南川页岩气田岩石抗钻特性参数分布规律研究及应用

Abstract

Abstract:

Rock anti-drillability parameters are important basic parameters for making drilling plan and implementing optimal drilling. In this paper, the computational models of formation anti-drillability parameters such as rock compressive strength, rock drillability level value and rock hardness are established through the rock mechanics testing. After that, combined with the logging data and geological data, the profiles of rock anti-drillability parameters varied with the well depth of different strata for shale gas in Nanchuan are also built up. Based on the analysis of its distribution rule, the bits are selected. The study shows that the characteristic parameters of the strata above Liangshan Formation in the shale gas block of Nanchuan fluctuate greatly, which indicates that the stratigraphic heterogeneity is obvious; the lower strata change more gently, but there is a gradual upward trend from the bottom of Longmaxi Formation. According to rock anti-drillability parameters, bits with good wear resistance, 5 ~ 6 blades, and 13 ~ 16 mm cutting teeth with high density should be selected in bit design. The field application shows that the recommended bit has a good effect and the drilling speed is obviously improved.

Key words: parameter of anti-drillability characteristics, distribution rule, bit selection, shale gas, Nanchuan

CLC Number:

TE242

ZHU Liang,LOU Yishan,SHEN Jianzhong,HE Qing,QIN Du. Distribution rule of formation anti-drillability parameters in shale gas block of Nanchuan and its application[J].Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(5): 84-88.

Figures/Tables 8

Table 1

Table 2

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Table 3

References 18

[1]	路保平 . 中国石化页岩气工程技术进步及展望[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2013,41(5):1-8.
[2]	臧艳彬, 百彬珍, 李新芝 , 等. 四川盆地及周缘页岩气水平井钻井面临的挑战与技术对策[J]. 探矿工程(岩土钻掘工程), 2014,41(5):20-24.
[3]	郭岭 . 渝东南地区志留系龙马溪组黑色页岩沉积特征及其页岩气意义[D]. 北京:中国地质大学( 北京), 2012.
[4]	方志雄, 何希鹏 . 渝东南武隆向斜常压页岩气形成与演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016,37(6):819-827.
[5]	高玉巧, 何希鹏, 李建青 , 等. 渝东南地区常压页岩气勘探研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2015,45(S1):1515.
[6]	袁明进, 王彦祺 . 彭水区块页岩气水平井钻井技术方案优化探讨[J]. 钻采工艺, 2015,38(5):28-31.
[7]	龙志平, 王彦祺, 周玉仓 , 等. 平桥南区页岩气水平井钻井优化设计[J]. 探矿工程(岩土钻掘工程), 2017,44(12):34-37.
[8]	张锦宏 . 彭水区块页岩气水平井钻井关键技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2013,41(5):9-15.
[9]	姜政华, 童胜宝, 丁锦鹤 . 彭页HF-1页岩气水平井钻井关键技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2012,40(4):28-31.
[10]	龙志平, 王彦祺, 周玉仓 . 隆页1HF页岩气井钻井关键技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2016,44(2):16-21.
[11]	陈安明, 龙志平, 周玉仓 , 等. 四川盆地外缘常压页岩气水平井低成本钻井技术探讨[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2018,46(6):9-14.
[12]	楼一珊, 金业权 . 岩石力学与石油工程[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2006: 27-39.
[13]	SY/T 5426—2016 Y/T 5426—2016.石油天然气钻井工程岩石可钻性测定与分级[S].北京: 石油工业出版社, 2016.
[14]	邓金根, 程远方, 陈勉 , 等. 井壁稳定预测技术[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2008: 45-55.
[15]	赵军, 蔡亚西, 林元华 . 声波测井资料在岩石可钻性及钻头选型中的应用[J]. 测井技术, 2001,25(4):305-307.
[16]	邹德永, 陈永红 . 利用声波时差资料确定岩石可钻性的研究[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 1996,18(6):27-30.
[17]	杨进, 高德利, 郑全方 , 等. 岩石声波时差与岩石可钻性的关系及其应用[J]. 钻采工艺, 1998,21(2):1-3.
[18]	李二帅 . 利用岩屑检测地层岩石力学参数的方法与实验研究[D]. 成都:西南石油大学, 2016.

序号	深度/m	层位	直径/mm	长度/mm	质量/g	密度/（g·cm^-3）	抗压强度/MPa
1	2 708.85	龙马溪组	25.00	54.52	72.018	2.691	37.90
2	3 401.91	龙马溪组	24.92	39.96	52.233	2.663	54.00
3	3 437.70	龙马溪组	24.96	56.24	73.635	2.667	37.25
4	3 798.67	龙马溪组	25.02	44.94	58.138	2.635	19.73
5	3 798.67	龙马溪组	25.00	49.52	63.359	2.606	18.56

序号	井深/m	层位	声波时差/（μs·m^-1）	硬度/MPa	可钻性级值
1	3 326.68	龙马溪组	234.28	574.27	5.79
2	3 401.91	龙马溪组	230.41	661.66	6.16
3	3 437.70	龙马溪组	217.26	936.31	6.55
4	3 462.68	龙马溪组	226.48	836.43	6.16
5	3 798.67	龙马溪组	210.07	917.58	6.53
6	3 836.73	龙马溪组	230.12	764.65	5.86
7	2 632.55	龙马溪组	238.65	555.54	5.61

地层	单轴抗压强度/ MPa	岩石可钻性级值	岩石硬度/ MPa
飞仙关组	21.23 ~ 31.39	5.68 ~ 6.30	1 314.73 ~ 1 842.53
长兴组	28.29 ~ 34.89	6.10 ~ 6.45	1 675.23 ~ 2 005.31
龙潭组	17.48 ~ 44.71	5.25 ~ 6.80	1 058.96 ~ 2 419.39
茅口组	36.96 ~ 50.28	6.41 ~ 6.93	2 021.18 ~ 2 598.48
栖霞组	35.75 ~ 47.69	6.44 ~ 6.89	2 009.35 ~ 2 446.16
梁山组	25.62 ~ 36.73	5.73 ~ 6.35	1 361.52 ~ 1 883.64
韩家店组	16.38 ~ 24.53	5.23 ~ 5.82	950.50 ~ 1 384.71
小河坝组	19.59 ~ 26.66	5.64 ~ 6.35	1 108.91 ~ 1 452.40
龙马溪组	20.20 ~ 24.87	5.48 ~ 5.98	1 114.78 ~ 1 546.40

Distribution rule of formation anti-drillability parameters in shale gas block of Nanchuan and its application

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 18

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	YAO Hongsheng, WANG Wei, HE Xipeng, ZHENG Yongwang, NI Zhenyu. Development practices of geology-engineering integration in complex structural area of Nanchuan normal pressure shale gas field [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 537-547.
[2]	LI Jingchang, LU Ting, NIE Haikuan, FENG Dongjun, DU Wei, SUN Chuanxiang, LI Wangpeng. Confidence evaluation of fractures seismic detection in shale gas formations on WY23 Pad in Weirong [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 614-626.
[3]	XIA Haibang, HAN Kening, SONG Wenhui, WANG Wei, YAO Jun. Pore scale fracturing fluid occurrence mechanisms in multi-scale matrix-fracture system of shale gas reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 627-635.
[4]	HAN Kening, WANG Wei, FAN Dongyan, YAO Jun, LUO Fei, YANG Can. Production forecasting for normal pressure shale gas wells based on coupling of production decline method and LSTM model [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 647-656.
[5]	XUE Gang, XIONG Wei, ZHANG Peixian. Genesis analysis and effective development of normal pressure shale gas reservoir: A case of Wufeng-Longmaxi shale gas reservoir in southeast margin of Sichuan Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 668-675.
[6]	LOU Zhanghua, ZHANG Xinke, WU Yuchen, GAO Yuqiao, ZHANG Peixian, JIN Aimin, ZHU Rong. Fluid response characteristics of shale gas preservation differences in Nanchuan and its adjacent blocks in Sichuan Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 451-458.
[7]	HU Zhijian, LI Shuxin, WANG Jianjun, ZHOU Hong, ZHAO Yulong, ZHANG Liehui. Productivity evaluation of multi-stage fracturing horizontal wells in shale gas reservoir with complex artificial fracture occurrence [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 459-466.
[8]	LIN Hun, SUN Xinyi, SONG Xixiang, MENG Chun, XIONG Wenxin, HUANG Junhe, LIU Hongbo, LIU Cheng. A model for shale gas well production prediction based on improved artificial neural network [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 467-473.
[9]	LIU Honglin,ZHOU Shangwen,LI Xiaobo. Application of PCA plus OPLS method in rapid reserve production rate prediction of shale gas wells [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 474-483.
[10]	LU Bi,HU Chunfeng,MA Jun. Influencing factors and countermeasures of inter-well interference of fracturing horizontal wells in Nanchuan shale gas field [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 330-339.
[11]	QIU Xiaoxue,ZHONG Guanghai,LI Xiansheng,CHEN Meng,LING Weitong. CFD simulation of flow characteristics of shale gas horizontal wells with different inclination [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 340-347.
[12]	NIE Yunli, GAO Guozhong. Classification of shale gas “sweet spot” based on Random Forest machine learning [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 358-367.
[13]	ZHANG Longsheng,WANG Weiheng. Study and application of a high temperature foaming agent in anionic-nonionic system namely HDHP: A case study of shale gas wells in Dongsheng Block, Sichuan Basin [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(2): 240-246.
[14]	ZHAO Renwen,XIAO Dianshi,LU Shuangfang,ZHOU Nengwu. Comparison of reservoir characteristics between continental shale from faulted basin and marine shale under high-over mature stage: Taking Shahezi Formation in Xujiaweizi faulted basin and Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin as an example [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 52-63.
[15]	LI Ying,LI Maomao,LI Haitao,YU Hao,ZHANG Qihui,LUO Hongwen. Physicochemical mechanism of water phase imbibition in shale reservoirs [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 64-73.