油气藏评价与开发 >
2024 , Vol. 14 >Issue 2: 167 - 175
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2024.02.002
火山岩气藏勘探开发理论技术与实践——以松南断陷白垩系火山岩为例
收稿日期: 2023-11-29
网络出版日期: 2024-05-07
基金资助
中国石化重点科技项目“松南断陷火山岩气藏精细描述与高效动用技术”(P21104-2)
Theories, technologies and practices of exploration and development of volcanic gas reservoirs: A case study of Cretaceous volcanic rocks in Songnan fault depression
Received date: 2023-11-29
Online published: 2024-05-07
近20年来，中国石化东北油气分公司在松辽盆地南部的勘探进一步证明，盆地火山岩是寻找油气藏的新靶区，具有广阔的前景。东北油气分公司根据盆地勘探实践，总结了以主成藏期为关键点的“生烃灶-成藏期古构造-断盖保存-有效储层”联动演化的断陷层四元耦合控藏模式，推动了松南地区长岭断陷火石岭组大规模火山岩气藏的发现。火山岩勘探方向从营城组拓展到更深层的火石岭组，勘探目标从酸性火山岩拓展到中基性火山岩，从水上喷发到水下喷发。采用气藏精细描述技术，建模数模一体化及地质工程一体化技术，在松南断陷多口井取得产能突破，实现火山岩气藏高效开发和规模上产。
马代鑫 , 任宪军 , 赵密福 , 韩娇艳 , 刘玉虎 . 火山岩气藏勘探开发理论技术与实践——以松南断陷白垩系火山岩为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024 , 14(2) : 167 -175 . DOI: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2024.02.002
In the past two decades, Sinopec Northeast Oil & Gas Company has made significant strides in exploring the southern Songliao Basin, revealing that the basin's volcanic rocks present a new and promising avenue for hydrocarbon exploration. According to the exploration practice of the basin, the company has developed a comprehensive four-component coupling reservoir control model specific to fault depressions. This model emphasizes the interconnected evolution of key elements such as hydrocarbon generating foci, reservoir formation periods, paleostructure, fault cap preservation, and effective reservoirs, with a particular focus on the main accumulation period. This strategic approach led to the significant discovery of a large-scale volcanic gas reservoir within the Huoshiling Formation in the Changling fault depression, located in the Songnan area. Consequently, the exploration focus has broadened from the Yingcheng Formation to the Huoshiling Formation, diversifying the exploration targets from acidic volcanic rocks to intermediate-basic volcanic rocks, and extending from subaerial to submarine eruptions. By using the technique of fine gas reservoir description, the integration of modeling, numerical modeling and geological engineering, the productivity breakthrough has been achieved in several wells in Songnan fault depression, and the efficient development and large-scale production of volcanic gas reservoir has been realized.
| [1] | TANG H F, TIAN Z W, GAO Y F, et al. Review of volcanic reservoir geology in China[J]. The International Geological Journal Bridging the Gap between Research Articles and Textbooks, Earth-Science Reviews, 2022, 232: 104-158. |
| [2] | 单玄龙, 牟汉生, 刘玉虎, 等. 湖盆水下喷发火山岩相类型、特征与储集意义——以松辽盆地南部查干花地区白垩系为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(4): 719-730. |
| [2] | SHAN Xuanlong, MU Hansheng, LIU Yuhu, et al. Subaqueous volcanic eruptive facies, facies model and its reservoir significance in a continental lacustrine basin: A case from the Cretaceous in Chaganhua area of southern Songliao Basin, NE China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(4): 719-730. |
| [3] | 谭杰, 周克明, 曾理, 等. 火山岩晶质及非晶质矿物组分定量分析方法——以四川盆地西部二叠系火山岩为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(5): 24-33. |
| [3] | TAN Jie, ZHOU Keming, ZENG Li, et al. Quantitative analysis method for crystalline and amorphous components in volcanic rocks: A case study on Permian volcanic rocks in the western Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(5): 24-33. |
| [4] | 何海清, 范土芝, 郭绪杰, 等. 中国石油“十三五”油气勘探重大成果与“十四五”发展战略[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(1): 17-30. |
| [4] | HE Haiqing, FAN Tuzhi, GUO Xujie, et al. Major achievements in oil and gas exploration of PetroChina during the 13th Five-Year Plan period and its development strategy for the 14th Five-Year Plan[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(1): 17-30. |
| [5] | 刘小洪, 王委委, 冯明友, 等. 准噶尔盆地克拉美丽气田滴西14井区石炭系蚀变凝灰岩储层热液作用过程及时限[J]. 地球科学, 2022, 47(5): 1694-1710. |
| [5] | LIU Xiaohong, WANG Weiwei, FENG Mingyou, et al. Hydrothermal process and duration of carboniferous altered tuff reservoir in Well Dixi 14 Area of Kelameili Gas Field (Junggar Basin), NW China[J]. Earth Science, 2022, 47(5): 1694-1710. |
| [6] | 蒋佳兵, 陈如鹤, 李小刚, 等. 火山岩内幕型储层特征与主控因素——以准噶尔盆地滴南凸起滴水泉西断裂下盘为例[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2023, 28(2): 119-132. |
| [6] | JIANG Jiabing, CHEN Ruhe, LI Xiaogang, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of inner volcanic reservoir: A case study of the footwall of West Dishuiquan Fault in Dinan Bulge, Junggar Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2023, 28(2): 119-132. |
| [7] | 谢继容, 李亚, 杨跃明, 等. 川西地区二叠系火山碎屑岩规模储层发育主控因素与天然气勘探潜力[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(3): 48-57. |
| [7] | XIE Jirong, LI Ya, YANG Yueming, et al. Main controlling factors and natural gas exploration potential of Permian scale volcanoclastic reservoirs in the western Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(3): 48-57. |
| [8] | 张赫, 王小军, 贾承造, 等. 松辽盆地北部中浅层全油气系统特征与油气成藏聚集模式[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(4): 683-694. |
| [8] | ZHANG He, WANG Xiaojun, JIA Chengzao, et al. Total petroleum system and hydrocarbon accumulation model in shallow and medium strata in northern Songliao Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(4): 683-694. |
| [9] | 熊海河. 松辽盆地南部天然气勘探开发现状及展望[J]. 天然气工业, 2000, 20(增刊1): 1-2. |
| [9] | XIONG Haihe. Current situation for natural gas exploration and development in the South part of Songliao Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2000, 20(suppl. 1): 1-2. |
| [10] | 任宪军, 许明静, 谢正霞. 松南气田火山岩气藏特征[J]. 内蒙古石油化工, 2010, 36(18): 124-126. |
| [10] | REN Xianjun, XU Mingjing, XIE Zhengxia. Volcanic gas reservoir characteristics of Songnan Gas Field[J]. Inner Mongolia Petrochemical Industry, 2010, 36(18): 124-126. |
| [11] | 苗长盛, 徐文, 刘玉虎, 等. 松辽盆地南部火山岩储层特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 635-643. |
| [11] | MIAO Changsheng, XU Wen, LIU Yuhu, et al. Characteristics of volcanic reservoirs in Southern Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2020, 50(2): 635-643. |
| [12] | 李瑞磊, 杨立英, 朱建峰, 等. 松辽盆地南部断陷层火山岩储层特征及油气成藏主控因素[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(4): 100-111. |
| [12] | LI Ruilei, YANG Liying, ZHU Jianfeng, et al. Volcanic reservoir characteristics and hydrocarbon accumulation control factors of rift depressions in southern Songliao Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(4): 100-111. |
| [13] | 冯志强, 刘嘉麒, 王璞珺, 等. 油气勘探新领域: 火山岩油气藏——松辽盆地大型火山岩气田发现的启示[J]. 地球物理学报, 2011, 54(2): 269-279. |
| [13] | FENG Zhiqiang, LIU Jiaqi, WANG Pujun, et al. New oil and gas exploration field: Volcanic hydrocarbon reservoirs——Enlightenment from the discovery of the large gas field in Songliao basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2011, 54(2): 269-279. |
| [14] | WANG P J, CHEN S M. Cretaceous volcanic reservoirs and their exploration in the Songliao Basin, northeast China[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2015, 99(3): 499-523. |
| [15] | 王璞珺, 迟元林, 刘万洙, 等. 松辽盆地火山岩相: 类型、特征和储层意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2003, 33(4): 449-456. |
| [15] | WANG Pujun, CHI Yuanlin, LIU Wanzhu, et al. Volcanic facies of the Songliao Basin: classification, characteristics and reservoir significance[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2003, 33(4): 449-456. |
| [16] | 谢家莹. 试论陆相火山岩区火山地层单位与划分——关于火山岩区填图单元划分的讨论[J]. 火山地质与矿产, 1996, 17(增刊2): 85-94. |
| [16] | XIE Jiaying. Discussion on volcanic stratigraphic units and division of continental volcanic rocks area: Discussion on division of mapping units of volcanic rocks area[J]. Volcanic Geology and Mineral Resources, 1996, 17(suppl. 2): 85-94. |
| [17] | 衣健, 王璞珺, 唐华风, 等. 火山地层界面的地质属性、地质内涵和储层意义——以中国东北地区中生代一新生代火山岩为例[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(3): 324-336. |
| [17] | YI Jian, WANG Pujun, TANG Huafeng, et al. Geological property, geological connotation and reservoir significance of volcanostratigraphic boundary: A case study of Mesozoic to Cenozoic volcanic rocks in Northeastern China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(3): 324-336. |
| [18] | 陈建文, 魏斌, 李长山, 等. 火山岩岩性的测井识别[J]. 地学前缘, 2000, 7(4): 458. |
| [18] | CHEN Jianwen, WEI Bin, LI Changshan, et al. Log identification of volcanic rock lithology[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2000, 7(4): 458. |
| [19] | 庞彦明, 章凤奇, 邱红枫, 等. 酸性火山岩储层微观孔隙结构及物性参数特征[J]. 石油学报, 2007, 28(6): 72-77. |
| [19] | PANG Yanming, ZHANG Fengqi, QIU Hongfeng, et al. Characteristics of microscopic pore structure and physical property parameter in acidic volcanic reservoir[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2007, 28(6): 72-77. |
| [20] | 姚红生, 王伟, 何希鹏, 等. 南川复杂构造带常压页岩气地质工程一体化开发实践[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 537-547. |
| [20] | YAO Hongsheng, WANG Wei, HE Xipeng, et al. Development practices of geology-engineering integration in complex structural area of Nanchuan normal pressure shale gas field[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(5): 537-547. |
| [21] | 任宪军. 松辽盆地长岭断陷盆缘陡坡带中性火山岩相模式及其对储层的控制作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(3): 816-828. |
| [21] | REN Xianjun. Neutral volcanic facies model and its controlling effect on reservoir in the steep slope zone of Changling fault depression in Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(3): 816-828. |
| [22] | 白国帅, 蒋有录, 侯帅, 等. 龙凤山地区火石岭组火山岩优质储层主控因素及成因机制[J]. 地球科学, 2022, 47(5): 1748-1761. |
| [22] | BAI Guoshuai, JIANG Youlu, HOU Shuai, et al. Main controlling factors and genetic mechanism of high-quality volcanic reservoirs in Huoshiling Formation of Longfengshan Area[J]. Earth Science, 2022, 47(5): 1748-1761. |
| [23] | 邢健. 松辽盆地长岭断陷盆缘斜坡带火石岭组中性火山岩储层发育模式[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2022. |
| [23] | XING Jian. Development model of neutral volcanic rock reservoir in Huoshiling Formation on the slope of Changling fault depression in Songliao Basin[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2022. |
| [24] | NIU P H, SHAN X L, REN X J, et al. Microscopic pore characteristics of andesite and implication from mineral content: A case study in Huoshiling Formation of Changling fault depression, Songliao Basin[J]. Global Geology, 2022, 25(2): 13. |
| [25] | SHI Y Q, YI J, BIAN W H, et al. Reservoir characteristics and development model of subaqueous pyroclastic rocks in a continental Lacustrine Basin: A case study of the Chaganhua Subsag in the Changling Fault Depression, Songliao Basin[J]. Energies, 2023: 4968. |
| [26] | 冷庆磊, 朱建峰, 刘玉虎. 松辽盆地南部查干花次凹下白垩统火山岩储层特征与发育规律[J]. 世界地质, 2023, 42(3): 527-535. |
| [26] | LENG Qinglei, ZHU Jianfeng, LIU Yuhu. Characteristics and development regularity of Lower Cretaceous volcanic rock reservoirs in Chaganhua subsag, southern Songliao Basin[J]. World Geology, 2023, 42(3): 527-535. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |