尺度效应对天然气混相驱驱油效果的影响

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to study the influence of the scale effects on the oil displacement efficiency of natural gas miscible-flooding, we proposed to take the volatile reservoir with mid-low permeability of the third section of the Shahejie formation of some block in Zhongyuan oilfield as an example, and carried out the small scaled physical simulation experiment of natural gas flooding by the combination of natural cores with different length to revealed the mechanism of enhanced oil recovery by long core miscible flooding. And then we researched the gas driving development effects with large size by the numerical simulation method based on the actual geological model. The results show that the recovery rate of the natural gas recovery with the core length of 1 800 mm, 950 mm and 500 mm respectively are 90.88 %, 82.89 % and 64.8 %. It is found that the oil displacement efficiency of the long core is about 25 % higher than that of the short one, that is to say, along with the increase of the injection volume at the same injection rate, the miscible section of the long core is longer, the miscible contact is sufficient and there are time lags in gas breakthrough. Meanwhile, it is verified by numerical simulation that the best well spacing range is 300 ~ 350 m. Within this range, the larger the well spacing is, the better the displacement effect will be. But as the well spacing increases, the increasing degree of the recovery efficiency and the economic effect all get worse. Based on this study, the influence of size effect on natural gas displacement is further clarified, which is of great practical significance for the optimization of injection and production parameters and the development of similar reservoirs.

Key words: scale effect, miscible displacement, recovery efficiency, long core, numerical simulation

CLC Number:

TE349

Yang Xue. Influence of scale effect on oil displacement efficiency by natural gasiscible-flooding[J].Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(5): 37-41.

Figures/Tables 6

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

References 18

[1]	聂法健 . 挥发性油藏天然气驱提高采收率技术与应用研究——以中原油田文88区块为例[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2017,31(1):111-114.
[2]	马清杰, 闫娥, 蒲万芬 , 等. 塔河托甫台区块注天然气与CO₂提高采收率实验研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2017,17(8):14-20.
[3]	史玉胜, 赵宇明, 张丽颖 , 等. 泉28断块注天然气混相驱开发效果影响因素分析[J]. 天然气与石油, 2015,33(1):49-53.
[4]	李士伦, 郭平, 王仲林 , 等. 中低渗透油藏注气提高采收率理论及应用[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2007:29-30, 104-112.
[5]	曾贤辉, 彭鹏商, 王进安 , 等. 文72块沙三中油藏烃气驱室内实验[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2003, 24(2):161-163+189. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3873.2003.02.023
[6]	王进安, 袁广均, 张军 , 等. 长岩心注二氧化碳驱油物理模拟实验研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2001,8(2):75-78.
[7]	李士伦, 张正卿, 冉新权 , 等. 注气提高石油采收率技术[M]. 成都: 四川科学技术出版社, 2001: 96-102.
[8]	FI小斯托卡. 混相驱开发油田[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1989.
[9]	汤勇 . 注气混相及近混相驱提高原油采收机率机理研究[D]. 四川:西南石油大学, 2001.
[10]	Koottungal,Leena. 2010 worldwide EOR survey[J]. Oil & Gas Journal, 2014,112(4):79-91.
[11]	Green D W, G P Willits. Enhanced oil recovery[M]. Richardson, Texas: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1998.
[12]	R Brownscombe Miller. Improved oil recovery by miscible displacement[C]// paper WPC-10140 presented at the 6th World Petroleum Congress, 19-26 June 1963, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
[13]	S T Lee, et al. Analysis of mass transfer mechanisms occurring in rich gas displacement process[C]// paper SPE-18062-MS presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 2-5 October 1988, Houston, Texas,USA.
[14]	Z Novosad, T G Costain . Mechanisms of miscibility development in hydrocarbon gas drives: New interpretation[J]. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 1989,4(3):341-347. doi: 10.2118/16717-PA
[15]	张艳玉, 崔红霞, 韩会军 , 等, 低渗透油藏天然气驱提高采收率数值模拟研究[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2005,12(4):61-63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2005.04.020
[16]	岳清山等编译. 混相驱提高石油采收率[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1993.
[17]	Nouar A, Flock D L . Prediction of the minimum miscibility pressure of a vaporizing gas drive[J]. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 1988,3(1):182-198. doi: 10.2118/15075-PA
[18]	Benmekki E H, Mansoori G A . Accurate vaporizing gas-drive minimum miscibility pressure prediction[J]. SPE Reservoir Engineering, 1988,3(2):559-564. doi: 10.2118/15677-PA

Influence of scale effect on oil displacement efficiency by natural gasiscible-flooding

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 18

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	CUI Yudong, LU Cheng, GUAN Ziyue, LUO Wanjing, TENG Bailu, MENG Fanpu, PENG Yue. Effects of creep on depressurization-induced gas well productivity in South China Sea natural gas hydrate reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 809-818.
[2]	HE Haiyan, LIU Xianshan, GENG Shaoyang, SUN Junchang, SUN Yanchun, JIA Qian. Numerical simulation of UGS facilities rebuilt from oil reservoirs based on the coupling of seepage and temperature fields [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 819-826.
[3]	LIANG Yunpei, ZHANG Huaijun, WANG Lichun, QIN Chaozhong, TIAN Jian, CHEN Qiang, SHI Bowen. Numerical simulation of flow fields and permeability evolution in real fractures under continuous loading stress [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 834-843.
[4]	YANG Bing, FU Qiang, GUAN Jingtao, LI Linxiang, PAN Haoyu, SONG Hongbin, QIN Tingting, ZHU Zhiwei. Oil displacement efficiency based on different well pattern adjustment simulation in high water cut reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 519-524.
[5]	CHEN Xiulin, WANG Xiuyu, XU Changmin, ZHANG Cong. CO₂ sequestration morphology and distribution characteristics based on NMR technology and microscopic numerical simulation [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 296-304.
[6]	HOU Mengru,LIANG Bing,SUN Weiji,LIU Qi,ZHAO Hang. Influence of mineral interface stiffness on fracture propagation law of shale hydraulic fracturing [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 100-107.
[7]	LIU Yexuan,LIU Xiangjun,DING Yi,ZHOU Xin,LIANG Lixi. Evaluation method of fracability of shale oil reservoir considering influence of interlayer [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 74-82.
[8]	HE Feng,FENG Qiang,CUI Yushi. Production schedule optimization of gas wells in W shale gas reservoir under controlled pressure difference based on numerical simulation [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 91-99.
[9]	CHEN Shaoying,WANG Wei,YANG Qingchun,ZHANG Lisong. Sequential coupling thermal-hydro-mechanical model for multiple cluster of fracturing network fracturing in dry hot rock reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(6): 869-876.
[10]	ZHOU Haiyan,ZHANG Yunlai,LIANG Xiao,ZHANG Jilei,XU Yanan,LIU Jizhu. Liquid production splitting of multi-layer mining considering multiple factors [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(6): 945-950.
[11]	CUI Chuanzhi,YAN Dawei,YAO Tongyu,WANG Jian,ZHANG Chuanbao,WU Zhongwei. Prediction method of migration law and gas channeling time of CO₂ flooding front: A case study of G89-1 Block in Shengli Oilfield [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 741-747.
[12]	LIAO Songlin,XIA Yang,CUI Yinan,LIU Fangzhi,CAO Shengjiang,TANG Yong. Variation of crude oil properties with multi-cycle CO₂ huff-n-puff of horizontal wells in ultra-low permeability reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 784-793.
[13]	ZHOU Xin,LIU Xiangjun,DING Yi,LIANG Lixi,LIU Yexuan. Simulation of intersecting hydraulic fractures with natural fractures considering layer barrier effect [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(3): 515-525.
[14]	LIU Xueli,ZHENG Xiaojie,DOU Lian,XIE Shuang,PENG Xiaolong,ZHU Suyang. High precision numerical simulation of thin sandstone reservoir with sufficient bottom water and multiple cyclothem: A case study on lower formation of 9th block of Tahe Oilfield [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(2): 391-398.
[15]	CHEN Shijie,PAN Yi,SUN Lei,SI Yong,LIANG Fei,GAO Li. Mechanism of enhanced oil recovery by CO₂ combination flooding in low permeability and high pour-point reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 823-830.