海上砂砾岩油藏层间与层内干扰实验研究

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2024.01.016

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

油田开发过程中普遍存在着层间与层内干扰，对于纵向上没完全隔开的海上强非均质性巨厚砂砾岩油藏而言尤为如此，是油藏细分层系的基础和内因。矿场上，干扰数据主要由生产测井得到，开发经验表明干扰系数随开发阶段、时间变化而变化，生产测井普遍为单点测试，无法得到全周期干扰系数。因此，有必要对层间与层内干扰进行室内实验研究。干扰系数理论研究涉及参数众多且随时间变化，可以解释多层合采油井整体产油能力低于分层开采累加量现象，未能解决其形成的理论根源，所以采用了一维岩心驱替实验装置进行了层间和层内干扰的研究，实验表明：巨厚砂砾岩油藏层间干扰随着时间推移，含水上升，干扰系数逐渐增大，但在高含水期有所下降，导致层间干扰的原因是单驱与合驱时各岩心驱替压力梯度不同；巨厚砂砾岩油藏层内干扰在早期采油指数干扰系数较大，随着含水增加，采油指数干扰系数逐渐变小，层内干扰产生的实质是不同储层渗流阻力变化随着时间的变化，导致储层流量分配的改变。

关键词: 砂砾岩油藏, 层间干扰, 层内干扰, 干扰系数, 岩心驱替实验

Abstract:

The interlayer and intralayer interference, which is commonly existing in the process of oilfield development, especially for the offshore strongly heterogeneous huge thick sandstone and conglomerate reservoirs that are not completely separated vertically, is the basis and internal cause of reservoir subdivision. In practice, interference data are primarily obtained from production logging, which shows that the interference coefficient changes with the development stage and over time. Since production logging is typically a point test, it does not capture the full cycle interference coefficient, highlighting the need for laboratory studies on interlayer and intralayer interference. The theoretical study of interference coefficient involves numerous parameters and the interference coefficient changes with time. This theory can explain the phenomenon that the overall oil production capacity of multi-layer combined production wells is lower than the cumulative amount of multi-layer production, but it fails to solve the theoretical root cause of its formation. So a one-dimensional core displacement experimental device was used for the study of the interlayer and intralayer interference. The experiment shows that for the interlayer interference, the interference coefficient gradually increases with time as water cut rises, but decreases in high water cut period. This is due to the difference in the displacement pressure gradient of each core during single flooding and combined flooding. While for the intralayer interference, the interference coefficient of oil production index is large in the early stage, and gradually decreases with the increase of water cut. The essence of the interference is that the change of seepage resistance of different reservoirs with time results in the change of reservoir flow distribution.

Key words: glutenite reservoir, interlayer interference, intralayer interference, interference coefficient, core displacement experiment

中图分类号:

TE357

罗宪波. 海上砂砾岩油藏层间与层内干扰实验研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(1): 117-123.

LUO Xianbo. Laboratory experiment on interlayer and intralayer interference in offshore sandy conglomerate reservoir[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(1): 117-123.

图/表 13

表1

表2

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

参考文献 26

[1]	孙鹏霄, 刘英宪. 渤海稠油油藏开发现状及热采开发难点与对策[J]. 中国海上油气, 2023, 35(2): 85-92.
	SUN Pengxiao, LIU Yingxian. Development status and thermal development difficulties and strategy of Bohai heavy oil reservoirs[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2023, 35(2): 85-92.
[2]	蔡晖. 基于微观剩余油启动条件变化规律的合理注采调控界限研究[J]. 中国海上油气, 2023, 35(4): 94-102.
	CAI Hui. Study on reasonable injection-production control limit based on the change law of microcosmic residual oil start-up conditions[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2023, 35(4): 94-102.
[3]	邓景夫, 李云鹏, 贾晓飞, 等. 海上高含水期油田细分层系技术界限研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25(2): 116-119.
	DENG Jingfu, LI Yunpeng, JIA Xiaofei, et al. Technical boundaries of reservoir subdivision in offshore oilfield with high water-cut[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2018, 25(2): 116-119.
[4]	苏彦春, 郑伟, 杨仁锋, 等. 海上稠油油田热采开发现状与展望[J]. 中国海上油气, 2023, 35(5): 100-106.
	SU Yanchun, ZHENG Wei, YANG Renfeng, et al. Current status and prospect of thermal recovery processes for offshore heavy oilfields[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2023, 35(5): 100-106.
[5]	张健. 海上高含水油田非连续化学驱模式研究[J]. 中国海上油气, 2023, 35(1): 70-77.
	ZHANG Jian. Study on discontinuous chemical flooding model of offshore high water cut oilfield[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2023, 35(1): 70-77.
[6]	黄世军, 康博韬, 程林松, 等. 海上普通稠油油藏多层合采层间干扰定量表征与定向井产能预测[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015, 42(4): 488-495.
	HUANG Shijun, KANG Botao, CHENG Linsong, et al. Quantitative characterization of interlayer interference and productivity prediction of directional wells in multi-layer commingled production of offshore ordinary heavy oil reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(4): 488-495.
[7]	贾晓飞, 苏彦春, 邓景夫, 等. 多层合采砂岩油藏动态干扰及其影响因素[J]. 断块油气田, 2016, 23(3): 334-337.
	JIA Xiaofei, SU Yanchun, DENG Jingfu, et al. Interlayer dynamic interference caused by commingled production and its influencing factors on sandstone reservoir[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2016, 23(3): 334-337.
[8]	刘洪杰. 常规油藏多层合采层间干扰系数确定新方法[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2013, 27(5): 80-82.
	LIU Hongjie. New determination method of interlayer interference coefficient among commingling production layers in conventional reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2013, 27(5): 80-82.
[9]	马子麟, 师永民, 李宜强, 等. 用于多层油藏层间干扰预测的渗流阻力计算方法[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2021, 28(3): 104-110.
	MA Zilin, SHI Yongmin, LI Yiqiang, et al. Calculation method of seepage resistance for prediction of interlayer interference in multilayer reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2021, 28(3): 104-110.
[10]	缪飞飞, 黄凯, 胡勇, 等. 渤海油田层间干扰物理模拟研究及应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(1): 136-140.
	MIAO Feifei, HUANG Kai, HU Yong, et al. Physical simulation of inter-layer interference and its application in Bohai oilfield[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2019, 26(1): 136-140.
[11]	罗宪波, 李波, 刘英, 等. 存在启动压力梯度时储层动用半径的确定[J]. 中国海上油气, 2009, 21(4): 248-250.
	LUO Xianbo, LI Bo, LIU Ying, et al. The determination of drainage radius for reserviors with a start-up pressure gradient[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2009, 21(4): 248-250.
[12]	林海春, 魏丛达, 邹信波, 等. 海上油田水平井二次完井防砂产能预测模型[J]. 石油机械, 2022, 50(4): 111-117.
	LIN Haichun, WEI Congda, ZOU Xinbo, et al. Sand control productivity prediction model for secondary completion of horizontal wells in offshore oilfield[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2022, 50(4): 111-117.
[13]	杜旭林, 戴宗, 辛晶, 等. 强底水稠油油藏水平井三维水驱物理模拟实验[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(2): 141-148.
	DU Xulin, DAI Zong, XIN Jing, et al. Three-dimensional water flooding physical simulationexperiment of horizontal well in heavy oil reservoir with strong bottom water[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(2): 141-148.
[14]	谭先红, 范廷恩, 张利军, 等. 河流相储层不连续界限对剩余油分布及布井策略的影响作用[J]. 中国海上油气, 2021, 33(2): 123-130.
	TAN Xianhong, FAN Ting'en, ZHANG Lijun, et al. Impact on remaining oil distribution and well spacing pattern of discontinuous boundary in fluvial reservoir[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2021, 33(2): 123-130.
[15]	雷霄, 张乔良, 罗吉会, 等. 涠西南油田群复杂断块油藏水驱剩余油精细表征技术及其现场应用[J]. 中国海上油气, 2015, 27(4): 80-85.
	LEI Xiao, ZHANG Qiaoliang, LUO Jihui, et al. Fine characterization technique of remaining oil after water flooding for complex fault block reservoirs in Weizhou oilfields and its application[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2015, 27(4): 80-85.
[16]	朱义东, 李威, 王要森, 等. 海上特高含水期油田精细油藏描述技术及应用——以陆丰油田海陆过渡相A油藏为例[J]. 中国海上油气, 2020, 32(5): 91-99.
	ZHU Yidong, LI Wei, WANG Yaosen, et al. Fine reservoir description and its application in offshore ultra-high water-cut oilfields: Taking the marine-continent transitional facies A reservoir of Lufeng oilfield as an example[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2020, 32(5): 91-99.
[17]	王立垒, 刘述忍, 张俊廷, 等. 基于动态测试资料的渤海稠油油田剩余油挖潜技术[J]. 油气井测试, 2021, 30(4): 37-43.
	WANG Lilei, LIU Shuren, ZHANG Junting, et al. Potential tapping technology of remaining oil in Bohai heavy oil field based on dynamic test data[J]. Well Testing, 2021, 30(4): 37-43.
[18]	冯鑫, 廖浩奇, 李丰辉, 等. 底水油藏高含水期剩余油挖潜可视化驱油实验[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2021, 21(22): 9315-9321.
	FENG Xin, LIAO Haoqi, LI Fenghui, et al. The Visual Oil Displacement Experiment of Residual Oil at High Water-cut Stage in Bottom-water Reservoir[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2021, 21(22): 9315-9321.
[19]	冯其红, 李尚, 韩晓冬, 等. 稠油油藏边水推进规律物理模拟实验[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2014, 21(5): 81-83.
	FENG Qihong, LI Shang, HAN Xiaodong, et al. Physical experiment on edge water drive law of offshore heavy oil reservoir[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2014, 21(5): 81-83.
[20]	郑小冬, 黄鹏, 潘磊. 非均质高孔渗岩层层间干扰实验规律分析[J]. 西部探矿工程, 2021, 21(8): 67-71.
	ZHENG Xiaodong, HUANG Peng, PAN Lei. Analysis of the experimental law of interlayer interference in heterogeneous high porosity and permeability rocks[J]. West-China Exploration Engineering, 2021, 21(8): 67-71.
[21]	薛德栋, 杨万有, 张凤辉, 等. 海上油田电控液驱分层注采系统研究[J]. 石油机械, 2022, 50(5): 76-81.
	XUE Dedong, YANG Wanyou, ZHANG Fenghui, et al. Study on offshore layered injection-production system with electronic control & hydraulic drive[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2022, 50(5): 76-81.
[22]	王守磊, 耿站立, 安桂荣. 海上稠油油藏层间干扰系数确定新方法[J]. 中国海上油气, 2017, 29(5): 90-95.
	WANG Shoulei, GENG Zhanli, AN Guirong, et al. A new method of determining the interlayer interference coefficient in offshore heavy oil reservoir[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2017, 29(5): 90-95.
[23]	康博韬, 姜彬, 陈国宁, 等. 多层稠油油藏层间干扰规律研究及应用[J]. 石油化工应用, 2020, 39(8): 14-19.
	KANG Botao, JIANG Bin, CHEN Guoning, et al. Application of interlayer interference law in multi-layer heavy oil reservoir[J]. Petrochemical Industry Application, 2020, 39(8): 14-19.
[24]	尹晓云, 敬加强, 孙杰, 等. 水平管内黏稠油水环输送管道停输再启动特性[J]. 石油机械, 2022, 50(4): 124-129.
	YIN Xiaoyun, JING Jiaqiang, SUN Jie, et al. Shutdown and restart characteristics on water ring transfer of heavy oil in horizontal pipeline[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2022, 50(4): 124-129.
[25]	张凯, 路然然, 张黎明, 等. 多层合采油藏启动压力及层间干扰[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2014, 33(6): 57-64.
	ZHANG Kai, LU Ranran, ZHANG Liming, et al. Threshold pressure and interlayer interference for multi-layer commingled production oil reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2014, 33(6): 57-64.
[26]	孟勇, 贾庆升, 张潦源, 等. 东营凹陷页岩油储层层间干扰及裂缝扩展规律研究[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2021, 49(4): 130-138.
	MENG Yong, JIA Qingsheng, ZHANG Liaoyuan, et al. Research on interlayer interference and the fracture propagation law of shale oil reservoirs in the Dongying Sag[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2021, 49(4): 130-138.

岩心编号	长度/m	直径/m	干重/g	孔隙度/%	气测渗透率/10^-3μm²	液测渗透率/10^-3μm
X4	0.058 2	0.025 4	53.60	26.42	66.89	69.66
Z6	0.052 5	0.024 4	50.84	30.70	99.34	53.49
X1	0.058 2	0.025 4	53.80	21.08	45.04	47.99
X3	0.058 3	0.025 4	55.63	21.08	12.11	21.27

岩心编号	长度/m	直径/m	干重/g	孔隙度/%	气测渗透率/10^-3μm²	液测渗透率/10^-3μm²
X1	0.058 2	0.025 4	53.80	21.08	45.04	47.99
Z6	0.052 5	0.024 4	50.84	30.70	99.34	53.49
X3	0.058 3	0.025 4	55.63	21.08	12.11	21.27
Z3	0.052 4	0.024 2	52.09	26.76	40.59	37.99
3-3	0.060 5	0.025 3	67.53	20.80	9.92	4.46
4-3	0.061 3	0.025 5	64.42	25.83	15.19	8.01