威荣深层页岩长水平段工程钻探能力延伸极限研究

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2022.03.013

Abstract

Abstract:

The vertical depth of Weirong deep shale gas reaches 3 800 m, and the formation collapse pressure coefficient is above 1.95. The ultra-long horizontal wells in the region are increasing year by year, and the ultra-long horizontal wells have become an important development means for stable production in the later stage of the gas field. Based on the research of rotary steerable drilling method, the hydraulic open-hole evaluation model and Landmark software are used to comprehensively analyze the influencing factors of geological parameters, trajectory profile, drill string mechanics, hydraulic parameters and surface equipment. The extension limits of the ultra-long horizontal section were different under different rig conditions and working conditions. The optimized profile type is beneficial to prevent collision between wells and safe running of pipe string. The stress intensity of the drill string in 3D trajectory profile is twice that of 2D trajectory profile, and both the density and viscosity of drilling fluid will affect the extension of ultra-long horizontal section. The evaluation results show that the theoretical limit of open hole horizontal section is 5 840 m without considering the drilling capacity, while the maximum horizontal section extension of 70 drilling rig is 3 500 m due to the drilling depth limit. The larger the pump displacement, the lower the drilling fluid density, and the longer the elongation capacity.

Key words: Weirong, deep shale gas, ultra-long horizontal section, extension limit, rotary steering drilling

CLC Number:

TE242

ZHU Huashu,WANG Xiyong,XU Xiaoling,GUO Zhiliang,HUANG Hechun. Extendability limit of engineering drilling in long horizontal section of Weirong deep shale gas[J].Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(3): 506-514.

Figures/Tables 19

Table 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Table 2

Table 3

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Table 4

Fig. 9

Table 5

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8

References 21

[1]	柳伟荣, 倪华峰, 王学枫, 等. 长庆油田陇东地区页岩油超长水平段水平井钻井技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2020, 48(1):9-14.
	LIU Weirong, NI Huafeng, WANG Xuefeng, et al. Shale oil horizontal drilling technology with super-long horizontal laterals in the Longdong Region of the Changqing Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2020, 48(1): 9-14.
[2]	孙永兴, 贾利春.国内3 000m长水平段水平井钻井实例与认识[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2020, 42(4):393-401.
	SUN Yongxing, JIA Lichun. Cases and understandings on the drilling of horizontal well with horizontal section of 3 000m long in China[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2020, 42(4): 393-401.
[3]	樊好福, 臧艳彬, 张金成, 等. 深层页岩气钻井技术难点与对策[J]. 钻采工艺, 2019, 42(3):20-23.
	FAN Haofu, ZANG Yanbin, ZHANG Jincheng, et al. Difficulties and counter measures of deep shale gas drilling technology[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2019, 42(3): 20-23.
[4]	于洋飞, 杨光, 陈涛, 等. 新疆玛湖区块2 000m 长水平段水平井钻井技术[J]. 断块油气田, 2017, 24(5):727-730.
	YU Yangfei, YANG Guang, CHEN Tao, et al. Drilling technology of 2 km-long horizontal section in Mahu Block, Xinjiang Oilfield[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2017, 24(5): 727-730.
[5]	杨金华, 郭晓霞. 一趟钻新技术应用与进展[J]. 石油科技论坛, 2017, 36(2):38-40.
	YANG Jinhua, GUO Xiaoxia. Application of new technology: Single bit-run drilling[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology Forum, 2017, 36(2): 38-40.
[6]	GAO D L. Modeling & simulation in drilling and completion for oil & gas[J]. Tech Science Press, Duluth, USA, 2012: 231-252.
[7]	GAO D L, TAN C, TANG H. Limit analysis of extended reach drilling in South China Sea[J]. Petroleum Science, 2009, 6(2): 166-171. doi: 10.1007/s12182-009-0026-8
[8]	LI X, GAO D L. Study on open-hole extended-reach li mit model analysis for horizontal drilling in shales[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering, 2016, 34: 520-533.
[9]	LI X, GAO D L. A comprehensive prediction model of hydraulic extended-reach li mit considering the allowable range of drilling fluid flow rate in horizontal drilling[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7(1): 3083. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03261-3
[10]	于洋飞, 杨光, 陈涛, 等. 新疆玛湖区块2 000 m 长水平段水平井钻井技术[J]. 断块油气田, 2017, 24(5):727-730.
	YU Yangfei, YANG Guang, CHEN Tao, et al. Drilling technology of 2 km-long horizontal section in Mahu Block, Xinjiang Oilfield[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2017, 24(5): 727-730.
[11]	王建龙, 冯冠雄, 刘学松. 长宁页岩气超长水平段水平井钻井完井关键技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2020, 48(2):1-8.
	WANG Jianlong, FENG Guanxiong, LIU Xuesong. Key technology for drilling and completion of horizontal wells in Changning shale gas ultra-long horizontal section[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2020, 48(2): 1-8.
[12]	汪志明, 郭晓乐, 张松杰, 等. 南海流花超大位移井井眼净化技术[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2006, 28(1):4-8.
	WANG Zhiming, GUO Xiaole, ZHANG Songjie, et al. Borehole cleaning technology for mega-extended-reach wells at Liuhua Field in South China Sea[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2006, 28(1): 4-8.
[13]	罗显尧. 孤岛地区水平井摩阻分析与减摩技术研究[D]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2010.
	LUO Xianyao. Friction analysis and friction reduction technology of horizontal wells in Gudao area[D]. Beijing:China University of Petroleum(Beijing), 2010.
[14]	兰俊. 海陆过渡相煤系页岩气成藏条件及储层特征[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2021, 35(5):27-32.
	LAN Jun. Reservoir forming conditions and reservoir characteristics of coal measure shale gas in marine continental transitional facies[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2021, 35(5): 27-32.
[15]	刘娜娜. 南川地区龙马溪组优质页岩段微观孔隙结构特征[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2021, 35(4):21-25.
	LIU Na’na. Micro pore structure characteristics of high quality shale section of Longmaxi formation in Nanchuan area[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2021, 35(4): 21-25.
[16]	杨洁, 董波, 郑义, 等. 川西气田二开长裸眼固井质量保障工艺[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2021, 35(6):81-85.
	YANG Jie, DONG Bo, ZHENG Yi, et al. Cementing quality assurance technology of long open hole in the second spud of western Sichuan gas field[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2021, 35(6): 81-85.
[17]	张晓明, 耿应春, 赵洪山, 等. “单弯双稳”导向钻具组合受力分析及在胜利油田的应用[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2021, 35(4):110-113.
	ZHANG Xiaoming, GENG Yingchun, ZHAO Hongshan, et al. Force analysis of “single bend and double stabilizers” steering BHA and its application in Shengli oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2021, 35(4): 110-113.
[18]	郭东明. 欠压实理论在随钻地层压力预测中的应用[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2021, 35(3):80-83.
	GUO Dongming. Application of under compaction theory in formation pressure prediction while drilling[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2021, 35(3): 80-83.
[19]	石崇东. 鄂尔多斯盆地宁陕区块深井钻井关键技术[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2021, 35(3):89-92.
	SHI Chongdong. Key drilling techniques for deep exploration wells in Ningshan block of Ordos basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2021, 35(3): 89-92.
[20]	胥豪, 唐洪林, 董广华, 等. 永进油田深层侧钻水平井钻井技术[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2020, 34(6):84-88.
	XU Hao, TANG Honglin, DONG Guanghua, et al. Deep sidetracking horizontal well drilling technology in Yongjin oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2020, 34(6): 84-88.
[21]	中国石油化工股份有限公司科技开发部.钻井队钻井设备配套标准(第5部分: 7000 m钻机): Q/SH 0168.5—2008[S].北京: 中国石化出版社, 2008, 3:1-7.
	Sinopec Science & Technology R&D Department. Standard for the drilling equipment matching a drilling rig of a drilling crew Part 5:The skid-mounted drilling rig of No.70: Q/SH 0168.5—2008[S]. Beijing: China Petrochemical Press, 2008, 3:1-7.

地层	地压梯度（MPa/hm）	破压梯度（MPa/hm）
遂宁组—新田沟组	1.00~1.10	1.8左右
自流井组—须家河组	1.10~1.30	大于1.8
雷口坡组—飞仙关组	1.30~1.50	大于2.0
长兴组—龙潭组	1.40~1.50	大于2.0
茅口组—石牛栏组	1.40~1.60	大于2.3
龙马溪组—五峰组	1.60~1.90	2.2~3.2

剖面类型	斜井段长（m）	井下摩阻（kN）
二维剖面	400~450	200~250
双二维剖面	630~750	260~280
三维剖面	1 600~1 850	300~330

井眼曲率 [（°）/hm]	最短靶前距（m）	井眼曲率 [（°）/hm]	最短靶前距（m）
16	358	21	272
17	337	22	260
18	318	23	249
19	302	24	239
20	286

类型	常规取值		威荣地区
类型	油基	水基	油基	水基
套管	0.23	0.29	0.24	0.32
裸眼	0.32	0.37	0.35	0.41

井号	塑性黏度（mPa·s）	摩阻（kN）	井号	塑性黏度（mPa·s）	摩阻（kN）
WY26-6	68~70	100	WY31-2	71~80	150
WY26-1	60~70	80	WY31-7	75~85	180
WY23-8	60~77	180	WY34-1	80~95	230
WY35-2	65~77	150	WY29-8	75~95	250

Extendability limit of engineering drilling in long horizontal section of Weirong deep shale gas

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 19

References 21

Related Articles 14

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

井眼直径（mm）	钻具直径（mm）	柱数（柱）	共计（柱）	剩余空间（柱）
215.9	139.7	43	254	-4（4柱不能摆放）
215.9	127.0	211	254	-4（4柱不能摆放）
165.1	139.7	36	270	0
	127.0	95
	101.6	139

井眼直径（mm）	直井段段长（m）	斜井段段长（m）	70钻机最大钻深（m）	裸眼水力延伸极限（m）	受钻机限制水平段长（m）	不考虑钻机限制总井深（m）
215.9	3 400	400	7 300	5 840	3 500	9 640
165.1	3 400	400	7 500	5 840	3 700	9 840

钻机类型	最大起重量（kN）	绞车功率（hp）	泵组功率（hp）
70钻机	4 500	2 000	1 600
7 500 m所需升级钻机	3 664	2 137	2 567

[1]	LI Jingchang, LU Ting, NIE Haikuan, FENG Dongjun, DU Wei, SUN Chuanxiang, LI Wangpeng. Confidence evaluation of fractures seismic detection in shale gas formations on WY23 Pad in Weirong [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 614-626.
[2]	DU Yang,NI Jie,LEI Wei,ZHOU Xingfu,LI Li,BU Tao. Optimum time of tubing installation in deep shale gas wells of Weirong [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(3): 526-533.
[3]	ZHAO Yong,LI Nanying,YANG Jian,CHENG Shisheng. Optimization of deep shale gas well spacing based on geology-engineering integration: A case study of Weirong Shale Gas Field [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(3): 340-347.
[4]	HE Zhiliang,NIE Haikuan,JIANG Tingxue. Challenges and countermeasures of effective development with large scale of deep shale gas in Sichuan Basin [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(2): 135-145.
[5]	XIONG Liang,PANG Heqing,ZHAO Yong,WEI Limin,ZHOU Hua,CAO Qian. Micro pore structure characterization and classification evaluation of reservoirs in Weirong Deep Shale Gas Field [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(2): 154-163.
[6]	ZHOU Hua,WEI Limin,WANG Tong,WANG Yan,PANG Heqing,ZHANG Tiancao. Evaluation method of Weirong deep shale gas reservoir and its application [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(2): 176-183.
[7]	YANG Jian,ZHAN Guowei,ZHAO Yong,REN Chunyu,QU Chongjiu. Characteristics of supercritical adsorption and desorption of deep shale gas in South Sichuan [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(2): 184-189.
[8]	Guo Tonglou. Progress and research direction of deep shale gas exploration and development [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(1): 1-6.
[9]	Wang Xingwen,Lin Yongmao,Miao Weijie. Volume fracturing technology of deep shale gas in southern Sichuan [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(1): 102-108.
[10]	Ge Zhongwei,Ouyang Jiasui,Wang Tong,Zhou Jing,Guo Weixingi,Jin Lichao. Reservoir characteristics and enrichment rule of Yongchuan Deep Shale Gas Field [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(1): 29-37.
[11]	Zhong Wenjun,Xiong Liang,Li Hong,Dong Xiaoxia,Zhou Jing. Application of log evaluation technology in Weirong Deep Shale Gas Field [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(1): 38-46.
[12]	Long Zhangliang,Zhong Jingmin,Hu Yongzhang,Wen Zhentao,Li Hui,Zeng Xianwei. Application of geomechanics in deep shale gas development in Yongchuan [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(1): 72-80.
[13]	Wang Haoyu,Xiong Liang,Shi Hongliang,Dong Xiaoxia,Wei Limin,Jian Wanhong. Testing and selection techniques of horizontal wells in Weirong Shale Gas Field [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(1): 86-94.
[14]	Du Yang,Lei Wei,Li Li,Zhao Zhejun,Ni Jie,Liu Tong. Post-frac production control and drainage technology of deep shale gas wells [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(1): 95-101.