Oil and Gas Exploration

Sedimentary evolution and main controlling factors of sand group levels in Pinghu Formation: A case study of well block W in Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin

  • WANG Jianwei ,
  • LYU Peng ,
  • WANG Zequn ,
  • YAN Shumei ,
  • PAN Lu ,
  • LIN Lixin ,
  • WANG Rui ,
  • XU Chen ,
  • LIU Shu ,
  • HUANG Xiaojuan
Expand
  • Exploration and Development Research Institute, Sinopec Shanghai Offshore Oil & Gas Company, Shanghai 200120, China

Received date: 2024-12-19

  Online published: 2025-09-19

Abstract

The lower member of the Pinghu Formation (hereinafter referred to as the lower Pinghu member) in the well block W of the Xihu Sag is an important oil and gas-bearing system. An accurate characterization of its sedimentary evolution patterns and reservoir distribution is critical for guiding future exploration and development. Based on core, drilling, and geophysical data, this study analyzed the sedimentary microfacies, evolution processes, and dominant controlling factors of the lower Pinghu member. The results showed that the lower Pinghu member (sand groups P12~P9) could be divided into third-order sequences, mainly comprising deltaic and tidal flat deposits influenced by tidal processes. The P12 sand group, deposited during a lowstand system tract with relatively low sea level, was primarily composed of deltaic deposits, issueed by tidal deposits. During deposition of the P11 and P10 sand groups in the transgressive system tract, sediment supply weakened and delta development was curtailed. Thus, tidal flat environments became dominant in the study area. The P9 sand group, deposited during the highstand system tract, experienced increased sediment supply, tidal flat deposition reduction, and delta progradation towards the basin. Analysis of the sedimentary evolution process clarified that sediment supply, sea level fluctuations, and the paleogeomorphology controlled the microfacies migration and evolution in the well block W. Firstly, paleogeomorphology directly controlled the depositional accommodation and determined the spatial distribution of sedimentation. Secondly, abundant sediment supply and relatively lower sea level promoted deltaic development, leading to the formation of distributary channel and mouth bar sand bodies. On the contrary, the reduction of sediment supply and rising relative sea level restricted deltaic propagation while enhancing tidal power, resulting in the development of tidal flats, tidal channels, and tidal sand bars. In the study area, the relative intensity of deltaic and tidal processes was controlled by changes in relative sea level and sediment supply. During deposition of the P12 and P9 sand groups, sufficient sediment supply and relatively low sea levels favored delta development. On the contrary, during marine transgression stage corresponding to the P11-P10 sand groups, the sediment supply weakened and the relative sea levels rose. Under such conditions, deltaic deposits were vulnerable to damage, which favored the development of tidal sediments. However, the development of deltaic and tidal flat deposits in response to changes in relative sea level and sediment supply was also controlled by paleogeomorphology. During deposition of the P12 sand group, the presence of a nose-shaped paleo-uplift in the central part of the study area limited eastward progradation of the western delta. This resulted in differences in sedimentary facies types between the east and west sides of the nose-shaped paleo-uplift during deposition of the P12 sand group. The western fault trough zone was dominated by deltaic deposits, while the eastern fault step zone was dominated by tidal deposits. During deposition of the P11-P9 sand groups, the influence of the nose-shaped paleo-uplift weakened, and the sedimentary facies types in the study area were relatively uniform (P11-P10 was mainly dominated by tidal flat deposits; P9 was mainly dominated by deltaic deposits). This study offers insights into the spatiotemporal distribution characteristics of favorable reservoirs in the study area and adjacent zones. In the western fault trough zone of the P12 sand group and in the P9 sand group, deltaic sand bodies such as channels, mouth bars, and sheet sands are the favorable sand body types, and their exploration and development should be primarily guided by the deltaic depositional model. In eastern fault step zone of the P12 sand group and in the P11-P10 sand groups, the dominant sand bodies are tidal sand bars or tidal channels extending seaward and parallel to the shoreline, and their exploration and development should follow the tidal depositional model.

Cite this article

WANG Jianwei , LYU Peng , WANG Zequn , YAN Shumei , PAN Lu , LIN Lixin , WANG Rui , XU Chen , LIU Shu , HUANG Xiaojuan . Sedimentary evolution and main controlling factors of sand group levels in Pinghu Formation: A case study of well block W in Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2025 , 15(5) : 773 -787 . DOI: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025.05.007

References

[1] 江东辉, 蒲仁海, 苏思羽, 等. 断陷盆地斜坡带大型油气田成藏条件: 西湖凹陷平北缓坡断裂与岩性控藏有利区[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(11): 33-42.
  JIANG Donghui, PU Renhai, SU Siyu, et al. Conditions for the formation of large oil and gas reservoirs in the slope belts of rift basins: Fault-and lithology-controlled accumulation zones in the Pingbei slope of Xihu Sag[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(11): 33-42.
[2] 周荔青, 江东辉, 张尚虎, 等. 东海西湖凹陷大中型油气田形成条件及勘探方向[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(5): 803-812.
  ZHOU Liqing, JIANG Donghui, ZHANG Shanghu, et al. Formation conditions and exploration direction of large and medium oil and gas reservoirs in Xihu Sag, East China Sea[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(5): 803-812.
[3] 周心怀. 西湖凹陷地质认识创新与油气勘探领域突破[J]. 中国海上油气, 2020, 32(1): 1-12.
  ZHOU Xinhuai. Geological understanding and innovation in Xihu sag and breakthroughs in oil and gas exploration[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2020, 32(1): 1-12.
[4] 侯国伟, 李帅, 秦兰芝, 等. 西湖凹陷西部斜坡带平湖组源-汇体系特征[J]. 中国海上油气, 2019, 31(3): 29-39.
  HOU Guowei, LI Shuai, QIN Lanzhi, et al. Source-to-Sink system of Pinghu Formation in west slope belt of Xihu sag, East China Sea basin[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2019, 31(3): 29-39.
[5] 蔡华. 东海平湖油气田潮道砂体垂向特征及平面分布[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2013, 29(8): 39-44.
  CAI Hua. Vertical and horizontal distribution of tidal channel sand body in Pinghu oilfield in the East China Sea[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2013, 29(8): 39-44.
[6] 蒋一鸣, 邵龙义, 李帅, 等. 西湖凹陷平湖构造带平湖组沉积体系及层序地层研究[J]. 现代地质, 2020, 34(1): 141-153.
  JIANG Yiming, SHAO Longyi, LI Shuai, et al. Deposition system and stratigraphy of Pinghu Formation in Pinghu tectonic belt, Xihu Sag[J]. Geoscience, 2020, 34(1): 141-153.
[7] 张志垚, 张昌民, 侯国伟, 等. 东海盆地某凹陷P井区平湖组沉积微相及沉积模式[J]. 地质与资源, 2020, 29(2): 142-151.
  ZHANG Zhiyao, ZHANG Changmin, HOU Guowei, et al. Microfacies distribution and sedimentary model of Pinghu formation in P well area, East China Sea basin[J]. Geology and Resources, 2020, 29(2): 142-151.
[8] 王泽宇, 徐清海, 侯国伟, 等. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷W井区平湖组潮汐沉积模式[J]. 海相油气地质, 2021, 26(2): 159-169.
  WANG Zeyu, XU Qinghai, HOU Guowei, et al. Tidal depositional model of Pinghu Formation in W well block of Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2021, 26(2): 159-169.
[9] 吴峰, 任培罡, 谈明轩, 等. 东海西湖凹陷孔雀亭地区平湖组沉积相演变及其主控因素分析[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2022, 42(2): 119-130.
  WU Feng, REN Peigang, TAN Mingxuan, et al. Facies evolution and its controlling factors of the Pinghu Formation in the Kongqueting area of Xihu Depression, the East China Sea[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2022, 42(2): 119-130.
[10] 刘英辉, 蔡华, 段冬平, 等. 西湖凹陷平湖地区平湖组海侵体系域潮控三角洲-潮坪沉积特征及模式[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2022, 38(1): 33-40.
  LIU Yinghui, CAI Hua, DUAN Dongping, et al. The sedimentary characteristics of tidal delta and tidal flat in transgressive system tract of Pinghu Formation in Pinghu area, Xihu Sag[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2022, 38(1): 33-40.
[11] 常吟善, 段冬平, 张兰, 等. 西湖凹陷平湖斜坡带A气田沉积体系定量表征及海平面变化周期性探讨[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2021, 41(3): 12-21.
  CHANG Yinshan, DUAN Dongping, ZHANG Lan, et al. Quantitative characterization of the depositional system in Gas field A, Pinghu slope belt, Xihu Sag and its bearing on periodicity of sea level changes[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2021, 41(3): 12-21.
[12] 吕鹏, 雷蕾, 孙莉, 等. 东海盆地西湖凹陷W气田平湖组煤系潮控砂体储层地震预测[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2023, 39(10): 66-76.
  Peng LYU, LEI Lei, SUN Li, et al. Seismic prediction of tide-controlled sand reservoir in Pinghu Formation coal seam, W Gas Field, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin[J]. Marine Geology Frontiers, 2023, 39(10): 66-76.
[13] 张兰, 汪文基, 何贤科, 等. 东海西湖凹陷平湖组富煤环境相控储层预测技术[J]. 现代地质, 2019, 33(2): 337-344.
  ZHANG Lan, WANG Wenji, HE Xianke, et al. A new phase-controlled reservoir prediction technique for coal-rich environment in the Pinghu Formation of the Xihu Sag, the East China Sea[J]. Geoscience, 2019, 33(2): 337-344.
[14] 张兰, 何贤科, 段冬平, 等. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷平湖斜坡带平湖组煤系地层地震沉积学研究[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2023, 43(4): 140-149.
  ZHANG Lan, HE Xianke, DUAN Dongping, et al. Seismic sedimentological analysis of coal stratigraphy of Pinghu Formation in the Pinghu slope belt, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2023, 43(4): 140-149.
[15] 徐长贵, 赖维成. 渤海古近系中深层储层预测技术及其应用[J]. 中国海上油气, 2005, 17(4): 231-236.
  XU Changgui, LAI Weicheng. Predication technologies of Paleogene mid-deep reservoir and their application in Bohai Sea[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2005, 17(4): 231-236.
[16] 叶泰然, 李书兵, 吕正祥, 等. 四川盆地须家河组层序地层格架及沉积体系分布规律探讨[J]. 天然气工业, 2011, 31(9): 51-57.
  YE Tairan, LI Shubing, Zhengxiang LYU, et al. Sequence stratigraphic framework and sedimentary system distribution of the Xujiahe Formation in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2011, 31(9): 51-57.
[17] 李志华, 黄文辉, 朱伟厚. 基准面变化与岩相及砂体展布的沉积响应: 以鄂尔多斯盆地苏南地区盒八段辫状河三角洲为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2016, 23(6): 709-715.
  LI Zhihua, HUANG Wenhui, ZHU Weihou. Sedimentary response of base-level to lithofacies and reservoirs sand body distribution: A case of braided delta in 8th Member of Shihezi Formation, southern Sulige Area, Erdos Basin[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2016, 23(6): 709-715.
[18] 张武, 徐国盛, 侯国伟, 等. 丽水凹陷西凹中部储层致密成因及优质储层主控因素[J]. 长江大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 17(3): 14-20.
  ZHANG Wu, XU Guosheng, HOU Guowei, et al. Densification causes and main controlling factors of high quality reservoirs in the central section of Lishui west sag[J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 17(3): 14-20.
[19] 李宝芳, 刘光华, 李祯, 等. 豫西太原组、山西组中潮道沉积的类型和特征[J]. 沉积学报, 1988, 6(2): 31-41.
  LI Baofang, LIU Guanghua, LI Zhen, et al. The types and characteristics of tidal channel deposits in western Henan province[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1988, 6(2): 31-41.
[20] 赵谦. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷西部斜坡带平湖组潮河联控沉积体系研究[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学, 2022.
  ZHAO Qian. Tidal and river joint-dominated sedimentary system analysis of the Pinghu formation in the west slope belt of Xihu depression, East China Sea shelf basin[D]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences, 2022.
[21] 周瑞琦, 傅恒, 徐国盛, 等. 东海陆架盆地西湖凹陷平湖组—花港组沉积层序[J]. 沉积学报, 2018, 36(1): 132-141.
  ZHOU Ruiqi, FU Heng, XU Guosheng, et al. Eocene Pinghu Formation-Oligocene Huagang Formation sequence stratigraphy and depositional model of Xihu Sag in East China Sea Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2018, 36(1): 132-141.
[22] 赵军, 唐贤君, 蒋一鸣, 等. 东海盆地西湖凹陷西北缘中始新世构造变革厘定及成因探讨[J]. 地质科技通报, 2020, 39(3): 58-67.
  ZHAO Jun, TANG Xianjun, JIANG Yiming, et al. Confirmation and genesis of the Middle Eocene tectonic transformation in northwestern margin of Xihu Depression, East China Sea Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2020, 39(3): 58-67.
Outlines

/