塔河油田螺杆泵配合水溶性降黏剂稠油开采技术

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2020.02.019

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

塔河油田为碳酸盐岩超深、超稠油油藏,应用掺稀降黏工艺开发,机械举升方式主要以液压反馈式抽稠泵和稠油电泵为主。随着稠油开发进入中高含水期,常规举升工艺配合掺稀降黏开采技术面临着含水乳化、腐蚀结垢、异常率高、经济效益差等难题,急需寻求更加高效的开采工艺。针对含水稠油井举升的特点,从工艺优选和技术替代的思路出发寻找解决办法,优选螺杆泵替代抽稠泵和电泵,应用水溶性降黏剂替代掺稀油,形成地面驱动螺杆泵配合水溶性降黏剂稠油开采技术。通过现场6口井的应用,平均稀稠比下降0.3,平均单井日节约稀油4.9 t,单井日增油3.8 t。现场应用的成功,证明了该技术对含水稠油井具有适应性强、应用效果好、经济效益突出的优势,进一步拓宽和完善了稠油高效开发的技术体系。

关键词: 超稠油, 抗硫, 螺杆泵, 水溶性, 稠油开采

Abstract:

Tahe Oilfield is an ultra-deep and ultra-heavy carbonate oil reservoir, which needs to mix with dilute oil to decreasing viscosity The mechanical lifting method is mainly hydraulic feedback heavy-oil pump and heavy oil electric pump. As the development of heavy oil enters the middle-high water cut period, the existing processes are facing the problems of water-cut emulsification, corrosion and scaling, high abnormal rate and poor economic benefit. It is urgent to seek more efficient and economical recovery technology. According to the lifting characteristics of heavy oil wells with water cut, the solution is found from the thought of process optimization and technology substitution. The screw pump is optimized to replace the old pumps, and the water-soluble viscosity reducer is used to replace the dilute oil. Therefore the heavy oil recovery technology by the combination of ground driven by screw pump and water soluble viscosity reducer is formed. Through the application of 6 wells, the average lean ratio decreased by 0.3, for single well per day in average, 4.9 tons of dilute oil are saved, and 3.8 tons of oil are increased. The success of the field application proves that this technology has the advantages of strong adaptability, good application effect and outstanding economic benefit for water-bearing heavy oil wells, and further widen and improve the technical system of high efficiency development of heavy oil.

Key words: ultra-heavy oil, sulfur resistance, screw pump, water soluble viscosity, heavy oil recovery

中图分类号:

TE355

梁志艳,王磊磊,唐照星. 塔河油田螺杆泵配合水溶性降黏剂稠油开采技术[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(2): 111-115.

Zhiyan LIANG,Leilei WANG,Zhaoxing TANG. Technology of heavy oil recovered by screw pump combined with water soluble viscosity in Tahe Oilfield[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(2): 111-115.

图/表 5

图1

表1

表2

表3

表4

参考文献 21

[1]	朝鲁门, 史继伟, 张江 , 等. 浅析塔河油田稠油井掺稀降黏工艺技术[J]. 化工管理, 2018,33(17):51-52.
	ZHAO L M, SHI J W, ZHANG J , et al. Analysis on the technology of mixing thin oil well and sticking in Tahe Oilfield[J]. Chemical Enterprise Management, 2018,33(17):51-52.
[2]	贾晓燕 . 塔河油田深层稠油开采技术研究[J]. 西部探矿工程, 2014,26(4):46-48.
	JIA X Y . Research on deep heavy oil recovery technology in Tahe Oilfield[J]. West-China Exploration Engineering, 2014,26(4):46-48.
[3]	孙宇 . 螺杆泵采油工艺及配套技术探讨[J]. 化学工程与装备, 2019,48(1):40-41.
	SUN Y . Discussion on oil extracton technology and supporting technology of screw pump[J]. Chemical Engineering & Equipment 2019,48(1):40-41.
[4]	刘佩衡 . 稠油高含水区块螺杆泵冷采技术探索与实践[J]. 化工管理, 2016,31(5):150.
	LIU P H . Exploration and practice of cold mining technology of screw pump in heavy oil block with high water content[J]. Chemical Enterprise Management, 2016,31(13):150.
[5]	李铭 . 油田地面驱动螺杆泵采油技术优化探析[J]. 化学工程与装备, 2019,48(9):104-105.
	LI M . Optimization of surface-driven screw pump in oil field[J]. Chemical Engineering & Equipment, 2019,48(9):104-105.
[6]	郑金忠, 孙晓涵 . 螺杆泵采油效率的影响因素分析及对策探讨[J]. 化工管理, 2017,32(35):12.
	ZHENG J Z, SUN X H . Analysis of factors affecting oil production efficiency of screw pump and discussion on countermeasures[J]. Chemical Enterprise Management, 2017,32(35):12.
[7]	李岩松 . 螺杆泵采油工艺存在的问题分析及对策探讨[J]. 化学工程与装备, 2019,48(1):141-142.
	LI Y S . Analysis and countermeasure of the existing problems in the oil extraction process of screw pump[J]. Chemical Engineering & Equipment, 2019,48(1):141-142.
[8]	韩传军, 任旭云, 郑继鹏 , 等. 稠油开采中常规螺杆泵定子衬套磨损研究[J]. 润滑与密封, 2018,43(5):25-29.
	HAN C J, Ren X Y, ZHENG J P , et al. Study on wear of stator bushing of conventional progressive cavity pump in heavy oil extraction[J]. Lubrication Engineering, 2018,43(5):25-29.
[9]	赵一泽 . 螺杆泵杆柱断脱原因分析及解决对策研究[J]. 化学工程与装备, 2019,48(10):196-197.
	ZHAO Y Z . Cause analysis and countermeasure research on rod string break of screw pump[J]. Chemical Engineering & Equipment, 2019,48(10):196-197.
[10]	王维岩 . 稠油开发中螺杆泵采油技术的应用分析[J]. 化学工程与装备, 2017,46(3):66-67.
	WANG W Y . Analysis on the application of screw pump in heavy oil development[J]. Chemical Engineering & Equipment, 2017,46(3):66-67.
[11]	周继柱, 时武光, 付增华 , 等. 一种抗温耐盐型水溶性两亲聚合物稠油降黏剂的合成及性能研究[J]. 应用化工, 2014,43(10):1843-1846.
	ZHOU J Z, SHI W G, FU Z H , et al. Preparation and properties research of viscosity reducing of salt and temperature resistance amphiphlic polymer[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2014,43(10):1843-1846.
[12]	王培 . 稠油降黏剂降黏技术研究[J]. 辽宁化工, 2018,47(9):960-962.
	WANG P . Study on viscosity reduction technology of heavy oil with viscosity reducer[J]. Liaoning Chemical Industry, 2018,47(9):960-962.
[13]	辛寅昌, 张军利 . 表面活性剂和水溶性聚合物耐盐和耐温性对原油降黏和钻井液的影响[J]. 中国石油和化工, 2010,9(11):40-41.
	XIN Y C, ZHANG J L . Effects of surfactants and water-soluble polymers on salt and temperature tolerance of crude oil on viscosity reduction and drilling fluids[J]. China Petroleum and Chemical Industry, 2010,9(11):40-41.
[14]	彭飞 . 超稠油化学降黏剂研究进展[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2018,38(22):136-137.
	PENG F . Research progress on chemical viscosity reducer of super heavy oil[J]. China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality, 2018,38(22):136-137.
[15]	程仲富, 张建军, 范伟东 , 等. 塔河油田低温催化降黏技术研究与应用[J]. 化学工程与装备, 2017,46(6):110-112.
	CHENG Z F, ZHANG J J, FAN W D , et al. Research and application of low-temperature catalytic viscosity reduction technology in Tahe Oilfield[J]. Chemical Engineering & Equipment, 2017,46(6):110-112.
[16]	刘文静, 刘保辉, 马凯旋 , 等. 稠油乳化降黏剂筛选的研究[J]. 石化技术, 2016,23(11):128-129.
	LIU W J, LIU B H, MA K X , et al. Selection of emulsified viscosity reducer for heavy oil[J]. Petrochemical Industry Technology, 2016,23(11):128-129.
[17]	郭娜, 李亮, 张潇 , 等. 高分子乳化降黏剂的制备与性能评价[J]. 应用化工, 2019,48(10):2038-2311.
	GUO N, LI L, ZHANG X , et al. Preparation and performance evaluation of polymer emulsifying viscosity reducer[J]. Applied Chemical Industry, 2019,48(10):2038-2311.
[18]	邹剑, 曹哲哲, 王秋霞 , 等. 海上稠油乳状液稳定性影响因素[J]. 油田化学, 2019,36(1):121-125.
	ZOU J, CAO Z Z, WANG Q X , et al. Influencing factors on the stability of offshore heavy oil emulsions[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2019,36(1):121-125.
[19]	敬加强, 孙娜娜, 安云鹏 , 等. 碱与乳化剂复合体系对稠油乳状液稳定性及流变性的影响[J]. 油田化学, 2015,32(1):114-118.
	JING J Q, SUN N N, AN Y P , et al. The effect of alkali and emulsifier binary system on the stability and rheological property of heavy oil-in-water emulsion[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2015,32(1):114-118.
[20]	蒋华义, 张兰新, 孙娜娜 , 等. 稠油水包油型乳状液稳定性与流变性影响因素[J]. 油气储运, 2017,37(10):1121-1127.
	JIANG H Y, ZHANG L X, SUN N N , et al. The factors influencing the stability and rheological property of heavy O/W emulsion[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2017,37(10):1121-1127.
[21]	马文辉, 梁梦兰, 袁红 , 等. 稠油O/W型乳状液稳定性的研究[J]. 化工时刊, 2002,16(5):23-26.
	MA W H, LIANG M L, YUAN H , et al. Study on stability of heavy crude oil-in water emulsion[J]. Chemical Industry Times, 2002,16(5):23-26.

等级		溶胀前后体积变化/%	溶胀前后质量变化/%	溶胀前后硬度变化/度
优	A	≤1	≤1	≤1
良	B	≤2	≤2	≤2
好	C	≤3	≤3	≤3
一般	D	≤4	≤4	≤4
可用	E	≤5~6	≤5~6	>4时不可用
不可用	F	>6	>6	>4时不可用

材质	体积 /cm³			体积溶胀率/ %	质量/g			质量溶胀率/ %	邵氏A硬度/度
材质	溶胀前	溶胀后	差值	体积溶胀率/ %	溶胀前	溶胀后	差值	质量溶胀率/ %	溶胀前	溶胀后	差值
NBR	2.071	2.138	0.067	3.25	2.510	2.585	0.075	2.98	78	76	2
NBRH	1.638	1.682	0.044	2.68	2.210	2.269	0.059	2.67	77	75	2
HNBR	1.508	1.547	0.039	2.56	2.910	2.973	0.063	2.18	74	73	1
FKM	1.552	1.593	0.041	2.64	1.825	1.866	0.041	2.24	77	76	1

井号	应用前			应用后			日节约稀油/ t	日增油/ t
井号	日产油/t	日掺稀/t	稀稠比	日产油/t	日掺稀/t	稀稠比	日节约稀油/ t	日增油/ t
A井	14	14	1.0	24	15	0.6	9.0	10
B井	10	12	1.2	9	4	0.4	2.3	-1
C井	12	7	0.6	13	6	0.5	1.8	1
D井	21	22	1.0	32	22	0.7	10.0	11
E井	17	20	1.2	21	22	1.0	3.2	4
F井	23	25	1.1	21	20	1.0	3.1	-2
合计	97	100	1.0	120	89	0.7	29.4	23

项目	日均产液/t	日均产油/t	含水率/%	日均掺稀油/t	加药量/ （L·d^-1）	掺稀比
试验前30天基值	11.0	10.0	9.1	12	0	1.2
试验生产	12.2	11.4	6.6	7	33	0.6
差值	1.2	1.4	-2.5	-5	33	-0.6