专家论坛

断陷期源汇系统及勘探方向——以东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷平北地区为例

  • 张尚虎 ,
  • 李昆 ,
  • 庄建建 ,
  • 朱宝衡 ,
  • 郑欣 ,
  • 杨超
展开
  • 中国石化上海海洋油气分公司,上海 200120
张尚虎(1978—),男,硕士,高级工程师,从事海上油气地质研究。地址:上海市浦东新区锦康路50弄2号楼,邮政编码:200120。E-mail:zhangshanghu.shhy@sinopec.com
庄建建(1984—),男,硕士,高级工程师,从事海上油气勘探研究。地址:上海市浦东新区锦康路50弄2号楼,邮政编码:200120。E-mail:zhuangjianjian.shhy@sinopec.com

收稿日期: 2024-11-20

  网络出版日期: 2025-09-19

基金资助

中国石化先导项目“海域重点增储与突破目标勘探潜力及评价”(YTBXD-CGKT-2024-002-011-SH)

Source-sink system and exploration directions during rift period: A case study of Pingbei area in Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin

  • ZHANG Shanghu ,
  • LI Kun ,
  • ZHUANG Jianjian ,
  • ZHU Baoheng ,
  • ZHENG Xin ,
  • YANG Chao
Expand
  • Sinopec Shanghai Offshore Oil & Gas Company, Shanghai 200120, China

Received date: 2024-11-20

  Online published: 2025-09-19

摘要

针对东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷保俶斜坡带平北地区宝石组—平湖组下段(以下简称平下段)沉积微相类型及砂体展布特征不明确的问题,该研究利用古地貌、生物遗迹、微量元素、井-震结合手段及现代沉积类比等多种方法开展了沉积微相类型、时空演化及圈闭模式分析。研究表明:平北地区宝石组—平下段处于强烈断陷期,古地貌呈深凹高隆构造格局,对沉积体系具有较强的控制作用。宝石组物源来自北部虎皮礁隆起的岩浆岩,平下段西侧海礁隆起物源供给逐步增强,形成双物源格局。微量元素分析认为:平湖组、宝石组沉积时期为干热古气候,整体属于海陆过渡、贫氧沉积环境。宝石组—平下段发育4个三级层序,为逐渐水进过程。综合岩心相、测井相及生物遗迹相分析,宝石组—平下段发育潮汐三角洲、潮坪相、海相3种沉积相及水下分支河道、席状砂、河口坝、潮汐水道、砂坪、混合坪、泥坪、支流间湾、海湾泥9种沉积微相。广泛发育的潮坪相为主要的沉积相类型,斜坡近凹带发育树状涨潮及退潮三角洲、潮道、潮汐砂坝沉积,明确了宝石组—平下段5种控砂模式,包括堑-垒型、隆起-断坡型、多断坡型、转换带型及挠曲坡折型控砂模式,总结了5种圈闭类型,包括堑-垒型构造圈闭、隆起-断坡型构造圈闭、多断坡型构造-岩性复合圈闭、转换带型构造-岩性复合圈闭、挠曲坡折型岩性圈闭。斜坡内带的平湖组、宝石组发育海湾环境下多类型规模砂体,受挠曲坡折控制易形成岩性集中尖灭;砂体经潮流和波浪淘洗为纯净细砂岩,抗压实能力较强,易形成“甜点”储层,整体成藏条件优越,为下步勘探指明方向。

本文引用格式

张尚虎 , 李昆 , 庄建建 , 朱宝衡 , 郑欣 , 杨超 . 断陷期源汇系统及勘探方向——以东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷平北地区为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2025 , 15(5) : 722 -733 . DOI: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025.05.002

Abstract

To address the unclear sedimentary microfacies types and sandbody distribution characteristics in the Baoshi Formation-lower member of Pinghu Formation (hereinafter referred to as lower Pinghu member) in the Pingbei area of the Baochu slope belt, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin, the study employed a comprehensive approach combining paleogeomorphology, biological traces, trace element analysis, well-seismic integration, and modern depositional analogs to analyze the sedimentary microfacies types, spatiotemporal evolution, and trap models. The research indicated that the Baoshi Formation-lower Pinghu member in the Pingbei area was in the intense rift period, with a paleo-geomorphologic pattern characterized by deep depressions and high uplifts, exerting a strong control on the sedimentary system. The Baoshi Formation was sourced from magmatic rocks in the northern Hupijiao uplift, while sediment supply from the Haijiao uplift in the western lower Pinghu member gradually increased, forming a dual-provenance system. Trace element analysis indicated that the deposition of the Pinghu and Baoshi Formations occurred under an arid and hot paleoclimate in a generally suboxic, marine-continental transitional environment. Four third-order sequences were developed in the Baoshi Formation-lower Pinghu member, representing a progressive marine transgression. Integrated analysis of core facies, logging facies, biofacies, and ichnofacies revealed that the Baoshi Formation-lower Pinghu member developed three sedimentary facies (tidal delta, tidal flat facies, and marine facies) and nine microfacies (subaqueous distributary channels, sheet sands, mouth bars, tidal channels, sand flats, mixed flats, mud flats, interdistributary bays, and bay mud). The extensively developed tidal flat facies was the dominant sedimentary facies type. Dendritic flood and ebb tidal deltas, tidal channels, and tidal sand bars developed near the slope depression belt. Five sand-controlling models were identified in the Baoshi Formation-lower Pinghu member: graben-horst type, uplift-fault slope type, multiple fault slope type, transfer zone type, and flexural slope break type. Five trap types were summarized: graben-horst structural traps, uplift-fault slope structural traps, multiple fault slope structural-lithological composite traps, transfer zone structural-lithological composite traps, and flexural slope break lithological traps. Within the inner slope zone, the Pinghu and Baoshi Formations developed large-scale sand bodies under bay environments, which were prone to lithologic pinch-out controlled by flexural slope breaks. Tidal and wave reworking produced clean fine sandstones with strong compaction resistance, forming favorable “sweet spot” reservoirs. Overall, the inner slope zone possesses excellent accumulation conditions. The research findings provide clear directions for future exploration.

参考文献

[1] 周心怀. 西湖凹陷地质认识创新与油气勘探领域突破[J]. 中国海上油气, 2020, 32(1): 1-12.
  ZHOU Xinhuai. Geological understanding and innovation in Xihu sag and breakthroughs in oil and gas exploration. [J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2020, 32(1): 1-12.
[2] 周荔青, 江东辉, 张尚虎, 等. 东海西湖凹陷大中型油气田形成条件及勘探方向[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(5): 803-812.
  ZHOU Liqing, JIANG Donghui, ZHANG Shanghu, et al. Formation conditions and exploration direction of large and medium oil and gas reservoirs in Xihu Sag, East China Sea[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(5): 803-812.
[3] 韩银学, 陈莹, 杨海长, 等. 白云凹陷恩平组“源—汇”体系及其对油气勘探的影响[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2017, 22(2): 25-34.
  HAN Yinxue, CHEN Ying, YANG Haichang, et al. “Source to sink” of Enping Formation and its effects on oil and gas exploration in Baiyun Sag, Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2017, 22(2): 25-34.
[4] 朱淑玥, 刘磊, 虎建玲, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西缘晚石炭世羊虎沟组源—汇系统特征及古地理格局[J]. 沉积学报, 2023, 41(5): 1430-1450.
  ZHU Shuyue, LIU Lei, HU Jianling, et al. Characteristics of the Source-to-Sink system and paleogeographical pattern from the Upper Carboniferous Yanghugou Formation in western margin of the Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2023, 41(5): 1430-1450.
[5] 刘英辉, 蔡华, 段冬平, 等. 西湖凹陷平湖地区平湖组海侵体系域潮控三角洲-潮坪沉积特征及模式[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2022, 38(1): 33-40.
  LIU Yinghui, CAI Hua, DUAN Dongping, et al. The sedimentary characteristics of tidal delta and tidal flat in transgressive system tract of Pinghu Formation in Pinghu area, Xihu Sag[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2022, 38(1): 33-40.
[6] 蔡华, 秦兰芝, 刘英辉. 西湖凹陷平北斜坡带海陆过渡相源-汇系统差异性及其耦合模式[J]. 地球科学, 2019, 44(3): 880-897.
  CAI Hua, QIN Lanzhi, LIU Yinghui. Differentiation and coupling model of source-to-sink systems with transitional facies in pingbei slope of Xihu Sag[J]. Earth Science, 2019, 44(3): 880-897.
[7] 李昆, 周兴海, 丁峰, 等. 西湖凹陷保俶斜坡带平北地区平湖组“多元控砂”机制分析[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2019, 39(6): 115-123.
  LI Kun, ZHOU Xinghai, DING Feng, et al. “Multi-factor control of sandboies distribution” in the Pinghu Formation, Pingbei region of Baochu slop, the Xihu Sag[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2019, 39(6): 115-123.
[8] 侯国伟, 李帅, 秦兰芝, 等. 西湖凹陷西部斜坡带平湖组源-汇体系特征[J]. 中国海上油气, 2019, 31(3): 29-39.
  HOU Guowei, LI Shuai, QIN Lanzhi, et al. Source-to-Sink system of Pinghu Formation in west slope belt of Xihu sag, East China Sea basin[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2019, 31(3): 29-39.
[9] 刘书会, 王宝言, 刘成鑫. 西湖凹陷平湖地区平湖组沉积相的再认识[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2009, 16(3): 1-3.
  LIU Shuhui, WANG Baoyan, LIU Chengxin. The recognition about sedimentary facies in Pinghu formation of Pinghu region[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2009, 16(3): 1-3.
[10] 程浩, 金振奎, 余文端, 等. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜三段浅水三角洲沉积古地貌、古环境恢复[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(3): 368-378.
  CHENG Hao, JIN Zhenkui, YU Wenduan, et al. Sedimentary Palaeogeomorphology and Palaeo-environment reconstruction of shallow water delta in the 3rd member of Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 368-378.
[11] 于仲坤, 丁飞, 赵洪. 西湖凹陷构造演化特征及油气运聚单元划分[J]. 上海国土资源, 2018, 39(4): 75-78.
  YU Zhongkun, DING Fei, ZHAO Hong. Characteristics of structural evolution and classification of hydrocarbon migration and accumulation units in Xihu Sag, China[J]. Shanghai Land & Resources, 2018, 39(4): 75-78.
[12] 侯方辉, 张志珣, 张训华, 等. 东海陆架盆地北部新构造运动特征[J]. 海洋地质动态, 2010, 26(11): 1-6.
  HOU Fanghui, ZHANG Zhixun, ZHANG Xunhua, et al. Neotectonic movement of the northern East China Sea shelf basin[J]. Marine Geology Letters, 2010, 26(11): 1-6.
[13] 黄晓松, 唐贤君, 许怀智, 等. 东海盆地西湖凹陷基底时空演化特征再认识及勘探意义[J]. 上海国土资源, 2024, 45(2): 125-131.
  HUANG Xiaosong, TANG Xianjun, XU Huaizhi, et al. Reunderstanding of temporal and spatial evolution characteristics of the basement of Xihu Depression in East China Sea Basin and its exploration significance[J]. Shanghai Land & Resources, 2024, 45(2): 125-131.
[14] 王军, 曹磊, 许怀智, 等. 东海盆地西湖凹陷平湖地区油气源对比及油气运移特征分析[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 39(1): 1-11.
  WANG Jun, CAO Lei, XU Huaizhi, et al. Comparison of oil-gas sources and analysis of oil-gas migration characteristics in Pinghu area of Xihu Sag,the East China Sea Basin[J]. Journal of Xi’an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 39(1): 1-11.
[15] 钟锴, 朱伟林, 高顺莉, 等. 东海陆架盆地形成演化及油气成藏关键地质问题[J]. 地球科学, 2018, 43(10): 3485-3497.
  ZHONG Kai, ZHU Weilin, GAO Shunli, et al. Key geological questions of the formation and evolution and hydrocarbon accumulation of the East China Sea shelf basin[J]. Earth Science, 2018, 43(10): 3485-3497.
[16] 周心怀, 蒋一鸣, 唐贤君. 西湖凹陷成盆背景、原型盆地演化及勘探启示[J]. 中国海上油气, 2019, 31(3): 1-10.
  ZHOU Xinhuai, JIANG Yiming, TANG Xianjun. Tectonic setting, prototype basin evolution and exploration enlightenment of Xihu sag in East China Sea basin[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2019, 31(3): 1-10.
[17] 徐东浩, 秦兰芝, 李帅, 等. 西湖凹陷平北斜坡平湖组潮坪环境砂体沉积模式及控制因素[J]. 中国海上油气, 2024, 36(5): 57-67.
  XU Donghao, QIN Lanzhi, LI Shuai, et al. Sedimentary models and controlling factors of sand bodies in tidal flat environment of Pinghu Formation on Pingbei Slope of Xihu Sag[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2024, 36(5): 57-67.
[18] 何昕锴, 李晓龙, 赵洪, 等. 东海西湖凹陷碎屑岩物源聚类分析[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2020, 36(6): 11-19.
  HE Xinkai, LI Xiaolong, ZHAO Hong, et al. Clustering analysis of clastic rocks for provenance in Xihu depression[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2020, 36(6): 11-19.
[19] 蒋一鸣, 何新建, 唐贤君, 等. 钓鱼岛隆褶带物质构成及东海西湖凹陷原型盆地东边界再认识[J]. 地球科学, 2019, 44(3): 773-783.
  JIANG Yiming, HE Xinjian, TANG Xianjun, et al. Material composition of Diaoyu Islands folded zone and reanalysis of eastern boundary of prototype basin of Xihu Sag in East China Sea[J]. Earth Science, 2019, 44(3): 773-783.
[20] 陈冰, 王家林, 吴健生, 等. 东海陆架盆地海礁凸起南块基底性质研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2002, 24(4): 301-305.
  CHEN Bing, WANG Jialin, WU Jiansheng, et al. Study on the basement properties of the south Haijiao uplift in the East China Sea shelf basin[J]. Experimental Petroleum Geology, 2002, 24(4): 301-305.
[21] 陈浩, 肖宝珠, 崔培龙, 等. 湖北襄阳地区龙潭组富锂黏土岩地球化学特征及其对物源和古沉积环境的指示[J]. 资源环境与工程, 2024, 38(2): 137-146.
  CHEN Hao, XIAO Baozhu, CUI Peilong, et al. Geochemical characteristics, provenance and Palaeosedimentary environment of lithium-rich claystone in Longtan formation in Xiangyang area, Hubei Province[J]. Resources Environment & Engineering, 2024, 38(2): 137-146.
[22] 兰华平, 任战利, 张莹, 等. 关中盆地新近系泥岩地球化学特征: 物源和古沉积环境恢复[J]. 地质通报, 2024, 43(10): 1801-1817.
  LAN Huaping, REN Zhanli, ZHANG Ying, et al. Geochemical characteristics of Neogene mudstone in Guanzhong basin: Provenance and paleosedimentary environment restoration[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2024, 43(10): 1801-1817.
[23] 王若谷, 周进松, 张建锋, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部晚石炭世—中二叠世沉积环境及演化[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1023-1036.
  WANG Ruogu, ZHOU Jinsong, ZHANG Jianfeng, et al. Sedimentary environment and evolution of late carboniferan-Middle Permian in southeastern Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 54(6): 1023-1036.
文章导航

/