复杂人工裂缝产状页岩气藏多段压裂水平井产能评价

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2023.04.007

油气藏评价与开发 ›› 2023, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (4): 459-466.doi: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2023.04.007

复杂人工裂缝产状页岩气藏多段压裂水平井产能评价

胡之牮¹(),李树新²,王建君³,周鸿⁴,赵玉龙¹(),张烈辉¹

1.西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程全国重点实验室，四川成都 610500
2.中国石油煤层气有限责任公司，北京 100028
3.中国石油浙江油田分公司，浙江杭州 310023
4.中国石油西南油气田分公司蜀南气矿，四川泸州 646001

收稿日期:2022-03-07 出版日期:2023-08-26 发布日期:2023-09-01
通讯作者: 赵玉龙（1986—），博士，研究员，主要从事非常规油气藏开发、数值模拟、试井分析等方面的科研与教学工作。地址：四川省成都市新都区新都大道8号，邮政编码：610500。E-mail：373104686@qq.com
作者简介:胡之牮（1998—），在读硕士研究生，主要从事油气藏渗流理论及应用研究。地址：四川省成都市新都区新都大道8号，邮政编码：610500。E-mail：178872337@qq.com
基金资助:
中国石油—西南石油大学创新联合体项目“川南深层与昭通中浅层海相页岩气整体动用理论与技术”(2020CX020202);中国石油—西南石油大学创新联合体项目“不同构型页岩储层流体流动规律及开发优化理论与方法”(2020CX030202);四川省杰出青年科技人才项目“深层海相页岩气藏流体赋存与传质机制研究”(2022JDJQ0009)

Productivity evaluation of multi-stage fracturing horizontal wells in shale gas reservoir with complex artificial fracture occurrence

HU Zhijian¹(),LI Shuxin²,WANG Jianjun³,ZHOU Hong⁴,ZHAO Yulong¹(),ZHANG Liehui¹

1. National Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China
2. PetroChina Coalbed Methane Company, Beijing 100028, China
3. PetroChina Zhejiang Oilﬁeld Company, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310023, China
4. Shunan Division, PetroChina Southwest Oil & Gas field Company, Luzhou, Sichuan 646001, China

Received:2022-03-07 Online:2023-08-26 Published:2023-09-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

基于页岩气多重运移机制理论，针对页岩储层压裂裂缝呈现复杂形状和非均匀分布的实际情况，建立耦合了两类孔隙表观渗透率的页岩表观渗透率统一模型，另外，运用实空间源汇函数理论和压降叠加原理，建立了气藏—裂缝—井筒耦合渗流模型。模拟分析了页岩气微观渗流、裂缝形状和裂缝非均匀分布对产能的影响，结果表明：微观渗流对页岩气井产量的影响不可忽视，在生产初期考虑微观渗流的日产气量比不考虑微观渗流的日产气量高了20.3 %；复杂形状裂缝的产能比理想矩形裂缝的产能要低，其中星形裂缝的产能最低；裂缝的非均匀分布会影响水平井的产能，需选择最优布缝方式。研究模型综合考虑了页岩气的微观渗流机理和实际压裂裂缝情况，为页岩气藏压裂水平井产能研究提供了参考。

关键词: 页岩气, 表观渗透率, 压裂水平井, 复杂裂缝, 产能模型

Abstract:

Considering complex shape and non-uniform distribution of fracturing fractures in shale reservoir, on the basis of multiple migration mechanisms a unified apparent permeability model is developed, incorporating two types of pore apparent permeability based on multiple migration mechanisms. This model serves as the foundation for establishing a gas reservoir-fracture-wellbore coupled seepage model, utilizing real space source function theory and pressure drawdown superposition principle. Through simulations and analyses, the study investigates the effects of micro seepage, fracture shape and non-uniform distribution of fractures on shale gas productivity. The demonstrate that micro seepage significantly impacts shale gas well production, with daily gas production being 20.3 % higher when considering micro seepage during the initial stage compared to neglecting it. Furthermore, the productivity of wells with complex fractures is lower than that of wells with ideal rectangular fractures, and star-shaped fractures exhibit the lowest productivity. The non-uniform distribution of fractures also affects the productivity of horizontal wells, and an optimal fracture layout is identified. The model takes into account both the micro seepage mechanism and actual fracturing fracture of shale gas, providing valuable guidance for the productivity research of fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoir.

Key words: shale gas, apparent permeability, fractured horizontal well, complex fracture, productivity model

中图分类号:

TE328

胡之牮, 李树新, 王建君, 周鸿, 赵玉龙, 张烈辉. 复杂人工裂缝产状页岩气藏多段压裂水平井产能评价[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 459-466.

HU Zhijian, LI Shuxin, WANG Jianjun, ZHOU Hong, ZHAO Yulong, ZHANG Liehui. Productivity evaluation of multi-stage fracturing horizontal wells in shale gas reservoir with complex artificial fracture occurrence[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 459-466.

图/表 12

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

表2

图10

参考文献 25

[1]	邹才能, 赵群, 丛连铸, 等. 中国页岩气开发进展、潜力及前景[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(1): 1-14.
	ZOU Caineng, ZHAO Qun, CONG Lianzhu, et al. Development progress, potential and prospect of shale gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(1): 1-14.
[2]	张金川, 史淼, 王东升, 等. 中国页岩气勘探领域和发展方向[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(8): 69-80.
	ZHANG Jinchuan, SHI Miao, WANG Dongsheng, et al. Fields and directions for shale gas exploration in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(8): 69-80.
[3]	车世琦. 涪陵气田平桥区块页岩气选区评价[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2022, 36(4): 48-54.
	CHE Shiqi. Selection evaluation of shale gas in Pingqiao block of Fuling gas field[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2022, 36(4): 48-54.
[4]	高志飞, 许寻, 王坤, 等. 低渗、特低渗轻质油藏溶解气驱气体流动临界饱和度研究[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2021, 35(3): 63-66.
	GAO Zhifei, XU Xun, WANG Kun, et al. Study on gas critical gas saturation of dissolved gas flooding in light oil reservoir with low permeability and ultra-low permeability[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2021, 35(3): 63-66.
[5]	CIVAN F. Effective correlation of apparent gas permeability in tight porous media[J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2010, 82(2): 375-384. doi: 10.1007/s11242-009-9432-z
[6]	CIVAN F, RAI C S, SONDERGELD C H. Shale-gas permeability and diffusivity inferred by improved formulation of relevant retention and transport mechanisms[J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2011, 86(3): 925-944. doi: 10.1007/s11242-010-9665-x
[7]	WU K L, LI X F, GUO C H, et al. Adsorbed gas surface diffusion and bulk gas transport in nanopores of shale reservoirs with real gas effect-adsorption-mechanical coupling[C]// Paper SPE-173201-MS presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, Texas, USA, February 2015.
[8]	吴克柳, 李相方, 陈掌星. 页岩气纳米孔气体传输模型[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(7): 837-848. doi: 10.7623/syxb201507008
	WU Keliu, LI Xiangfang, CHEN Zhangxing. A model for gas transport through nanopores of shale gas reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(7): 837-848. doi: 10.7623/syxb201507008
[9]	岳陈军, 张烈辉, 赵玉龙, 等. 考虑表面扩散的页岩气渗透率两区复合解析模型[J]. 水动力学研究与进展(A辑), 2016, 31(3): 362-371.
	YUE Chenjun, ZHANG Liehui, ZHAO Yulong, et al. A dual-zone composite analytic model for shale gas permeability considering surface diffusion[J]. Chinese Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2016, 31(3): 362-371.
[10]	顾岱鸿, 丁道权, 刘军, 等. 三重介质页岩气藏分段压裂水平井产能预测模型[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2016, 35(1): 158-165.
	GU Daihong, DING Daoquan, LIU Jun, et al. Productivity predicting model of the staged fractured horizontal well in triple-media shale gas reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2016, 35(1): 158-165.
[11]	OZKAN E, BROWN M, RAGHAVAN R, et al. Comparison of fractured-horizontal-well performance in tight sand and shale reservoirs[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2011, 14(2): 248-259.
[12]	杨兆中, 廖梓佳, 李小刚, 等. 非均布导流下页岩气藏压裂水平井产量模拟[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(3): 93-100. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.16745086.2020.03.09.01
	YANG Zhaozhong, LIAO Zijia, LI Xiaogang, et al. Production simulation of fractured horizontal well with non-uniform space distribution of fracture conductivity in shale gas reservoir[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2021, 43(3): 93-100. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.16745086.2020.03.09.01
[13]	蒲谢洋, 胡永全, 赵金洲, 等. 考虑微观渗流的页岩气藏拉链式压裂水平井产能预测[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2016, 37(5): 565-570.
	PU Xieyang, HU Yongquan, ZHAO Jinzhou, et al. Productivity prediction of zipper-like fracturing horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs with considering microscopic flow[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2016, 37(5): 565-570.
[14]	何易东, 任岚, 赵金洲, 等. 页岩气藏体积压裂水平井产能有限元数值模拟[J]. 断块油气田, 2017, 24(4): 550-556.
	HE Yidong, REN Lan, ZHAO Jinzhou, et al. Finite element numerical simulation of shale gas production of hydraulically fractured horizontal well with stimulated reservoir volume[J]. Fault-block Oil & Gas Field, 2017, 24(4): 550-556.
[15]	ZHAO J Z, LI Z Q, HU Y Q, et al. The impacts of microcosmic flow in nanoscale shale matrix pores on the gas production of a hydraulically fractured shale-gas well[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering, 2016, 29(1): 431-439.
[16]	胡小虎. 页岩气非均匀压裂水平井非稳态产能评价方法[J]. 断块油气田, 2021, 28(4): 519-524.
	HU Xiaohu. Transient productivity evaluation method for shale gas uneven-fractured horizontal well[J]. Fault-block Oil & Gas Field, 2021, 28(4): 519-524.
[17]	刘嘉, 陈俊, 芮福鑫, 等. 离散裂隙网络对页岩气井产能影响的数值模拟[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2017, 45(6): 66-71.
	LIU Jia, CHEN Jun, RUI Funxin, et al. Numerical simulation for effect of discrete fracture network on shale gas productivity of horizontal well[J]. COAL GEOLOGY & EXPLORATION, 2017, 45(6): 66-71.
[18]	向雪冰, 司马立强, 王亮, 等. 页岩气储层孔隙流体划分及有效孔径计算——以四川盆地龙潭组为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(4): 137-146.
	XIANG Xuebing, SIMA Liqiang, WANG Liang, et al. Pore fluid division and effective pore size calculation of shale gas reservoir: A case study of Longtan Formation in Sichuan Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(4): 137-146.
[19]	王志伟, 卢双舫, 王民, 等. 湖相、海相泥页岩孔隙分形特征对比[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2016, 28(1): 88-93.
	WANG Zhiwei, LU Shuangfang, WANG Min, et al. Fractal characteristics of lacustrine shale and marine shale[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(1): 88-93.
[20]	BESKOK A, KAMIADAKIS G E. A model for flows in channels, pipes, and ducts at micro and nano scales[J]. Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, 1999, 3(1): 43-77. doi: 10.1080/108939599199864
[21]	BEHRANG A, KANTZAS A. A hybrid methodology to predict gas permeability in nanoscale organic materials; a combination of fractal theory, kinetic theory of gases and Boltzmann transport equation[J]. Fuel, 2017, 188: 239-245. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.10.014
[22]	李亚雄, 刘先贵, 胡志明, 等. 页岩气滑脱、扩散传输机理耦合新方法[J]. 物理学报, 2017, 66(11): 230-240.
	LI Yaxiong, LIU Xiangui, HU Zhiming, et al. A new method for the transport mechanism coupling of shale gas slippage and diffusion[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2017, 66(11): 230-240.
[23]	贾爱林, 位云生, 刘成, 等. 页岩气压裂水平井控压生产动态预测模型及其应用[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(6): 71-80.
	JIA Ailin, WEI Yunsheng, LIU Cheng, et al. A dynamic prediction model of pressure control production performance of shale gas fractured horizontal wells and its application[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(6): 71-80.
[24]	孔祥言. 高等渗流力学[M]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学出版社, 1999.
	KONG Xiangyan. Advanced mechanics of fluids in porous media[M]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China Press, 1999.
[25]	赵玉龙, 梁洪彬, 井翠, 等. 页岩气井EUR快速评价新方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 124-131. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2019.09.16.09
	ZHAO Yulong, LIANG Hongbin, JING Cui, et al. A new method for quick EUR evaluation of shale gas wells[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2019, 41(6): 124-131. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2019.09.16.09

参数	取值	参数	取值
井底流压/MPa	6	气藏长度/m	1 950
裂缝数量	7	气藏宽度/m	1 100
裂缝半长/m	150	气藏厚度/m	50
裂缝宽度/m	0.005	基质渗透率/10^-3 μm²	1×10^-5
裂缝高度/m	50	基质孔隙度	0.05
裂缝间距/m	200	气藏温度/K	353
裂缝导流能力/（10^-3 μm²·m）	0.2	原始地层压力/MPa	30

参数	取值	参数	取值
气藏长度/m	2 000	气藏温度/K	377
气藏宽度/m	500	原始地层压力/MPa	36
气藏厚度/m	30	井底流压/MPa	10
基质孔隙度	0.061	Langmuir压力/MPa	4.5
有机质占比	0.055	Langmuir体积/（m³/kg）	2.7×10^-3
综合压缩系数/MPa^-1	0.024	裂缝导流能力/ （10^-3 μm²·m）	0.15

复杂人工裂缝产状页岩气藏多段压裂水平井产能评价

Productivity evaluation of multi-stage fracturing horizontal wells in shale gas reservoir with complex artificial fracture occurrence

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	姚红生, 王伟, 何希鹏, 郑永旺, 倪振玉. 南川复杂构造带常压页岩气地质工程一体化开发实践 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 537-547.
[2]	李京昌, 卢婷, 聂海宽, 冯动军, 杜伟, 孙川翔, 李王鹏. 威荣地区WY23平台页岩气层裂缝地震检测可信度评价 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 614-626.
[3]	夏海帮, 韩克宁, 宋文辉, 王伟, 姚军. 页岩气藏多尺度孔缝介质压裂液微观赋存机理研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 627-635.
[4]	韩克宁, 王伟, 樊冬艳, 姚军, 罗飞, 杨灿. 基于产量递减与LSTM耦合的常压页岩气井产量预测 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 647-656.
[5]	薛冈, 熊炜, 张培先. 常压页岩气藏成因分析与有效开发——以四川盆地东南缘地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气藏为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 668-675.
[6]	楼章华, 张欣柯, 吴宇辰, 高玉巧, 张培先, 金爱民, 朱蓉. 四川盆地南川地区及邻区页岩气保存差异的流体响应特征 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 451-458.
[7]	林魂, 孙新毅, 宋西翔, 蒙春, 熊雯欣, 黄俊和, 刘洪博, 刘成. 基于改进人工神经网络的页岩气井产量预测模型研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 467-473.
[8]	刘洪林,周尚文,李晓波. PCA-OPLS联合法快速评价页岩气井储量动用程度 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 474-483.
[9]	卢比,胡春锋,马军. 南川页岩气田压裂水平井井间干扰影响因素及对策研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(3): 330-339.
[10]	邱小雪,钟光海,李贤胜,陈猛,凌玮桐. 不同井斜页岩气水平井流动特征的CFD模拟研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(3): 340-347.
[11]	聂云丽, 高国忠. 基于随机森林的页岩气“甜点”分类方法 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(3): 358-367.
[12]	张龙胜,王维恒. 阴-非体系高温泡排剂HDHP的研究及应用——以四川盆地东胜页岩气井为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(2): 240-246.
[13]	赵仁文,肖佃师,卢双舫,周能武. 高—过成熟陆相断陷盆地页岩与海相页岩储层特征对比——以徐家围子断陷沙河子组和四川盆地龙马溪组为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(1): 52-63.
[14]	李颖,李茂茂,李海涛,于皓,张启辉,罗红文. 水相渗吸对页岩储层的物化作用机理研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(1): 64-73.
[15]	何封,冯强,崔宇诗. W页岩气藏气井控压生产制度数值模拟研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(1): 91-99.