源—储分类新方法在川东地区页岩气井产量分析中的应用

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2022.03.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用总有机碳含量（TOC）、孔隙度等实验分析和水平井钻井试气等相关资料,开展了南川区块海相页岩储层源—储耦合关系与典型高低产井原因分析。研究表明,页岩有机质与储集空间紧密相连,互相依存,二者之间形成复杂的源—储耦合关系,TOC（源）和孔隙度（储）是表征源—储配置类型的关键参数,可划分为富碳高孔、中碳中孔、低碳低孔等12种类型,对页岩源—储相配置系进行半定量评价;同时,通过引入源—储分类新方法,建立了研究区五峰组—龙马溪组Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ类页岩储层源—储配置评价标准,结合研究区开采工艺相似的8口水平井源—储配置评价与试气产量分析表明,Ⅰ类源—储配置层段在水平井段中占比越大,压裂试气产量越高。源—储分类新方法是页岩气井地质评价与压后产能分析的实用工具,具有推广意义。

关键词: 总有机碳含量, 孔隙度, 源—储耦合系数, 五峰组—龙马溪组, 川东地区

Abstract:

By using the experimental test data such as the total organic carbon content（TOC） and porosity and the drilling and testing data of horizontal wells, the researches on the source-reservoir coupling relationship of marine shale reservoirs in Nanchuan district and the reasons for typical high and low field wells have been carried out. The researches show that the shale organic matter and storage space are closely connected and interdependent, forming a complex source-reservoir coupling relationship between each other. The TOC（the source） and the porosity（the reservoir） are the key parameters to characterize the source-reservoir configuration types. There are 12 categories, including high-carbon with high-porosity, medium-carbon with medium-porosity, and low-carbon with low-porosity, for the semi-quantitative evaluation. By introducing this new method of source-reservoir classification, the evaluation criteria of source-reservoir configuration for Ⅰ, Ⅱ and Ⅲ shale reservoirs of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation in the study area are established. Combining the source-reservoir configuration evaluation and gas test production analysis of 8 horizontal wells with similar mining technology in the study area, it is shown that the larger the proportion of class Ⅰ source reservoir configuration in horizontal wells, the higher the fracturing gas test production. The new source-reservoir classification method is a practical tool for geological evaluation and post-compression productivity analysis of shale gas wells, and has the popularization significance.

Key words: total organic carbon（TOC）, porosity, source-reservoir coupling coefficient, Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation, Eastern Sichuan

中图分类号:

TE122

刘雨林,范凌霄,房大志,彭勇民,曾联波,冯动军. 源—储分类新方法在川东地区页岩气井产量分析中的应用[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(3): 429-436.

LIU Yulin,FAN Lingxiao,FANG Dazhi,PENG Yongmin,ZENG Lianbo,FENG Dongjun. Application of a new source-reservoir classification method in production analysis of shale gas wells in Eastern Sichuan[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(3): 429-436.

图/表 8

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

表2

参考文献 26

[1]	胡宗全, 杜伟, 彭勇民, 等. 页岩微观孔隙特征及源-储关系——以川东南地区五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(6):1001-1008.
	HU Zongquan, DU Wei, PENG Yongmin, et al. Microscopic pore characteristics and the source-reservoir relationship of shale —A case study from the Wufeng and Longmaxi Formations in Southeast Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015, 36(6): 1001-1008.
[2]	胡宗全, 王濡岳, 刘忠宝, 等. 四川盆地下侏罗统陆相页岩气源储特征及耦合评价[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(1):261-272.
	HU Zongquan, WANG Ruyue, LIU Zhongbao, et al. Source-reservoir characteristics and coupling evaluation of lacustrine shale gas in the Lower Jurassic, Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2021, 28(1): 261-272.
[3]	郭旭升. 南方海相页岩气“二元富集”规律——四川盆地及周缘龙马溪组页岩气勘探实践认识[J]. 地质学报, 2014, 88(7):1209-1218.
	GUO Xusheng. Rules of two-factor enrichiment for marine shale gas in southern China——Understanding from the Longmaxi Formation Shale Gas in Sichuan Basin and Its surrounding area[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2014, 88(7): 1209-1218.
[4]	董大忠, 王玉满, 黄旭楠, 等. 中国页岩气地质特征、资源评价方法及关键参数[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(9):1583-1601.
	DONG Dazhong, WANG Yuman, HUANG Xu'nan, et al. Discussion about geological characteristics, resource evaluation methods and its key parameters of shale gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(9): 1583-1601.
[5]	JARVIE D M, HILL R J, RUBLE T E, et al. Unconventional shale-gas systems: The Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment[J]. Aapg Bulletin, 2007, 91(4): 475-499. doi: 10.1306/12190606068
[6]	腾格尔, 高长林, 胡凯, 等. 上扬子东南缘下组合优质烃源岩发育及生烃潜力[J]. 石油实验地质, 2006, 28(4):359-365.
	TENGGER, GAO Changlin, HU Kai, et al. High-quality source rocks in the Lower Combination in Southeast Upper-Yangtze area and their hydrocarbon generating potential[J]. Petroleum Geology And Experiment, 2006, 28(4): 359-365.
[7]	秦建中, 申宝剑, 陶国亮, 等. 优质烃源岩成烃生物与生烃能力动态评价[J]. 石油实验地质, 2014, 36(4):465-472.
	QIN Jianzhong, SHEN Baojian, TAO Guoliang, et al. Hydrocarbon-forming organisms and dynamic evaluation of hydrocarbon generation capacity in excellent source rocks[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2014, 36(4): 465-472.
[8]	BUSTIN RM, BUSTIN AM, CUI A, et al. Impact of shale properties on pore structure and storage characteristics[C]// Paper SPE-119892-MS presented at the SPE Shale Gas Production Conference, Fort Worth, Texas, USA, November 2008.
[9]	王濡岳, 胡宗全, 杨滔, 等. 黔东南岑巩地区下寒武统黑色页岩孔隙结构特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019, 41(2):207-214.
	WANG Ruyue, HU Zongquan, YANG Tao, et al. Pore structure characteristics of the Lower Cambrian black shale in the Cengong block, southeastern Guizhou area[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2019, 41(2): 207-214.
[10]	王濡岳, 胡宗全, 董立, 等. 页岩气储层表征评价技术进展与思考[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1):54-65.
	WANG Ruyue, HU Zongquan, DONG Li, et al. Advancement and trends of shale gas reservoir characterization and evaluation[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(1): 54-65.
[11]	李玉喜, 何建华, 尹帅, 等. 页岩油气储层纵向多重非均质性及其对开发的影响[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(2):118-125.
	LI Yuxi, HE Jianhua, YIN Shuai, et al. The multi-anisotropy of shale oil and gas reservoirs in vertical and its influence on oil-gas development[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(2): 118-125.
[12]	聂海宽, 何治亮, 刘光祥, 等. 四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气优质储层成因机制[J]. 天然气工业, 2020, 40(6):31-41.
	NIE Haikuan, HE Zhiliang, LIU Guangxiang, et al. Genetic mechanism of high-quality shale gas reservoirs in the Wufeng-Longmaxi Fms in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(6): 31-41.
[13]	葛忠伟, 樊莉, 钟文俊, 等. 威远龙马溪组黑色页岩非均质性及对开发的影响[J]. 非常规油气, 2019, 6(4):33-39.
	GE Zhongwei, FAN Li, ZHONG Wenjun, et al. Heterogeneity of black shale of Longmaxi Formation in Weiyuan and its impact on development[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2019, 6(4): 33-39.
[14]	高全芳. 武隆向斜五峰组—龙马溪组优质页岩特征及水平井靶窗优选[J]. 非常规油气, 2019, 6(3):99-105.
	GAO Quanfang. The high-quality shale characteristics of Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation in Wulong syncline and the best target of horizontal well[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2019, 6(3): 99-105.
[15]	聂海宽, 金之钧, 边瑞康, 等. 四川盆地及其周缘上奥陶统五峰组—下志留统龙马溪组页岩气“源—盖控藏”富集[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(5):557-571.
	NIE Haikuan, JIN Zhijun, BIAN Ruikang, et al. The “source-cap hydrocarbon-controlling” enrichment of shale gas in Upper Ordovician Wufeng Formation-Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation of Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(5): 557-571.
[16]	邹才能, 董大忠, 王玉满, 等. 中国页岩气特征、挑战及前景(二)[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(2):166-178.
	ZOU Caineng, DONG Dazhong, WANG Yuman, et al. Shale gas in China: characteristics, challenges and prospects(Ⅱ)[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(2): 166-178.
[17]	金晓波. 南川区块断层精细解释研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2018, 8(4):6-10.
	JIN Xiaobo. Study on the fine fault interpretation in Nanchuan district[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2018, 8(4): 6-10.
[18]	郭旭升. 上扬子地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩层序地层及演化模式[J]. 地球科学, 2017, 42(7):1069-1082.
	GUO Xusheng. Sequence stratigraphy and evolution model of the Wufeng-Longmaxi shale in the upper yangtze area[J]. Earth Science, 2017, 42(7): 1069-1082.
[19]	何贵松, 何希鹏, 高玉巧, 等. 中国南方3套海相页岩气成藏条件分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019, 31(1):57-68.
	HE Guisong, HE Xipeng, GAO Yuqiao, et al. Analysis of accumulation conditions of three sets of marine shale gas in southern China[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2019, 31(1): 57-68.
[20]	HU H, HAO F, LIN J, et al. Organic matter-hosted pore system in the Wufeng-Longmaxi(O₃w-S₁l) shale, Jiaoshiba area, Eastern Sichuan Basin, China[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2017, 173: 40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2017.02.004
[21]	ARINGHIERI R. Nanoporosity characteristics of some natural clay minerals and soils[J]. Clays and Clay Minerals, 2004, 52(6): 700-704. doi: 10.1346/CCMN.2004.0520604
[22]	张金川, 聂海宽, 徐波, 等. 四川盆地页岩气成藏地质条件[J]. 天然气工业, 2008(2):151-156.
	ZHANG Jinchuan, NIE Haikuan, XU Bo, et al. Geological condition of shale gas accumulation in sichuan basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2008(2): 151-156.
[23]	郭旭升, 胡东风, 李宇平, 等. 海相和湖相页岩气富集机理分析与思考:以四川盆地龙马溪组和自流井组大安寨段为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(2):18-28.
	GUO Xusheng, HU Dongfeng, LI Yuping, et al. Analyses and thoughts on accumulation mechanisms of marine and lacustrine shale gas: A case study in shales of Longmaxi Formation and Da'anzhai Section of Ziliujing Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(2): 18-28.
[24]	刘伟新, 鲍芳, 俞凌杰, 等. 川东南志留系龙马溪组页岩储层微孔隙结构及连通性研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38(4):453-459.
	LIU Weixin, BAO Fang, YU Lingjie, et al. Micro-pore structure and connectivity of the Silurian Longmaxi shales, southeastern Sichuan area[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2016, 38(4): 453-459.
[25]	彭勇民.基于页岩源储相互关系的分类评价方法及装置:中国,ZL201610373919.4[P].2020-09-04.
	PENG Yongmin.Classification evaluation method and device based on the relationship between shale source and reservoir: China, ZL201610373919.4[P]. 2020-09-04.
[26]	邱振, 邹才能, 王红岩, 等. 中国南方五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气差异富集特征与控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(2):163-175.
	QIU Zhen, ZOU Caineng, WANG Hongyan, et al. Discussion on characteristics and controlling factors of differential enrichment of Wufeng-Longmaxi formations shale gas in South China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2020, 31(2): 163-175.

储配置类别		源—储配置类型
储配置类别		TOC（源）≥4 %	TOC（源）：2 %~4 %	TOC（源）：1 %~2 %	TOC（源）<1 %
孔隙度（储）（%）	≥4	富碳高孔源—储	高碳高孔源—储	中碳高孔源—储	低碳高孔源—储
	2~4	富碳中孔源—储	高碳中孔源—储	中碳中孔源—储	低碳中孔源—储
	<2	富碳低孔源—储	高碳低孔源—储	中碳低孔源—储	低碳低孔源—储

井名	1-3号小层钻遇率（%）	返排率（%）	Ⅰ类占比（%）	Ⅱ类占比（%）	12 mm油嘴试气产量（10⁴ m³/d）	水平段长（m）	压裂段数（段）	加液量（m³）	加砂量（m³）
JY-AHF井	100	2.36	96.96	1.38	32	1 538	20	36 904.05	1 348.60
JY-BHF井	100	2.34	79.10	4.87	16	1 400	20	41 156.40	1 430.40
JY-CHF井	95	3.90	94.43	3.38	24	1 459	20	42 099.89	1 215.39
JY-DHF井	100	3.88	89.66	0	26	1 512	19	40 486.00	1 223.10
JY-EHF井	94	7.38	89.17	9.02	22	1 529	18	34 155.45	1 106.29
JY-FHF井	94	2.98	93.51	2.43	31	1 440	18	34 375.40	1 072.70
JY-GHF井	100	5.09	84.70	8.93	18	1 423	19	36 480.70	1 485.10
JY-HHF井	100	3.57	81.88	18.13	15	1 422	20	41 222.60	1 355.10