五里堠井田不同构造部位煤层气储层物性及产气差异研究

王瑞; 谭学斌; 陈瑞杰; 韩勇

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025014

油气藏评价与开发 >

0 2025014 - 2025014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025014

五里堠井田不同构造部位煤层气储层物性及产气差异研究

王瑞 ,
谭学斌 ,
陈瑞杰 ,
韩勇

展开

1.山西潞安金源煤层气开发有限责任公司,山西长治 046204;
2.河南理工大学能源科学与工程学院,河南焦作 454000

王瑞（1987—）,男,本科,高级工程师,从事煤层气开发与开采工作。地址：山西省长治市襄垣县侯堡镇金源煤层气公司, 邮政编码：046204。E-mail： 365637153@qq.com

谭学斌（1997—）,男,在读博士研究生,从事煤系气开发研究工作。地址：河南省焦作市世纪大道2001号河南理工大学,邮政编码：454000。E-mail： c.b_txb@foxmail.com

收稿日期: 2025-01-07

网络出版日期: 2025-11-14

基金资助

河南省高校科技创新团队项目“煤系气储层物性定量表征与评价”（21IRTSTHN007）

收起

Study on physical properties and gas production differences of coalbed methane reservoirs in different structural locations of Wulihou mine field

WANG RUI ,
TAN XUEBIN ,
CHEN RUIJIE ,
HAN YONG

Expand

1. Shanxi Lu’an Jinyuan Coalbed Methane Development Co., Ltd., Changzhi, Shanxi 046204, China;
2. School of Energy Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454000, China

Received date: 2025-01-07

Online published: 2025-11-14

Fold

摘要

查明不同构造部位煤储层物性及产气差异,可为煤层气合层开发提供重要依据。以五里堠井田20口煤层气合采井为例,基于目标开发层位（3号+4号煤层和15号煤层）的煤层底板行迹和构造曲率,划分了构造组合类型。结合已有勘探资料,系统对比了不同构造部位煤储层的显微组分、吸附特性、煤体结构、含气特性与渗透率等关键物性参数差异,并分析了典型合采井的产气特征（排采曲线特征）。结果表明：①研究区煤储层构造组合可划分为7种类型：背斜-背斜型、背斜-平缓型、向斜-向斜型、向斜-平缓型、平缓-平缓型、平缓-背斜型和平缓-向斜型。②查明了研究区目标煤层（3号+4号煤层和15号煤层）在不同构造位置的显微组分、吸附特性、煤体结构、含气量和渗透率的物性差异。储层变形程度与灰分含量、Langmuir体积和煤体结构特征均有较强相关性。3号+4号煤层和15号煤层的构造曲率差值与含气量差值呈负相关,含气量变化范围较小;而与渗透率差值呈正相关,渗透率变化显著。不同构造组合类型的煤层含气量差值（单位：m³/t）依次为：平缓-背斜型（1.55）>平缓-向斜型（1.42）>背斜-平缓型（1.41）>平缓-平缓型（1.32）>向斜-平缓型（1.06）>向斜-向斜型（0.77）>背斜-背斜型（0.58）;渗透率差值（单位：10⁻³ μm²）依次为：背斜-平缓型（0.24）>向斜-平缓型（0.21）>平缓-向斜型（0.19）=背斜-背斜型（0.19）>向斜-向斜型（0.17）>平缓-平缓型（0.16）>平缓-背斜型（0.11）。③对比不同构造部位合采井产气特征：背斜-背斜型、背斜-平缓型产气效果较好,产气峰值普遍超过1 000 m³/d;平缓-平缓型、平缓-背斜型和平缓-向斜型产气波动性较大,峰值介于200~1 200 m³/d;向斜-向斜型、向斜-平缓型产气表现较差,峰值仅约200~500 m³/d。

关键词： 五里堠; 合层排采; 构造曲率; 储层物性; 产气表现

本文引用格式

王瑞 , 谭学斌 , 陈瑞杰 , 韩勇 . 五里堠井田不同构造部位煤层气储层物性及产气差异研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 0 : 2025014 -2025014 . DOI: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025014

Abstract

Identifying the differences in physical properties and gas production of coal reservoirs at different structural locations provides an important basis for the co-development of coalbed methane (CBM). Taking 20 CBM co-production wells in the Wulihou mine field as an example, the structural combination types of reservoirs were classified based on seam floor traces and structural curvature of the target development layers (No.3 + No.4 coal seams and No.15 coal seam). Combined with existing exploration data, the study compared key physical parameters of reservoirs at different structural locations, such as maceral components, adsorption characteristics, coal structure, gas-bearing characteristics, and permeability, and analyzed the drainage and production curve characteristics of typical co-production wells. The results indicated that: (1) the structural combination of coal reservoirs in the study area could be classified into seven types: anticline-anticline, anticline-gentle, syncline-syncline, syncline-gentle, gentle-gentle, gentle-anticline, and gentle-syncline. (2) The differences in maceral components, adsorption characteristics, coal structure, gas-bearing characteristics, and permeability were identified between the No.3 + No.4 coal seams and the No.15 coal seam at different structural locations. The degree of reservoir deformation was strongly correlated with ash content, Langmuir volume, and coal structure. The difference in structural curvature between the No.3 + No.4 and No.15 coal seams was negatively correlated with the difference in gas content, with a relatively small range of gas content variation, but was positively correlated with the difference in permeability, which changed significantly. The differences in gas content (unit: m³/t) across different structural combination types followed the order: gentle-anticline (1.55) > gentle-syncline (1.42) > anticline-gentle (1.41) > gentle-gentle (1.32) > syncline-gentle (1.06) > syncline-syncline (0.77) > anticline-anticline (0.58). The differences in permeability (unit: 10^-3 μm²) followed the order: anticline-gentle (0.24) > syncline-gentle (0.21) > gentle-syncline (0.19) = anticline-anticline (0.19) > syncline-syncline (0.17) > gentle-gentle (0.16) > gentle-anticline (0.11). (3) Comparisons of gas production characteristics of co-production wells at different structural locations showed that the anticline-anticline and anticline-gentle types had better gas output, with peak values generally exceeding 1 000 m³/d. The gentle-gentle, gentle-anticline, and gentle-syncline types showed significant production fluctuations, with peak values between 200 and 1 200 m³/d. The syncline-syncline and syncline-gentle types showed poorer gas production performance, with peak values only about 200-500 m³/d.

Key words： Wulihou; multilayer drainage and production; structural curvature; reservoir properties; gas production performance

参考文献

[1] 贾慧敏, 胡秋嘉, 张聪, 等. 煤层气双层合采直井产能预测及排采试验: 以沁水盆地郑庄西南部为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(4): 657-665.
JIA Huimin, HU Qiujia, ZHANG Cong, et al.Prediction of productivity and co-drainage trial of bilayer vertical coalbed methane wells: Cases study of the southwest of Zhengzhuang Block, Qinshui Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(4): 657-665.
[2] 桑树勋, 郑司建, 刘世奇, 等. 煤系气及深部煤层气高效勘探开发若干研究进展[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2025, 54(1): 1-25.
SANG Shuxun, ZHENG Sijian, LIU Shiqi, et al.Research advances in efficient exploration and development of coal measure gases and deep coallbed methane[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2025, 54(1): 1-25.
[3] 黄中伟, 李国富, 杨睿月, 等. 我国煤层气开发技术现状与发展趋势[J]. 煤炭学报, 2022, 47(9): 3212-3238.
HUANG Zhongwei, LI Guofu, YANG Ruiyue, et al.Review and development trends of coalbed methane exploitation technology in China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2022, 47(9): 3212-3238.
[4] 孙斌, 田文广, 杨兆彪, 等. 滇黔北探区煤层气储层特征及多层合采有利区优选[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2022, 50(9): 86-95.
SUN Bin, TIAN Wenguang, YANG Zhaobiao, et al.Optimum selection of favorable areas for multi-layer CBM mining and reservoir characterstics in North Yunnan and Guizhou exploration area[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2022, 50(9): 86-95.
[5] 黄力, 熊先钺, 王峰, 等. 深层煤层气直丛井产能影响因素确定新方法[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(6): 990-996.
HUANG Li, XIONG Xianyue, WANG Feng, et al.A new method for determining factors Influencing productivity of deep coalbed methane vertical cluster wells[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(6): 990-996.
[6] 邱文慈, 桑树勋, 郭志军, 等. 贵州六盘水煤田构造煤储层特征与煤层气勘探开发方向[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(6): 959-966.
QIU Wenci, SANG Shuxun, GUO Zhijun, et al.Characteristics of stratified coal reservoirs in Liupanshui coalfield of Guizhou Province and exploration and development direction of coalbed methane[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(6): 959-966,.
[7] 金之钧, 张金川, 唐玄. 非常规天然气成藏体系[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(8): 58-68.
JIN Zhijun, ZHANG Jinchuan, TANG Xuan.Unconventional natural gas accumulation system[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(8): 58-68.
[8] 秦勇, 吴建光, 申建, 等. 煤系气合采地质技术前缘性探索[J]. 煤炭学报, 2018, 43(6): 1504-1516.
QIN Yong, WU Jianguang, SHEN Jian, et al.Frontier research of geological technology for coal measure gas joint-mining[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2018, 43(6): 1504-1516.
[9] 倪小明, 冯冬, 郝少伟, 等. 五里堠井田煤系气合采产气来源及贡献判识[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(6): 952-958.
NI Xiaoming, FENG Dong, HAO Shaowei, et al.Gas source and contribution identification for coal measure gas commingled production in Wulihou mining area[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(6): 952-958.
[10] 唐志潭, 刘敬寿, 闫霞, 等. 深层煤岩微构造对现今地应力的控制机理[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(5): 344-357.
TANG Zhitan, LIU Jingshou, YAN Xia, et al.The control mechanism of deep coal rock microstructure on in situ stress[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2024, 31(5): 344-357.
[11] 韩文龙, 王延斌, 倪小明, 等. 正断层发育特征对煤层气直井开发的影响: 以沁水盆地南部柿庄南区块为例[J]. 煤炭学报, 2020, 45(10): 3522-3532.
HAN Wenlong, WANG Yanbin, NI Xiaoming, et al.Influence of normal development faults characteristics on the exploitation of vertical coal-bed methane wells: A case study of the Shizhuang Block in the south of Qinshui Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2020, 45(10): 3522-3532.
[12] 李洋阳, 杨兆彪, 孙晗森, 等. 黔西滇东区块储层物性制约下煤层气开发潜力评价[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2018, 46(8): 164-171.
LI Yangyang, YANG Zhaobiao, SUN Hansen, et al.Evaluation on development potential of coalbed methane under physical property restriction of reservoir in West Guizhou and East Yunnan Block[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2018, 46(8): 164-171.
[13] 陈振宏, 贾承造, 宋岩, 等. 构造抬升对高、低煤阶煤层气藏储集层物性的影响[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2007, 34(4): 461-464.
CHEN Zhenhong, JIA Chengzao, SONG Yan, et al.Effects of tectonic uplift on physical properties of high and low rank coal reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2007, 34(4): 461-464.
[14] 郭晨, 吉彦, 赵宸谊, 等. 煤层气多层合采解吸叠加效应分析方法与实践: 以黔西小屯井田为例[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2025, 53(1): 152-162.
GUO Chen, JI Yan, ZHAO Chenyi, et al.An analytical method for the desorption superposition effect in commingled production of coalbed methane and its application: A case study of the Xiaotun mine field in western Guizhou Province, China[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2025, 53(1): 152-162.
[15] 赵军龙, 池佳玮. 煤层气储层物性影响因素和预测方法综述与展望[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2020, 35(1): 272-280.
ZHAO Junlong, CHI Jiawei.Review and prospect of influencing factors and prediction methods of coal bed gas reservoir physical properties[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2020, 35(1): 272-280.
[16] 李鑫, 肖翠, 陈贞龙, 等. 延川南煤层气田低效井原因分析与措施优选[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(4): 32-38.
LI Xin, XIAO Cui, CHEN Zhenlong, et al.Analysis of low-efficiency wells in CBM gas field of South Yanchuan and optimization of measures[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(4): 32-38.
[17] 赵欣, 段士川, 王梓良, 等. 煤层气井位精细部署的地质工程一体化影响因素分析与科学优化[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2023, 51(12): 42-51.
ZHAO Xin, DUAN Shichuan, WANG Ziliang, et al.Analysis and scientific optimization of geological engineering integration influencing factors for precise deployment of coalbed methane well locations[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2023, 51(12): 42-51.
[18] 张金川, 王香增, 李中明, 等. 页岩含气量现场测试技术进展与发展趋势[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(1): 315-326.
ZHANG Jinchuan, WANG Xiangzeng, LI Zhongming, et al.Technological progress and trend in shale gas on-site testing: A critical review[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2024, 31(1): 315-326.
[19] 郭子熙, 张舒, 马骉, 等. 基于融合多模态特征的深层煤岩气产量预测[J]. 天然气工业, 2024, 44(10): 140-149.
GUO Zixi, ZHANG Shu, MA Biao, et al.Production prediction of deep coal-rock gas based on integrated multi-modal characteristics[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2024, 44(10): 140-149.
[20] 张烈辉, 胡勇, 李小刚, 等. 四川盆地天然气开发历程与关键技术进展[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(12): 60-72.
ZHANG Liehui, HU Yong, LI Xiaogang, et al.History and key technological progress of natural gas development in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(12): 60-72.
[21] 祝汉京, 张军建. 基于低场核磁共振技术和多重分形理论的高阶煤样孔裂隙分维特征[J]. 煤炭工程, 2024, 56(6): 158-162.
ZHU Hanjing, ZHANG Junjian.Study on pore and fracture heterogeneity of high rank coal samples based on NMR technology and multi-fractal theories[J]. Coal Engineering, 2024, 56(6): 158-162.
[22] 吴见, 孙强, 石雪峰, 等. 深部煤层孔隙结构与流体差异赋存特征研究[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2024, 52(8): 89-100.
WU Jian, SUN Qiang, SHI Xuefeng, et al.Pore structure and differential fluid occurrence of deep coal seams[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2024, 52(8): 89-100.
[23] 张聪, 李梦溪, 冯树仁, 等. 沁水盆地南部郑庄区块15号煤与3号煤储层物性及产气差异研究[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2022, 50(9): 145-153.
ZHANG Cong, LI Mengxi, FENG Shuren, et al.Reservoir properties and gas production difference between No.15 coal and No.3 coal in Zhengzhuang Block, southern Qinshui Basin[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2022, 50(9): 145-153.
[24] 范立勇, 周国晓, 杨兆彪, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地深部煤层气差异富集的地质控制[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2025, 53(1): 203-215.
FAN Liyong, ZHOU Guoxiao, YANG Zhaobiao, et al.Geological control of differential enrichment of deep coalbed methane in the Ordos Basin[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2025, 53(1): 203-215.
[25] 李中博, 李瑞明, 周梓欣, 等. 准南煤田玛纳斯河-三屯河一带煤层气储层物性特征及有利煤层优选[J]. 新疆地质, 2024, 42(4): 569-577.
LI Zhongbo, LI Ruiming, ZHOU Zixin, et al.Coalbed methane reservoir physical characteristics and favorable coal seam optimization in manas river-santun river area[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2024, 42(4): 569-577.
[26] 周德华, 李倩文, 蔡勋育, 等. 黔西地区红果区块煤层气资源评价与勘探潜力分析[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(4): 12-16.
ZHOU Dehua, LI Qianwen, CAI Xunyu, et al.Resource assessment and exploration potential analysis of CBM in Hongguo Block, western Guizhou[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(4): 12-16.
[27] 张建国, 韩晟, 张聪, 等. 基于聚煤环境分区的煤体结构测井判别及应用: 以沁水盆地南部马必东地区为例[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2021, 49(4): 114-122.
ZHANG Jianguo, HAN Sheng, ZHANG Cong, et al.Coal body structure identification by logging based on coal accumulation environment zoning and its application in Mabidong Block, Qinshui Basin[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2021, 49(4): 114-122.
[28] 申有义, 王凯峰, 唐书恒, 等. 沁水盆地榆社—武乡区块二叠系煤系页岩储层地质建模及“甜点”预测[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
SHEN Youyi, WANG Kaifeng, TANG Shuheng, et al.Geological modeling and “sweet spot” prediction of Permian coal measures shale reservoirs in Yushe-Wuxiang block, Qinshui Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2024, 36(4): 98-108.
[29] 石玉江, 何羽飞, 万金彬, 等. 深层煤岩气地质品质及含气量测井评价方法研究[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2024, 29(4): 126-141.
SHI Yujiang, HE Yufei, WAN Jinbin, et al.Research on logging evaluation methods for geological quality and gas content of deep coal measure gas[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2024, 29(4): 126-141.
[30] 辛福东, 许浩, 汤达祯, 等. 低煤阶煤储层物性演化特征及其对储层评价的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(5): 637-647.
XIN Fudong, XU Hao, TANG Dazhen, et al.Physical property evolution of low-rank coal reservoir and its influence on reservoir evaluation[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(5): 637-647.
[31] 郑贵强, 杨德方, 李小明, 等. 沁水盆地柿庄北区块深部煤储层特征测井评价研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2019, 47(6): 178-186.
ZHENG Guiqiang, YANG Defang, LI Xiaoming, et al.Study on features and logging evaluation of deep coal reservoir in North Shizhuang Block of Qinshui Basin[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2019, 47(6): 178-186.
[32] 王俏, 刘佳, 罗琼, 等. 破坏类型对构造煤吸附解吸特性影响实验研究[J]. 江西煤炭科技, 2024(4): 144-148.
WANG Qiao, LIU Jia, LUO Qiong, et al.Experimental study on influence of damage type on adsorption and desorption characteristics of structural coal[J]. Jiangxi Coal Science & Technology, 2024(4): 144-148.
[33] 李小诗, 琚宜文, 侯泉林, 等. 构造变形作用对煤岩大分子结构的影响: 以构造煤镜质组分离为例[J]. 煤炭学报, 2010, 35(增刊1): 150-157.
LI Xiaoshi, JU Yiwen, HOU Quanlin, et al.Influence mechanism of tectonic deformation on macromolecular chemical structure of coals: A case study of vitrinite separation of tectonically deformed coals[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2010, 35(Suppl.1): 150-157.
[34] 傅雪海, 齐琦, 程鸣, 等. 煤储层渗透率测试、模拟与预测研究进展[J]. 煤炭学报, 2022, 47(6): 2369-2385.
FU Xuehai, QI Qi, CHENG Ming, et al.Review of research on test, simulation and prediction of coal reservoir permeability[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2022, 47(6): 2369-2385.
[35] 倪小明, 冯冬, 郝少伟, 等. 五里堠井田煤系气合采产气来源及贡献判识[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(6): 952-958.
NI Xiaoming, FENG Dong, HAO Shaowei, et al.Gas source and contribution identification for coal measure gas commingled production in Wulihou mining area[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(6): 952-958.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献