低渗透油藏混相气驱生产气油比预测

油气藏评价与开发 ›› 2019, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (3): 14-18.

低渗透油藏混相气驱生产气油比预测

王高峰¹,姚杰²,王昊³,余光明⁴,罗文利¹

^1. 提高石油采收率国家重点实验室（中国石油勘探开发研究院）,北京 100083
^2. 中国石油塔里木油田公司,新疆库尔勒 841000
^3. 中国石油吉林油田公司,吉林松原 138001
^4. 中国石油长庆油田公司,陕西西安 710021

收稿日期:2019-01-29 出版日期:2019-06-26 发布日期:2019-07-02
作者简介:王高峰（1980 —）,男,工程师,注气技术研究。E-mail： wanggaofeng@petrochina.com.cn。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划“CO₂封存与驱油关键技术研究与应用”(2018YFB0605501);中国石油集团科技项目“低碳与清洁发展关键技术研究及应用”(2016E-1208)

Prediction of produced GOR of miscible gas flooding in low permeability reservoirs

Wang Gaofeng¹,Yao Jie²,Wang Hao³,Yu Guangming⁴,Luo Wenli¹

^1. State Key Laboratory of EOR, Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, CNPC, Beijing 100083, China
^2. Tarim Oilfield, Korla, Xinjiang 841000, China
^3. Jilin oilfield, CNPC, Songyuan, Jilin 138001, China
^4. Changqing oilfield, CNPC, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710021, China

Received:2019-01-29 Online:2019-06-26 Published:2019-07-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

生产气油比是气驱油藏开发设计的一项关键指标。在明确气驱全生命周期产出气具有5种来源基础上,提出了与3个开发阶段相匹配的低渗透油藏气驱生产气油比预测公式。从注气到见气前阶段生产气油比主要受油藏流体初始溶解气油比控制,给出了水溶气等效气油比确定方法;从见气到气窜前阶段的生产气油比主要受气驱“油墙”的溶气能力影响,可借鉴低渗透油藏气驱“油墙”物理性质描述系统方法确定气驱“油墙”溶解气油比;气窜后阶段的生产气油比变化情况由游离气形成的气油比决定,其预测基于“采出液腾出的空间被注入气和水充满”朴素认识,联合应用油气渗流分流方程、Corey模型和Stone方程、低渗透油藏气驱增产倍数,以及交替注入的水气段塞比等概念进行计算。“3段式”气驱生产气油比预测油藏工程方法得到了低渗透油藏CO₂混相驱矿场试验的验证,可用于注气开发方案设计,采油工艺优化或注气埋存潜力评价。

关键词: 低渗透油藏, 混相驱, 生产气油比, 溶解气, 游离气, 油墙, 分流方程, 气驱增产倍数

Abstract:

The produced GOR is a key index for the development and design of gas flooding reservoirs. On the basis of confirming that there are five sources of gas production in the whole life cycle of gas flooding, the prediction formula of produced GOR in low permeability reservoirs matching with three development stages is proposed. From gas injection to pre-gas production, the produced GOR is mainly controlled by the initial dissolved GOR of the reservoir fluid, and method of determining the equivalent GOR of water-soluble gas is given. The produced GOR in the stage from pre-gas production to gas channeling is affected by the gas dissolved capacity of ″oil bank″. The method of describing the physical property of gas flooding″oil bank″ in low permeability reservoirs can be used for reference to determine dissolved GOR of gas flooding″oil bank″. The change of produced GOR after gas channeling is determined by the GOR formed by free gas, and its prediction based on the understanding that the pore space released by the produced liquids would be filled with the injected gas and water. It is calculated by oil and gas fractional flow equation, Corey's model and Stone's equation combined with concepts of gas flooding increasing multiple in low permeability reservoir, and slug size ratio of water-gas during water alternating gas injection. The reservoir engineering method of produced GOR prediction taking the form of ″three-stages″ has been verified by the field test of CO₂ miscible flooding. It can be used in gas injection development planning design, optimization of oil production process or gas injection storage potential evaluation.

Key words: low permeability reservoir, miscible gas flooding, produced gas/oil ratio（produced GOR）, dissolved gas, free gas, oil bank, fractional flow equation, gas flooding increasing multiple

中图分类号:

TE357

王高峰,姚杰,王昊,余光明,罗文利. 低渗透油藏混相气驱生产气油比预测[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2019, 9(3): 14-18.

Wang Gaofeng,Yao Jie,Wang Hao,Yu Guangming,Luo Wenli. Prediction of produced GOR of miscible gas flooding in low permeability reservoirs[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(3): 14-18.

图/表 2

参考文献 13

[1]	Koottungal L . 2008 worldwide EOR survey[J]. Oil & Gas Journal, 2008,106(15):47-59.
[2]	Koottungal L . 2006 worldwide EOR survey[J]. Oil & Gas Journal, 2006,104(15):45-57.
[3]	Koottungal L . 2004 worldwide EOR survey[J]. Oil & Gas Journal, 2004,102(14):53-65.
[4]	Stalkup F I, Stein M H, Lake L W , et al. CO₂ Flooding[M]. Texas: Society of Petroleum Engineer, 1998.
[5]	李士伦, 孙雷, 郭平 , 等. 再论我国发展注气提高采收率技术[J]. 天然气工业, 2006,26(12):30-34.
[6]	秦积舜, 韩海水, 刘晓蕾 . 美国CO₂驱油技术应用及启示[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015,42(2):209-216.
[7]	王高峰, 郑雄杰, 张玉 , 等. 适合二氧化碳驱的低渗透油藏筛选方法[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015,42(3):358-363.
[8]	王高峰, 胡永乐, 宋新民 , 等. 低渗透油藏气驱产量预测新方法[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2013,13(30):8906-8911.
[9]	王高峰, 秦积舜, 胡永乐 , 等. 低渗透油藏气驱“油墙”物理性质描述[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2017,17(1):106-113.
[10]	薛海涛, 卢双舫, 付晓泰 . 甲烷、二氧化碳和氮气在油相中溶解度的预测模型[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2005,26(4):444-449. doi: 10.11743/ogg20050408
[11]	Duan Z H, Sun R . An improved model calculating CO₂ solubility in pure water and aqueous NaCl solutions from 273 to 533K and from 0 to 2000 bar[J]. Chemical Geology, 2003,193(3-4):257-271. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2541(02)00263-2
[12]	王高峰 . 注气开发低渗透油藏见气见效时间预报方法[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2014,14(34):18-23.
[13]	王高峰, 张云海, 郑国臣 . 低渗透油藏气驱“油墙”几何形态描述[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2015,15(32):906-911.

[1]	郭平,张万博,JIA Na,陈馥,刘煌,汪周华,葛性波. 降低CO₂-原油最小混相压力的助混剂研究进展 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(5): 726-733.
[2]	孔维军,崔传智,吴忠维,李立峰,苏书震,张建宁. CO₂非混相驱前缘运移及气窜规律室内实验研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(5): 764-776.
[3]	计秉玉,何应付. 中国石化低渗透油藏CO₂驱油实践与认识 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(6): 805-811.
[4]	王瑞. 低渗透油藏油水两相流动压裂井产能研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(5): 760-765.
[5]	王鑫,李敏. 大庆外围油田CO₂近混相驱特征图版的建立 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(3): 45-50.
[6]	曹绪龙, 吕广忠, 王杰, 张东, 任敏. 胜利油田CO₂驱油技术现状及下步研究方向 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(3): 51-59.
[7]	金忠康,王智林,毛超琪. 低渗透M油藏CO₂非混相驱主控机理及应用 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(3): 68-74.
[8]	刘丽娜,印婷,郑小杰,马新平,刘蕊,谢爽. 塔河油田强底水凝析气顶油藏地面产量劈分的新方法 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(2): 65-70.
[9]	房雨佳,杨二龙,殷代印. 裂缝性低渗透油藏不同含水阶段剩余油动用比例研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2019, 9(4): 12-18.
[10]	杨光宇,汤勇,李兆国,张永强,余光明. 系线法研究CO₂驱最小混相压力影响因素 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2019, 9(3): 32-35.
[11]	曹绪龙,吕广忠,王杰,张东. 滩坝砂特低渗透油藏CO₂驱油技术及应用 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2019, 9(3): 41-46.
[12]	陈祖华,孙雷,杨正茂,王海妹,冯洋,华柑霖. 草舍泰州组油藏CO₂混相驱效果及二次气驱可行性研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2019, 9(3): 47-50.
[13]	汤勇,廖松林,雷欣慧,余光明,康兴妹. 黄3区低渗透裂缝性油藏提高CO₂驱波及对策研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2019, 9(3): 9-13.
[14]	曹军,唐海,吕栋梁,吴锦伟. 应力敏感性差异对天然裂缝储层直井产能的影响 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2019, 9(1): 23-28.
[15]	杨雪. 尺度效应对天然气混相驱驱油效果的影响 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2018, 8(5): 37-41.