3 286 2 109	2 509~3 937 3 196	2 793~3 408 3 017
产液量（m³/d）	0.21~0.68 0.43	0.57~1.85 0.94	0.33~0.66 0.44
油压（MPa）	1.00~1.80 1.43	1.03~2.347 1.38	1.20~1.90 1.63
套压（MPa）	5.60~6.10 5.80	5.50~5.80 5.63	5.72~5.90 5.86
油套压差（MPa）	3.80~5.06 4.37	3.03~4.55 4.25	4.00~4.70 4.23

Test and application of new amphoteric-nonionic foaming agents in Lower Palaeozoic gas reservoir

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 28

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	XU Guochen, LIU Xiaowen. Research and application of supporting technologies for improving success rate of water injection well testing [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 773-780.
[2]	XIA Haibang, HAN Kening, SONG Wenhui, WANG Wei, YAO Jun. Pore scale fracturing fluid occurrence mechanisms in multi-scale matrix-fracture system of shale gas reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 627-635.
[3]	ZHANG Jiawei, LIU Xiangjun, XIONG Jian, LIANG Lixi, REN Jianfei, LIU Baiqu. Discrete element simulation study on fracture propagation law of dual well synchronous fracturing [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 657-667.
[4]	CUI Chuanzhi, LI Huailiang, WU Zhongwei, ZHANG Chuanbao, LI Hongbo, ZHANG Yinghua, ZHENG Wenkuan. Analysis of pressures in water injection wells considering fracture influence induced by pressure-drive water injection [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 686-694.
[5]	LI Ying, MA Hansong, LI Haitao, GANZER Leonhard, TANG Zheng, LI Ke, LUO Hongwei. Dissolution of supercritical CO₂ on carbonate reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 288-295.
[6]	YAO Hongsheng,YUN Lu,ZAN Ling,ZHANG Longsheng,QIU Weisheng. Development mode and practice of fault-block oriented shale oil well in the second member of Funing Formation, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(2): 141-151.
[7]	QU Lili, LI Minglin, WU Zhimin, ZHANG Lin, FENG Linping, DENG Liping. Application of unascertained measure model in reservoir potential evaluation of Nanpu H Fault Block [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(2): 190-199.
[8]	ZHANG Jie,ZENG Cheng,LI Yanze,LI Minglin,LUO Hongmei,LI Jinghua. New evaluation method of water flooding reserve control degree in complex fault block reservoirs [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(2): 200-205.
[9]	PEI Xiuling, LI Jiaqi, MA Xufei, ZHANG Aixiang, ZHANG Leilei, LU Xiangguo, HE Xin. Experimental study on change characteristics of fractional flow rate of each structural unit in thick oil reservoir of Daqing Oilfield [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(2): 233-239.
[10]	ZHANG Longsheng,WANG Weiheng. Study and application of a high temperature foaming agent in anionic-nonionic system namely HDHP: A case study of shale gas wells in Dongsheng Block, Sichuan Basin [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(2): 240-246.
[11]	YANG Zhaozhong, ZHENG Nanxin, ZHU Jingyi, LI Xiaogang. Preparation of nanoparticle-stabilized foam fracturing fluid and its foam stabilization mechanism [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(2): 260-268.
[12]	WANG Xiaoqiang,ZHAO Li’an,WANG Zhiyuan,XIU Chunhong,JIA Guolong,DONG Yan,LU Detang. Data analysis method of pump shutdown pressure based on water hammer effect and cepstrum transformation [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 108-116.
[13]	SHEN Xin,GUO Jianchun,WANG Shibin. Acidification retardation caused by shielding of cationic surfactants [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 117-126.
[14]	CHENG Xiaojun. Enhanced oil recovery and parameter optimization of hydrocarbon injection in fractured-cavity reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(6): 902-909.
[15]	CHENG Keyang,QI Zhilin,TIAN Jie,YAN Wende,HUANG Xiaoliang,HUANG Shiwen. Change law of reservoir property during multi-cycle steam stimulation in heavy oil reservoir: A case study of HJ Oilfield [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 816-824.