油气藏评价与开发 >
2021 , Vol. 11 >Issue 2: 146 - 153
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2021.02.002
页岩及致密地层油气井的生产特征及可采储量计算方法
收稿日期: 2020-09-28
网络出版日期: 2021-04-30
Production performance and EUR forecast of wells producing from tight/shale reservoirs
Received date: 2020-09-28
Online published: 2021-04-30
作为页岩及致密地层油气藏开发的重要经济指标之一,页岩及致密地层油气井的产量预测及可采储量计算是非常规油气藏工程中非常重要的一项工作。因此,无论国内还是国外都把产量预测及可采储量的计算作为研究的重要课题,也是非常规油气藏工程师所面临的挑战之一。通过对页岩及致密地层油气藏的地质特征的描述,分析了页岩及致密地层油气藏生产井的生产产量特征。从生产特征出发,阐述常规油气藏计算储量及预测产量方法对页岩及致密地层低渗透油气藏油气井计算的不适用性。结合国际石油工程评价委员会（SPEE）建议的方法,最终提出计算页岩及致密地层生产井的产量预测及可采储量计算方法及工作流。应用实例说明了计算工作流的正确性。
YU Shaoyong , 刘玉慧 . 页岩及致密地层油气井的生产特征及可采储量计算方法[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021 , 11(2) : 146 -153 . DOI: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2021.02.002
As one of the important economic indicators for the development of shale/tight reservoirs, the production performance and EUR calculation of shale/tight wells is an important subject in unconventional reservoir engineering. This has been challenging for the reservoir engineers from both China and other country for a dozen of years. Based on the understanding of the unique geological characteristics of shale/tight reservoirs, this paper describes in detail the production performance of those wells producing extremely tight reservoirs, from which the inapplicability of using traditional methods has been explained. Further, a new methodology and the workflow has been presented from SPEE recommendations, and one practical example has also been illustrated of implementing the workflow.
Key words： shale; tight formation; production behavior; production forecast; EUR estimation
| [1] | 彭刚. 中国石油在川页岩气2018年产42.7亿方[N/OL]. 中国石油报, 2019-01-07[2020-09-20]. http://www.ccin.com.cn/detail/a24196f6ca74841331df156e9b0c6635. |
| [1] | PENG Gang. PetroChina Sichuan shale gas output reached 4.27 billion cubic meters in 2018[N/OL]. China Petroleum Daily. 2019-01-07[2020-09-20]. http://www.ccin.com.cn/detail/a24196f6ca74841331df156e9b0c6635. |
| [2] | 虞绍永. 页岩及致密油气藏工程方法[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2018: 4-6. |
| [2] | YU Shaoyong. Shale and tight reservoir engineering[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2018: 4-6. |
| [3] | 王科, 李海涛, 李留杰, 等. 3种常用页岩气井经验递减方法——以四川盆地威远区块为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019,30(7):946-954. |
| [3] | WANG Ke, LI Haitao, LI Liujie, et al. Research on three widely-used empirical decline methods for shale gas wells in Weiyuan block of the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019,30(7):46-954. |
| [4] | 郭为, 张晓伟, 于荣泽, 等. 长宁页岩气田单井EUR计算方法[J]. 天然气工业, 2017,37(S1):101-106. |
| [4] | GUO Wei, ZHANG Xiaowei, YU Rongze, et al. Single well EUR calculation method in Changning Shale Gas Field[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2017,37(S1):101-106. |
| [5] | SEIDLE J P. Estimating developed reserves in selected low-permeability unconventional reservoirs[M]. Houston: SPEE, 2016. |
| [6] | CLARKSON C R, HAGHSHENAS B, GHANIZADEH A, et al. Nanopores to megafractures: current challenges and methods for shale gas reservoir and hydraulic fracture characterization[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016,31:612-657. |
| [7] | DEVEGOWDA D, SAPMANEE K, CIVAN F, et al. Phase behavior of gas condensates in shales due to pore proximity effects: Implications for transport, reserves and well productivity[C]// paper SPE-160099-MS presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, October 8-12, 2012, San Antonio, Texas, USA. |
| [8] | GHANIZADEH A, AQUINO S, CLARKSON C R. Petrophysical and geomechanical characteristics of Canadian tight oil and liquid-rich gas reservoirs[C]// paper SPE-171633-MS presented at the SPE/CSUR Unconventional Resources Conference-Canada, September 30-October 2, 2014, Alberta, Canada. |
| [9] | 商绍芬, 严鸿, 吴建, 等. 四川盆地长宁页岩气井生产特征及开采方式[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2018,41(4):69-75. |
| [9] | SHANG Shaofen, YAN Hong, WU Jian, et al. Production characteristics and development modes of shale-gas wells,Changning gasfield, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2018,41(4):69-75. |
| [10] | RATERMAN K T, FARRELL H E, MORA O S, et al. Sampling a stimulated rock volume: An eagle ford example[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2018,21(4):927-941. |
| [11] | ARPS J J. Analysis of decline curves[J]. Transactions of the AIME, 1945,160(1):228-247. |
| [12] | FETKOVICH M J. Decline curve using type curves[C]// paper SPE-203662-MS presented at the SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, August 11-13, 2020, Nigeria. |
| [13] | JOSHI K, LEE W J. Comparison of various deterministic forecasting techniques in shale gas reservoirs[C]// paper SPE-163870-MS presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, February 4-6, 2013, The Woodland, Texas, USA. |
| [14] | LONG D R, DAVIS M J. A new approach to the hyperbolic curve[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1988,40(7):909-912. |
| [15] | DUONG A N. An unconventional rate decline approach for tight and fracture dominated gas wells[J]. SPE Reservoir Engineering and Evaluation, 2011,14(3):377-387. |
| [16] | VALKó P P. Assigning value to stimulation in the Barnett Shale: a simultaneous analysis of 7000-plus production histories and well completion records[C]// paper SPE-119369-MS presented at the SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, January 19-21, 2009, The Woodland, Texas, USA. |
| [17] | YU S Y, LEE W J, MIOCEVIC D J, et al. Estimating proved reserves in tight/shale wells using the modified SEPD method[C]// paper SPE-166198-MS presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, September 30-October 2, 2013, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. |
| [18] | CLARK A J, LAKE L W, PATZEK T W. Production forecasting with logistic growth models[C]// paper SPE-144790-MS presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, October 30-November 2, 2011, Denver, Colorado, USA. |
| [19] | YU S Y, JIANG Z X, LEE W J. Reconciling empirical methods for reliable EUR and production profile forecasts of horizontal wells in tight/shale reservoirs[C]// paper SPE-189802-MS presented at the SPE Canada Unconventional Resources Conference, March 13-14, 2018, Alberta, Canada. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |