Reservoir Evaluation and Development ›› 2019, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (3): 77-81.
• CO2 Storage • Previous Articles Next Articles
Jin Yangjun,Chen Nai'an,Sheng Yi,Xu Yanmei,Wang Junliang,Pan Zhiyan(
)
Received:2019-03-27
Online:2019-06-26
Published:2019-07-02
Contact:
Pan Zhiyan
E-mail:panzhiyan@zjut.edu.cn
CLC Number:
Jin Yangjun,Chen Nai'an,Sheng Yi,Xu Yanmei,Wang Junliang,Pan Zhiyan. Study on the solubility of CO2 in simulated saline solution under geological storage condition[J].Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(3): 77-81.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Fig. 1
Solubility measuring device"
Fig. 2
Standard curve of CO2 concentration and Raman peak height ratio"
Fig. 3
Raman peak spectra under different burial depths when CO2 is saturated"
Fig. 4
CO2 solubility under different buried depth, temperature and pressure"
Table 1
Estimation of total CO2 storage in saline layer with different thickness（8.25 g/L）"
| 封存面积/km2 | 盐水层厚度/m | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 200 | 300 | 400 | |
| 50 | 6.46×108 | 9.54×108 | 1.25×109 |
| 100 | 1.29×109 | 1.91×109 | 2.51×109 |
| 150 | 1.94×109 | 2.86×109 | 3.76×109 |
| 200 | 2.58×109 | 3.82×109 | 5.02×109 |
| 250 | 3.23×109 | 4.77×109 | 6.27×109 |
Table 2
Estimation of total CO2 storage in saline layer with different thickness（99 g/L）"
| 封存面积/km2 | 盐水层厚度/m | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 200 | 300 | 400 | |
| 50 | 5.18×108 | 7.67×108 | 1.01×109 |
| 100 | 1.04×109 | 1.53×109 | 2.02×109 |
| 150 | 1.55×109 | 2.30×109 | 3.03×109 |
| 200 | 2.07×109 | 3.07×109 | 4.05×109 |
| 250 | 2.59×109 | 3.84×109 | 5.06×109 |
| [1] | 段海燕, 王雷 . 我国石油工业二氧化碳地质封存研究[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2009,31(1):121-124. |
| [2] |
Leung D Y C, Caramanna G, Maroto-Valer M M . An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014,39:426-443.
doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.093 |
| [3] |
Kovscek A R, Kakici M D . Geologic storage of carbon dioxide and enhanced oil recovery.Ⅱ. Cooptimization of storage and recovery[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2005,46(11-12):1941-1956.
doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2004.09.009 |
| [4] | 刘红霞, 廖传华, 朱跃钊 . 二氧化碳矿物封存的研究进展[J]. 中国陶瓷, 2010,46(7):9-14. |
| [5] | 王景云, 郭茹, 杨海真 . 碳捕捉与封存研究进展浅析[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2012,35(12):156-160. |
| [6] | 刘志坚, 史建公, 张毅 . 二氧化碳储存技术研究进展[J]. 中外能源, 2017,22(3):1-9. |
| [7] | 谷丽冰, 李治平, 侯秀林 . 二氧化碳地质埋存研究进展[J]. 地质科技情报, 2008,27(4):80-84. |
| [8] | 俞宏伟, 李实, 陈兴隆 . 盐水层二氧化碳封存主控因素数值模拟研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2012,12(28):7314-7317. |
| [9] | 万玉玉 . 鄂尔多斯盆地石千峰组咸水层CO2地质储存中CO2的迁移转化特征[D]. 吉林:吉林大学, 2012. |
| [10] | Prutton C F, Savage R L . The solubility of carbon dioxide in calcium chloride-water solutions at 75°, 100°, 120° and high pressures[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2002,67(9):1550-1554. |
| [11] | Nighswander J A, Kalogerakis N, Mehrotra A K . Solubilities of carbon dioxide in water and 1 wt % sodium chloride solution at pressures up to 10 MPa and temperatures from 80 to 200 ℃[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 1989,34(3):355-360. |
| [12] | Teng H, Yamasaki A . Solubility of liquid CO2 in synthetic sea water at temperatures from 278 K to 293 K and pressures from 6.44 MPa to 29.49 MPa, and densities of the corresponding aqueous solutions[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 1998,43(1):1301-1310. |
| [13] |
Liu Y, Hou M, Yang G , et al. Solubility of CO2 in aqueous solutions of NaCl, KCl, CaCl2 and their mixed salts at different temperatures and pressures[J]. Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 2011,56(2):125-129.
doi: 10.1016/j.supflu.2010.12.003 |
| [14] | 胡丽莎, 常春, 于青春 . 鄂尔多斯盆地山西组地下咸水CO2溶解能力[J]. 地球科学, 2012,37(2):301-306. |
| [15] | 曾荣树, 孙枢, 陈代钊 , 等. 减少二氧化碳向大气层的排放—二氧化碳地下储存研究[J]. 中国科学基金, 2004,18(4):6-10. |
| [1] | LI Shilun,TANG Yong,DUAN Shengcai,QIN Jiazheng,CHEN Yinuo,LIU Yaxin,ZHENG Peng,ZHAO Guoqing. Progress in source-sink matching and safety evaluation of CO2 geological sequestration [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 269-297. |
| [2] | YANG Yu,XU Qilin,LIU Ronghe,HUANG Dongjie,YAN Ping,WANG Jianmeng. Phase equilibrium law of CO2 storage in depleted gas reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 280-287. |
| [3] | LI Ying, MA Hansong, LI Haitao, GANZER Leonhard, TANG Zheng, LI Ke, LUO Hongwei. Dissolution of supercritical CO2 on carbonate reservoirs [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 288-295. |
| [4] | CHEN Xiulin, WANG Xiuyu, XU Changmin, ZHANG Cong. CO2 sequestration morphology and distribution characteristics based on NMR technology and microscopic numerical simulation [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 296-304. |
| [5] | WANG Jianmeng,CHEN Jie,JI Lidong,LIU Ronghe,ZHANG Qian,HUANG Dongjie,YAN Ping. Research progress and prospect of state equation in CO2 storage [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 305-312. |
| [6] | GUO Ping,ZHANG Wanbo,JIA Na,CHEN Fu,LIU Huang,WANG Zhouhua,GE Xingbo. Research progress of assistants for reducing CO2-crude oil minimum miscible pressure [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 726-733. |
| [7] | WANG Gaofeng, LIAO Guangzhi, LI Hongbin, HU ZhiMing, WEI Ning, CONG Lianzhu. Mechanism and calculation model of EOR by CO2 flooding [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 734-740. |
| [8] | CUI Chuanzhi,YAN Dawei,YAO Tongyu,WANG Jian,ZHANG Chuanbao,WU Zhongwei. Prediction method of migration law and gas channeling time of CO2 flooding front: A case study of G89-1 Block in Shengli Oilfield [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 741-747. |
| [9] | ZHANG Lisong,JIANG Menggang,LI Wenjie,ZHANG Shiyan,CHEN Shaoying,WANG Wei,SUN Zhixue. Mathematical model and numerical analysis for leakage of fluid along geological fault during CO2 storage [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 754-763. |
| [10] | KONG Weijun,CUI Chuanzhi,WU Zhongwei,LI Lifeng,SU Shuzhen,ZHANG Jianning. Laboratory experiment of front migration and gas channeling of CO2 immiscible flooding [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 764-776. |
| [11] | DENG Jiasheng,WANG Ziyi,HE Wangda,PENG Dongyu,YU Bo,TANG Hongming. Experimental study on reaction of chlorite with CO2 aqueous solution [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 777-783. |
| [12] | LIAO Songlin,XIA Yang,CUI Yinan,LIU Fangzhi,CAO Shengjiang,TANG Yong. Variation of crude oil properties with multi-cycle CO2 huff-n-puff of horizontal wells in ultra-low permeability reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 784-793. |
| [13] | GUO Deming,PAN Yi,SUN Yang,CHAO Zhongtang,LI Xiaonan,CHENG Shisheng. EOR mechanism of viscosity reducer-CO2 combined flooding in heavy oil reservoir with low permeability [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 794-802. |
| [14] | LI Yang,HUANG Wenhuan,JIN Yong,HE Yingfu,CHEN Zuhua,TANG Yong,WU Gongyi. Different reservoir types of CO2 flooding in Sinopec EOR technology development and application under “dual carbon” vision [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 793-804. |
| [15] | JI Bingyu,HE Yingfu. Practice and understanding about CO2 flooding in low permeability oil reservoirs by Sinopec [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 805-811. |
