油气藏评价与开发 >
2025 , Vol. 15 >Issue 6: 947 - 958
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025.06.001
煤系气储层孔隙发育特征与成藏潜力——以尼泊尔低喜马拉雅造山带Tansen地区为例
收稿日期: 2024-10-03
网络出版日期: 2025-10-24
基金资助
江苏省创新支撑计划国际科技合作“一带一路”创新合作项目“非常规天然气资源潜力与勘探开发技术模式的合作研究”(BZ2022015);国家自然科学基金项目“煤系气高效勘探开发的岩石力学地层理论方法体系研究”(42030810);中国矿业大学研究生创新计划“基于岩石力学地层理论的煤系气共采储层改造机理研究”(2024WLKXJ008)
Pore development characteristics and accumulation potential of coal measure gas reservoirs: A case study of Tansen area in Lesser Himalayan orogenic belt, Nepal
Received date: 2024-10-03
Online published: 2025-10-24
煤系气是非常规天然气的重要类型,其成储、成藏是构造沉积作用耦合配置下的结果,尼泊尔低喜马拉雅造山带是研究复杂构造区煤系气储层发育与富集规律的重点区域。以尼泊尔低喜马拉雅造山带Tansen地区Gondwana群和Surkhet群煤系气储层为研究对象,分析了冈瓦纳及前陆盆地煤系气储层类型与组合特征,不同煤系气储层微观孔裂隙形貌发育与孔隙结构特征,探讨了逆冲推覆作用下煤系气储层孔裂隙演化过程与优势孔裂隙形成机制,最后,初步预测了煤系气潜在有利储层、有利区与资源潜力。研究结果表明:① 尼泊尔低喜马拉雅造山带煤系气储层组合类型主要包括“源储一体型”的煤层-页岩气型、“下生上储型”的煤层-致密砂岩气型和页岩-致密砂岩气型以及“源储紧邻型”的煤层-页岩-致密砂岩气型;② 页岩矿物相关的中孔与有机质微孔发育,孔容占总孔容64.6%,比表面积占总比表面积98.1%,煤层主要发育微孔,总比表面积达8.22 m²/g,致密砂岩以粒间孔和微裂隙为主,渗透性在各类储层中最高;③ 页岩孔裂隙具有破坏和新生双重效应,逆冲推覆作用下不同岩性煤系气储层孔裂隙系统演化各异,煤层主要发生构造揉皱作用并发育更多微孔,致密砂岩则主要表现为构造裂隙的形成与扩展;④ Tansen地区东南部Jhadewa矿区是煤系气潜在有利区,Surkhet群Bhainskati组煤层-页岩组合是煤系气优势储层类型,初步估算该地区煤系气资源量达5.04×108 m3。研究旨在初步查明尼泊尔低喜马拉雅造山带煤系气潜在有利储层与有利区,为尼泊尔油气资源评价与勘探研究提供方向。
桑树勋 , 何俊杰 , 韩思杰 , KUMAR Khadka , 周效志 , 刘世奇 , UPENDRA Baral , SAUNAK Bhandari . 煤系气储层孔隙发育特征与成藏潜力——以尼泊尔低喜马拉雅造山带Tansen地区为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2025 , 15(6) : 947 -958 . DOI: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025.06.001
Coal measure gas is an important type of unconventional natural gas, and its formation and accumulation are the result of the coupling configuration of tectonic sedimentation. The Lesser Himalayan orogenic belt in Nepal is a key area for studying the development and enrichment patterns of coal measure gas reservoirs in complex structural areas. In this study, the coal measure gas reservoirs of the Gondwana Group and Surkhet Group in the Tansen area of the Lesser Himalayan orogenic belt in Nepal were taken as the research objects. The types and combination characteristics of coal measure gas reservoirs in Gondwana and foreland basins were analyzed. The development of microscopic pore-fracture system morphology and pore structure characteristics of different coal measure gas reservoirs were analyzed. The evolution process of pore-fracture systems and the formation mechanisms of dominant pore-fracture systems in coal measure gas reservoirs under the action of thrust nappe were discussed. Finally, potential favorable reservoirs, favorable areas, and resource potential of coal measure gas were preliminarily predicted. The results showed that: (1) The combination types of coal measure gas reservoirs in the Lesser Himalayan orogenic belt of Nepal mainly included the “source-reservoir integration” type of coal-shale gas, the “lower source-upper reservoir” type of coal-tight sandstone gas and shale gas-tight sandstone gas, and the “source-reservoir adjacent” type of coal-shale gas-tight sandstone gas. (2) The mesopores and organic matter micropores related to shale minerals were well developed, accounting for 64.6% of total pore volume and 98.1% of total specific surface area. The coal seam mainly developed micropores, and the total specific surface area reached 8.22 m2/g. In tight sandstones, intergranular pores and microfractures were predominant, demonstrating the highest permeability among all types of reservoirs. (3) The shale pore-fracture system had the dual effects of destruction and regeneration. The evolution of pore-fracture system in coal measure gas reservoirs with different lithologies varied under the action of thrust nappe. The coal seam mainly experienced cataclastic deformation, resulting in the development of more micropores, while the tight sandstones were mainly characterized by the formation and propagation of structural fractures. (4) The coal-shale combination of the Bhainskati Formation of the Surkhet Group in the Tansen area was the dominant coal measure gas reservoir type. The Jhadewa mining area in the southeast of Tansen area was a potential favorable area for coal measure gas. It was preliminarily estimated that the coal measure gas resources in this area reached 5.04×108 m3. This study preliminarily identifies the potential favorable reservoirs and favorable areas of coal measure gas in the Lesser Himalayan orogenic belt of Nepal, providing direction for the evaluation and exploration of oil and gas resources in Nepal.
| [1] | 秦勇, 申建, 沈玉林. 叠置含气系统共采兼容性: 煤系“三气”及深部煤层气开采中的共性地质问题[J]. 煤炭学报, 2016, 41(1): 14-23. |
| QIN Yong, SHEN Jian, SHEN Yulin. Joint mining compatibility of superposed gas-bearing systems: A general geological problem for extraction of three natural gases and deep CBM in coal series[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2016, 41(1): 14-23. | |
| [2] | 桑树勋, 郑司建, 易同生, 等. 煤系叠合型气藏及其勘探开发技术模式[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2022, 50(9): 13-21. |
| SANG Shuxun, ZHENG Sijian, YI Tongsheng, et al. Coal measures superimposed gas reservoir and its exploration and development technology modes[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2022, 50(9): 13-21. | |
| [3] | 傅雪海, 德勒恰提·加娜塔依, 朱炎铭, 等. 煤系非常规天然气资源特征及分隔合采技术[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(3): 36-40. |
| FU Xuehai, DELEQIATI Jianatayi, ZHU Yanming, et al. Resources characteristics and separated reservoirs’ drainage of unconventional gas in coal measures[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(3): 36-40. | |
| [4] | 傅雪海, 陈振胜, 宋儒, 等. 煤系灰岩气的发现及意义[J]. 中国煤炭地质, 2018, 30(6): 59-63. |
| FU Xuehai, CHEN Zhensheng, SONG Ru, et al. Discovery of coal measures limestone gas and its significance[J]. Coal Geology of China, 2018, 30(6): 59-63. | |
| [5] | 曹代勇, 姚征, 李靖. 煤系非常规天然气评价研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2014, 42(1): 89-92. |
| CAO Daiyong, YAO Zheng, LI Jing. Evaluation status and development trend of unconventional gas in coal measure[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2014, 42(1): 89-92. | |
| [6] | 王佟, 王庆伟, 傅雪海. 煤系非常规天然气的系统研究及其意义[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2014, 42(1): 24-27. |
| WANG Tong, WANG Qingwei, FU Xuehai. The significance and the systematic research of the unconventional gas in coal measures[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2014, 42(1): 24-27. | |
| [7] | 朱炎铭, 侯晓伟, 崔兆帮, 等. 河北省煤系天然气资源及其成藏作用[J]. 煤炭学报, 2016, 41(1): 202-211. |
| ZHU Yanming, HOU Xiaowei, CUI Zhaobang, et al. Resources and reservoir formation of unconventional gas in coal measure, Hebei Province[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2016, 41(1): 202-211. | |
| [8] | 李靖, 姚征, 陈利敏, 等. 木里煤田侏罗系煤系非常规气共存规律研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2017, 45(7): 132-138. |
| LI Jing, YAO Zheng, CHEN Limin, et al. Study on unconventional gas coexisted law of Jurassic coal measures in Muri Coalfield[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2017, 45(7): 132-138. | |
| [9] | 梁冰, 石迎爽, 孙维吉, 等. 中国煤系“三气”成藏特征及共采可能性[J]. 煤炭学报, 2016, 41(1): 167-173. |
| LIANG Bing, SHI Yingshuang, SUN Weiji, et al. Reservoir forming characteristics of “the three gases” in coal measure and the possibility of commingling in China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2016, 41(1): 167-173. | |
| [10] | 刘翰林, 邹才能, 尹帅, 等. 中国煤系气形成分布、甜点评价与展望[J]. 天然气工业, 2024, 44(10): 1-21. |
| LIU Hanlin, ZOU Caineng, YIN Shuai, et al. Formation, distribution, sweet spot evaluation and development prospect of coal-measure gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2024, 44(10): 1-21. | |
| [11] | 秦勇. 中国煤系气共生成藏作用研究进展[J]. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(4): 26-36. |
| QIN Yong. Research progress of symbiotic accumulation of coal measure gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(4): 26-36. | |
| [12] | 宋儒, 苏育飞, 陈小栋. 山西省深部煤系“三气”资源勘探开发进展及研究[J]. 中国煤炭地质, 2019, 31(1): 53-58. |
| SONG Ru, SU Yufei, CHEN Xiaodong. Exploration and exploitation progress and study on deep coal measures “Triple-Gas” resources in Shanxi Province[J]. Coal Geology of China, 2019, 31(1): 53-58. | |
| [13] | 邹才能, 杨智, 黄士鹏, 等. 煤系天然气的资源类型、形成分布与发展前景[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(3): 433-442. |
| ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, HUANG Shipeng, et al. Resource types, formation, distribution and prospects of coal-measure gas[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(3): 433-442. | |
| [14] | 陆加敏, 刘超. 断陷盆地致密砂砾岩气成藏条件和资源潜力: 以松辽盆地徐家围子断陷下白垩统沙河子组为例[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2016, 21(2): 53-60. |
| LU Jiamin, LIU Chao. Accumulation conditions and resource potential of tight glutenite gas in fault depression basins: A case study on Lower Cretaceous Shahezi Formation in Xujiaweizi fault depression, Songliao Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2016, 21(2): 53-60. | |
| [15] | 杨兆彪, 秦勇, 高弟, 等. 煤层群条件下的煤层气成藏特征[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2011, 39(5): 22-26. |
| YANG Zhaobiao, QIN Yong, GAO Di, et al. Coalbed methane(CBM) reservoir-forming character under conditions of coal seam groups[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2011, 39(5): 22-26. | |
| [16] | 施雷庭, 赵启明, 任镇宇, 等. 煤岩裂隙形态对渗流能力影响数值模拟研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 424-432. |
| SHI Leiting, ZHAO Qiming, REN Zhenyu, et al. Numerical simulation study on the influence of coal rock fracture morphology on seepage capacity[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 424-432. | |
| [17] | 李启晖, 任大忠, 甯波, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地神木地区侏罗系延安组煤层微观孔隙结构特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2): 76-88. |
| LI Qihui, REN Dazhong, NING Bo, et al. Micropore structure characteristics of coal seams of Jurassic Yan’an Formation in Shenmu area, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(2): 76-88. | |
| [18] | MA Y, ZHONG N N, LI D H, et al. Organic matter/clay mineral intergranular pores in the Lower Cambrian Lujiaping Shale in the northeastern part of the Upper Yangtze area, China: A possible microscopic mechanism for gas preservation[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2015, 137: 38-54. |
| [19] | LOUCKS R G, RUPPEL S C, WANG X Z, et al. Pore types, pore-network analysis, and pore quantification of the lacustrine shale-hydrocarbon system in the Late Triassic Yanchang Formation in the southeastern Ordos Basin, China[J]. Interpretation, 2017, 5(2): 63-79. |
| [20] | 刘文平, 张成林, 高贵冬, 等. 四川盆地龙马溪组页岩孔隙度控制因素及演化规律[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(2): 175-184. |
| LIU Wenping, ZHANG Chenglin, GAO Guidong, et al. Controlling factors and evolution laws of shale porosity in Longmaxi Formation, Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(2): 175-184. | |
| [21] | 琚宜文, 姜波, 侯泉林, 等. 华北南部构造煤纳米级孔隙结构演化特征及作用机理[J]. 地质学报, 2005, 79(2): 269-285. |
| JU Yiwen, JIANG Bo, HOU Quanlin, et al. Structural evolution of nano-scale pores of tectonic coals in southern North China and its mechanism[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2005, 79(2): 269-285. | |
| [22] | 谭富文, 杨平, 王正和, 等. 尼泊尔西部代莱克(Dailekh)地区石油地质条件分析[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质, 2020, 40(3): 87-95. |
| TAN Fuwen, YANG Ping, WANG Zhenghe, et al. Petroleum geological conditions in Dailekh area, western Nepal[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2020, 40(3): 87-95. | |
| [23] | 杨平, 谭富文, 施美凤, 等. 尼泊尔低喜马拉雅推覆带油源对比及油气成藏[J]. 地质学报, 2021, 95(11): 3426-3441. |
| YANG Ping, TAN Fuwen, SHI Meifeng, et al. Oil-source correlation and hydrocarbon accumulation in the Lesser Himalayan belt of Nepal[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2021, 95(11): 3426-3441. | |
| [24] | 王正和, 谭富文, RAJAURE Sudhir, 等. 尼泊尔及南侧邻区元古宙以来的构造-沉积演化[J]. 地球科学, 2022, 47(2): 405-417. |
| WANG Zhenghe, TAN Fuwen, RAJAURE Sudhir, et al. The tectonosedimentary evolution since Proterozoic in Nepal and its southern adjacent areas[J]. Earth Science, 2022, 47(2): 405-417. | |
| [25] | 钟建华, 刘闯, 吴建光, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘临兴地区煤系气共生成藏特征[J]. 煤炭学报, 2018, 43(6): 1517-1525. |
| ZHONG Jianhua, LIU Chuang, WU Jianguang, et al. Symbiotic accumulation characteristics of coal measure gas in Linxing Block, eastern Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2018, 43(6): 1517-1525. | |
| [26] | 高为, 易同生, 颜智华, 等. 贵州省煤系气成藏条件及勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2022, 33(5): 799-806. |
| GAO Wei, YI Tongsheng, YAN Zhihua, et al. Reservoir forming conditions and exploration direction of coal measure gas in Guizhou Province[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2022, 33(5): 799-806. | |
| [27] | CAI Y D, LIU D M, PAN Z J, et al. Pore structure and its impact on CH4 adsorption capacity and flow capability of bituminous and subbituminous coals from Northeast China[J]. Fuel, 2013, 103: 258-268. |
| [28] | MA Y, ZHONG N N, HAN H, et al. Definition and structure characteristics of pores in mylonitized organic-rich shales[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2014, 57(12): 3027-3034. |
| [29] | GHAZI S, AZIZ T, KHALID P, et al. Petroleum play analysis of the Jurassic sequence, Meyal-field, Potwar basin, Pakistan[J]. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 2014, 84(6): 727-738. |
| [30] | KENT W N, DASGUPTA U. Structural evolution in response to fold and thrust belt tectonics in northern Assam. A key to hydrocarbon exploration in the Jaipur anticline area[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2004, 21(7): 785-803. |
| [31] | 李浩. 鄂尔多斯盆地中部上古生界烃源岩研究[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2015. |
| LI Hao. Research of source rocks in Upper Paleozoic, central Ordos Basin[D]. Xi’an: Northwest University, 2015. | |
| [32] | 李琪琪, 李斌, 刘羿伶, 等. 川西北古生界烃源岩特征及生烃潜力评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25(3): 44-49. |
| LI Qiqi, LI Bin, LIU Yiling, et al. Paleozoic source-rock properties and hydrocarbon generation potential in northwest Sichuan[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2018, 25(3): 44-49. | |
| [33] | SINGH M P, SINGH A K. Petrographic characteristics and depositional conditions of Eocene coals of platform basins, Meghalaya, India[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2000, 42(4): 315-356. |
| [34] | KUMAR J, MENDHE V A, KAMBLE A D, et al. Coalbed methane reservoir characteristics of coal seams of south Karanpura coalfield, Jharkhand, India[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2018, 196: 185-200. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |