油气藏评价与开发 >
2025 , Vol. 15 >Issue 1: 28 - 39
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025.01.004
页岩纹层类型与测井表征方法研究——以苏北盆地高邮凹陷阜宁组二段为例
收稿日期: 2024-09-13
网络出版日期: 2025-01-26
基金资助
中国石化科研项目“内陆断陷湖盆断块型页岩油勘探开发关键技术”(P23189)
Research on shale lamination types and logging characterization methods: A case study of the Funing Formation Member 2 in Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin
Received date: 2024-09-13
Online published: 2025-01-26
苏北盆地高邮凹陷阜宁组二段(以下简称阜二段)页岩岩相非均质性强,纹层类型复杂且测井定量表征难度大,制约了页岩油“甜点”有利区带的优选。因此,基于阜二段不同沉积阶段的气候环境演化特征,结合岩心薄片、全岩衍射、元素录井、测井等资料,详细研究了高邮凹陷阜二段页岩纹层类型及纹层发育程度的测井定量表征方法。研究结果表明:高邮凹陷阜二段页岩主要发育长英质、黏土质、方解石和白云石条带等纹层类型,受古气候演化影响,阜二段各小层不同纹层类型占比存在差异,不同纹层类型的叠置耦合造成了纵向上页岩油差异富集,且纹层越发育,页岩油的富集程度越高。针对页岩纹层差异分布的地质特征,进一步通过电成像测井图像边缘检测和页岩沉积速率计算等方法综合分析,阜二段页岩Ⅳ-3—Ⅳ-7、Ⅴ-6—Ⅴ-8小层纹层发育程度高,为纵向上页岩油地质“甜点”层。其中基于电成像测井图像边缘检测的页岩纹层识别精度高,可适用于不同区块页岩油纵向“甜点”层的精细地质评价,而通过计算页岩沉积速率变化来表征纹层发育程度适用于开展页岩纹层发育程度的空间展布预测,指导页岩油的立体勘探。
唐磊 , 廖文婷 , 夏连军 , 马捷 , 张娟 . 页岩纹层类型与测井表征方法研究——以苏北盆地高邮凹陷阜宁组二段为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2025 , 15(1) : 28 -39 . DOI: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025.01.004
The shale lithofacies in the second member of the Funing Formation (hereafter referred to as Funing Formation Member 2) in the Gaoyou Sag of Subei Basin exhibits significant heterogeneity, with complex lamination types that are challenging to quantify using well logging, thus limiting the identification of favorable “sweet spots” for shale oil. Therefore, this study investigates the methods for quantitative characterization of shale lamination types and their development in Funing Formation Member 2 of Gaoyou Sag, by integrating data from core thin sections, whole rock diffraction, elemental logging, and well logging, based on the climatic and environmental evolution during different sedimentary stages. The results show that shale lamination types mainly include quartz-enriched, clay-enriched, calcite, and dolomite bands. Influenced by ancient climatic evolution, the proportions of different lamination types vary across intervals, and the vertical superposition and coupling of these lamination types lead to differential shale oil enrichment, with more developed laminations corresponding to higher oil enrichment. During the deposition of intervals Ⅴ-6 to Ⅴ-10, the sediments exhibit a high aridity index, low Sr/Cu ratio, significant variation in the Sr/Ba ratio, and high V/(V+Ni) ratio. These characteristics suggest a strongly reducing, semi-arid to arid saline water environment with fluctuating water depths and periodic variation in lake nutrients. Saline stratification and diagenesis facilitate the development of abundant bright calcite layers, fibrous calcite layers, and dolomite layers, providing favorable reservoir properties for shale oil. During the deposition of intervals Ⅴ-1 to Ⅴ-5, the Sr/Cu ratio increases significantly while the aridity index decreases. The overall environmental characteristics indicate a strongly reducing, arid saline water environment. The shale is predominantly composed of clay-rich to sandy-mixed lithology, with clay-enriched layers and clay-rich laminations as the dominant lamination types. Due to the influence of recrystallization degree, the proportion of bright calcite layers decreases while the proportion of mudstone-like calcite layers increases. During the deposition of intervals Ⅳ-5 to Ⅳ-8, the Sr/Cu ratio exhibits a periodic variation of “decrease followed by increase”, indicating a decrease in lake water salinity. The lithology primarily consists of clay-rich to sandy-mixed shale, with the development of clay-enriched layers, clay-rich laminations, bright calcite layers, fibrous calcite layers, and dolomite layers. These intervals demonstrate excellent reservoir properties and are regarded as high-quality sweet spot layers for shale oil. During the deposition of intervals Ⅳ1-Ⅳ4, the Sr/Cu ratio increases, indicating intensified arid conditions. The climate characteristics suggest a strongly reducing, arid saline environment. The recrystallization degree of calcite is higher, leading to the development of bright calcite, fibrous calcite, and dolomite layers. Additionally, the proportion of mudstone-like calcite layers increases, indicating a higher overall carbonate mineral content influenced by the depositional environment. During the deposition of the subinterval Ⅲ, the climate alternates between humid and arid conditions, with a higher degree of calcite crystallization and the development of bright calcite layers. Subintervals Ⅱ and Ⅰ exhibit a significant decrease in Fe/Mn and Sr/Ba ratios, indicating intensified humid conditions. Water depth increases, and the shale gradually transitions to blocky structure. The content of gray and muddy minerals decreases, limiting the development of gray and muddy laminations. The study further confirms a positive correlation between the degree of shale lamination development and shale oil enrichment. Based on the geological characteristics of the shale lamination distribution, further analysis was conducted using methods such as edge detection from electrical imaging well logging and shale deposition rate calculation. The study identified intervals Ⅳ-3 to Ⅳ-7 and Ⅴ-6 to Ⅴ-8 in Funing Formation Member 2 as having well-developed laminations and higher total organic carbon (TOC) compared to other intervals, marking them as vertical shale oil sweet spot layers. The image edge detection method using electrical imaging well logging offers high accuracy for shale bedding identification and is suitable for detailed geological evaluation of vertical shale oil sweet spot layers in different blocks. Furthermore, as the climate change during shale deposition becomes more frequent and the sedimentation rate varies more drastically, the vertical heterogeneity and lamination development of shale increase. Thus, sedimentation rate variations can serve as an indicator of shale lamination development. An analysis of stratigraphic cycles in the Huazhuang area's Funing Formation Member 2 revealed that natural gamma MTM spectrum analysis of well Huaye 7 identified eight dominant frequencies, corresponding to cycle thicknesses of 39.84, 11.76, 9.43, 4.20, 3.19, 2.32, 2.13, 1.82 m. The ratio of cycle thicknesses is 21.91:6.47:5.19:2.13:1.76:1.28:1.17:1.00, which is close to the theoretical cycle ratio of 21.32:6.58:5.26:2.74:2.00:1.21:1.16:1.00 for this period. Therefore, the shale deposition process of the Funing Formation Member 2 is controlled by the Milankovitch astronomical cycle. The optimal sedimentation rate for this interval was determined to be 10.8 cm/kyr. Using this optimal rate, the eCOCO statistical method was applied to track and analyze sedimentation rate variations in the Funing Formation Member 2. The results indicate significant differences in sedimentation rates among different sub-layers of the Funing Formation Member 2 due to the influence of periodic climatic fluctuations. Moreover, the degree of lamination development indicated by the sedimentation rate variation correlates well with the overall proportion of lamination development obtained from thin section analysis, and is consistent with the lamination development detected by imaging logging in different intervals. Consequently, this method can predict the spatial distribution of lamination development, providing guidance for three-dimensional shale oil exploration. In summary, this study provides insight on the lithological heterogeneity and quantitative logging characterization of the Funing Formation Member 2 in the Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin. These findings contribute to the identification and evaluation of shale oil sweet spot layers, promoting shale oil exploration and development.
[1] | 云露, 何希鹏, 花彩霞, 等. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系陆相页岩油成藏地质特征及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 176-187. |
YUN Lu, HE Xipeng, HUA Caixia, et al. Accumulation characteristics and resource potential of Paleogene continental shale oil in Qintong sag of Subei Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(1): 176-187. | |
[2] | 余涛, 卢双舫, 李俊乾, 等. 东营凹陷页岩油游离资源有利区预测[J]. 断块油气田, 2018, 25(1): 16-21. |
YU Tao, LU Shuangfang, LI Junqian, et al. Prediction for favorable area of shale oil free resources in Dongying Sag[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2018, 25(1): 16-21. | |
[3] | 王芙蓉, 何生, 郑有恒, 等. 江汉盆地潜江凹陷潜江组盐间页岩油储层矿物组成与脆性特征研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38(2): 211-218. |
WANG Furong, HE Sheng, ZHENG Youheng, et al. Mineral composition and brittleness characteristics of the inter-salt shale oil reservoirs in the Qianjiang Formation, Qianjiang Sag[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2016, 38(2): 211-218. | |
[4] | 李宁, 徐彬森, 武宏亮, 等. 人工智能在测井地层评价中的应用现状及前景[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(4): 508-522. |
LI Ning, XU Binsen, WU Hongliang, et al. Application status and prospects of artificial intelligence in well logging and formation evaluation[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(4): 508-522. | |
[5] | 段宏亮, 孙雅雄, 杨保良. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油富集主控因素[J]. 石油实验地质, 2024, 46(3): 441-450. |
DUAN Hongliang, SUN Yaxiong, YANG Baoliang. Main controlling factors of shale oil enrichment in second member of Paleogene Fuling Formation in Gaoyou Sag of Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2024, 46(3): 441-450. | |
[6] | 孙雅雄, 梁兵, 邱旭明, 等. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷阜二段页岩天然裂缝发育特征及其对页岩油富集和保存的影响[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(5): 61-74. |
SUN Yaxiong, LIANG Bing, QIU Xuming, et al. Characteristics of natural fractures and its influence on shale oil enrichment and preservation in Member 2 of Funing Formation in Gaoyou sag,Subei Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers 2024, 31(5): 61-74. | |
[7] | 刘国恒, 黄志龙, 姜振学, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组湖相页岩纹层发育特征及储集意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(3): 408-417. |
LIU Guoheng, HUANG Zhilong, JIANG Zhenxue, et al. The characteristic and reservoir significance of lamina in shale from the Yanchang Formation of Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(3), 408-417. | |
[8] | 王冠民, 钟建华. 湖泊纹层沉积机理研究评述与展望[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2004, 23(1): 43-48. |
WANG Guanmin, ZHONG jianhua. A review and the prospects of the researches on sedimentary mechanism of lacustrine laminae[J]. Acta Petrologica et Mineralogica, 2004, 23(1): 43-48. | |
[9] | APLIN A C, MAVQUAKER J S H. Mudstone diversity: Origin and implications for source, seal, and reservoir properties in petroleum systems[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2011, 95(12): 2031-2059. |
[10] | 王慧中, 梅洪明. 东营凹陷沙三下亚段油页岩中古湖泊学信息[J]. 同济大学学报, 1998, 26(3): 315-318. |
WANG Huizhong, MEI Hongming. Paleolimnological information from the oil shale in the Lower part of Sha 3 Formation, in Dongying Depression[J]. Journal of Tongji University, 1998, 26(3): 315-318. | |
[11] | ZALMAI Y, JUERGEN S. On the origin of silt laminae in laminated shales[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2017, 360(9): 22-34. |
[12] | 施振生, 董大忠, 王红岩, 等. 含气页岩不同纹层及组合储集层特征差异性及其成因: 以四川盆地下志留统龙马溪组一段典型井为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(4): 829-840. |
SHI Zhensheng, DONG Dazhong, WANG Hongyan, et al. Differences in the characteristics of gas shale reservoirs in different lamellae and combinations and their genesis: Taking a typical well in the first member of the Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Sichuan Basin as an example[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(4): 829-840. | |
[13] | LETICIA M, CONCHA A, JULIAN E, et al. Lacustrine stromatolites as multi-scale recorders of climate change: In sights from the Miocene Ebro Basin[J]. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology, 2019, 530: 312-329. |
[14] | 葸克来, 李克, 操应长, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长73亚段富有机质页岩纹层组合与页岩油富集模式[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(6): 1244-1255. |
XI Kelai, LI Ke, CAO Yingchang, et al. Laminae combination and shale oil enrichment patterns of Chang 73 sub-member organic-rich shales in the Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(6): 1244-1255. | |
[15] | 曾棒, 刘小平, 刘国勇, 等. 陆相泥页岩层系岩相测井识别与预测: 以南堡凹陷拾场次洼为例[J]. 地质科技通报, 2021, 40(1): 69-79. |
ZENG Bang, LIU Xiaoping, LIU Guoyong, et al. Logging identification and prediction of lithofacies of lacustrine shales system in Shichang Sub-Sag, Nanpu Depression[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2021, 40(1): 69-79. | |
[16] | 刘国强, 赵先然, 袁超, 等. 测井新技术应用方法与典型案例[M]. 北京: 科技出版社, 2021. |
LIU Guoqiang, ZHAO Xianran, YUAN Chao, et al. Application methods and typical cases of new well logging techniques[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2021. | |
[17] | 欧发辉, 赖富强, 夏小雪, 等. 一种页岩气储层有机孔提取及测井计算新模型[J]. 断块油气田, 2023, 30(5): 705-714. |
OU Fahui, LAI Fuqiang, XIA Xiaoxue, et al. A new model of organic pore extraction and logging calculation for shale gas reservoir[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2023, 30(5): 705-714. | |
[18] | MARTI A. The role of electrical anisotropy in magnetotelluric response: from modelling and dimensionality analysis to inversion and interpretation[J]. Surveys in Geophysics, 2014, 35: 179-218. |
[19] | CANNY J. A computational approach to edge detection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1986, 8(6): 679-698. |
[20] | 刘国强, 赵先然, 袁超, 等. 陆相页岩油宏观结构测井评价及其甜点优选[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2023, 28(1): 120-134. |
LIU Guoqiang, ZHAO Xianran, YUAN Chao, et al. Logging evaluation of macro-structure of continental shale oil reservoir and sweet spots selection[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2023, 28(1): 120-134. | |
[21] | 张瑞, 金之钧, 朱如凯, 等. 中国陆相富有机质页岩沉积速率研究及其页岩油勘探意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(4): 829-845. |
ZHANG Rui, JIN Zhijun, ZHU Rukai, et al. Investigation of deposition rate of terrestrial organic-rich shales in China and its implications for shale oil exploration[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(4): 829-845. | |
[22] | 彭军, 于乐丹, 许天宇, 等. 湖相泥页岩地层米氏旋回测井识别及环境响应特征: 以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷东营凹陷樊页1井Es4scs为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2022, 43(4): 957-969. |
PENG Jun, YU Ledan, XU Tianyu, et al. Logging identification of Milankovitch cycle and environmental response characteristics of lacustrine shale: A case study on Es4scs in Well Fanye 1, Dongying Sag, Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2022, 43(4): 957-969. | |
[23] | 李儒峰, 陈莉琼, 李亚军, 等. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷热史恢复与成藏期判识[J]. 地学前缘, 2010, 17(4): 152-159. |
LI Rufeng, CHEN Liqiong, LI Yajun, et al. The thermal history reconstruction and hydrocarbon accumulation period discrimination of Gaoyou Depression in Subei Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2010, 17(4): 151-159. | |
[24] | 吴向阳, 高德群. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷阜宁组油气成藏期研究[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2011, 16(4): 37-41. |
WU Xiangyang, GAO Dequn. Analysis on hydrocarbon accumulation period of funing Formation in Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2011, 16(4): 37-41. | |
[25] | 邱旭明, 刘玉瑞, 傅强. 苏北盆地上白垩统—第三系层序地层与沉积演化[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2006. |
QIU Xuming, LIU Yurui, FU Qiang. Upper Cretaceous-Tertiary sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary evolution in Subei Basin[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2006. | |
[26] | 李维, 朱筱敏, 段宏亮, 等. 苏北盆地高邮—金湖凹陷古近系阜宁组细粒沉积岩纹层特征与成因[J]. 古地理学报, 2020, 22(3): 469-482. |
LI Wei, ZHU Xiaomin, DUAN Hongliang, et al. Characteristics and forming mechanism of laminated fine-grained sedimentary rock of the Paleogene Fuling Formation in Gaoyou and Jinhua Sags, Subei Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition), 2020, 22(3): 469-482. | |
[27] | 段宏亮, 刘世丽, 付茜, 等. 苏北盆地古近系阜宁组二段富有机质页岩特征与沉积环境[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(4): 612-617. |
DUAN Hongliang, LIU Shili, FU Qian. Characteristics and sedimentary environment of organic-rich shale in the second member of Paleogene Fuling Formation, Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(4): 612-617. | |
[28] | 昝灵, 骆卫峰, 马晓东. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜二段烃源岩生烃潜力及形成环境[J]. 非常规油气, 2016, 3(3): 1-8. |
ZAN Ling, LUO Weifeng, MA Xiaodong. Hydrocarbon generation potential and genetic environments of second member of Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2016, 3(3): 1-8. | |
[29] | 付茜, 段宏亮, 刘世丽, 等. 高邮凹陷花庄地区阜二段页岩储层孔喉结构特征研究[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2024, 17(2): 131-138. |
FU Qian, DUAN Hongliang, LIU Shili, et al. Study on pore throat structure characteristics of shale reservoirs in the second member of Funing Formation in the Huazhuang area of Gaoyou Sag[J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2024, 17(2): 131-138. | |
[30] | 彭艳霞, 杜玉山, 蒋龙, 等. 济阳坳陷缓坡带页岩油储层微观孔隙结构及分形特征[J]. 断块油气田, 2023, 30(4): 535-544. |
PENG Yanxia, DU Yushan, JIANG Long, et al. Micropore structure and fractal characteristics of shale oil reservoir in gentle slope zone of Jiyang Depression[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2023, 30(4): 535-544. | |
[31] | 王淼, 陈勇, 徐兴友, 等. 泥质岩中纤维状结构脉体成因机制及其与油气活动关系研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(10): 1107-1118. |
WANG Miao, CHEN Yong, XU Xingyou, et al. Progress on formation mechanism of the fibrous veins in mudstone and its implications to hydrocarbon migration[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2015, 30(10): 1107-1118. | |
[32] | 逄淑伊, 操应长, 梁超. 渤海湾盆地东营凹陷沙四上亚段—沙三下亚段岩相特征及沉积环境: 以樊页1井为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(4): 799-809. |
PANG Shuyi, CAO Yingchang, LIANG Chao. Lithofacies characteristics and sedimentary environment of Es4U and Es3L: A case study of Well FY1 in Dongying sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(4): 799-809. | |
[33] | 刘苗苗, 付小平, 倪楷. 岩相组合特征及其对页岩含气性的影响: 以涪陵地区凉高山组为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2023, 30(1): 1-8. |
LIU Miaomiao, FU Xiaoping, NI Kai. Characteristics of lithofacies combinations and its influence on shale gas-bearing property: A case study of the Lianggaoshan Formation in Fuling area[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2023, 30(1): 1-8. | |
[34] | 刘姝君, 操应长, 梁超. 渤海湾盆地东营凹陷古近系细粒沉积岩特征及沉积环境[J]. 古地理学报, 2019, 21(3) : 479-489. |
LIU Shujun, CAO Yingchang, LIANG Chao. Lithologic characteristics and sedimentary environment of fine-grained sedimentary rocks in the Paleogene in Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition), 2019, 21(3): 479-489. | |
[35] | 张永生, 杨玉卿, 漆智先, 等. 江汉盆地潜江凹陷古近系潜江组含盐岩系沉积特征与沉积环境[J]. 古地理学报, 2003, 5(1): 29-35. |
ZHANG Yongsheng, YANG Yuqing, QI Zhixian, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and environments of the salt-bearing series of the Qianjiang Formation of the Paleogene in Qianjiang Sag of Jianghan Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography(Chinese Edition), 2003, 5(1): 29-35. | |
[36] | 蒲秀刚, 董姜畅, 柴公权, 等. 渤海湾盆地沧东凹陷古近系孔店组二段页岩高丰度有机质富集模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(3): 696-709. |
PU Xiugang, DONG Jiangchang, CHAI Gongquan, et al. Enrichment model of high-abundance organic matter in shales in the 2nd member of the Paleogene Kongdian Formation, Cangdong Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(3): 696-709. | |
[37] | 杨勇, 张世明, 吕琦, 等. 中国东部陆相断陷盆地页岩油开发理论认识与技术实践: 以济阳页岩油为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2024, 31(5): 1-15. |
YANG Yong, ZHANG Shiming, LYU Qi, et al. Theoretical understanding and technical practice of shale oil development in continental faulted basins in eastern China: A case study of Jiyang shale oil[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2024, 31(5): 1-15. | |
[38] | BERGER A, LOUTRE M F, LASKAR J. Stability of the astronomical frequencies over the earth's history for paleoclimate studies[J]. Science, 1992, 255(5044): 560-566. |
[39] | LI M S, HINNOV L, KUMP L. Acycle: Time-series analysis software for paleoclimate research and education[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2019, 127: 12-22. |
[40] | 石巨业, 金之钧, 刘全有, 等. 天文旋回在页岩油勘探及富有机质页岩地层等时对比中的应用[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(4): 152-159. |
SHI Juye, JIN Zhijun, LIU Quanyou, et al. Application of astronomical cycles in shale oil exploration and the high-precision stratigraphic isochronous comparison of organic-rich fine-grain sedimentary rocks[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(4): 152-159. | |
[41] | MEYERS S R, SAGEMAN B B. Quantification of deep-time orbital forcing by average spectral misfit[J]. American Journal of Science, 2007, 307(5): 773-792. |
[42] | 石巨业, 金之钧, 刘全有, 等. 基于米兰科维奇理论的湖相细粒沉积岩高频层序定量划分[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(6): 1205-1214. |
SHI Juye, JIN Zhijun, LIU Quanyou, et al. Quantitative classification of high-frequency sequences in fine-grained lacustrine sedimentary rocks based on Milankovitch theory[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(6): 1205-1214. | |
[43] | 宋翠玉, 吕大炜. 米兰科维奇旋回时间序列分析法研究进展[J]. 沉积学报, 2022, 40(2): 380-395. |
SONG Cuiyu, LYU Dawei. Advances in Time Series Analysis Methods for Milankovitch Cycles[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2022, 40(2): 380-395. | |
[44] | LAI J, WANG G W, FAN Q X, et al. Geophysical well-log evaluation in the era of unconventional hydrocarbon resources: A review on current status and prospects[J]. Surveys in Geophysics, 2022, 43: 913-957. |
[45] | LI M S, KPUMP L R, HINNOV L A, et al. Tracking variable sedimentation rates and astronomical forcing in Phanerozoic paleoclimate proxy series with evolutionary correlation coefficients and hypothesis testing[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2018, 501: 165-179. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |