收稿日期: 2024-11-13
网络出版日期: 2025-12-25
基金资助
中国石化科技部科研项目“涠洲油田海工设施优化关键技术研究”(P24119)
Identification and application of operation windows of jacket platform construction in East China Sea
Received date: 2024-11-13
Online published: 2025-12-25
东海海域涌浪大、台风频发,导管架平台施工作业主要借鉴南海作业海况限制条件和待机率,导致平台实际安装工期及费用与设计预期偏差大。因此,开展东海海域导管架平台施工作业窗口研究,对保障导管架平台在东海海域安全、经济安装方面具有重要指导作用。采用高精度模式对东海目标海域点位处的海况条件进行了模拟,并基于附近海域预报和观测数据对模拟结果加以修正,创新性地建立了长时间跨度、大数据容量的海况资料库,在此基础上采用综合分析法、倒推法等研究方法,综合考虑设计海况、船舶性能、海域气象等因素影响,形成了东海导管架平台施工窗口识别技术,并按月识别出了东海海域适宜导管架平台安装作业的天气窗口及待机率。结果表明:东海海域导管架平台海上安装的最佳窗口为4—6月,且在24 h连续作业情况下,4—6月作业率约为60%,48 h和72 h连续作业情况下,各月份作业率较24 h分别降低约10%和20%;若施工作业时有义波高由1.5 m提高至2.0 m,各月天气待机率均有20%~40%的降幅。相关研究结论填补了东海海域导管架平台施工作业窗口数据的空白,可有效保障导管架平台海上安装作业的安全。
王亮 , 张宗峰 , 王琪 . 东海导管架平台施工作业窗口识别与应用[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2026 , 16(1) : 198 -205 . DOI: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2024539
The East China Sea experiences extreme waves and frequent typhoons. Currently, the installation design of jacket platforms in the East China Sea is mainly based on the sea state restrictions and standby coefficient obtained from installation experience in the South China Sea. Consequently, the actual installation period and investment of jacket platforms in the East China Sea deviate significantly from design expectation. Therefore, studying the operation windows of jacket platform construction in the East China Sea plays an important guiding role in ensuring their safe and economical installation. At present, a large number of studies have focused on the operation windows for offshore wind turbines in shallow waters, and some studies have analyzed the operation windows for offshore operation in the deep waters of the South China Sea. However, research on offshore operation in the East China Sea remains limited. The area of the East China Sea investigated in this study is classified as mid- to deep-water, with depth ranging from 80 to 110 m, and its waves are larger than those of the South China Sea. The jacket platforms operating in this area have significantly greater sizes and weights than offshore wind turbines, making the installation of offshore oil and gas platforms much more difficult than offshore wind turbines in this area. The stability of the floating crane vessels and the property of the cranes are very important for the offshore installation. Generally, both daily reports during the operation period of the installation and the simulation analyses according to the design parameters of floating crane vessels such as Huatianlong, Blue Whale, are essential. Code checking based on Noble Denton and API standards was performed on the operation performance of floating crane vessels and cranes. By comprehensively analyzing the actual installation conditions of the platforms, the stability of floating crane vessels, the capability of cranes, and the environmental conditions were identified to meet the requirements for jacket platform installation by the crane vessels. The results showed that when the jacket was installed, the wind speed was required to be no more than 10 m/s, and the significant wave height must not exceed 2.0 meters. Otherwise, when the stability of the floating crane vessels deteriorated, the installation conditions could not be satisfied. When the topsides were required to nest the Christmas tree, stringent demands were imposed on the floating crane vessels regarding sea conditions, limiting the wind speed to no more than 10 m/s and the significant wave height to no more than 1.5 meters. When the topsides were installed conventionally, wind speed for the floating crane vessels was required to be more than 14 m/s, and the significant wave height was not more than 2.0 meters. During the installation phase of the jacket platform, the feasibility of offshore installation and the period of the installation mainly depended on the stability of the floating crane vessel and the strength of the platform. The jacket platform mainly consisted of a jacket and topsides. The installation design reports of 3 jackets and 4 topsides implemented in the East China Sea were investigated. All jackets were designed according to the significant wave height not more than 1.5 meters and the wind speed less than 10 m/s. In addition, only one of the four topsides installation was designed with a significant wave height not exceeding 2.0 meters, while the other topsides were designed with a significant wave height not exceeding 1.5 meters, with the wind speed less than 10 m/s. It could be concluded that the sea conditions adopted in the installation design of a jacket and topsides were calmer than the sea conditions allowable for the stability of the floating crane in the actual installation process. Therefore, the sea conditions adopted in the installation design of a jacket and topsides should be used as the governing sea conditions during the installation process. A high-precision model was used to simulate the sea state conditions of the target sea areas in the East China Sea, and the simulation results were calibrated based on both the prediction and observation data of the nearby sea area. Consequently, the high-precision wind wave data of the East China Sea from 2015 to 2023 were obtained, enabling the establishment of an innovative sea state database with long time span and large data capacity. On this basis, research methods such as comprehensive analysis method and reverse inference method were used to analyze the wind and wave data. Wind speed and wave height were identified as two key factors to be considered in evaluating the operation windows. It should be noted that the requirements for weather conditions varied significantly at different stages of offshore installation of the jacket platform. Specifically, the launch of the jacket imposed relatively higher requirements for sea conditions, while the requirements for pile driving and grouting operation of the jacket were relatively lower. To further evaluate the duration of the window period in terms of time and safety, a comprehensive analysis method for offshore operation windows considering the effects of wind, waves, and sustainable operation time conditions was innovatively proposed. In this analysis, any period of continuous offshore installation shorter than the required duration was excluded from being counted as an operation window. According to the large amount of data involved, it was assumed that the wind speed did not exceed 12 m/s, and the significant wave height was not more than 1.5 meters to simplify and accelerate the statistical analysis. Then, the duration of installation periods meeting the wind and wave requirements were statistically analyzed for intervals of at least 24, 48, and 72 hours, respectively. A code was developed via MATLAB to read the wind and wave data day by day, and subsequently, the annual and monthly operation windows were evaluated. Finally, reverse inference analyses were performed. The results showed that the average number of operation windows exceeded 15 from March to August, and the number of operation windows in October was at least 8.44 under the conditions of 24-hour continuous operation. Under the conditions of 48-hour continuous operation, the average number of operation windows exceeded 10 from March to September, and there were at least 4.75 in December. Under the conditions of 72-hour continuous operation, the average number of operation windows was more than 10 from April to August, and at least 2.38 in December. In conclusion, the optimal window for offshore installation of the jacket platform in the East China Sea is from April to June. If the significant wave height of the installation operation considered in design is increased from 1.5 meters to 2.0 meters, the weather standby coefficient will be reduced by 20% to 40%. Therefore, to improve the offshore installation efficiency of jacket platforms and reduce the waiting probability, it is recommended to adopt the significant wave height of 2.0 meters for jacket installation design. When the topsides are required to nest the Christmas tree, the installation design should adopt the significant wave height of 1.5 meters, and the installation design of the remaining topsides should adopt significant wave height of 2.0 meters. These research findings fill the gap in the operation window data for the East China Sea and effectively ensure the safety of the offshore installation of jacket platforms.
| [1] | 石晓, 杨玉良, 田玉芹, 等. 四桩腿导管架平台吊装受力分析[J]. 电子质量, 2018(6): 78-80. |
| SHI Xiao, YANG Yuliang, TIAN Yuqin, et al. Analysis of lifting force of the four-leg jacket platform[J]. Electronics Quality, 2018(6): 78-80. | |
| [2] | 顾明, 张亮. 海上风电施工窗口期对施工的重要性[J]. 百科论坛电子杂志, 2019, 7(15): 442. |
| GU Ming, ZHANG Liang. Importance of window phase for offshore wind power construction[J]. Encyclopedic Forum, 2019, 7(15): 442. | |
| [3] | 姜书舟, 林宇, 吴子昂, 等. 大型海上升压站浮托法安装施工窗口期[J]. 船舶工程, 2024, 46(): 113-118. |
| JIANG Shuzhou, LIN Yu, WU Zi’ang, et al. Operation window for large-capacity offshore substation installation with floatover method[J]. Ship Engineering, 2024, 46(): 113-118. | |
| [4] | 林逸凡, 杨梓豪, 刘玉飞, 等. 中国沿海风电施工窗口期及功效分析[J]. 太阳能学报, 2023, 44(1): 273-280. |
| LIN Yifan, YANG Zihao, LIU Yufei, et al. Analysis of weather window and construction efficiency for wind power development in offshore China[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2023, 44(1): 273-280. | |
| [5] | 尹朝晖, 林鸣, 王彰贵, 等. 外海大型沉管浮运安装气象海洋作业窗口选择[J]. 中国港湾建设, 2019, 39(10): 21-26. |
| YIN Zhaohui, LIN Ming, WANG Zhanggui, et al. Selection of meteorological ocean operating window for large immersed tube floating installation in offshore[J]. China Harbour Engineering, 2019, 39(10): 21-26. | |
| [6] | 张光扬. 南海A海域水文气象条件分析评价与作业时间窗口优选[D]. 浙江大学, 2015. |
| ZHANG Guangyang. Analysis and evaluation of hydrometeorological conditions and optimization of operation time window in sea area A of South China Sea[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2015. | |
| [7] | 谢波涛, 张琪, 高磊, 等. 南海海上作业气候窗分析方法研究[J]. 海洋工程装备与技术, 2022, 9(3): 65-72. |
| XIE Botao, ZHANG Qi, GAO Lei, et al. Analysis and study of climate window for marine operations in South China Sea[J]. Ocean Engineering Equipment and Technology, 2022, 9(3): 65-72. | |
| [8] | 宋强, 畅元江, 刘秀全, 等. 深水水下采油树下放作业窗口研究[J]. 石油机械, 2015, 43(8): 64-68. |
| SONG Qiang, CHANG Yuanjiang, LIU Xiuquan, et al. Research on running window of deepwater subsea x’mas tree[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2015, 43(8): 64-68. | |
| [9] | 骆寒冰, 谢芃, 季红叶, 等. 东海涌浪环境下大型起重船吊装组块耦合运动响应数值模拟研究[J]. 船舶力学, 2017, 21(): 198-208. |
| LUO Hanbing, XIE Peng, JI Hongye, et al. Numerical simulation on the coupled motions of the mooring crane vesselduring lifting operations in East China Sea swells[J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2017, 21(): 198-208. | |
| [10] | 易丛, 李达, 白雪平, 等. 浮托船舶在东海海域组块安装的应用分析[J]. 舰船科学技术, 2019, 41(11): 94-99. |
| YI Cong, LI Da, BAI Xueping, et al. Floatover feasibility in harsh environment with different vessel[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2019, 41(11): 94-99. | |
| [11] | 王飚, 杨小龙, 张广磊, 等. 动力定位驳船浮托安装关键技术及其在东海适用性分析[J]. 中国造船, 2017, 58(1): 162-169. |
| WANG Biao, YANG Xiaolong, ZHANG Guanglei, et al. Key technologies of DP float-over installation and corresponding feasibility analysis in the East China Sea[J]. Shipbuilding of China, 2017, 58(1): 162-169. | |
| [12] | 范学君, 李巍, 李华山, 等. 海上平台三甘醇脱水装置故障分析及工艺优化[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2024, 53(1): 14-19. |
| FAN Xuejun, LI Wei, LI Huashan, et al. Fault analysis and process optimization of TEG dehydration unit on offshore platform[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2024, 53(1): 14-19. | |
| [13] | 周鹏. 东海及毗邻的西北太平洋海域气候过渡期的环境情景特征分析[D]. 上海: 上海师范大学, 2023. |
| ZHOU Peng. Analysis of environmental scenario characteristics during the climate transition period in the East China Sea and the adjacent northwest Pacific Ocean[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Normal University, 2023. | |
| [14] | 许鑫, 李欣, 杨建民. 半潜式起重船浮吊作业的数值模拟与模型试验[J]. 船舶力学, 2014, 18(7): 799-808. |
| XU Xin, LI Xin, YANG Jianmin. Numerical and experimental analysis for lifting of a semi-submersible crane vessel[J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2014, 18(7): 799-808. | |
| [15] | 马世瑞. 环境载荷下浮吊动态特性分析[D]. 青岛: 中国海洋大学, 2015. |
| MA Shirui. Research on dynamic characteristic of floating crane under the environment load[D]. Qingdao: Ocean University of China, 2015. | |
| [16] | Denton Noble. Guidelines for lifting operations: 0027/ND-2009 [S]. London, UK: Noble Denton Group Limited, 2009. |
| [17] | 中华人民共和国交通运输部. 起重船打捞作业起重安全操作规程: [S]. 北京: 中华人民共和国交通运输部, 2024. |
| Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. Safety code of practice for salvage lifting operations of floating crane: [S]. Beijing: Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China, 2024. | |
| [18] | 中国船级社. 船舶与海上设施起重设备规范 [S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2007. |
| China Classification Society. Rules for lifting appliances of ships and offshore installations [S]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2007. | |
| [19] | Det Norske Veritas. Marine operations and marine warranty: DNV-ST-N001-2024 [S]. Oslo, Norway: Det Norske Veritas, 2024. |
| [20] | 黄钰. 基于蒙特卡洛模拟的海洋平台安装工期估计研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2019. |
| HUANG Yu. Study on the estimation of installation period for offshore platform based on Monte Carlo simulation[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2019. | |
| [21] | 曹德明, 宋青武, 王超, 等. 双船配合作业模式下导管架海上安装方法研究[J]. 天然气与石油, 2019, 37(4): 21-26. |
| CAO Deming, SONG Qingwu, WANG Chao, et al. Research on the offshore jacket installation method between two floating cranes[J]. Natural Gas and Oil, 2019, 37(4): 21-26. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |