深/浅部煤储层孔裂隙结构及三维空间分布差异特征

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025.02.007

油气藏评价与开发 ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (2): 227-236.doi: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025.02.007

深/浅部煤储层孔裂隙结构及三维空间分布差异特征

王鹏翔¹(), 张洲¹^,²^,³(), 余婉莹¹, 邹强¹, 杨正滔¹

1.河南理工大学资源环境学院，河南焦作 454000
2.中原经济区煤层（页岩）气河南省协同创新中心，河南焦作 454000
3.河南省非常规能源地质与开发国际联合实验室，河南焦作 454000

收稿日期:2024-10-21 发布日期:2025-04-01 出版日期:2025-04-26
通讯作者: 张洲 E-mail:1227181367@qq.com;zhangzhou@hpu.edu.cn
作者简介:王鹏翔（1998—），男，在读硕士研究生，主要从事煤地质与非常规天然气地质研究。地址：河南省焦作市世纪路2001号河南理工大学，邮政编码：454000。E-mail：1227181367@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“煤层气低产储层靶向改造增产关键理论及技术基础”(42230814);河南省高等学校重点项目计划“煤层气井煤粉沉降规律及处理系统研究”(25B170010)

Characteristics of pore-fracture structure and three-dimensional spatial distribution differences in deep and shallow coal reservoirs: A case study of Junggar Basin

WANG Pengxiang¹(), ZHANG Zhou¹^,²^,³(), YU Wanying¹, ZOU Qiang¹, YANG Zhengtao¹

1. School of Resources and Environment, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454000, China
2. Collaborative Innovation Center of Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas for Central Plains Economic Region, Jiaozuo, Henan 454000, China
3. Henan International Joint Laboratory for Unconventional Energy Geology and Development, Jiaozuo, Henan 454000, China

Received:2024-10-21 Online:2025-04-01 Published:2025-04-26
Contact: ZHANG Zhou E-mail:1227181367@qq.com;zhangzhou@hpu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

深/浅部煤储层孔隙-裂隙结构差异特征对煤层气开采具有较大影响，针对这些结构特征差异进行的研究可为探索其物性特征，寻找煤层气勘探开发有利区提供部分理论依据。以准噶尔盆地深/浅部煤储层的煤岩样品作为研究对象，对深/浅部样品进行扫描电子显微镜、低温N₂吸附、高压压汞和CT（计算机断层成像）扫描等测试。测试结果表明，从浅部到深部的煤岩样品的渗透率逐渐降低，总孔体积逐渐降低，微孔与大孔分布频率逐渐降低；浅层样品孔隙-裂隙发育较好，中孔与大孔阶段孔隙分形维数值低，孔隙发育的均质性强，大孔隙与微裂隙相互连通；深部煤岩样品孔隙-裂隙发育相对较为孤立，在中孔与大孔阶段孔隙发育情况较复杂，孔隙-裂隙多被矿物充填。通过最大球算法对样品构建孔隙网络模型，阐明了样品连通孔裂隙的分布规律、形态与结构在三维空间的发育情况，并对等效孔隙、孔喉参数等结构参数和连通情况进行统计和分析，发现浅层样品连通孔隙度和总孔隙度优于深层样品，浅部样品孔隙-裂隙数量多，在微裂隙尺度占有优势，喉道短，孔喉半径大，发育密集，配位数高，连通性好，有利于气体在储层中流动。研究成果对于准噶尔盆地开发深/浅部煤层气采用适配性技术提供了实验数据支撑，对现场开发具有一定的指导意义。

关键词: 准噶尔盆地, 深部煤层气, 孔隙特征, 物性特征, CT（计算机断层成像）扫描

Abstract:

The differences in pore-fracture structures between deep and shallow coal reservoirs significantly affect coalbed methane extraction. Research on these structural differences provides theoretical support for exploring their physical properties and identifying favorable zones for coalbed methane exploration and development. This study analyzed coal samples from deep and shallow coal reservoirs in the Junggar Basin. These samples were tested using scanning electron microscopy, low-temperature N₂ adsorption, high-pressure mercury injection, and CT scan. The results showed that, from shallow to deep coal samples, the permeability, total pore volume, and distribution frequency of micropores and macropores gradually decreased. The shallow coal samples exhibited well-developed pores and fractures, with low fractal dimensions in the mesopore and macropore stages, strong homogeneity in pore development, and interconnection between macropores and microfractures. In contrast, the deep coal samples showed relatively isolated pore-fracture development, more complex pore development in the mesopore and macropore stages, and significant mineral filling within pores and fractures. A pore network model for the samples was established using the maximal sphere algorithm to analyze the distribution pattern, morphology, and three-dimensional structural development of the connected pores and fractures. The equivalent pores, throat parameters, and other structural parameters, along with the connectivity, were statistically analyzed. The results revealed that shallow coal samples showed higher connectivity and total porosity compared to the deep samples. The shallow samples exhibited more pores and fractures, with a dominance at the microfracture scale. Additionally, they exhibited shorter throats, larger pore-throat radii, denser pore development, higher coordination numbers, and better connectivity, which facilitated gas flow in the reservoir. The research findings provide experimental data support for the development of deep and shallow coalbed methane in the Junggar Basin using adaptive technologies, and offer valuable guidance for on-site development.

Key words: Junggar Basin, deep coalbed methane, pore characteristics, physical properties, CT scan

中图分类号:

TE132

王鹏翔,张洲,余婉莹等. 深/浅部煤储层孔裂隙结构及三维空间分布差异特征[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2025, 15(2): 227-236.

WANG Pengxiang,ZHANG Zhou,YU Wanying, et al. Characteristics of pore-fracture structure and three-dimensional spatial distribution differences in deep and shallow coal reservoirs: A case study of Junggar Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2025, 15(2): 227-236.

图/表 12

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

表2

表3

图5

图6

图7

图8

表4

参考文献 36

[1]	蒋曙鸿, 师素珍, 赵康, 等. 深部煤及煤层气勘探前景及发展方向[J]. 科技导报, 2023, 41(7): 106-113.
	JIANG Shuhong, SHI Suzhen, ZHAO Kang, et al. Prospect and development direction of deep coal and coalbed methane exploration[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2023, 41(7): 106-113.
[2]	贾承造, 王祖纲, 姜林, 等. 中国油气勘探开发成就与未来潜力: 深层、深水与非常规油气——专访中国科学院院士、石油地质与构造地质学家贾承造[J]. 世界石油工业, 2023, 30(3): 1-8.
	JIA Chengzhao, WANG Zugang, JIANG Lin, et al. Achievements and future potential for oil&gas exploration and development in China: deep-formation, deep-water and unconventional reservoirs—Interview with JIA Chengzao, Academician of the CAS, geologist in petroleum geology and structure[J]. World Petroleum Industry, 2023, 30(3): 1-8.
[3]	张华珍, 徐海云, 张焕芝, 等. 2022国外油气田开发技术进展[J].世界石油工业, 2023, 30(3): 53-60.
	ZHANG Huazhen, XU Haiyun, ZHANG Huanzhi, et al. Progress of oil and gas field development technologies in 2022[J]. World Petroleum Industry, 2023, 30(3): 53-60.
[4]	汪泽成, 赵振宇, 黄福喜, 等. 中国中西部含油气盆地超深层油气成藏条件与勘探潜力分析[J]. 世界石油工业, 2024, 31(1): 33-48.
	WANG Zecheng, ZHAO Zhenyu, HUANG Fuxi, et al. Ultra-deep hydrocarbon accumulation conditions and exploration potential in sedimentary basins of Central-Western China[J]. World Petroleum Industry, 2024, 31(1): 33-48.
[5]	秦勇. 中国深部煤层气地质研究进展[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(11): 1791-1811.
	QIN Yong. Progress on geological research of deep coalbed methane in china[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(11): 1791-1811.
[6]	邓泽, 王红岩, 姜振学, 等. 深部煤储层孔裂隙结构对煤层气赋存的影响: 以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘大宁-吉县区块为例[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2024, 52(8): 106-123.
	DENG Ze, WANG Hongyan, JIANG Zhenxue, et al. Influence of deep coal pore and fracture structure on occurrence of coalbed methane: A case study of Daning-Jixian Block in eastern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2024, 52(8): 106-123.
[7]	章新文, 王勇, 金芸芸, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部旬-宜探区深部煤层气成藏条件与勘探潜力[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2024, 38(2): 77-81.
	ZHANG Xinwen, WANG Yong, JIN Yunyun, et al. Reservoir-forming conditions and exploration potential of deep coalbed methane in Xun-Yi exploration area, southern Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2024, 38(2): 77-81.
[8]	许晓凡, 杨铁梅, 邓志宇, 等. 深煤层可改造性测井评价方法研究[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2024, 38(5): 30-35.
	XU Xiaofan, YANG Tiemei, DENG Zhiyu, et al. Logging evaluation of the transformability potential for deep coalbed methane reservoir[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2024, 38(5): 30-35.
[9]	降文萍, 张群, 姜在炳, 等. 构造煤孔隙结构对煤层气产气特征的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016, 27(1): 173-179.
	BENG Wenping, ZHANG Qun, JIANG Zaibing, et al. Effect on CBM drainage characteristics of pore structure of tectonic coal[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2016, 27(1): 173-179.
[10]	李相臣, 康毅力. 煤层气储层微观结构特征及研究方法进展[J]. 中国煤层气, 2010, 7(2): 13-17.
	LI Xiangchen, KANG Yili. Advances in the micro-structural features and research methodology of coalbed methane reservoir[J]. China Coalbed Methane 2010, 7(2): 13-17.
[11]	刘大锰, 贾奇锋, 蔡益栋. 中国煤层气储层地质与表征技术研究进展[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2022, 50(1): 196-203.
	LIU Dameng, JIA Qifeng, CAI Yidong. Research progress on coalbed methane reservoir geology and characterization technology in China[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2022, 50(1): 196-203.
[12]	JIANG B, QU Z H, WANG G, et al. Effects of structural deformation on formation of coalbed methane reservoirs in Huaibei coalfield, China[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2010, 82(3-4): 175-183.
[13]	SCHMITT M, FERNANDES C P, CUNHA NETO J A B DA, et al. Characterization of pore systems in seal rocks using nitrogen gas adsorption combined with mercury injection capillary pressure techniques[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2013, 39(1): 138-149.
[14]	王睿, 冯宏飞, 柳长峰. 压汞法和液氮吸附法在高阶煤孔隙结构表征中的适用性[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2024, 46(1): 112-118.
	WANG Rui, FENG Hongfei, LIU Changfeng. Applicability of mercury intrusion method and nitrogen adsorption method in characterizing pore structure of high-rank coal[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2024, 46(1): 112-118.
[15]	张慧. 煤孔隙的成因类型及其研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2001, 26(1): 40-44.
	ZHANG Hui. Genetical types of pores in coal reservoir and its research significance[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2001, 26(1): 40-44.
[16]	姚艳斌, 刘大锰, 蔡益栋, 等. 基于NMR和X-CT的煤的孔裂隙精细定量表征[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2010, 40(11): 1598-1607.
	YAO Yanbin, LIU Dameng, CAI Yidong, et al. Fine quantitative characterization of pore fracture in coal based on NMR and X-CT[J]. Scientia Sinica(Terrae), 2010, 40(11): 1598-1607.
[17]	王尧, 王传格, 曾凡桂, 等. 中低阶煤纳米孔隙结构的小角X射线散射研究[J]. 煤炭转化, 2022, 45(4): 10-18.
	WANG Yao, WANG Chuange, ZENG Fangui, et al. Small-Angle X-ray scattering study on the Nano-pore structure of middle and low rank coal[J]. Coal Conversion, 2022, 45(4): 10-18.
[18]	苟启洋, 徐尚, 郝芳, 等. 基于微米CT页岩微裂缝表征方法研究[J]. 地质学报, 2019, 93(9): 2372-2382.
	GOU Qiyang, XU Shang, HAO Fang, et al. Study on characterization of micro-fracture of shale based on micro-CT[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2019, 93(9): 2372-2382.
[19]	彭紫燕, 谢斐, 王炜肖, 等. 页岩储层压裂裂缝形态描述及流动模拟方法研究现状[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2023, 37(5): 120-126.
	PENG Ziyan, XIE Fei, WANG Yixiao,et al. Research status of fracture morphology description and flow simulation method in shale reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2023, 37(5): 120-126.
[20]	张苗, 刘钦节, 王兴阵, 等. 整合压汞、N₂和CO₂吸附的中-高阶煤多重分形特征[J]. 煤炭学报, 2024, 49(5): 2394-2404.
	ZHANG Miao, LIU Qinjie, WANG Xingzhen, et al. Multiple fractal characterization of medium-high-rank coal integrating mercury intrusion porosimetry, N₂ and CO₂ adsorption experiments[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2024, 49(5): 2394-2404.
[21]	刘世奇, 王鹤, 王冉, 等. 煤层孔隙与裂隙特征研究进展[J]. 沉积学报, 2021, 39(1): 212-230.
	LIU Shiqi, WANG He, WANG Ran, et al. Research advances on characteristics of pores and fractures in Coal Seams[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2021, 39(1): 212-230.
[22]	汪周华, 范琨鹏, 赵建飞, 等. 非常规储层微纳米孔隙介质中流体相态研究进展[J]. 世界石油工业, 2024, 31(3): 68-77.
	WANG Zhouhua, FAN Kunpeng, ZHAO Jianfei, et al. Research progress of fluid phase behavior in micro-nano porous media of unconventional reservoirs[J]. World Petroleum Industry, 2024, 31(3): 68-77.
[23]	汤达祯, 杨曙光, 唐淑玲, 等. 准噶尔盆地煤层气勘探开发与地质研究进展[J]. 煤炭学报, 2021, 46(8): 2412-2425.
	TANG Dazhen, YANG Shuguang, TANG Shuling, et al. Advance on exploration-development and geological research of coalbed methane in the Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2021, 46(8): 2412-2425.
[24]	桑树勋, 李瑞明, 刘世奇, 等. 新疆煤层气大规模高效勘探开发关键技术领域研究进展与突破方向[J]. 煤炭学报, 2024, 49(1): 563-585.
	Shuxun SAN, LI Ruiming, LIU Shiqi, et al. Research progress and breakthrough direction of the key technical fields for large scale and efficient exploration and development of coalbed methane in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2024, 49(1): 563-585.
[25]	兰浩, 杨兆彪, 仇鹏, 等. 新疆准噶尔盆地白家海凸起深部煤层气勘探开发进展及启示[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2024, 52(2): 13-22.
	LAN Hao, YANG Zhaobiao, CHOU Peng, et al. Exploration and exploitation of deep coalbed methane in the Baijiahai uplift, Junggar Basin: Progress and its implications[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2024, 52(2): 13-22.
[26]	程建, 周小进, 刘超英, 等. 中西部大盆地重点勘探领域战略选区研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(2): 229-237.
	CHENG Jian, ZHOU Xiaojin, LIU Chaoying, et al. Strategic area selection and key exploration fields in central and western large basins[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(2): 229-237.
[27]	彭文利, 薛冽, 马效杰, 等. 准噶尔盆地南缘齐古地区煤层气地质特征[J]. 非常规油气, 2021, 8(1): 8-14.
	PENG Wenli, XUE Lie, MA Xiaojie, et al. Geological characteristics of coalbed methane in Qigu area on the southern margin of Junggar Basin[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2021, 8(1): 8-14.
[28]	彭文利, 薛冽, 胡斌, 等. 准噶尔盆地东部煤层气地质特征及有利区优选[J]. 非常规油气, 2015, 2(5): 7-12.
	PENG Wenli, XUE Lie, HU Bin, et al. CBM geological characteristics and favorable zone optimization in eastern Junggar Basin[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2015, 2(5): 7-12.
[29]	宋永, 唐勇, 何文军, 等. 准噶尔盆地油气勘探新领域、新类型及勘探潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2024, 45(1): 52-68.
	SONG Yong, TANG Yong, HE Wenjun, et al. New fields, new types and exploration potentials of oil-gas exploration in Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2024, 45(1): 52-68.
[30]	张哲泠, 杨正红. 微介孔材料物理吸附准确性分析的理论与实践[J]. 催化学报, 2013, 34(10): 1797-1810.
	ZHANG Zheling, YANG Zhenghong. Theoretical and practice discussion of measurement accuracy for physisorption with micro-and mesoporous materials[J]. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2013, 34(10): 1797-1810.
[31]	张昆, 孟召平, 金毅, 等. 不同煤体结构煤的孔隙结构分形特征及其研究意义[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2023, 51(10): 198-206.
	ZHANG Kun, MENG Zhaoping, JIN Yi, et al. Fractal characteristics of pore structures on different coal structures and its research significance[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2023, 51(10): 198-206.
[32]	SONG Y, JIANG B, LIU J G. Nanopore structural characteristics and their impact on methane adsorption and diffusion in low to medium tectonically deformed coals: Case study in the Huaibei coal field[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(7): 6711-6723.
[33]	ZHANG Z, LIU G F, WANG X M, et al. A fractal Langmuir adsorption equation on coal: Principle, methodology and implication[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2024, 488: 150869.
[34]	LIU D M, ZHAO Z, CAI Y D, et al. Review on applications of X-ray computed tomography for coal characterization: Recent progress and perspectives[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2022, 36(13): 6659-6674.
[35]	张开仲, 程远平, 王亮, 等. 基于煤中瓦斯赋存和运移方式的孔隙网络结构特征表征[J]. 煤炭学报, 2022, 47(10): 3680-3694.
	ZHANG Kaizhong, CHENG Yuanping, WANG Liang, et al. Pore network structure characterization based on gas occurrence and migration in coal[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2022, 47(10): 3680-3694.
[36]	ZHANG K Z, WANG S L, WANG L, et al. 3D visualization of tectonic coal microstructure and quantitative characterization on topological connectivity of pore-fracture networks by Micro-CT[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 208: 109675

样品编号	采样位置	去矿物基显微组分体积分数/%			工业分析组分质量分数/%				常量元素质量分数/%					渗透率/ 10^-3 μm²
样品编号	采样位置	镜质组	惰质组	壳质组	M_ad	A_ad	V_daf	FC_ad	ω（N）	ω（C）	ω（H）	ω（S）	ω（O）	渗透率/ 10^-3 μm²
QG	深部	45.56	53.67	0.77	3.87	2.59	25.68	67.86	0.52	78.33	4.16	0.07	12.43	0.022
DN	深部	75.33	23.68	0.99	2.87	2.92	41.24	52.97	0.75	75.83	5.56	0.13	12.12	0.013
KG	浅部	12.55	86.61	0.84	5.74	1.27	21.30	71.69	1.37	78.19	3.78	0.05	10.21	0.097
LHG	浅部	21.20	78.00	0.80	9.85	1.98	23.76	64.41	0.04	71.25	3.46	0.03	13.95	0.149

样品编号	采样位置	相对压力（p/p₀）小于0.5			相对压力（p/p₀）大于0.5
样品编号	采样位置	拟合函数	D₁	R²	拟合函数	D₂	R²
QG	深部	y＝-0.763 6x－3.346 4	2.236 4	0.950 9	y＝-0.338 2x－3.318 5	2.661 8	0.993 0
DN	深部	y＝-0.452 4x－0.216 0	2.547 6	0.978 1	y＝-0.277 7x－0.103 4	2.722 3	0.978 1
KG	浅部	y＝-0.366 6x＋1.078 7	2.633 4	0.965 7	y＝-0.144 0x＋1.095 7	2.855 9	0.997 8
LHG	浅部	y＝-0.356 8x＋1.327 0	2.643 2	0.921 5	y＝-0.136 3x＋1.292 9	2.863 7	0.993 1

样品编号	采样位置	大孔			中孔
样品编号	采样位置	拟合函数	D₃	R²	拟合函数	D₄	R²
QG	深部	y＝0.070 8x－3.852 2	2.929 2	0.959 7	y＝0.033 9x－3.864 7	2.966 1	0.991 0
DN	深部	y＝0.098 7x－3.786 0	2.901 3	0.954 9	y＝0.140 9x－3.795 6	2.859 1	0.992 0
KG	浅部	y＝0.218 0x－4.667 2	2.782 0	0.990 2	y＝0.512 8x－4.732 8	2.487 2	0.995 5
LHG	浅部	y＝0.407 2x－3.936 0	2.592 8	0.985 7	y＝0.559 3x－4.013 1	2.440 7	0.996 5

样品编号	孔径	等效孔隙数量	平均孔隙等效直径/μm	累计孔隙等效直径/μm	孔喉长度/μm	孔喉数量	平均孔喉长度/μm	累计孔喉长度/μm	有效配位数
DN	<5	226	1.91	432	<50	0	0	0	80
	5~<10	62	6.46	401	50~<100	5	78.8	394
	10~<20	23	13.26	305	100~<200	45	157.6	7 094
	20~<30	15	25.20	378	200~<300	35	256.8	8 989
	30~50	33	39.51	1 304	300~500	40	381.6	15 265
	>50	36	69.30	2 498	>500	5	587.4	2 937
QG	<5	127	2.39	304	<50	10	36.6	366	227
	5~<10	44	7.04	310	50~<100	50	78.2	3 908
	10~<20	101	14.70	1 485	100~<200	97	145.2	14 087
	20~<30	58	24.70	1 437	200~<300	98	246.3	24 139
	30~50	43	36.48	1 569	300~500	91	378.3	34 430
	>50	28	83.03	2 325	>500	27	589.3	15 912
KG	<5	0	0	0	<50	229	35.9	8 242	972
	5~<10	136	7.61	1 036	50~<100	157	78.6	12 347
	10~<20	302	17.63	5 327	100~<200	84	139.2	11 694
	20~<30	81	23.03	1 866	200~<300	27	274.7	7 418
	30~50	15	34.80	522	300~500	19	332.0	6 314
	>50	5	57.80	289	>500	7	539.5	3 777
LHG	<5	0	0	0	<50	200	35.1	7 019	878
	5~<10	255	8.30	2 119	50~<100	140	69.5	9 731
	10~<20	517	13.62	7 046	100~<200	84	143.2	12 028
	20~<30	79	23.36	1 846	200~<300	41	248.1	10 174
	30~50	21	37.00	777	300~500	42	383.7	16 118
	>50	10	79.20	792	>500	46	669.0	30 774

深/浅部煤储层孔裂隙结构及三维空间分布差异特征

Characteristics of pore-fracture structure and three-dimensional spatial distribution differences in deep and shallow coal reservoirs: A case study of Junggar Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 36

相关文章 9

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	赵崇胜, 王波, 苟波, 罗鹏飞, 陈国军, 巫国全. 深部煤层气油电混驱压裂设备配置与工艺技术 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2025, 15(2): 292-299.
[2]	李雪彬,金力新,陈超峰,俞天喜,向英杰,易多. 深层煤岩气水平井压裂关键技术——以准噶尔盆地白家海地区侏罗系为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(4): 629-637.
[3]	桑树勋,韩思杰,周效志,刘世奇,王月江. 华东地区深部煤层气资源与勘探开发前景 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 403-415.
[4]	姚红生,肖翠,陈贞龙,郭涛,李鑫. 延川南深部煤层气高效开发调整对策研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(4): 545-555.
[5]	王然,何文军,赵辛楣,刘国良,周作铭,赵毅. 准噶尔盆地吉174井芦草沟组页岩油地质剖面分析 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1): 192-203.
[6]	姚红生,陈贞龙,郭涛,李鑫,肖翠,解飞. 延川南深部煤层气地质工程一体化压裂增产实践 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(3): 291-296.
[7]	杨兆中,李扬,饶政,何帆,李小刚,马薛丽. 注入水水质对SN-1井区油藏采收率影响研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(6): 103-109.
[8]	吴聿元,陈贞龙. 延川南深部煤层气勘探开发面临的挑战和对策 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(4): 1-11.
[9]	陈波,郝媛媛,石海信,孙国强,史基安,吴志雄. 冷东地区下干柴沟组上段沉积储层特征研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2018, 8(3): 1-6.