延川南煤层气田动态特征和SEC动态储量评估方法研究

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2020.04.008

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

煤层气的SEC储量评估难点是：①煤层气的产量变化有其不同于常规油气的特点;②不同煤阶煤层气的开发规律存在差异。研究表明：深层高阶煤层气与浅层低阶煤层气在评估参数上差异很大。粉河盆地浅层低阶煤层气在评估参数上表现出上产快、峰值产量高和递减大的特点,而延川南深层、高阶煤层气则表现为排水达产时间较长、峰值产量较低和递减小的特点。总结出“三段式”产量预测模式的3种类型和4个亚类。对于I类,采取完整三段式预测,上产时间为28个月,稳产气产量850 m ³/d,稳产期一年,递减率25 %。对于IIa亚类,产量已超过封顶产量,目前产量稳定,采取两段式预测,稳产期半年,递减率25 %;对于IIb亚类,排采时间长,目前产量稳定,虽未达到封顶产量,采取两段式预测,稳产期半年,递减率25 %。对于IIIa亚类,产量已超过封顶产量,目前产量在下降,采取一段式预测,递减率25 %;对于IIIb亚类,整体上产量在上升,但在评估基准日前产量出现下降,采取一段式预测,递减率25 %。利用该方法和评估参数进行的自评估结果与外方评估结果误差在±10 %,证明该方法和评估参数适用于延川南深层、高阶煤层气SEC储量评估。

关键词: 煤层气开发, 动态评估, SEC储量, 延川南煤层气田, 粉河盆地

Abstract:

The difficulty of SEC reserve assessment of CBM is: ①the yield change of CBM is different from conventional oil and gas; ②there are differences in the development rules of CBM with different coal ranks. The research shows that deep high-rank and shallow low-rank CBM vary greatly in the evaluation parameters: the shallow low-rank CBM in the Powder River Basin shows the characteristics of quickly entering of high yield period, high peak yield and large production decline, while the high-rank coal seam gas in the deep parts of South Yanchuan are characterized by longer drainage time, low peak yield and low decline. The three types and four sub-classes of the “three-segment” yield forecasting model are summarized. For type I, a complete three-stage forecast is adopted. The yield time is 28 months, the stable production output is 850 m ³/d with the cycle for one year, and the decline rate is 25 %. For the IIa subcategory whose production has exceeded the capped production and is stable at present, or the IIb sub-class whose discharge time is long and the current production of which is stable, although the production hasn’t reached the capped production, two-stage forecast is adopted, the stable production period is half a year, and the decline rate is 25 %. For the IIIa subcategory whose production has exceeded the capped production and the production is declining at present, or the IIIb sub-category whose overall production is on the rise but goes down before the base date of assets evaluation, single-stage forecast is adopted, and the decline rate is 25 %. The error between the self-assessment result and the external assessment result by using this method and the assessment parameters is ±10 %, which proves that this method and the assessment parameters are suitable for the SEC reserve assessment of deep and high-order coalbed methane in south Yanchuan.

Key words: CBM development, dynamic assessment, SEC reserves, Yanchuannan coalbed methane field, Powder River Basin

中图分类号:

TE132.2

周亚彤. 延川南煤层气田动态特征和SEC动态储量评估方法研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(4): 53-58.

ZHOU Yatong. Dynamic characteristics and SEC dynamic reserve assessment of CBM gas field in South Yanchuan[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(4): 53-58.

图/表 12

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

表2

图10

参考文献 15

[1]	周焱斌, 王晖, 张运来 , 等. 上市储量评估中指数递减法合理递减率的选取[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018,25(6):120-125.
	ZHOU Y B, WANG H, ZHANG Y L , et al. Reasonable decline rate determination of exponential decline in listed reserve assessment[J]. Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2018,25(6):120-125.
[2]	王庆帅 . 可靠技术在南海气田SEC储量评估中的应用[J]. 石油实验地质, 2019,41(6):923-930.
	WANG Q S . Application of reliable technology in SEC reserve evaluation of South China Sea Gas Field[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2019,41(6):923-930.
[3]	丁蓉, 曹毅民, 董海超 , 等. SEC准则下煤层气证实储量评估方法[J]. 天然气工业, 2018,38(1):57-61.
	DING R, CAO Y M, DONG H C , et al. Assessment method of proven reserves of CBM under SEC guidelines[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018,38(1):57-61.
[4]	伊伟, 熊先钺, 曹毅民 , 等. SEC储量动态评估方法在煤层气田中的应用——以鄂尔多斯盆地韩城区块为例[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2019,47(3):105-116.
	YI W, XIONG X Y, CAO Y M , et al. Application of dynamic reserves evaluation method in coalbed methane field: A case from Hancheng block in Ordos basin[J]. Coal geology and exploration, 2019,47(3):105-116.
[5]	HAN G Q, LING K G, ZHANG H . Smart de-watering and production system through real-time water level surveillance for Coal-Bed Methane wells[C]// paper SPE-173408-MS presented at the SPE Digital Energy Conference and Exhibition, 3-5 March 2016, The Woodlands, Texas, USA.
[6]	WEI M Q, WEN M, DUAN Y G , et al. Production decline type curves analysis of a finite conductivity fractured well in coalbed methane reservoirs[J]. Open Physics, 2017,15(1):143-153.
[7]	STOPA J , MIKOŁAJCZAK E. Empirical modeling of two-phase CBM production using analogy to nature[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018,171:1487-1495.
[8]	王镜惠, 王美冬, 田锋 , 等. 高煤阶煤层气储层产气能力定量评价[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019,26(4):105-110.
	WANG J H, WANG M D, TIAN F , et al. Quantitative evaluation of production capacity of high rank coalbed methane reservoir[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019,26(4):105-110.
[9]	周圣昊 . 煤层气多级压降排采工艺[J]. 非常规油气, 2019,6(6):63-67.
	ZHOU S H . Process of drainage and gas extraction fro multi-stage pressure drop of CBM well[J]. Unconventional Oil and Gas, 2019,6(6):63-67.
[10]	原俊红, 付玉通, 宋昱 . 深部煤层气储层测井解释技术及应用[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2018,25(5):24-31.
	YUAN J H, FU Y T, SONG Y . Logging interpretation technology and its application to deep coalbed methane reservoir[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2018,25(5):24-31.
[11]	陈贞龙 . 解吸阶段划分对延川南煤层气田开发的指示意义[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2017,7(5):80-84.
	CHEN Z L . The signoficance of desorption phase division on the development of coalbed methane fields in southern Yanchuan County[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2017,7(5):80-84.
[12]	刘羽欣 . 柿庄北区块煤层气井排采制度研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019,26(5):118-123.
	LIU Y X . Drainage gas recovery system of CBM well in the north Shizhuang block[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2019,26(5):118-123.
[13]	付玉通, 马健强, 李永臣 , 等. 延川南区块深层煤层气井产能主控因素[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2017,45(5):48-53.
	FU Y T, MA J Q, LI Y C , et al. Research on key factors of CBM well productivity in deep strata in block of south Yanchuan[J]. Coal geology and exploration, 2017,45(5):48-53.
[14]	王涛, 邓泽, 胡海燕 , 等. 国内外低阶煤煤层气储层特征对比研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2019,47(9):41-50.
	WANG T, DENG Z, HU H Y , et al. Study on characteristics comparison of low rank coal coalbed methane reservoirs at home and abroad[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2019,47(9):41-50.
[15]	SWINDELL G S . Powder River Basin coalbed methane wells-reserves and rates[C]// paper SPE-107308-MS presented at the Rocky Mountain Oil & Gas Technology Symposium, 16-18 April 2007, Denver, Colorado, USA.

盆地	煤层埋深/ m	煤层厚度/m	镜质体反射率/%	含气量/ （m³·t^-1）	煤层渗透率/ 10^-3μm²
延川南	800~1 500	4.2~5.9	1.6~3.2	5.5~20.5	0.3~0.4
粉河盆地	90~500	12~120	0.3~0.4	0.5~3.4	30~550

盆地	地质参数			评估参数
盆地	煤层埋深/m	镜质体反射率/%	煤层渗透率/10^-3μm²	评估井数/口	排水达产时间/月	峰值产量/（m³·d^-1）	后期递减率/%
延川南	800~1 500	1.6~3.2	0.3~0.4	680	28	800~1 000	25
粉河盆地	90~500	0.3~0.4	30~550	6 600	14	4 000~5 600	45