冷东地区下干柴沟组上段沉积储层特征研究

Abstract

Abstract:

Based on the data of the heavy mineral, core, logging and physical, we studied the sedimentary microfacie reservoirs' characteristics of the upper reservoir of the lower Gangchaigou formation in eastern Lenghu region. The results show that during the deposition period, the area is close to the source, and the developed raided river delta plain, sandstone type is mainly composed of feldspar lithic sandstone and lithic feldspar sandstone, and its composition and structure maturity are low. The main pore types of the reservoir are the residual intergranular pores, and the grain size is positively correlated with the porosity and permeability. According to the reservoir classification standard, the reservoir area is divided into three types, most of which not only belong to reservoir Ⅱ and Ⅲ with low porosity and permeability, but also belong to medium and low porosity-low permeability reservoirs with strong heterogeneity. The physical properties of reservoirs in the study area are related to the hydrodynamic forces at the time of the sedimentation. The high quality reservoirs are mainly distributed in thick sand bodies with braided river delta distributions.

Key words: upper reservoin of the lower Gangchaigou formation, sedimentary facies and reservoir characteristic, physical characteristics, reservoir evaluation

CLC Number:

TE122.2

Chen Bo,Hao Yuanyuan,Shi Haixing,Sun Guoqiang,Shi Ji'an,Wu Zhixiong. Sedimentary facies and reservoir characteristics of upper reservoir of lower Gangchaigou formation in eastern Lenghu region[J].Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(3): 1-6.

Figures/Tables 9

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Table 1

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Table 2

References 17

[1]	汪立君, 郝芳, 陈红汉 , 等. 中国浅层油气藏的特征及其资源潜力分析[J]. 地质通报, 2006,25(z2):1079-1087. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2006.09.016
[2]	庞雄奇, 汪文洋, 汪英勋 , 等. 含油气盆地深层与中浅层油气成藏条件和特征差异性比较[J]. 石油学报, 2015,36(10):1167-1187.
[3]	米立军, 段吉利 . 渤中坳陷中浅层油气成藏特点及其聚集规律[J]. 石油学报, 2001,22(2):32-37. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2001.02.006
[4]	颉永琛, 关平, 戴胜群 , 等. 南八仙油气田中浅层(N₁—N₂ ²)油气藏类型研究 [J]. 天然气地球科学, 2012,23(5):868-875.
[5]	陈波, 陈汾君, 吴志雄 , 等. 柴北缘冷湖地区古近系路乐河组成岩作用及有利成岩相研究[J]. 地质科技情报, 2015,34(4):20-27.
[6]	陈吉, 张永梅, 史基安 , 等. 柴北缘冷湖—马仙地区古近系—新近系成岩作用特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012,24(2):21-25.
[7]	汪正江, 陈洪德, 张锦泉 . 物源分析的研究与展望[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质, 2000,20(4):104-110.
[8]	赵红格, 刘池洋 . 物源分析方法及研究进展[J]. 沉积学报, 2003,21(3):409-415. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0550.2003.03.007
[9]	付玲, 关平, 赵为永 , 等. 柴达木盆地古近系路乐河组重矿物特征与物源分析[J]. 岩石学报, 2013,29(8):2867-2875.
[10]	和钟铧, 刘招君, 张峰 . 重矿物在盆地分析中的应用研究进展[J]. 地质科技情报, 2001,20(4):29-32. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7849.2001.04.006
[11]	李珍, 焦养泉, 刘春华 , 等. 黄骅坳陷高柳地区重矿物物源分析[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 1998,25(6):5-7.
[12]	李双建, 王清晨, 李忠 . 库车坳陷库车河剖面重矿物分布特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2005,24(1):53-61. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6524.2005.01.006
[13]	张金亮 . 高邮凹陷阜三段沉积相分析[J]. 中国海洋大学学报自然科学版, 2002,32(4):591-596.
[14]	张占松, 张超谟 . 测井资料沉积相分析在砂砾岩体中的应用[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2007,29(4):91-93. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9752.2007.04.017
[15]	李红哲, 杨占龙, 吴青鹏 , 等. 沉积相分析在岩性油气藏勘探中的应用——以吐哈盆地胜北洼陷中侏罗统-白垩系为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2006,17(5):698-702.
[16]	陈波, 王子天, 康莉 , 等. 准噶尔盆地玛北地区三叠系百口泉组储层成岩作用及孔隙演化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016,46(1):23-25 doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201601103
[17]	应凤祥, 王衍奇, 王克玉 , 等. 中国油气储层研究图集,卷一:碎屑岩[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1994.

岩性	排驱压力/MPa	饱和度中值压力/MPa	饱和度中值半径/μm	最大连通孔喉半径/μm	最大进汞饱和度,%	退汞效率,%	孔隙度,%	渗透率/ 10^-3μm²
泥质粉砂岩	7.89	25.56	0.04	0.09	96.37	33.78	7.98	0.03
粉砂岩	3.39	8.96	0.09	0.26	92.56	23.89	13.26	0.16
细砂岩	0.38	2.78	0.28	2.12	81.98	13.97	18.76	2.46
中砂以上	0.26	2.69	0.31	3.46	72.96	13.89	18.96	8.66

储层类型	压汞参数
储层类型	孔隙度,%	渗透率/10^-3μm²	排驱压力/MPa	最大连通孔喉半径/μm	饱和度中值半径/μm
Ⅰ类	>20	>5	<1.09	>0.67	>0.16
Ⅱ类	8~20	0.1~5	1.09~4.06	0.67~0.18	0.16~0.05
Ⅲ类	<8	<0.1	>4.06	<0.18	<0.05

Sedimentary facies and reservoir characteristics of upper reservoir of lower Gangchaigou formation in eastern Lenghu region

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 17

Related Articles 4

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	TAO Jinyu,SHEN Baojian,HU Zongquan,PAN Anyang. Pore characteristics and evaluation of shale reservoir in Lower Carboniferous Luzhai Formation, northern part of middle Guangxi Depression [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(3): 437-444.
[2]	OU Fang,YANG Huiting,HUANG Xiaobing. Application of logging interpretation method for reef shoal reservoir in Feixianguan Formation of X Gas Field [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(5): 744-752.
[3]	ZHOU Hua,WEI Limin,WANG Tong,WANG Yan,PANG Heqing,ZHANG Tiancao. Evaluation method of Weirong deep shale gas reservoir and its application [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(2): 176-183.
[4]	Wu Yuping,Sun Wei,Wei Chi,Lyu Ke. Reservoir comprehensive evaluation based on cluster analysis and gray correlative analytical method: A case study in Chang-6₁ formation of Jiyuan area in Ordos Basin [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(1): 12-15.