油气藏评价与开发 >
2025 , Vol. 15 >Issue 6: 983 - 994
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025.06.004
鄂尔多斯盆地东缘低压致密砂岩气储层敏感性实验研究
收稿日期: 2024-07-04
网络出版日期: 2025-10-24
基金资助
中国石油前瞻性、基础性科研攻关项目“煤系地层‘三气合采’立体开发技术研究”(2021DJ2304);中国石油煤层气有限责任公司工程技术研究院项目“大吉区块山1、盒8段致密砂岩及本溪组8号深层煤岩物性评价及储层保护对策研究”(2022-GCYKJ-03)
Sensitivity experimental study of low-pressure tight sandstone gas reservoirs in eastern margin of Ordos Basin
Received date: 2024-07-04
Online published: 2025-10-24
鄂尔多斯盆地东缘致密气储量丰富,但储层压力系数低、物性差、黏土矿物等敏感性矿物大量赋存、孔隙结构复杂,导致储层潜在损害程度较高,制约了气井高产稳产。为了明确研究区致密气储层敏感性特征,以二叠系山西组1段、石盒子组8段致密砂岩为研究对象,利用铸体薄片、扫描电镜、X射线衍射和岩心流体驱替实验等手段开展了储层敏感性实验研究,并提出了针对性的储层保护对策。实验结果表明:研究区岩石类型为细—中粒岩屑砂岩,黏土矿物占比平均为21.59%,以伊蒙间层为主;储层孔隙主要类型为剩余粒间孔与次生溶蚀孔,纳米孔发育,且微—纳孔缝连通性差;盒8段岩心中值孔隙度为6.43%,中值渗透率为0.149×10-3 μm2;山1段岩心中值孔隙度为6.46%,中值渗透率为0.387×10-3 μm2;地层水pH值介于5.47~6.83,平均总矿化度为118 077.21 mg/L。研究区气藏属低温、低压致密气藏,具有弱速敏、弱—中等偏弱水敏、弱—中等偏弱盐敏、中等偏弱—中等偏强酸敏、弱—中等偏强碱敏、中等偏强—强应力敏感的特点。平均临界流速为0.3 mL/min,临界矿化度为60 000 mg/L,平均临界pH值为7.79。开发过程中应关注储层低压、低温、纳米孔占比高等特点,着重考虑酸敏、碱敏和应力敏感,并在钻完井、压裂和生产制度中进行完善与优化。研究结果对低压致密砂岩气高效开发具有指导意义。
陈明君 , 唐星宇 , 王玉斌 , 康毅力 , 郭智栋 , 颜茂凌 , 陈雪妮 . 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘低压致密砂岩气储层敏感性实验研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2025 , 15(6) : 983 -994 . DOI: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025.06.004
The eastern margin of the Ordos Basin is rich in tight gas resources. However, the reservoirs are characterized by low pressure coefficients, poor physical properties, a high concentration of sensitive minerals such as clay minerals, and complex pore structures. These features result in a high degree of potential reservoir damage, which constrains stable and high gas production. To clarify the sensitivity characteristics of tight gas reservoirs in the study area, the study used tight sandstones from the first member of the Permian Shanxi Formation (Shan-1 member) and the eighth member of the Permian Shihezi Formation (He-8 member) as the research objects. Cast thin-section analysis, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction, and core fluid displacement tests were employed to investigate reservoir sensitivity. Based on the results, targeted strategies for reservoir protection were proposed. Experimental results indicated that the reservoir rocks were fine to medium grained lithic sandstones, with an average clay mineral content of 21.59%, primarily consisting of mixed-layer illite-smectite. The main pore types were residual intergranular pores and secondary dissolution pores. Nanopores were well-developed, with poor connectivity between micro- and nanopores. In cores from the He-8 member, the median porosity and permeability were 6.43% and 0.149 × 10-3 μm2, respectively. In cores from the Shan-1 member, the median porosity and permeability were 6.46% and 0.387 × 10-3 μm2, respectively. The pH values of the formation water ranged from 5.47 to 6.83, with an average total salinity of 118 077.21 mg/L. The reservoirs in the study area were low-temperature, low-pressure tight gas reservoirs, exhibiting weak velocity sensitivity, weak to moderately weak water sensitivity, weak to moderately weak salt sensitivity, moderately weak to moderately strong acid sensitivity, weak to moderately strong alkali sensitivity, and moderately strong to strong stress sensitivity. The average critical flow velocity was 0.3 mL/min, the critical salinity was 60 000 mg/L, and the average critical pH value was 7.79. During development, attention should be paid to the low pressure, low temperature, and high nanopore proportion of the reservoirs. Acid sensitivity, alkali sensitivity, and stress sensitivity should be prioritized, and improvements and optimizations should be made in drilling, completion, fracturing, and production practices. The research findings provide significant guidance for the efficient development of low-pressure tight sandstone gas resources.
| [1] | 邹才能, 朱如凯, 吴松涛, 等.常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望:以中国致密油和致密气为例[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(2): 173-187. |
| ZOU Caineng, ZHU Rukai, WU Songtao, et al. Types, characteristics, genesis and prospects of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon accumulations: Taking tight oil and tight gas in China as an instance[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(2): 173-187. | |
| [2] | 邹才能, 张国生, 杨智, 等. 非常规油气概念、特征、潜力及技术:兼论非常规油气地质学[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(4): 385-399. |
| ZOU Caineng, ZHANG Guosheng, YANG Zhi, et al. Geological concepts, characteristics, resource potential and key techniques of unconventional hydrocarbon: On unconventional petroleum geology[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(4): 385-399. | |
| [3] | 戴金星, 倪云燕, 吴小奇. 中国致密砂岩气及在勘探开发上的重要意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(3): 257-264. |
| DAI Jinxing, NI Yunyan, WU Xiaoqi. Tight gas in China and its significance in exploration and exploitation[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(3): 257-264. | |
| [4] | 魏国齐, 张福东, 李君, 等. 中国致密砂岩气成藏理论进展[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(2): 199-210. |
| WEI Guoqi, ZHANG Fudong, LI Jun, et al. New progress of tight sand gas accumulation theory and favorable exploration zones in China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(2): 199-210. | |
| [5] | 马尚伟, 魏丽, 赵飞, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部石盒子组盒8下段砂岩物源分析[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 38(4): 1-11. |
| MA Shangwei, WEI Li, ZHAO Fei, et al. Provenance analysis of sandstone in lower segment of He 8 member of Shihezi formation, Southern Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University(Natural Science), 2023, 38(4): 1-11. | |
| [6] | 李建忠, 郭彬程, 郑民, 等. 中国致密砂岩气主要类型、地质特征与资源潜力[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(4): 607-615. |
| LI Jianzhong, GUO Bincheng, ZHENG Min, et al. Main types, geological features and resource potential of tight sandstone gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(4): 607-615. | |
| [7] | 贾承造, 郑民, 张永峰. 中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(2): 129-136. |
| JIA Chengzao, ZHENG Min, ZHANG Yongfeng. Unconventional hydrocarbon resources in China and the prospect of exploration and development[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(2): 129-136. | |
| [8] | 李宪文, 杨波, 赵倩云, 等. 气悬浮支撑剂技术在长庆致密气压裂中的应用[J]. 钻采工艺, 2023, 46(1): 64-70. |
| LI Xianwen, YANG Bo, ZHAO Qianyun, et al. Application of bubble-suspending proppant technology used for fracturing in Changqing's tight gas reservoirs[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2023, 46(1): 64-70. | |
| [9] | 谌丽, 王才志, 宁从前, 等. 基于机器学习的鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长7段岩相测井识别方法[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 525-536. |
| SHEN Li, WANG Caizhi, NING Congqian, et al. Well-log lithofacies classification based on machine learning for Chang-7 member in Longdong area of Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 525-536. | |
| [10] | 康毅力, 张杜杰, 游利军, 等. 塔里木盆地超深致密砂岩气藏储层流体敏感性评价[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(4): 738-748. |
| KANG Yili, ZHANG Dujie, YOU Lijun, et al. Fluid sensitivity evaluation of ultra-deep tight sandstone gas reservoirs, Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(4): 738-748. | |
| [11] | 柴光胜, 师永民, 杜书恒, 等. 致密砂岩储层敏感性评价及影响因素分析:以鄂尔多斯盆地盐池地区长8储层为例[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 56(2): 253-261. |
| CHAI Guangsheng, SHI Yongmin, DU Shuheng, et al. Sensitivity evaluation and influencing factors analysis of tight sandstone reservoirs: A case study of the Chang-8 Reservoir in Yanchi Area of Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2020, 56(2): 253-261. | |
| [12] | 王巧智, 江安, 苏延辉, 等. 用CT扫描技术分析致密砂岩储层应力敏感性[J]. 钻采工艺, 2022, 45(4): 56-60. |
| WANG Qiaozhi, JIANG An, SU Yanhui, et al. Stress sensitivity analysis for tight sandstone reservoir by CT scanning technology[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2022, 45(4): 56-60. | |
| [13] | 黎明, 周福建, 田亚凯, 等. 致密砂岩储层应力敏感模型建立与验证[J]. 天然气与石油, 2021, 39(6): 75-81. |
| LI Ming, ZHOU Fujian, TIAN Yakai, et al. Establishment and verification of stress-sensitive model for tight sandstone reservoirs[J]. Natural Gas and Oil, 2021, 39(6): 75-81. | |
| [14] | 冯乔, 耿安松, 徐小蓉, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界低压气藏成因[J]. 石油学报, 2007, 28(1): 33-37. |
| FENG Qiao, GENG Ansong, XU Xiaorong, et al. Genesis of low-pressure gas reservoir of the Upper Paleozoic in Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2007, 28(1): 33-37. | |
| [15] | 胡进军, 肖伟伟, 邓义成, 等. 致密性气藏储层损害实验方法探讨与评价[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2020, 37(4): 488-493. |
| HU Jinjun, XIAO Weiwei, DENG Yicheng, et al. Investigation on experimental methods and evaluation of tight gas reservoir Damage[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2020, 37(4): 488-493. | |
| [16] | 聂志宏, 巢海燕, 刘莹, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘深部煤层气生产特征及开发对策:以大宁—吉县区块为例[J]. 煤炭学报, 2018, 43(6): 1738-1746. |
| NIE Zhihong, CHAO Haiyan, LIU Ying, et al. Development strategy and production characteristics of deep coalbed methane in the east Ordos Basin: Taking Daning-Jixian block for example[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2018, 43(6): 1738-1746. | |
| [17] | 程敏华, 雷丹凤, 张连群, 等. 苏里格致密砂岩气田效益开发技术对策研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(3): 475-483. |
| CHENG Minhua, LEI Danfeng, ZHANG Lianqun, et al. Technical strategy for beneficial development of tight sand gas in Sulige Gas Field[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(3): 475-483. | |
| [18] | 党佳城, 赵靖舟, 耳闯, 等. 大宁—吉县地区盒8段储层特征及其控气作用[J]. 断块油气田, 2023, 30(4): 529-534. |
| DANG Jiacheng, ZHAO Jingzhou, Chuang ER, et al. Reservoir characteristics and its gas control of He 8 Member in Daning-Jixian area[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2023, 30(4): 529-534. | |
| [19] | 宋雨纯, 黄昊, 周创飞, 等. 姬塬油田麻黄山地区长4+5和长6储集层敏感性差异评价[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2022, 43(5): 546-553. |
| SONG Yuchun, HUANG Hao, ZHOU Chuangfei, et al. Evaluation on sensitivity difference between Chang 4+5 and Chang 6 reservoirs in Mahuangshan Area of Jiyuan Oilfield[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2022, 43(5): 546-553. | |
| [20] | 李五忠, 陈刚, 孙斌, 等. 大宁—吉县地区煤层气成藏条件及富集规律[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2011, 22(2): 352-360. |
| LI Wuzhong, CHEN Gang, SUN Bin, et al. Geological controls of coalbed methane enrichment in Daning-Jixian Area, Southeastern Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2011, 22(2): 352-360. | |
| [21] | 宗廷博, 陈德照, 杨頔, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗西部山西组致密砂岩储层特征及物性控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2024, 35(4): 608-622. |
| ZONG Tingbo, CHEN Dezhao, YANG Di, et al. Tight sandstone reservoir characteristics and physical property control factors of Shanxi Formation in western Hangjinqi,Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2024, 35(4): 608-622. | |
| [22] | 何涛, 王芳, 汪伶俐. 致密砂岩储层微观孔隙结构特征:以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7储层为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(4): 23-26. |
| HE Tao, WANG Fang, WANG Lingli. Characteristics of micropore structure of tight sandstone reservoir: A case study from Chang 7 reservoir of Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(4): 23-26. | |
| [23] | 李爱芬, 任晓霞, 王桂娟, 等. 核磁共振研究致密砂岩孔隙结构的方法及应用[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(6): 92-98. |
| LI Aifen, REN Xiaoxia, WANG Guijuan, et al. Characterization of pore structure of low permeability reservoirs using a nuclear magnetic resonance method[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2015, 39(6): 92-98. | |
| [24] | 杨建. 川中地区致密砂岩气藏损害机理及保护技术研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油学院, 2006. |
| YANG Jian. Study on the formation damage mechanisms and protective techniques of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the center of Sichuan Basin[D]. Chengdu: SouthWest Petroleum University, 2006. | |
| [25] | 陈明君, 康毅力, 游利军, 等. 饱和水致密砂岩电学参数对有效应力变化的响应[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2014, 29(3): 1128-1132. |
| CHEN Mingjun, KANG Yili, YOU Lijun, et al. The response of electrical parameters of saturated tight sandstone to effective stress changes[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2014, 29(3): 1128-1132. | |
| [26] | 杜新龙. 低渗透微裂缝砂岩油层损害评价方法及损害机理研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2009. |
| DU Xinlong. Evaluation methods and mechanism of formation damage in low-permeability sandstone reservoirs with micro fractures[D]. Chengdu: SouthWest Petroleum University, 2009. | |
| [27] | 康毅力, 赖哲涵, 陈明君, 等. 基于压力衰减法的页岩气体扩散系数应力敏感性实验[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(2): 59-70. |
| KANG Yili, LAI Zhehan, CHEN Mingjun, et al. Stress sensitivity experiments of shale gas diffusion coefficients based on the pressure decay method[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(2): 59-70. | |
| [28] | 康毅力, 赖哲涵, 陈明君, 等. 页岩储层应力敏感性的时间效应[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 46(1): 53-63. |
| KANG Yili, LAI Zhehan, CHEN Mingjun, et al. Time effects of stress sensitivity in shale reservoirs[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2024, 46(1): 53-63. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |