梁平福禄镇剖面大安寨段泥页岩地质特征

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2022.01.012

Abstract

Abstract:

The lacustrine mud shale in Jurassic of Sichuan Basin is characterized by fast sedimentary phase transition, complex and diverse lithological combination types, and strong reservoir inhomogeneity, which is quite different from the marine shale. Therefore, it is of great significance to establish a typical geological section of Jurassic lacustrine shale in Sichuan Basin and further study the microfacies and lithologic assemblage characteristics of lacustrine shale. The Da'anzhai section of Fulu Town, Liangping District, Chongqing, Eastern Sichuan is selected as the research object. Through the division of small layers, fine description of sedimentary microfacies and lithologic combination characteristics, sample collection, field profile measurement, organic geochemistry, reservoir physical properties and whole rock X-ray diffraction, it is shown that the Da'anzhai section of Fulu town is mainly carbonate lake sediments. The microfacies and lithologic assemblages have three stages: initial transgression, maximum transgression and initial regression. The first and third members of the Da'anzhai formation are mainly composed of the microfacies of the thick layer mesoclastic limestone deposited in the bioclastic beaches of the carbonate shallow lake; The second member of Da'anzhai formation is a semi deep lacustrine subfacies. There are two microfacies: Storm beach and semi deep lacustrine mud. They are characterized by two lithologic associations, i.e. unequal thickness interbedding of grey clastic limestone and grey black shale, and thick black shale with thin shell limestone, With high content of brittle minerals and better permeability and compressibility, it is a sweet spot for shale oil and gas enrichment. Compared with the typical shale gas drilling, The semi deep lacustrine facies of the second member is mainly distributed in Fuling Jiannan area in eastern Sichuan, which is conducive to the formation of shale oil and gas. The carbonate shallow lacustrine clastic shoals of the first and third members are mainly distributed in Central Sichuan Northeast Sichuan, which is conducive to the enrichment of tight oil and gas.

Key words: lithological association, continental shale, shale oil and gas, Da'anzhai section, Fulu Town section, Sichuan Basin

CLC Number:

TE122

ZHU Tong,ZHANG Zhe,FENG Dongjun,ZHENG Rongcai,WANG Feng,PENG Yongmin. Geological characteristics of mud shale in Da'anzhai section of Fulu Town, Liangping[J].Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(1): 139-149.

Figures/Tables 9

Fig. 1

Table 1

Layered data of Da'anzhai section in Fulu Town"

分层号	地层名称	岩性描述	样品号	导线号	倾向λ （?）	倾角α（?）	方位角Φ（?）	坡度角β （?）	分层厚度（m）	累计厚度（m）
30	凉高山组	灰绿色厚层块状细砂岩		9	161	49	178	2	2.90	109.88
29	过渡层	灰黑色泥岩夹灰绿色细砂岩		8	161	49	178	2	2.60	106.98
28	大三段	震积角砾岩		8	161	49	178	2	2.30	104.38
27		灰黑色微晶灰岩	F-42	8	161	49	178	2	5.42	102.08
26		灰色介屑灰岩夹黑色泥岩	F-41	8	169	36	130	2	3.64	96.66
25		灰色微晶介屑灰岩夹灰黑色泥岩	F-40	7	171	38	130	2	2.16	93.02
24		灰色介屑灰岩与泥岩互层	F-39	7	171	38	130	2	1.02	90.86
23		灰色微晶介屑灰岩	F-38	7	171	38	130	2	0.62	89.84
22		灰褐色微晶灰岩夹灰黑色页岩	F-37	7	171	38	130	2	1.37	89.22
21		灰黑色泥岩夹粉晶灰岩	F-36	7	160	23	156	1	2.25	87.85
20		灰色粉晶介屑灰岩	F-34、35	7	155	23	156	1	1.40	85.60
19	大二段	灰黑色泥岩夹微晶灰岩	F-32、33	6	150	29	156	1	6.12	84.20
18		灰色微晶灰岩	F-31	6	158	26	156	1	0.63	78.08
17		灰色泥岩与介壳灰岩互层		6	158	26	156	1	3.07	77.45
16		灰色泥岩夹介屑灰岩	F-30	6	158	26	156	1	4.26	74.38
15		黑色泥岩与介壳灰岩互层	F-28、29	6	158	27	156	1	2.65	70.12
14		黑色泥岩夹薄层灰岩	F-27	6	168	34	156	1	1.70	67.47
13		灰色介屑粉晶灰岩	F-25、26	6	170	24	156	1	1.36	65.77
12		灰黑色泥岩夹介壳灰岩	F-23、24	6	163	21	156	1	3.90	64.41
11		灰色介壳灰岩	F-22	6	140	24	156	1	1.12	60.51
10		黑色页岩夹薄层介壳灰岩	F-18、19、20、21	6	158	36	188	2	24.12	59.39
9		灰黑色页岩夹介壳灰岩	F-17下、中、上	6	140	24	188	2	9.18	35.27
8		灰色介壳灰岩与灰黑色页岩互层	F-12、13、14、15、16	5	158	35	188	2	3.15	26.09
7		灰色介屑灰岩夹薄层泥岩	F-9、10、11	5	170	22	237	2	3.27	22.94
6		黑色泥岩	F-6、7、8	3-4	192	23	237	2	3.51	19.67
5	大一段	灰色介屑灰岩	F-5	2	150	14	237	2	1.93	16.16
4		灰黑色泥岩夹薄层灰岩	F-4	1	150	14	237	2	2.87	14.23
3		灰黑色泥岩		1	150	14	222	2	2.05	11.36
2		灰色亮晶介屑灰岩	F-3	1	194	14	222	2	2.18	9.31
1		灰褐色介屑灰岩夹泥岩	F-2	1	198	14	222	2	4.03	7.13
0	马鞍山段	灰绿色粉砂岩	F-1	0	155	13	222	2	3.10	3.10

Table 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Table 2

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Table 3

Fig. 6

References 25

[1]	康玉柱. 中国非常规泥页岩油气藏特征及勘探前景展望[J]. 天然气工业, 2012, 32(4):1-5.
	KANG Yuzhu. Characteristics and exploration prospect of unconventional shale gas reservoirs in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2012, 32(4):1-5.
[2]	张金川, 姜生玲, 唐玄, 等. 我国页岩气富集类型及资源特点[J]. 天然气工业, 2009, 29(12):109-114.
	ZHANG Jinchuan, JIANG Shengling, TANG Xuan, et al. Accumulation types and resources characteristics of shale gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2009, 29(12):109-114.
[3]	张金川, 聂海宽, 徐波, 等. 四川盆地页岩气成藏地质条件[J]. 天然气工业, 2008, 28(2):151-156.
	ZHANG Jinchuan, NIE Haikuan, XU Bo, et al. Geological condition of shale gas accumulation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2008, 28(2):151-156.
[4]	王良军, 王庆波. 四川盆地涪陵自流井组页岩气形成条件与勘探方向[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 43(5):757-764.
	WANG Liangjun, WANG Qingbo. Formation conditions and explorative directions of Jurassic shale gas in Fuling, Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition), 2013, 43(5):757-764.
[5]	朱彤, 曹艳, 张快. 美国典型页岩气藏类型及勘探开发启示[J]. 石油实验地质, 2014, 36(6):1-7.
	ZHU Tong, CAO Yan, ZHANG Kuai. Typical shale gas reservoirs in USA and enlightenment to exploration and development[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2014, 36(6):1-7.
[6]	魏祥峰, 黄静, 李宇平, 等. 元坝地区大安寨段陆相页岩气富集高产主控因素[J]. 中国地质, 2014, 41(3):970-981.
	WEI Xiangfeng, HUANG Jing, LI Yuping, et al. The main factors controlling the enrichment and high production of Da'anzhai member continental shale gas in Yuanba area[J]. Geology in China, 2014, 4l(3):970-981.
[7]	郑荣才, 何龙, 梁西文, 等. 川东地区下侏罗统大安寨段页岩气(油)成藏条件[J]. 天然气工业, 2013, 33(12):30-40.
	ZHENG Rongcai, HE Long, LIANG Wenxi, et al. Forming conditions of shale gas(oil) plays in the Lower Jurassic Da'anzhai member in the eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2013, 33(12):30-40.
[8]	郭旭升, 胡东风, 李宇平, 等. 海相和湖相页岩气富集机理分析与思考:以四川盆地龙马溪组和自流井组大安寨段为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(2):18-28.
	GUO Xusheng, HU Dongfeng, LI Yuping, et al. Analyses and thoughts on accumulation mechanisms of marine and lacustrine shale gas: A case study in shales of Longmaxi Formation and Da'anzhai Section of Ziliujing Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(2):18-28.
[9]	朱彤, 俞凌杰, 王烽. 四川盆地海相、湖相页岩气形成条件对比及开发策略[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(4):633-641.
	ZHU Tong, YU Lingjie, WANG Feng. Comparative analysis of the accumulationconditions and development strategies of the marine and lacustrine shale gas from the Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(4):633-641.
[10]	胡宗全, 郑荣才, 熊应明. 四川盆地下侏罗统大安寨组层序分析[J]. 天然气工业, 2000, 20(3):34-37.
	HU Zongquan, ZHENG Rongcai, XIONG Yingming. Sequence analysis of the Lower Jurassic Da'anzhai Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2000, 20(3):34-37.
[11]	郑荣才. 四川盆地下侏罗统大安寨段高分辨率层序地层学[J]. 沉积学报, 1998, 16(2):42-49.
	ZHENG Rongcai. High-resolution sequence stratigraphy of Da'anzhai Formation, Lower Jurassic in Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologicl Sinica, 1998, 16(2):42-49.
[12]	李延钧, 冯媛媛, 刘欢, 等. 四川盆地湖相页岩气地质特征与资源潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(4):423-428.
	LI Yanjun, FENG Yuanyuan, LIU Huan, et al. Geological characteristics and resource potential of lacustrine shale gas in the Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(4):423-428.
[13]	李忠权, 冉隆辉, 陈更生, 等. 川东高陡构造成因地质模式与含气性分析[J]. 成都理工学院学报, 2002, 29(6):605-609.
	LI Zhongquan, RAN Longhui, CHEN Gengsheng, et al. Genetic geologic model and gas—bearing analysis of high and steep structures in east Sichuan[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology, 2002, 29(6):605-609.
[14]	韦清海. 四川省地质局区测报告—垫江幅1:20万[R]. 成都:四川省地质局107地质队, 1980.
	WEI Qinghai. Regional survey report of Sichuan Geological Bureau: Dianjiang, 1:200 000[R]. Chengdu: No. 107 Geological Team, Sichuan Geological Bureau, 1980.
[15]	倪超, 郝毅, 陈更生, 等. 四川盆地中部侏岁系大安寨段含有机质泥质介壳灰岩储层的认识及其意义[J]. 海相油气地质, 2012, 17(2):45-56.
	NI Chao, HAO Yi, CHEN Gengsheng, et al. Cognition and Significance of Lower Jurassic Da'anzhai Organic Muddy Shell Limestone Reservoir in Central Sichuan Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2012, 17(2):45-56.
[16]	何龙, 郑荣才, 梁西文, 等. 川东涪陵地区大安寨段裂缝控制因素及期次分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(4):88-96.
	HE Long, ZHENG Rongcai, LIANG Xiwen, et al. Controlling factors and development periods of fracture of Da’anzhai member in Fuling area,eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(4):88-96.
[17]	林世国, 郑荣才, 刘满仓, 等. 陆相碎屑震积岩形成机理及其研究意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(1):78-84.
	LIN Shiguo, ZHENG Rongcai, LIU Mancang, et al. Formation mechanism and significance of continental clastic seismite[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013, 24(1):78-84.
[18]	朱彤. 四川盆地陆相页岩油气富集主控因素及类型[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(3):345-354.
	ZHU Tong. Main controlling factors and enrichment types of continental shale oil and gas in Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(3):345-354.
[19]	朱彤, 龙胜祥, 王烽, 等. 四川盆地湖相泥页岩沉积模式及岩石相类型[J]. 天然气工业, 2016, 6(8):22-28.
	ZHU Tong, LONG Shengxiang, WANG Feng, et al. Sedimentary models and lithofacies types of lacustrine mud shale in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 6(8):22-28.
[20]	冯荣昌, 吴因业, 杨光, 等. 川中大安寨段风暴沉积特征及分布模式[J]. 沉积学报, 2015, 33(5):909-908.
	FENG Rongchang, WU Yinye, YANG Guang, et al. Storm deposition of the Da'anzhai member(Jurassic) in central Sichuan basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologicl Sinica, 2015, 33(5):909-908.
[21]	朱彤, 胡宗全, 刘忠宝, 等. 四川盆地湖相页岩气源—储配置类型及评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(6):1146-1153.
	ZHU Tong, HU Zongquan, LIU Zhongbao, et al. Type and evaluation of the source-reservoir configuration of lacustrine shale gas in the Sichuan basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(6):1146-1153.
[22]	郑荣才, 郭春利, 梁西文, 等. 四川盆地大安寨段非常规储层的储集空间类型与评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(1):16-29.
	ZHENG Rongcai, GUO Chunli, LIANG Xiwen, et al. Characteristics and evaluation of reservoir spaces of shale gas(oil)in Da’anzhai member of Ziliujing formation in Sichuan basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(1):16-29.
[23]	卢炳雄, 郑荣才, 梁西文, 等. 川东地区侏罗系自流井组大安寨段页岩气(油)储层评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(3):488-496.
	LU Bingxiong, ZHENG Rongcai, LIANG Xiwen, et al. Evaluation of reservoirs in the Da’anzhai member of the Jurassic Ziliujing formation in Eastern Sichuan basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 33(12):30-40.
[24]	许丹, 胡瑞林, 高玮, 等. 页岩纹层结构对水力裂缝扩展规律的影响[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(4):523-528.
	XU Dan, HU Ruilin, GAO Wei, et al. Effects of laminated structure on hydraulic fracture propagation in shale[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(4):523-528.
[25]	赵文韬, 侯贵廷, 张居增, 等. 层厚与岩性控制裂缝发育的力学机理研究——以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组为例[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 51(6):1047-1058.
	ZHAO Wentao, HOU Guiting, ZHANG Juzeng, et al. Study on the development law of structural fractures of Yanchang formation in Longdong area, Ordos basin[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium(Universitatis Pekinensis), 2015, 51(6):1047-1058.

		大一、三亚段	大二亚段
沉积相特征	亚相类型	浅湖	半深湖
	微相类型	高能介屑滩	湖坡风暴滩	半深湖泥
	水动能条件	强	较强	弱
	沉积构造	块状	纹层状	页理状
	泥地比（%）	16~38	56~64	88
	岩性组合	厚层介屑灰岩	泥页岩与介屑灰岩不等厚互层	厚层页岩夹薄层介壳灰岩
	宏观剖面特征
	微观特征
烃源特征	TOC（%）	0.1~1.1,平均0.6	0.3~1.7,平均1.2
储层特征	孔隙度（%）	0.8~3.1,平均2.2	0.7~2.8,平均1.9
	孔隙类型	晶间孔和溶蚀孔	黏土矿物线状孔为主、溶蚀孔	黏土矿物线状孔隙为主
	裂缝发育类型	构造裂缝较发育	纹理缝、粒缘缝发育	页理缝较发育
可压性	黏土矿物（%）	10~21,平均15	24~41,平均31	38~58,平均45
	硅质（%）	11~30,平均19	19~29,平均26	27~45,平均35
	钙质（%）	40~75,平均58	20~47,平均36	8~24,平均14
	脆性指数	平均0.8	平均0.6	平均0.45

Geological characteristics of mud shale in Da'anzhai section of Fulu Town, Liangping

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 25

Related Articles 11

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

样号	岩性描述	TOC （%）	黏土矿物（%）	石英、长石（%）	碳酸盐矿物（%）	其他矿物（%）
FL-01	强风化灰褐色泥岩	0.20	53	34	13	0
FL-02	介屑灰岩	0.17	16	36	48	0
FL-03	亮晶介屑灰岩	0.07	3	1	95	1
FL-04	灰黑色泥岩	0.11	28	19	52	1
FL-05	介屑灰岩	0.09	7	9	55	29
FL-06	深灰色页岩
FL-07	深灰色页岩	0.65	43	29	26	2
FL-08	亮晶介屑灰岩	0.18	4	2	94	0
FL-09	灰色页岩	0.24	36	41	22	1
FL-10	灰色页岩	0.36	50	24	24	2
FL-11	介屑灰岩	0.05	6	1	93	0
FL-12	灰黑色页岩	0.55	53	29	15	3
FL-13	深灰色页岩	0.86	55	31	12	2
FL-14	介屑灰岩	0.33	4	7	86	3
FL-15	深灰色页岩	1.08	38	19	39	4
FL-16	深灰色页岩	0.59	48	38	13	1
FL-17上	介壳灰岩	0.10	8	4	86	2
FL-17中	深灰色页岩	0.89	53	26	16	5
FL-17下	介壳灰岩	0.11	6	1	93	0
FL-18	深灰色页岩	1.36	56	33	7	4
FL-19	灰黑色页岩	0.69	55	28	15	2
FL-20	灰黑色页岩	0.82	51	27	21	1
FL-21	灰褐色介壳灰岩	0.16	4	12	81	3
FL-22	深灰色页岩	0.99	52	26	19	3
FL-23	深灰色页岩	1.58	61	29	6	4
FL-24	深灰色页岩	1.59	59	33	6	2
FL-25	深灰色页岩	0.94	52	29	17	2
FL-26	介壳灰岩	1.32	40	32	26	2
FL-27	深灰色页岩	0.83	43	48	7	2
FL-28	深灰色页岩	0.71	45	37	16	2
FL-29	深灰色页岩	0.91	62	30	5	3
FL-30	介壳灰岩	0.20	13	4	82	1
FL-31	灰色介壳灰岩	0.18	12	2	86	0
FL-32	灰色页岩	0.92	57	35	6	2
FL-33	灰色页岩	0.99	58	26	13	3
FL-34	介壳灰岩	0.32	12	3	83	2
FL-35	灰黑色页岩	1.02	64	28	4	4
FL-36	介壳灰岩	0.24	10	4	81	5
FL-37	介屑灰岩	0.31	6	3	88	3
FL-38	灰黑色页岩	1.15	66	25	5	4
FL-39	介屑灰岩	0.12	4	2	93	1
FL-40	介屑灰岩	0.03	5	1	93	1
FL-41	介屑灰岩	0.04	5	1	93	1

[1]	XUE Gang, XIONG Wei, ZHANG Peixian. Genesis analysis and effective development of normal pressure shale gas reservoir: A case of Wufeng-Longmaxi shale gas reservoir in southeast margin of Sichuan Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 668-675.
[2]	WANG Xiaoming,CHEN Junbin,REN Dazhong. Research progress and prospect of pore structure representation and seepage law of continental shale oil reservoir [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 23-30.
[3]	LI Donghui,TIAN Lingyu,NIE Haikuan,PENG Zeyang. Factor analysis and comprehensive evaluation model of shale gas well productivity based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: Taking Jiaoshiba shale gas field in Sichuan Basin as an example [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(3): 417-428.
[4]	HE Wenyuan,FENG Zihui,ZHANG Jinyou,BAI Yunfeng,FU Xiuli,ZHAO Ying,CHENG Xinyang,GAO Bo,LIU Chang. Characteristics of geological section of Well-GY8HC in Gulong Sag, Northern Songliao Basin [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(1): 1-9.
[5]	YAO Suping,WU Yuyuan,YU Wenduan,ZHANG Bailin,HU Wenxuan. Outcrop characteristic and lithofacies changes of both Gufeng and Dalong Formations in lower Yangtze Region [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(1): 215-232.
[6]	LIU Ruobing,WEI Xiangfeng,LIU Zhujiang,YAN Jihong,YUAN Tao,WEI Fubin. Geological section analysis of drilling in Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in Well-JY1 [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(1): 47-57.
[7]	WANG Hongyan,DONG Dazhong,SHI Zhensheng,QIU Zhen,LU Bin,SHAO Nan,SUN Shasha,ZHANG Surong. Lithfacies and “sweet spot” interval of marine shale in southern Sichuan: A case study of Shuanghe Outcrop in Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation, Changning [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(1): 68-81.
[8]	LI Chang,SHEN Anjiang,CHANG Shaoying,LIANG Zhengzhong,LI Zhenlin,MENG He. Application and contrast of machine learning in carbonate lithofacies log identification: A case study of Longwangmiao Formation of MX area in Sichuan Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(4): 586-596.
[9]	HE Zhiliang,NIE Haikuan,JIANG Tingxue. Challenges and countermeasures of effective development with large scale of deep shale gas in Sichuan Basin [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(2): 135-145.
[10]	Guo Tonglou. Progress and research direction of deep shale gas exploration and development [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(1): 1-6.
[11]	YANG Zhenheng,HU Zongquan,XIONG Liang,DING Jianghui,SHEN Baojian,SHI Hongliang,LU Longfei,WEI Limin,LI Zhiming. Gas storage characteristics and coupling characteristics of deep shale gas: a case study of well-X in southern Sichuan basin, China [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(5): 20-27.