泥岩隔层发育背景下的河道砂岩气藏剩余气挖潜实践——以新场气田JS22气层为例

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2022.02.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

新场气田JS₂²气层为三角洲前缘亚相分流河道微相砂体沉积,部分砂体区域发育泥岩隔层,形成两期河道沉积,部分双层砂体发育气井仅射孔压裂其中一层,另一层砂体可能受泥岩隔层隔挡未被动用,但目前泥岩隔层分布规律认识不清,隔层垂向封隔性能尚未有先例验证,制约了该层剩余气的开发。通过建立JS₂²气层隔层测井曲线识别标准,对单井进行小层对比划分,开展隔层发育规模和平面分布规律研究,利用老井挖潜探索河道砂岩内部泥岩隔层垂向封隔性能。结果表明,泥岩隔层主要分布在JS₂²气藏东部,厚1~15 m,总体表现为两厚夹一薄特征。利用A1井挖潜实践,原未射孔压裂层经射孔和加砂压裂后增产明显,首次证实A1井区10 m泥岩隔层具有较好垂向封隔性能,该成果将对JS₂²气层剩余气开发提供新思路和实践依据,对提高整个气藏采收率具有重要意义。

关键词: 新场气田, JS₂²气层, 隔层, 剩余气, 老井挖潜

Abstract:

The JS₂² gas reservoir in the Xinchang Gas Field is the microfacies of distributary channel deposit in the delta front subfacies. The mudstone interlayer developed in some sandstone layers form the channel sediments twice. For some gas wells with double developed sand layers, the perforation and fracturing are carried out only in one of the two layers, while the rest may be blocked by mudstone interlayer, resulting in its untapped situation. However, the understanding of the distribution rule of the mudstone interlayer is unclear, and the sealing performance of interlayers hasn't been verified by precedent, limiting the development of the remaining gas in this reservoir. By the establishment of the logging curve identification standards of the interlayer, the interlayer of every single well is identified and divided, and the development scale and plane distribution rule of the interlayer are studied. And then, the old wells are used to explore the vertical sealing performance of the mudstone interlayer inside the channel sandstone. The study results show that the mudstone interlayer, with the thickness of 1~15 meters, is mainly distributed in the east of the JS₂² gas reservoir, and has the characteristic of one thin-line area laying between two thick areas along the distribution direction. In the application of potential tapping of Well-A1, the production obviously increase after the perforation and sand-fracture, firstly verifying that the mudstone interlayer with the thickness of 10 meters in A1 well area has better vertical sealing performance. This achievement will provide new ideas and practical basis for the development of remaining gas in the JS₂² gas reservoir, and is of great significance for improving the recovery rate of the entire gas reservoir.

Key words: Xinchang Gas Field, JS₂² gas reservoir, interlayer, remaining gas, potential tapping of old wells

中图分类号:

TE37

黎虹玮,袁剑,赵志川等. 泥岩隔层发育背景下的河道砂岩气藏剩余气挖潜实践——以新场气田JS₂²气层为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(2): 365-372.

Hongwei LI,Jian YUAN,Zhichuan ZHAO, et al. Practice of potential tapping of remaining gas in channel sandstone gas reservoir under the background of mudstone interlayers development: A case study of JS₂² gas layer in Xinchang Gas Filed[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(2): 365-372.

图/表 11

图1

图2

表1

图3

表2

图4

图5

表3

图6

图7

表4

参考文献 24

[1]	刘成川. 新场气田沙溪庙组多层致密气藏开发调整方案研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学, 2007.
	LIU Chengchuan. Research development adjustment plan for the Shaximiao tight gas reservoir with multi-layers in Xinchang Gas Field[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2007.
[2]	王旭, 李祖友, 严小勇, 等. 川西侏罗系气藏动态特征及开采对策[J]. 中外能源, 2015, 20(2):53-60.
	WANG Xu, LI Zuyou, YAN Xiaoyong, et al. Dynamic character and production countermeasure for Jurassic gas reservoirs in west Sichuan[J]. Sino-Global Energy, 2015, 20(2): 53-60.
[3]	朱宏权. 川西坳陷中段沙溪庙组沉积相与储层评价研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学, 2009.
	ZHU Hongquan. Depositional facies and reservoir characteristics research and evaluation of Shaximiao Formation, middle area of western Sichuan Depression[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2009.
[4]	胡荣杰. 新场气田沙溪庙组JS₂²储层三维地质建模研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学, 2015.
	HU Rongjie. The 3D geological modeling of JS₂² gas reservoir in Upper Shaximiao Formation, Xinchang Gas Field[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2015.
[5]	刘露, 王勇飞, 詹国卫. 川西地区致密砂岩气藏开采规律--以新场气田沙溪庙组J₂S₂气藏为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(S1):179-183.
	LIU Lu, WANG Yongfei, ZHAN Guowei. Exploitation laws of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the west of Sichuan: A case study for the J₂S₂ gas reservoir of Shaximiao Formation in Xinchang Gas Field[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(S1): 179-183.
[6]	王勇飞, 刘成川, 刘露. 川西坳陷致密砂岩气藏差异性开发实践与认识--以新场J₂S₂气藏为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(S1):174-178.
	WANG Yongfei, LIU Chengchuan, LIU Lu. Practice and understanding of the difference development of tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the west Sichuan Depression:A case study for the J₂S₂ gas reservoir of Shaximiao Formation in Xinchang gas field[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(S1): 174-178.
[7]	向刘洋, 邹陈蓉. 致密砂岩气藏井网加密优化研究--以新场气田沙溪庙组气藏为例[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2020, 34(3):62-66.
	XIANG Liuyang, ZOU Chenrong. Optimization of well pattern infilling in tight sandstone gas reservoirs: By taking Shaximiao Formation of Xinchang gas field as an example[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2020, 34(3): 62-66.
[8]	李锐强. 新场气田沙二气藏差气层录井再评价[D]. 成都:西南石油大学, 2014.
	LI Ruiqiang. Logging re-evaluation of the poor gas layer in the Sha-2 gas reservoir in Xinchang gas field[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2014.
[9]	邓强, 赵志川, 范世龙, 等. 新场气田蓬二气藏老井复查潜力评价[J]. 中外能源, 2018, 23(6):44-51.
	DENG Qiang, ZHAO Zhichuan, FAN Shilong, et al. Evaluation of the re-examination potential of old wells in Jp₂ gas reservoir of Xinchang gas field[J]. Sino-Global Energy, 2018, 23(6): 44-51.
[10]	田刚, 李祖友, 王旭. 川西地区老井挖潜选井评层标准研究[J]. 中外能源, 2014, 19(12):41-45.
	TIAN Gang, LI Zuyou, WANG Xu. Standards of well choosing and formation evaluation for tapping the potential of old Wells in western Sichuan area[J]. Sino-Global Energy, 2014, 19(12): 41-45.
[11]	王安东. 河流相储层隔、夹层的研究[D]. 青岛:中国石油大学(华东), 2010.
	WANG Andong. The research of interlayers and interbeds in fluvial reservoir[D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum(East China), 2010.
[12]	邹志文, 斯春松, 杨梦云. 隔夹层成因、分布及其对油水分布的影响--以准噶尔盆地腹部莫索湾莫北地区为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2010, 22(3):66-70.
	ZOU Zhiwen, SI Chunsong, YANG Mengyun. Origin and distribution of interbeds and the influence on oil-water layer: An example from Mosuowan area in the hinterland of Junggar Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoir, 2010, 22(3): 66-70.
[13]	王健, 徐守余, 仲维苹. 河流相储层隔夹层成因及其分布特征[J]. 地质科技情报, 2010, 29(4):84-88.
	WANG Jian, XU Shouyu, ZHONG Weiping. Genesis and distribution of the Interlayer in fluvial reservoir[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2010, 29(4): 84-88.
[14]	束青林. 孤岛油田馆陶组河流相储层隔夹层成因研究[J]. 石油学报, 2006, 27(3):100-103.
	SHU Qinglin. Interlayer characterization of fluvial reservoir in Guantao Formation of Gudao Oilfield[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2006, 27(3): 100-103.
[15]	李俊飞, 王鹏飞, 杨建民, 等. 渤海湾盆地D油田三角洲前缘储层隔夹层研究[J]. 新疆石油天然气, 2018, 14(3):7-11.
	LI Junfei, WANG Pengfei, YANG Jianmin, et al. Research on interlayers of delta front reservoir in D Oilfield, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Xinjiang Oil & Gas, 2018, 14(3): 7-11.
[16]	宋修章, 吕正祥, 章顺利, 等. 川西拗陷新场构造上沙溪庙组储层下限分析[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 43(4):431-437.
	SONG Xiuzhang, LYU Zhengxiang, ZHANG Shunli, et al. Study on the lower limit parameters of the Shangshaximiao Formation Reservoir in Xinchang structure, West Sichuan depression, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2016, 43(4): 431-437.
[17]	卜淘, 李忠平, 詹国卫, 等. 川西坳陷低渗砂岩气藏剩余气类型及分布研究[J]. 天然气工业, 2003, 23(S1):13-15.
	BU Tao, LI Zhongping, ZHAN Guowei, et al. Types and distribution of the remaining gas in low permeability sandstone gas reservoir in west Sichuan Deperession[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2003, 23(S1): 13-15.
[18]	刘正中. 低渗砂岩气藏剩余气分布规律研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学, 2005.
	LIU Zhengzhong. Research of residual gas of low permeability sandstone[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2005.
[19]	王栎霖. 大牛地盒三气藏剩余气分布影响因素研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学, 2011.
	WANG Yuelin. Study of effect factors of distribution of remaining gas in Daniudi He Ⅲ gas reservoir[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2011.
[20]	王昔彬, 刘传喜, 郑祥克, 等. 低渗特低渗气藏剩余气分布的描述[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2003, 24(4):401-403.
	WANG Xibin, LIU Chuanxi, ZHENG Xiangke, et al. Quantitative description of remaining gas distribution in low and extremely-low permeability gas reservoirs[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2003, 24(4): 401-403.
[21]	李勇明, 李崇喜, 郭建春. 砂岩气藏压裂裂缝高度影响因素分析[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2007, 98(2):87-90.
	LI Yongming, LI Chongxi, GUO Jianchun. Analysis on the Influence factors of fracture height of sandstone gas reservoir fracturing[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2007, 98(2): 87-90.
[22]	罗天雨, 刘全稳, 胡罡. 环玛湖三叠系玛X井压裂窜层可能性分析[J]. 广东石油化工学院学报, 2017, 27(6):31-34.
	LUO Tianyu, LIU Quanwen, HU Gang. Possibility analysis on the communication between zones in layer fracturing of Triassic System Ma X well in Huan Ma-lake Region[J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology, 2017, 27(6): 31-34.
[23]	朱新春. 杭锦旗区块压裂缝高影响因素及延伸规律分析[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2020, 42(1):119-144.
	ZHU Xinchun. Influential factors and propagation laws of hydraulic fracture height in the Hangjinqi Block[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2020, 42(1): 119-144.
[24]	胡阳明, 胡永全, 赵金洲, 等. 裂缝高度影响因素分析及控缝高对策技术研究[J]. 重庆科技学院学报(自然科学版), 2009, 49(1):28-31.
	HU Yangming, HU Yongquan, ZHAO Jinzhou, et al. Analysis of fracture height Influence factors and study of height control gaming techniques[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology(Natural Science Edition), 2009, 49(1): 28-31.

类型	发育位置	产状	垂向规模	分布范围	油气水隔挡
隔层	砂层组间、砂层间	垂向加积	几十厘米至几十米	连续分布,大于气藏或气层50 %面积	隔挡性好
夹层	砂层间、单砂体间、单砂体内	加积、侧积、前积	几十厘米至几米	分布不连续,小于气藏或气层50 %面积	隔挡性差

测井位置	自然伽马（API）	密度（g/cm³）	补偿中子（%）	电阻率（Ω·m）	自然电位（mV）	声波时差（μs/m）
砂岩层	50~70	2.35~2.55	13~20	15~35	-100~50	212~278
隔层	75~95	2.50~2.65	9~16	12~22	-100~50	230~245
相对砂体变化	变大	变大	变小	变小	无差异	变小

挖潜潜力井	拟挖潜层位	砂体垂厚（m）	隔层垂厚（m）	测井数据								平面未动用指标
挖潜潜力井	拟挖潜层位	砂体垂厚（m）	隔层垂厚（m）	自然伽马（API）	声波时差（μs/m）	深侧向电阻率（Ω·m）	补偿中子（%）	密度（g/cm³）	孔隙度（%）	渗透率（10^-3μm²）	含水饱和度（%）	平面未动用指标
挖潜标准	JS₂^2-1或JS₂^2-2	≥13.0	≥5.0	40.0~75.0	≥213	16~50	8~18	2.30~2.60	≥5	≥0.20	≤80.0	与生产邻井距离大于邻井控制半径
A1	JS₂^2-1	22.4	10.5	60.5	242	16	11	2.35	11	0.59	45.5	598~1 008 m> 90~163 m

井名及层位		砂岩垂深（m）	砂岩岩性	泥岩隔层垂厚（m）	槽面显示（%）	钻时（min/m）	泥浆密度（g/cm³）	黏度（mPa·s）	气测全烃（%）	自然伽马（API）	声波时差（μs/m）
A1 （挖潜潜力井）	JS₂^2-1 （挖潜潜力层）	22.4	中砂岩	10.5	20	4~7	1.78下降至1.76	53上升至55	4.87上升至45.10	60.5	229
A1 （挖潜潜力井）	JS₂^2-2 （已射孔压裂）	15.7	细砂岩	10.5	25	10下降至4	1.78下降至1.76	53上升至56	9.96上升至58.97	59.5	253
A2	JS₂^2-1 （已射孔压裂）	22.2	中砂岩	3.7	20	2~3	1.70下降至1.69	46上升至47	0.94上升至76.98	57~74	239~255
A2	JS₂^2-2 （已射孔压裂）	22.2	中砂岩	3.7	20	2~7	1.71下降至1.70	43上升至44	6.13上升至66.36	68	252
A3	JS₂^2-1 （已射孔压裂）	23	细、中砂岩	6.5	20	12下降至1	1.91下降至1.76	32上升至50	0.33上升至11.77	60.3	256
A3	JS₂^2-2 （已射孔压裂）	22	细、中砂岩	6.5	20	6下降至2	1.75下降至1.71	32上升至50	1.94上升至5.8	66.3	260
井名及层位		深侧向电阻率（Ω·m）	浅侧向电阻率（Ω·m）	补偿中子（%）	密度（g/cm³）	孔隙度（%）	渗透率（10^-3μm²）	含水饱和度（%）	综合解释	动态储量（10⁴m³）	与A1井距离（m）
A1 （挖潜潜力井）	JS₂^2-1 （挖潜潜力层）	16	14.5	11	2.35	11.0	0.59	45.5	气层
A1 （挖潜潜力井）	JS₂^2-2 （已射孔压裂）	15	13.5	12	2.31	11.5	0.74	46.5	气层	803
A2	JS₂^2-1 （已射孔压裂）	23	21	11.5~13.0		12	0.53	45	气层	4 416	598
A2	JS₂^2-2 （已射孔压裂）	22	21	13.4		12	0.65	46	气层	4 416	598
A3	JS₂^2-1 （已射孔压裂）	18.2	16.5	13.6	2.42	13	0.58	43	气层	8 485	664
A3	JS₂^2-2 （已射孔压裂）	17.5	15.9	14.0	2.40	15	0.65	47	气层	8 485	664

泥岩隔层发育背景下的河道砂岩气藏剩余气挖潜实践——以新场气田JS₂²气层为例

Practice of potential tapping of remaining gas in channel sandstone gas reservoir under the background of mudstone interlayers development: A case study of JS₂² gas layer in Xinchang Gas Filed

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 24

相关文章 4

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	刘叶轩,刘向君,丁乙,周鑫,梁利喜. 考虑隔层影响的页岩油储层可压性评价方法 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(1): 74-82.
[2]	周鑫,刘向君,丁乙,梁利喜,刘叶轩. 考虑隔层效应的水力裂缝与天然裂缝相交模拟 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(3): 515-525.
[3]	范玲玲. 杭锦旗东部盒1段储层宏观非均质性与气藏类型关系研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(2): 274-284.
[4]	肖翠,王伟,李鑫,杨小龙. 基于现代产量递减分析的延川南煤层气田剩余气分布数值模拟研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(4): 25-31.