油气藏评价与开发 >
2024 , Vol. 14 >Issue 2: 176 - 189
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2024.02.003
陆相湖盆水下喷发火山岩储层特征及发育模式——以松辽盆地长岭断陷查干花次凹为例
收稿日期: 2023-11-29
网络出版日期: 2024-05-07
基金资助
中国石化重点科技项目“松南断陷火山岩气藏精细描述与高效动用技术”(P21104-2)
Characteristics and development model of underwater eruptive volcanic reservoirs in continental lacustrine basin: A case study of Chaganhua Subsag in Changling Fault Depression, Songliao Basin
Received date: 2023-11-29
Online published: 2024-05-07
在松辽盆地长岭断陷陆相湖盆水下喷发的火石岭组火山碎屑岩中发现了工业油气,有广阔的勘探前景。研究针对火石岭组水下喷发火山碎屑岩储层的储集空间特征、物性特征及孔隙结构差异开展,分析不同类型储层物性差异原因及其形成和演化过程。主要有以下4个方面:①凝灰岩中火山玻璃含量较高,储集空间以脱玻化孔和溶蚀孔为主,并且粒度越粗物性越好,孔隙规模、孔径大小、孔隙丰度等方面逐渐变大;沉凝灰岩黏土矿物含量高,以黏土矿物晶间孔为主,物性差;凝灰质砂岩中长石、岩屑和浊沸石等易溶组分含量高,以溶蚀孔为主。②研究区火山碎屑岩储层原生孔隙不发育,储层较为致密,平均孔隙度为2.43%,渗透率平均值为0.076×10-3 μm2,粗粒凝灰岩孔隙度最高,其次是凝灰质砂岩和细粒凝灰岩,沉凝灰岩物性最差。③脱玻化作用是凝灰岩储层中高孔隙度和超低渗透率的重要原因,中成岩阶段的2次油气充注导致岩石发生有机酸溶蚀,此外,裂缝可以为有机酸和深部热液提供运移通道,导致后期溶蚀,并连接各种分散的溶蚀孔隙,提高储集空间的有效性。④近源相带气携水下火山碎屑流亚相粗粒凝灰岩储层是油气勘探的有利目标。
任宪军 , 石云倩 , 靖伟 . 陆相湖盆水下喷发火山岩储层特征及发育模式——以松辽盆地长岭断陷查干花次凹为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024 , 14(2) : 176 -189 . DOI: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2024.02.003
Industrial oil and gas have been found in the volcaniclastic rocks of the Huoshiling Formation erupted underwater in the continental lacustrine basin of the Changling fault depression in the Songliao Basin, which has broad exploration prospects. The study focuses on the reservoir space characteristics, physical properties and pore structure differences of the underwater eruption pyroclastic rock reservoirs in the Huoshiling Formation, and analyzes the reasons for the differences in physical properties of different types of reservoirs and their formation and evolution processes. There are mainly the following four aspects: ① Tuff, with its high volcanic glass content, predominantly features devitrification and dissolution pores as its main reservoir spaces. Coarser particle sizes in tuff correlate with improved physical properties, including larger and more abundant pores. Sedimentary tuff, rich in clay minerals, exhibits mainly interstitial spaces between these minerals and poorer physical properties. Tuffaceous sandstone, with high levels of soluble components like feldspar, debris, and laumontite, is characterized by dissolution pores. ② The average porosity is 2.43%, and the average permeability is 0.076×10-3 μm2. Coarse-grained tuff exhibits the highest porosity, followed by tuffaceous sandstone and fine-grained tuff, with sedimentary tuff displaying the poorest physical properties. ③ Devitrification significantly contributes to the high porosity yet ultra-low permeability observed in tuff reservoirs. Organic acid dissolution during the middle diagenesis stage, resulting from two separate oil and gas fillings, further enhances porosity. Additionally, fractures serve as conduits for organic acids and deep hydrothermal fluids, promoting further dissolution that connects dispersed dissolution pores and enhances reservoir space effectiveness. ④The coarse-grained tuff reservoir in the near-source facies gas-carrying subaqueous pyroclastic flow subfacies is a favorable target for oil and gas exploration.
[1] | WHITE J D.L, SMELLIE J L, CLAGUE D A. A deductive outline and topical overview of subaqueous explosive volcanism[J]. Explosive Subaqueous Volcanism, 2003, 140. |
[2] | 黄金富, 王啊丽, 夏国朝, 等. 喷发相火山岩储层特征研究及地质意义[J]. 非常规油气, 2023, 10(6): 27-34. |
[2] | HUANG Jinfu, WANG Ali, XIA Guochao, et al. Study on reservoir characteristics of eruptive facies volcanic rock and its geological significance[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2023, 10(6): 27-34. |
[3] | CHADWICK W W, EMBLEY R W, RONDE C E D, et al. Long-term eruptive activity at a submarine arc volcano[J]. Nature, 2006, 441: 494-497. |
[4] | PONTBRIAND C W, SOULE S A, SOHN R A, et al. Effusive and explosive volcanism on the ultraslow-spreading Gakkel Ridge, 85°E[J]. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 2012, 13(10): 1236-1238. |
[5] | SHARON L, WALKER J, BAKER E T, et al. Eruption-fed particle plumes and volcaniclastic deposits at a submarine volcano: NW Rota-1, Mariana arc[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth, 2008, 113(B8): 975-978. |
[6] | CAS R A F. Submarine volcanism: Eruption styles, products, and relevance to understanding the host-rock successions to volcanic-hosted massive sulfide deposits[J]. Economic Geology & the Bulletin of the Society of Economic Geologists 1992, 87(3): 511-541. |
[7] | ALLEN R S, HAYWARD W B, MATHEWS E. A facies model for a submarine volcaniclastic apron: The Miocene Manukau Subgroup, New Zealand[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2007, 119(5): 725-742. |
[8] | HELO C, CLAGUE D A, DINGWELL D B, et al. High and highly variable cooling rates during pyroclastic eruptions on Axial Seamount, Juan de Fuca Ridge[J]. Journal of Volcanology & Geothermal Research, 2013, 253: 54-64. |
[9] | HEAD J W, WILSON L. Deep submarine pyroclastic eruptions: Theory and predicted landforms and deposits[J]. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 2003, 121(3): 155-193. |
[10] | WHITE J D L, SCHIPPER C I, KANO K. Submarine explosive volcanism[D]. America: Academic Press, 2015. |
[11] | MUELLER W U. A subaqueous eruption model for shallow-water, small volume eruptions: Evidence from two Precambrian examples[J]. Geophysical Monograph Series, 2003, 140: 189-203. |
[12] | KANO K. Subaqueous pumice eruptions and their products: A Review[J]. American Geophysical Union, 2003, 140: 213-229. |
[13] | 单玄龙, 牟汉生, 刘玉虎, 等. 湖盆水下喷发火山岩相类型、特征与储集意义——以松辽盆地南部查干花地区白垩系为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(4): 719-730. |
[13] | SHAN Xuanlong, MU Hansheng, LIU Yuhu, et al. Subaqueous volcanic eruptive facies, facies model and its reservoir significance in a continental lacustrine basin: A case from the cretaceous in Chaganhua area of southern Songliao Basin, NE China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(4): 719-730. |
[14] | 单玄龙, 李吉焱, 陈树民, 等. 陆相水下火山喷发作用及其对优质烃源岩形成的影响: 以松辽盆地徐家围子断陷营城组为例[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2014, 44(12): 2637-2644. |
[14] | SHAN Xuanlong, LI Jiyan, CHEN Shumin, et al. Continental underwater volcanic eruption and its influence on the formation of high-quality source rocks: A case study of Yingcheng Formation in Xujiaweizi fault depression, Songliao Basin[J]. Science in China: Earth Sciences, 2014, 44(12): 2637-2644. |
[15] | 刘德成, 陈亚军, 伍宏美, 等. 火山岩陆上与水下喷发沉积环境的地球化学判识方法研究[J]. 地质科学, 2022, 57(3): 809-834. |
[15] | LIU Decheng, CHEN Yajun, WU Hongmei, et al. Geochemistry discriminance study of subaerial and underwater eruptive depositional environment of volcanic rocks[J]. Chinese Journal of Geology, 2022, 57(3): 809-834. |
[16] | 伍宏美, 陈亚军, 孟朋飞, 等. 火山岩陆上与水下喷发环境的氧化系数判别方法[J]. 沉积学报, 2022, 40(3): 599-615. |
[16] | WU Hongmei, CHEN Yajun, MENG Pengfei, et al. Discrimination methods of oxidation index of volcanic rock in land and underwater eruption environments[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2022, 40(3): 599-615. |
[17] | 唐华风, 王寒非, KENNEDY Ben, 等. 水下喷发火山碎屑岩储层特征及主控因素: 以新西兰Taranaki盆地中新世Kora火山为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2021, 28(1): 375-387. |
[17] | TANG Huafeng, WANG Hanfei, KENNEDY Ben, et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of volcanic reservoirs of subaqueous pyroclastic rocks: An analysis of the Miocene Kora Volcano in the Taranaki Basin, New Zealand[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2019, 28(1): 375-387. |
[18] | SHI Y Q, YI J, BIAN W H, et al. Reservoir characteristics and development model of subaqueous pyroclastic rocks in a continental Lacustrine Basin: A case study of the Chaganhua Subsag in the Changling fault depression, Songliao Basin[J]. Energies, 2023, 16(13): 1-31. |
[19] | 王璞珺, 侯启军, 刘万洙, 等. 松辽盆地深层火山岩储层岩相特征和天然气的来源[J]. 世界地质, 2007, 26(3): 319-325. |
[19] | WANG Pujun, HOU Qijun, LIU Wanzhu, et al. Characteristics of volcanic facies and genesis of natural gases in deep Songliao Basin, NE China[J]. World Geology, 2007, 26(3): 319-325. |
[20] | 时应敏. 松辽盆地长岭断陷火山机构及天然气成藏特征研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2012. |
[20] | SHI Yingmin. Study on volcanic mechanism and natural gas accumulation characteristics in Changling fault depression, Songliao Basin[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2012. |
[21] | 杜长鹏. 松辽盆地莺山-双城断陷白垩系致密火山岩天然气成藏条件及主控因素[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2023, 35(4): 115-124. |
[21] | DU Changpeng. Natural gas accumulation conditions and main controlling factors of Cretaceous tight volcanic rocks in Yingshan-Shuangcheng fault depression, Songliao Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2023, 35(4): 115-124. |
[22] | 刘小洪, 王委委, 冯明友, 等. 准噶尔盆地克拉美丽气田滴西14井区石炭系蚀变凝灰岩储层热液作用过程及时限[J]. 地球科学, 2022, 47(5): 1694-1710. |
[22] | LIU Xiaohong, WANG Weiwei, FENG Mingyou, et al. Hydrothermal process and duration of carboniferous altered tuff reservoir in Well Dixi 14 area of Kelamili Gas field(Junggar Basin), NW China[J]. Earth Science, 2022, 47(5): 1694-1710. |
[23] | 唐华风, 杨迪, 邵明礼, 等. 火山地层就位环境对储集层分布的约束——以松辽盆地王府断陷侏罗系火石岭组二段流纹质火山地层为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(4): 573-579. |
[23] | TANG Huafeng, YANG Di, SHAO Mingli, et al. Constraints of volcano-stratigraphic emplacement environment on the reservoir distribution: A case analysis of rhyolitic volcanic strata in the 2nd member of Jurassic Huoshiling Formation in Wangfu fault depression, Songliao Basin, East China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(4): 573-579. |
[24] | SING K S, EVERETT D H, HAUL R A W, et al. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity[J]. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1985, 57: 603-619. |
[25] | 孙浩伟, 范存辉, 张云峰, 等. 川东地区二叠系火山岩储层特征[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2022, 36(2): 30-34. |
[25] | SUN Haowei, FAN Cunhui, ZHANG Yunfeng, et al. Reservoir characteristics of Permian volcanic rocks in eastern Sichuan[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2022, 36(2): 30-34. |
[26] | 蒋佳兵, 陈如鹤, 李小刚, 等. 火山岩内幕型储层特征与主控因素——以准噶尔盆地滴南凸起滴水泉西断裂下盘为例[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2023, 28(2): 119-132. |
[26] | JIANG Jiabing, CHEN Ruhe, LI Xiaogang, et al. Characteristics and main controlling factors of inner volcanic reservoir: A case study of the footwall of West Dishuiquan Fault in Dinan Bulge, Junggar Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2023, 28(2): 119-132. |
[27] | 张赫, 王小军, 贾承造, 等. 松辽盆地北部中浅层全油气系统特征与油气成藏聚集模式[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(4): 683-694. |
[27] | ZHANG He, WANG Xiaojun, JIA Chengzao, et al. Total petroleum system and hydrocarbon accumulation model in shallow and medium strata in northern Songliao Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(4): 683-694. |
[28] | GOULTY N R, SARGENT C, ANDRAS P, et al. Compaction of diagenetically altered mudstones-Part 1: mechanical and chemical contributions[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2016, 77: 703-713. |
[29] | LIU G H, ZHAI G Y, HUANG Z L, et al. The effect of tuffaceous material on characteristics of different lithofacies: A case study on Lucaogou Formation fine-grained sedimentary rocks in Santanghu Basin[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, 2019, 179: 355-377. |
[30] | WANG P J, MATTERN F, DIDENKO N A, et al. Tectonics and cycle system of the Cretaceous Songliao Basin: An inverted active continental margin basin[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2016, 159: 82-102. |
/
〈 | 〉 |