低孔低渗储层有效厚度确定方法研究——以安塞油田长2储层为例

Abstract

Abstract:

The Chang-2 reservoir of Ansai oilfield has the geological characteristics of low porosity, low permeability, fast change of physical properties and strong vertical and horizontal heterogeneity. Based on the ''four properties'' relation of reservoir, we established the minimum standards of effective thickness by using the core analysis, oil test, production dynamics and logging by the way of histogram method and cross plot method. Then we proposed the different types of interlayer logging quantitative identification chart and the elimination criterion of various interlayer on the basis of the semi-quantification and semi-qualitative analysis by many kinds of logging curves. The minimum values were as follows: the oil-bearing property was to see the grease spots; the lithological property was to see the fine-grained sandstone; the physical property were the porosity was more than or equaled to 11.5 % and the permeability was more than or equaled to 0.63×10 ^-3μm ²; the electrical property were the resistivity was more than or equaled to 13 Ω·m and the acoustic was more than or equaled to 230 μs/m. The main types of interlayer were calcareous interlayer and muddy interlayer. We could identify and eliminate the interlayer by the quantification of curves of natural gamma, acoustic and microelectrode, and the qualitative analysis of the curves of spontaneous potential, RILD, RILM, microsphere resistivity and micronormal.

Key words: low permeability reservoir, effective thickness, cutoff standards, interlayer elimination, Ansai oilfield

CLC Number:

TE122

Wang Xia,Fu Guomin,Guo Aihua,Wang Chao,Sun Xiao,Jin Xing. Research on determination of effective thickness for oil reservoirs with low permeability: A case of Chang-2 reservoir of Ansai oilfield[J].Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(6): 1-6.

Figures/Tables 9

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Table 1

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Table 2

References 30

[1]	王亚青, 高博禹, 孙立春 . 提高地质储量计算精度需注意的几个问题[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2011,33(5):63-67.
[2]	刘占良, 崔明明, 樊爱萍 , 等. 致密砂岩气藏储量计算方法探讨——以容积法计算SX区块储量为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014,25(12):1983-1993.
[3]	杨通佑, 范尚炯, 陈元千 , 等. 石油及天然气储量计算方法[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1990: 18-62.
[4]	岳绍飞, 刘杰, 马丽娜 , 等. 福山凹陷流沙港组三段储层四性关系及有效厚度下限标准[J]. 石油地质与采收率, 2013,20(4):42-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2013.04.010
[5]	杨俊杰 . 鄂尔多斯盆地构造演化与油气分布规律[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2002.
[6]	邓秀芹, 蔺昉晓, 刘显阳 , 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组沉积演化及其与早印支运动关系的探讨[J]. 古地理学报, 2008,10(2):159-166.
[7]	罗静兰, 张晓莉, 张云翔 , 等. 成岩作用对河流—三角洲相砂岩储层物性演化的影响——以延长油区上三叠统延长组长2砂岩为例[J]. 沉积学报, 2001,19(4):541-547.
[8]	郭艳琴, 邱雅洁, 李文厚 , 等. 陕西安塞油田长2和长3储层特征及其非均质性[J]. 地质通报, 2013,32(11):1815-1823. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.2013.11.014
[9]	戴亚权, 赵俊英, 罗静兰 , 等. 安塞油田坪桥地区长2段储层非均质性研究[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2010,40(2):287-292.
[10]	孙鲁平, 首皓, 李平 , 等. 非均质储层测井二次解释——以辽河GS油田为例[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2009,31(4):91-95. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9752.2009.04.022
[11]	闫建平, 首祥云, 李尊芝 . 测井二次解释模型在储量套改中的应用[J]. 石油地质与采收率, 2006,13(6):55-58.
[12]	国土资源部储量司. 矿产资源储量计算方法汇编[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2000.
[13]	王霞, 郭爱华, 张添锦 , 等. 用含水砂岩作标准层进行测井资料标准化处理的尝试[J]. 延安大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,36(4):17-21.
[14]	李克永, 李文厚, 陈全红 , 等. 安塞油田镰刀湾长2油层优质储层特征分析[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2011,41(1):95-99.
[15]	朱广社, 李相明, 别旭伟 . 安塞油田长2油层储层特征[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2005,27(6):857-858.
[16]	郭睿 . 储集层物性下限值确定方法及其补充[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2004,31(5):140-144.
[17]	焦翠华, 夏冬冬, 王军 , 等. 特低渗砂岩储层物性下限确定方法——以永进油田西山窑组储集层为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2009,30(3):379-383.
[18]	操应长, 王艳忠, 徐涛玉 , 等. 东营凹陷西部沙四上亚段滩坝砂体有效储层的物性下限及控制因素[J]. 沉积学报, 2009,27(2):230-237.
[19]	宋子齐, 程国建, 王静 , 等. 特低渗透油层有效厚度确定方法研究[J]. 石油学报, 2006,27(6):103-106. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2006.06.023
[20]	俞保财, 张永强, 雷启鸿 , 等. 吴起—铁边城油田长6储层四性关系及有效厚度下限研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2011,1(6):52-56.
[21]	王媛媛, 王桂成, 徐勇强 , 等. 杏子川油田长6低渗透储层有效厚度下限研究[J]. 地质科技情报, 2013,32(3):113-117.
[22]	陈玲 . 边城油田陈家舍区块戴一段储层下限参数研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2016,6(4):14-17.
[23]	冯林杰 . 鄂尔多斯盆地H区长4+5、长6储层四性关系及有效厚度下限研究[J]. 石化技术, 2017,24(4):162-163.
[24]	魏小薇, 谢继容, 唐大海 , 等. 低孔渗砂岩储层基质物性下限确定方法研究——以川中LA构造沙一段油藏为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2005,25(增刊A):28-31.
[25]	黎著, 罗彬, 张旭阳 , 等. 致密砂岩气藏储层物性下限及控制因素分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2013,35(2):54-62.
[26]	付金华, 罗安湘, 张妮妮 , 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7油层组有效储层物性下限的确定[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2014,19(6):82-88. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2014.06.0010
[27]	柳锦云 . 低渗透油藏有效厚度下限标准研究[J]. 海洋石油, 2008,28(3):70-73.
[28]	严科, 赵红兵 . 三角洲前缘储层中钙质夹层分布及成因探讨[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014,36(1):33-38.
[29]	Lynds R, Hajek E . Conceptual model for predicting mudstone dimensions in sandy braided river reservoirs[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2006,90(8):1273-1288. doi: 10.1306/03080605051
[30]	赵向原, 曾联波, 刘忠群 , 等. 致密砂岩储层中钙质夹层特征及与天然裂缝分布的关系[J]. 地质论评, 2015,61(1):163-171. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0371-5736.2015.01.017

类别	下限标准
电性下限	230 μs/m≤Δt<242 μs/m,RILD≥-0.275Δt+78.65 Ω·m; Δt≥242 μs/m,RILD≥13 Ω·m
物性下限	φ≥11.5 %;K≥0.63×10^-3μm²
含油下限	油迹级
岩性下限	细砂岩级

夹层类型	定量				定性
夹层类型	自然伽马/ API	声波时差/ （μs·m^-1）	微梯度/ （Ω·m）	井径/ cm	自然电位/ mV	深感应/ （Ω·m）	中感应/ （Ω·m）	微球/ （Ω·m）	微电位/ （Ω·m）
泥质夹层	≥90	≥245	≤11.5	≥22	相对高	低值	低值	低值	低值,与ML2无明显幅差
钙质夹层	≤85	≤230	≥20	≤20	低值	高值	高值	高值	高值,与ML2正幅差不明显

Research on determination of effective thickness for oil reservoirs with low permeability: A case of Chang-2 reservoir of Ansai oilfield

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 30

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	ZHANG Fengxi, NIU Congcong, ZHANG Yichi. Evaluation of multi-stage fracturing a horizontal well of low permeability reservoirs in East China Sea [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 695-702.
[2]	LIAO Songlin,XIA Yang,CUI Yinan,LIU Fangzhi,CAO Shengjiang,TANG Yong. Variation of crude oil properties with multi-cycle CO₂ huff-n-puff of horizontal wells in ultra-low permeability reservoir [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 784-793.
[3]	GUO Deming,PAN Yi,SUN Yang,CHAO Zhongtang,LI Xiaonan,CHENG Shisheng. EOR mechanism of viscosity reducer-CO₂ combined flooding in heavy oil reservoir with low permeability [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 794-802.
[4]	ZHAO Baoyin,ZHANG Ming. Application of facies-controlled prestack geostatistical inversion method in high quality reservoir prediction of low permeability reservoir: A case study of V Oil Formation of Es₃³ in Block A [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(4): 666-676.
[5]	JI Bingyu,HE Yingfu. Practice and understanding about CO₂ flooding in low permeability oil reservoirs by Sinopec [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 805-811.
[6]	WU Gongyi,ZHAO Ziping,WU Bo. CO₂ flooding development models and economic benefit evaluation of different types of reservoirs in Subei basin [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 864-870.
[7]	LIU Lu,WANG Yongfei,ZHAN Zedong,XIE Jinfeng. Main control factors of horizontal wells in J₂s₂ tight sandstone gas reservoir of Xinchang Gas Field [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(6): 890-896.
[8]	TANG Mingguang,LIU Qinghua,XUE Guoqing,ZHANG Jiqiang,LU Ruibin. Key parameter limits of water injection quality in offshore low permeability reservoir: A case study of Liushagang Formation in Weizhou 11-4N Oilfield [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(5): 709-715.
[9]	WANG Rui. Fracturing well productivity of low permeability reservoir with taking the oil-water two phase flow into consideration [J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(5): 760-765.
[10]	CAO Xulong, LYU Guangzhong, WANG Jie, ZHANG Dong, REN Min. Present situation and further research direction of CO₂ flooding technology in Shengli Oilfield [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(3): 51-59.
[11]	JIN Zhongkang,WANG Zhilin,MAO Chaoqi. Dominant mechanism and application of CO₂ immiscible flooding in M block with low permeability [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(3): 68-74.
[12]	Wang Gaofeng,Yao Jie,Wang Hao,Yu Guangming,Luo Wenli. Prediction of produced GOR of miscible gas flooding in low permeability reservoirs [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(3): 14-18.
[13]	Tang Yong,Liao Songlin,Lei Xinhui,Yu Guangming,Kang Xingmei. Study on improving the sweep efficiency of CO₂ flooding in low permeability fractured reservoirs in Huang-3 block [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(3): 9-13.
[14]	Li Ming,Qi Nan,Chen Chaobing,Zhu Yushuang,Zhang Quanpei. Extra-low permeability reservoir heterogeneity and its effect on the distribution of reservoirs in L2 area of Ganguyi Oilfield [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(2): 1-6.
[15]	Cao Jun,Tang Hai,Lyu Dongliang,Wu Jinwei. Influence of stress sensitive differences on natural well productivity in fractured reservoirs [J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(1): 23-28.