Reservoir Evaluation and Development ›› 2018, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (4): 6-10.
• Reservoir Geology • Previous Articles Next Articles
Jin Xiaobo
Received:
2017-11-09
Online:
2018-08-26
Published:
2018-11-12
CLC Number:
Jin Xiaobo. Study on the fine fault interpretation in Nanchuan district[J].Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(4): 6-10.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks
Table 2
Basic element of fault"
序 号 | 断层 名称 | 性质 | 走向 | 倾向 | 最大垂直 断距/m | 延伸距离/km | 断开地层 | 序 号 | 断层 名称 | 性质 | 走向 | 倾向 | 最大垂直 断距/m | 延伸距离/km | 断开地层 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | F01 | 逆断层 | NE转NW | SE转NE | 300 | 13.8 | 小河坝组—上寒武 | 27 | F27 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 150 | 3.1 | 韩家店组—上寒武 | |
2 | F02 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 160 | 9.2 | 小河坝组—上寒武 | 28 | F28 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 50 | 1.3 | 小河坝组—奥陶 | |
3 | F03 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 100 | 4.5 | 小河坝组—上寒武 | 29 | F29 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 330 | 6 | 韩家店组—上寒武 | |
4 | F04 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 510 | 13.1 | 小河坝组—中寒武 | 30 | F30 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 150 | 4 | 韩家店组—上寒武 | |
5 | F05 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 700 | 24.1 | 嘉陵江组—中寒武 | 31 | F31 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 320 | 11.5 | 韩家店组—上寒武 | |
6 | F06 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 100 | 2.6 | 小河坝组—上寒武 | 32 | F32 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 2 600 | 18.3 | 嘉陵江组—中寒武 | |
7 | F07 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 10 | 1.8 | 小河坝组—奥陶 | 33 | F33 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 40 | 3.5 | 小河坝组—上寒武 | |
8 | F08 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 50 | 2 | 韩家店组—上寒武 | 34 | F34 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 100 | 5 | 龙马溪组—上寒武 | |
9 | F09 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 50 | 2.1 | 韩家店组—上寒武 | 35 | F35 | 逆断层 | NW转NE | NE转SE | 1 050 | 19 | 嘉陵江组—中寒武 | |
10 | F10 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 160 | 3.5 | 龙马溪组—奥陶 | 36 | F36 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 20 | 2 | 小河坝组—上寒武 | |
11 | F11 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 170 | 8 | 小河坝组—上寒武 | 37 | F37 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 30 | 4 | 龙马溪组—上寒武 | |
12 | F12 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 370 | 6.5 | 龙马溪组—上寒武 | 38 | F38 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 30 | 3 | 龙马溪组—上寒武 | |
13 | F13 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 280 | 5.6 | 小河坝组—上寒武 | 39 | F39 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 80 | 2 | 龙马溪组—上寒武 | |
14 | F14 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 250 | 14 | 小河坝组—上寒武 | 40 | F40 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 240 | 6 | 小河坝组—上寒武 | |
15 | F15 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 30 | 5.2 | 韩家店组—奥陶 | 41 | F41 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 200 | 4 | 龙马溪组—上寒武 | |
16 | F16 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 280 | 5.3 | 韩家店组—奥陶 | 42 | F42 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 160 | 8 | 龙马溪组—上寒武 | |
17 | F17 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 450 | 3.5 | 韩家店组—上寒武 | 43 | F43 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 80 | 4 | 小河坝组—奥陶 | |
18 | F18 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 150 | 3.2 | 小河坝组—上寒武 | 44 | F44 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 440 | 6 | 韩家店组—上寒武 | |
19 | F19 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 780 | 16.3 | 韩家店组—上寒武 | 45 | F45 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 240 | 6 | 小河坝组—上寒武 | |
20 | F20 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 550 | 17 | 小河坝组—中寒武 | 46 | F46 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 160 | 7 | 小河坝组—上寒武 | |
21 | F21 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 270 | 10 | 小河坝组—中寒武 | 47 | F47 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 190 | 2.2 | 龙马溪组—中寒武 | |
22 | F22 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 170 | 5 | 小河坝组—上寒武 | 48 | F49 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 120 | 2 | 小河坝组—上寒武 | |
23 | F23 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 240 | 3.5 | 韩家店组—上寒武 | 49 | F50 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 70 | 2 | 小河坝组—上寒武 | |
24 | F24 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 580 | 14.5 | 韩家店组—上寒武 | 50 | F51 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 700 | 8.3 | 嘉陵江组—下寒武 | |
25 | F25 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 400 | 10 | 小河坝组—上寒武 | 51 | F52 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 300 | 8.4 | 嘉陵江组—下寒武 | |
26 | F26 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 180 | 3 | 韩家店组—上寒武 | 52 | F57 | 逆断层 | NE | SE | 100 | 4.2 | 小河坝组—奥陶 |
[1] | 李伦炯, 杨飞, 孙传敏 , 等. 渝东南—湘鄂西地区构造运动与下志留统页岩气勘探[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2013,35(10):68-71. |
[2] |
李丰渝, 张军, 冯兆伟 , 等. Depth Team Express速度场建立在无井区的应用[J]. 内江科技, 2012,33(7):152.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-1436.2012.07.120 |
[3] |
张文起, 徐海霞, 李静 . 孤东垦东地区储层精细构造解释及构造特征分析[J]. 内蒙古石油化工, 2009,19(4):99-101.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7981.2009.04.046 |
[4] |
王明飞, 陈超, 屈大鹏 , 等. 涪陵页岩气田焦石坝区块五峰组—龙马溪组一段页岩气储层地球物理特征分析[J]. 石油物探, 2015,54(5):613-626.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2015.05.014 |
[5] | 胡伟光, 刘珠江, 范春华 , 等. 四川盆地J地区志留系龙马溪组页岩裂缝地震预测与评价[J]. 海相油气地质, 2014,19(4):25-29. |
[6] |
陆明华, 骆璞, 姜传芳 , 等. 地震属性技术在页岩裂缝预测中的应用[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2013,35(8):62-64.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9752.2013.08.013 |
[1] | LI Guoyan, CHANG Lin, CHEN Meng, ZHONG Ping, CHEN Jie, WANG Lin, LI Yuping, ZHANG Yu. Evaluation method of remaining oil in water-flooded formation considering injected-water volumes and ion exchange [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 801-808. |
[2] | YAO Hongsheng, WANG Wei, HE Xipeng, ZHENG Yongwang, NI Zhenyu. Development practices of geology-engineering integration in complex structural area of Nanchuan normal pressure shale gas field [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 537-547. |
[3] | HAN Kening, WANG Wei, FAN Dongyan, YAO Jun, LUO Fei, YANG Can. Production forecasting for normal pressure shale gas wells based on coupling of production decline method and LSTM model [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 647-656. |
[4] | QIU Xiaoxue,ZHONG Guanghai,LI Xiansheng,CHEN Meng,LING Weitong. CFD simulation of flow characteristics of shale gas horizontal wells with different inclination [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 340-347. |
[5] | CUI Chuanzhi,LI Jinghong,WU Zhongwei,ZHANG Tuan,ZHANG Chuanbao. Calculation and analysis of breakthrough pressure of caprock in CO2 storage [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 322-329. |
[6] | CHEN Xiulin, WANG Xiuyu, XU Changmin, ZHANG Cong. CO2 sequestration morphology and distribution characteristics based on NMR technology and microscopic numerical simulation [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 296-304. |
[7] | SONG shuling,YANG Erlong,SHA Mingyu. Influencing factors of occurrence state of shale oil based on molecular simulation [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(1): 31-38. |
[8] | CHEN Shaoying,WANG Wei,YANG Qingchun,ZHANG Lisong. Sequential coupling thermal-hydro-mechanical model for multiple cluster of fracturing network fracturing in dry hot rock reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(6): 869-876. |
[9] | WANG Wei,CHEN Shaoying,YANG Qingchun,LIU Heping,ZHANG Lisong. Single-connected analytical model analysis of stress field response of geothermal reservoirs induced by staged fracturing [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(6): 894-901. |
[10] | ZHOU Haiyan,ZHANG Yunlai,LIANG Xiao,ZHANG Jilei,XU Yanan,LIU Jizhu. Liquid production splitting of multi-layer mining considering multiple factors [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(6): 945-950. |
[11] | XIANG Xueni,HUANG Liang,ZHOU Wen,ZOU Jie,ZHANG Zhuoya. Structural characteristics and gas storage properties of gas hydrates based on molecular simulation [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 825-832. |
[12] | SHANG Xiaofei,WANG Mingchuan,LI Meng,ZHAO Lei. High precision stratigraphic framework modeling for oil and gas reservoirs based on VBM algorithm: A case study of Xu2 Formation in Xinchang tectonic zone, western Sichuan Depression [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(2): 302-312. |
[13] | YANG Yubin,XIAO Wenlian,HAN Jian,GOU Ling,LI Min,ZHOU Keming,OUYANG Mukun,CHEN Li. Gas-water flow characteristics and influencing factors of tight sandstone in Danfengchang Gas Field [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(2): 356-364. |
[14] | WAN Youwei,LIU Xiangjun,YUAN Fang,XIONG Jian,LI Chao. Physic-chemical and mechanical properties of rocks in Baxigai Formation, Tarim Basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(5): 753-759. |
[15] | WANG Rui. Fracturing well productivity of low permeability reservoir with taking the oil-water two phase flow into consideration [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(5): 760-765. |
|