油气藏评价与开发 >
2025 , Vol. 15 >Issue 4: 664 - 671
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025.04.016
低渗透油藏CO2驱开发全过程动态预测
收稿日期: 2024-06-03
网络出版日期: 2025-07-19
基金资助
国家自然科学基金项目“基于超声作用促进低渗透油藏CO2驱动态混相机理研究”(51974329)
Dynamic prediction of whole CO2 flooding development process in low permeability reservoirs
Received date: 2024-06-03
Online published: 2025-07-19
CO2驱能有效提高低渗透油藏采收率,但由于低渗透油藏普遍存在强非均质性,导致CO2驱开发动态难以准确预测。针对该问题,在综合考虑喉道大小及分布、CO2溶解降黏和界面张力变化等因素的基础上,结合CO2驱渗流力学理论,建立了基于时间节点的低渗透油藏CO2驱开发全过程动态预测模型。该模型创新性地实现了考虑油藏微观非均质性的全过程动态预测。结果表明:喉道半径对CO2驱替初期的渗流阻力影响较大,同时CO2驱替过程中伴随的扩散-溶解-降黏-降阻的作用不断迭代耦合,导致同一时刻不同半径的喉道中CO2驱替前缘位置不同。这种差异反映在开发动态上表现为:储层孔喉半径越大、物性越好;油井见气时间越早,同一时刻油井的气油比越高。根据注采井间CO2体积分数分布,可将驱替过程划分为纯CO2区、传质扩散区和纯油区3个区域。当大喉道传质扩散区前缘到达采油井时油井开始见气,油井产量也逐渐增大,此后采出程度迅速增加;纯CO2区前缘到达采油井时气油比迅速增加,油井产量迅速减小,采出程度曲线增幅减小直至趋于平稳。对比实验结果:模型预测采收率误差分别为5.7%和4.5%,气油比及采出程度曲线均比较吻合。运用该方法预测了H3试验区的开发动态,对分析CO2驱开发动态、及时调整气窜井开发制度起到了关键指导作用。
王彦伟 , 林利飞 , 王恒力 . 低渗透油藏CO2驱开发全过程动态预测[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2025 , 15(4) : 664 -671 . DOI: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025.04.016
CO2 flooding can effectively enhance oil recovery of low permeability reservoirs. However, due to the common presence of strong heterogeneity in such reservoirs, accurately predicting the development dynamics of CO2 flooding is difficult. To address this issue, a time-node-based dynamic prediction model for the entire CO2 flooding process in low permeability reservoirs was developed, based on the comprehensive consideration of factors such as throat size and distribution, viscosity reduction due to CO2 dissolution, and changes in interfacial tension, combined with CO2 flooding seepage mechanics theory. This model achieved innovative whole-process dynamic prediction by accounting for reservoir micro-heterogeneity. The results showed that the throat radius significantly influences flow resistance during the early stage of CO2 displacement. Meanwhile, the continuous iterative coupling of diffusion, dissolution, viscosity reduction, and drag reduction during the CO2 displacement process led to differences in the displacement front positions in throats of different radii at the same time. The difference was reflected in development dynamics: larger pore-throat radius and better reservoir properties led to earlier gas breakthrough and higher gas-oil ratio at the same time. According to the CO2 volume fraction distribution between injection and production wells, the displacement process could be divided into three zones: pure CO2 zone, mass transfer diffusion zone, and pure oil zone. When the front of the mass transfer diffusion zone in large throats reached the production well, gas breakthrough occurred, and oil production gradually increased; thereafter, the oil recovery increased rapidly. When the front of the pure CO2 zone reached the production well, the gas-oil ratio increased rapidly, oil production decreased sharply, and the growth rate of the recovery curve slowed down and eventually stabilized. Compared with the experimental results, the predicted recovery errors of the model were 5.7% and 4.5%, respectively, with good agreement in gas-oil ratio and oil recovery curves. This method was used to predict the development dynamics of the H3 experimental area, providing critical guidance for analyzing CO2 flooding performance and timely adjustment of the development strategy for gas channeling wells.
| [1] | 胡永乐, 郝明强, 陈国利, 等. 中国CO2驱油与埋存技术及实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(4): 716-727. |
| HU Yongle, HAO Mingqiang, CHEN Guoli, et al. Technologies and practice of CO2 flooding and sequestration in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(4): 716-727. | |
| [2] | 李阳. 低渗透油藏CO2驱提高采收率技术进展及展望[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2020, 27(1): 1-10. |
| LI Yang. Technical advancement and prospect for CO2 flooding enhanced oil recovery in low permeability reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020, 27(1): 1-10. | |
| [3] | 何志勇, 郭本帅, 汪东, 等. CO2捕集和利用技术的应用与研发进展[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(1): 70-75. |
| HE Zhiyong, GUO Benshuai, WANG Dong, et al. Application and research progress of CO2 capture and utilization technology[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 70-75. | |
| [4] | 秦积舜, 韩海水, 刘晓蕾. 美国CO2驱油技术应用及启示[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(2): 209-216. |
| QIN Jishun, HAN Haishui, LIU Xiaolei. Application and enlightenment of carbon dioxide flooding in the United States of America[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(2): 209-216. | |
| [5] | 鞠斌山, 秦积舜, 李治平, 等. 二氧化碳-原油体系最小混相压力预测模型[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(2): 274-277. |
| JU Binshan, QIN Jishun, LI Zhiping, et al. A prediction model for the minimum miscibility pressure of the CO2-crude oil system[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(2): 274-277. | |
| [6] | 贾凯锋, 计董超, 高金栋, 等. 低渗透油藏CO2驱油提高原油采收率研究现状[J]. 非常规油气, 2019, 6(1): 107-114. |
| JIA Kaifeng, JI Dongchao, GAO Jindong, et al. The exisiting state of enhanced oil recovery by CO2 flooding in low permeability reservoirs[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2019, 6(1): 107-114. | |
| [7] | 张东, 刘显太, 刘彦东, 等. CO2驱合理注入量计算方法[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2020, 27(1): 107-112. |
| ZHANG Dong, LIU Xiantai, LIU Yandong, et al. Calculation method of reasonable injection amount of CO2 flooding[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020, 27(1): 107-112. | |
| [8] | 姚红生, 高玉巧, 郑永旺, 等. CO2快速吞吐提高页岩油采收率现场试验[J]. 天然气工业, 2024, 44(3): 10-19. |
| YAO Hongsheng, GAO Yuqiao, ZHENG Yongwang, et al. Field tests and effect of CO2 rapid huff-n-puff to enhance shale oil recovery[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2024, 44(3): 10-19. | |
| [9] | KWON S, LEE W. Parameter estimation in multiple contact CO2 miscibility simulation with uncertain experimental core flooding data[J]. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2012, 29(6): 750-755. |
| [10] | WANG C, LI T T, GAO H, et al. Study on the blockage in pores due to asphaltene precipitation during different CO2 flooding schemes with NMR technique[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology, 2017, 35(16): 1660-1666. |
| [11] | WANG, D H, HOU Q F, LUO Y S, et al. Feasibility studies on CO2 foam flooding EOR technique after polymer flooding for Daqing reservoirs[J]. Journal of Dispersion Science and Technology, 2015, 36(4): 453-461. |
| [12] | 蒲万芬, 王崇阳, 李一波, 等. 致密油储层CO2驱核磁共振实验研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2017, 17(7): 30-34. |
| PU Wanfen, WANG Chongyang, LI Yibo, et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance(NMR)experimental study of CO2 flooding in tight reservoir[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2017, 17(7): 30-34. | |
| [13] | 张硕, 杨平, 叶礼友, 等. 核磁共振在低渗透油藏气驱渗流机理研究中的应用[J]. 工程地球物理学报, 2009, 6(6): 675-680. |
| ZHANG Shuo, YANG Ping, YE Liyou, et al. Application of a study on porous flow mechanisms of gas flooding with NMR in low permeability reservoirs[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophysics, 2009, 6(6): 675-680. | |
| [14] | 张硕. 低渗透油藏CO2气驱渗流机理核磁共振研究[J]. 深圳大学学报(理工版), 2009, 26(3): 228-233. |
| ZHANG Shuo. NMR study on porous flow mechanisms in low permeability reservoirs with CO2 flooding[J]. Journal of Shenzhen University (Science & Engineering), 2009, 26(3): 228-233. | |
| [15] | FANG H H, SANG S X, LIU S Q. Three-dimensional spatial structure of the macro-pores and flow simulation in anthracite coal based on X-ray μ-CT scanning data[J]. Petroleum Science, 2020, 17(5): 1221-1236. |
| [16] | 王千, 杨胜来, 拜杰, 等. 非均质多层储层中CO2驱替方式对驱油效果及储层伤害的影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(7): 875-884. |
| WANG Qian, YANG Shenglai, BAI Jie, et al. Influence of CO2 flooding mode on oil displacement effect and reservoir damage in heterogeneous multi-layer reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(7): 875-884. | |
| [17] | 陈龙龙, 汤瑞佳, 江绍静, 等. 致密砂岩油藏CO2灌注提高混相程度研究[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2024, 53(4): 79-84. |
| CHEN Longlong, TANG Ruijia, JIANG Shaojing, et al. CO2 perfusion to improve degree of miscibility in tight sandstone reservoir[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2024, 53(4): 79-84. | |
| [18] | 迟杰, 鞠斌山, 吕广忠, 等. CO2混相与非混相共同驱极限井距计算方法[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(5): 771-778. |
| CHI Jie, JU Binshan, Guangzhong LYU, et al. A computational method of critical well spacing of CO2 miscible and immiscible concurrent flooding[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(5): 771-778. | |
| [19] | 王玉霞, 尚庆华, 王艳霞. CO2混相驱油井产能预测方法[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2013, 37(1): 97-103. |
| WANG Yuxia, SHANG Qinghua, WANG Yanxia. Well productivity prediction research for CO2 miscible flooding[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2013, 37(1): 97-103. | |
| [20] | ZHAO F l, HAO H D, LYU G Z. Performance improvement of CO2 flooding using production controls in 3D areal heterogeneous models: Experimental and numerical simulations[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018, 164: 12-23. |
| [21] | 陈祖华, 汤勇, 王海妹, 等. CO2驱开发后期防气窜综合治理方法研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(5): 102-106. |
| CHEN Zuhua, TANG Yong, WANG Haimei, et al. Comprehensive treatment of gas channeling at the later stage of CO2 flooding[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(5): 102-106. | |
| [22] | ZHOU X, YUAN Q W, ZHANG Y Z, et al. Performance evaluation of CO2 flooding process in tight oil reservoir via experimental and numerical simulation studies[J]. Fuel, 2019, 236: 730-746. |
| [23] | 吴晓东, 尚庆华, 刘长宇, 等. 一种CO2驱油井产能预测方法及其应用[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2012, 34(1): 72-74. |
| WU Xiaodong, SHANG Qinghua, LIU Changyu, et al. A productivity prediction method for CO2 flooding well and its application[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2012, 34(1): 72-74. | |
| [24] | 李楠, 潘志坚, 苏婷, 等. 超低渗油藏CO2驱正交试验设计与数值模拟优化[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2017, 38(1): 62-65. |
| LI Nan, PAN Zhijian, SU Ting, et al. Orthogonal test design and numerical simulation optimization of CO2 flooding in extra-low permeability reservoirs[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2017, 38(1): 62-65. | |
| [25] | MA D S, ZHANG K, QIN J S. Flow properties of CO2/crude oil in miscible phase flooding[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology, 2010, 28(14): 1427-1433. |
| [26] | 肖朴夫, 杨正明, 王学武, 等. 室内注二氧化碳微观驱油机理研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 37(4): 161-165. |
| XIAO Pufu, YANG Zhengming, WANG Xuewu, et al. A laboratory study on the micro mechanism of oil displacement with CO2 flooding[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2015, 37(4): 161-165. | |
| [27] | 郭建春, 陶亮, 陈迟, 等. 川南地区龙马溪组页岩混合润湿性评价新方法[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(2): 216-225. |
| GUO Jianchun, TAO Liang, CHEN Chi, et al. A new method for evaluating the mixed wettability of shale in Longmaxi Formation in the southern Sichuan[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(2): 216-225. | |
| [28] | 赵伶玲, 陶璐, 盛洁, 等. 原子间作用力对超临界CO2-水界面张力影响的研究[J]. 工程热物理学报, 2014, 35(10): 1992-1996. |
| ZHAO Lingling, TAO Lu, SHENG Jie, et al. Study on effects of atom forces on the interfacial tension of supercritical CO2-water[J]. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2014, 35(10): 1992-1996. | |
| [29] | ARAB D, KANTZAS A, BRYANT S L. Water flooding of oil reservoirs: Effect of oil viscosity and injection velocity on the interplay between capillary and viscous forces[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 186: 106691. |
| [30] | RAHIMI V, BIDARIGH M, BAHRAMI P. Experimental study and performance investigation of miscible water-alternating-CO2 flooding for enhancing oil recovery in the Sarvak formation[J]. Oil & Gas Sciences and Technology-Revue D’ IFP Energies Nouvelles, 2017, 72(6): 655-668. |
| [31] | 张金龙, 王洁, 张卫东, 等. CO2在盐水层中的扩散和运移泄漏风险评价模型[J]. 中外能源, 2013, 18(8): 101-105. |
| ZHANG Jinlong, WANG Jie, ZHANG Weidong, et al. A model of diffusion and migration leakage risk assessment of CO2 in saline aquifer[J]. Sino-Global Energy, 2013, 18(8): 101-105. | |
| [32] | 陈转转, 高永利, 高辉. 陇东地区长7致密油储层微观孔喉结构特征[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 29(2): 29-33. |
| CHEN Zhuanzhuan, GAO Yongli, GAO Hui. Study on microscope pore throat structural features of Chang-7 tight oil reservoir in the eastern region of Gansu Province[J]. Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University(Natural Science), 2014, 29(2): 29-33. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |