专家论坛

沁水盆地高阶煤煤层气水平井高效开发技术及实践

  • 武玺
展开
  • 中国石油华北油田分公司,河北 任丘 062552
武玺(1974—),男,硕士,教授级高级工程师,从事油气田开发研究工作。地址:河北省任丘市会战道华北油田公司机关大楼6楼西煤层气事业部,邮政编码:062552。E-mail:c4_wuxi@petrochina.com.cn

收稿日期: 2024-11-04

  网络出版日期: 2025-04-01

基金资助

国家自然科学基金项目“煤层气储层地质学”(42125205)

Technology and practice for efficient development of coalbed methane horizontal wells in high-rank coal of Qinshui Basin

  • WU Xi
Expand
  • PetroChina Huabei Oilfield Company, Renqiu, Hebei 062552, China

Received date: 2024-11-04

  Online published: 2025-04-01

摘要

沁水盆地作为中国高阶煤煤层气主要生产基地,储层具有成煤及成藏条件多样、构造复杂、渗透率低、储层非均质性强和改造难度大等特点,早期开发存在资源有效动用率低、单井产气量低、开发利润低等问题。通过分析高阶煤储层的特点和煤层气开发的规律,认为制约高阶煤煤层气高效开发的关键问题主要有3个:①高效开发建产选区精准性差;②开发技术适应性差;③改造工艺与煤储层的匹配性差。通过研究微构造、煤体结构、地应力和裂缝等影响高阶煤煤层气开发的关键因素,评价不同地质因素对产量的影响程度,进行多维度精细开发单元划分,明确不同单元地质特征,建立了“五元”可采性高效建产区评价指标体系,确立了高阶煤煤层气高效建产区优选方法。分析认为:由于高阶煤渗透率低、非均质性强,水平井能够连通更多煤层裂缝,扩大排采降压泄气面积,降低气、水流动阻力,具有单井产量高、经济效益好等优势,针对不同地质分区和开发程度,按照“控制储量最大化、采气速度最大化、经济效益最优化”的原则,形成了高阶煤煤层气水平井优化布井技术。在此基础上,以“启动缝网、压开新缝、控制储量”为目标,形成了聚能定向射孔、阶梯提排量逐级造缝、粉细砂组合和井间干扰同步为主的关键技术,同时配套完善了以活性水为主体的桥塞射孔联作、井组同步干扰作业的工艺技术,建立了气体易产出的线性缝网体系,实现了高效改造。研究成果应用在沁水盆地,实现了高阶煤煤层气的高效开发,水平井单井日产气量提高一倍,单井最终可采储量提升50%,新建区块产能到位率达到90%,将其推广到中国其他高阶煤煤层气区块,为煤层气产业做大做强提供了技术支撑和可供借鉴的示范。

本文引用格式

武玺 . 沁水盆地高阶煤煤层气水平井高效开发技术及实践[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2025 , 15(2) : 167 -174 . DOI: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025.02.001

Abstract

The Qinshui Basin is the main production base of high-rank coalbed methane in China. High-rank coal reservoirs in this region exhibit diverse conditions for coal formation and reservoir development, complex geological structures, low permeability, pronounced reservoir heterogeneity, and significant challenges in reservoir stimulation, which led to early issues such as a low effective resource utilization rate, low gas production per well, and low development profits. By analyzing the characteristics of high-rank coal reservoirs and the development patterns of coalbed methane, this study identifies three key constraints to the efficient development of high-rank coalbed methane: (1) poor precision in selecting areas for efficient development; (2) limited adaptability of development technologies; (3) a mismatch between stimulation processes and coal reservoirs. Investigations into microstructures, coal body structures, in-situ stresses, and fractures—combined with an evaluation of various geological factors’ impact on production—enabled a multidimensional division of development units to identify the geological features of each unit. Consequently, a “five-element” evaluation index system for production potential in efficient development areas was established, and an optimization method for selecting efficient development areas for high-rank coalbed methane was formulated. Analysis suggests that due to the low permeability and strong heterogeneity of high-rank coal, horizontal wells can connect more coal seam fractures, thereby expanding the drainage and pressure-relief areas and reducing the flow resistance of gas and water. This possesses advantages such as high per-well gas production and improved economic benefits. For different geological zones and development stages, in accordance with the principle of “maximizing controlled reserves, maximizing gas production rate, and optimizing economic benefits”, an optimized horizontal well layout technology for high-rank coalbed methane was developed. On this basis, with the objective of “initiating a fracture network, creating new fractures, and controlling reserves”, key technologies were devised—primarily including energy-focused directional perforation, stepwise hydraulic fracturing for incremental production enhancement, a combined application of fine-powder sand, and synchronous well-group interference. At the same time, the process technologies of bridge-plug-and-perforation using active water as the main body and well-group synchronous interference operations were refined, leading to the establishment of a linear fracture network system conducive to gas production, achieving efficient hydraulic fracturing. The application of these research outcomes in the Qinshui Basin has enabled the efficient development of high-rank coal, with daily gas production per horizontal well doubling, the ultimate recoverable reserve per well increasing by 50%, and the productivity attainment rate of newly-built blocks surpassing 90%. When extended to other high-rank coalbed methane blocks in China, these advantages provide technical support and a demonstrative model for strengthening the coalbed methane industry.

参考文献

[1] 朱庆忠, 杨延辉, 左银卿, 等. 中国煤层气开发存在的问题及破解思路[J]. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(4): 96-100.
  ZHU Qingzhong, YANG Yanhui, ZUO Yinqing, et al. CBM development in China: Challenges and solutions[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(4): 96-100.
[2] 朱庆忠, 左银卿, 杨延辉. 如何破解我国煤层气开发的技术难题: 以沁水盆地南部煤层气藏为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2015, 35(2): 106-109.
  ZHU Qingzhong, ZUO Yinqing, YANG Yanhui. How to solve the technical problems in the CBM development: A case study of a CMB gas reservoir in the southern Qinshui Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(2): 106-109.
[3] 熊先钺, 季亮, 张正朝, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘韩城区块煤层气高产井地质主控因素[J]. 天然气工业, 2024, 44(3): 64-71.
  XIONG Xianyue, JI Liang, ZHANG Zhengchao, et al. Main geological factors controlling high productivity of CBM wells in the Hancheng block at the eastern edge of the Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2024, 44(3): 64-71.
[4] 蔡路, 姚艳斌, 张永平, 等. 沁水盆地郑庄区块煤储层水力压裂曲线类型及其地质影响因素[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(增刊1): 83-90.
  CAI Lu, YAO Yanbin, ZHANG Yongping, et al. Hydraulic fracturing curve types of coal reservoirs in Zhengzhuang block, Qinshui Basin and their geological influence factors[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(Suppl. 1): 83-90.
[5] 刘贻军. 中国中阶煤和高阶煤的储层特性及提高单井产量主要对策[J]. 天然气工业, 2005, 25(6): 72-74.
  LIU Yijun. Reservoir characteristics of medium-highrank coal and main countermeasures to improve gas production of single well[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2005, 25(6): 72-74.
[6] 徐凤银, 闫霞, 林振盘, 等. 我国煤层气高效开发关键技术研究进展与发展方向[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2022, 50(3): 1-14.
  XU Fengyin, YAN Xia, LIN Zhenpan, et al. Research progress and development direction of key technologies for efficient coalbed methane development in China[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2022, 50(3): 1-14.
[7] 田炜, 王会涛. 沁水盆地高阶煤煤层气开发再认识[J]. 天然气工业, 2015, 35(6): 117-123.
  TIAN Wei, WANG Huitao. Latest understandings of the CBM development from high-rank coals in the Qinshui Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(6): 117-123.
[8] 侯月华, 姚艳斌, 杨延辉, 等. 基于对应分析技术的煤体结构判别: 以沁水盆地安泽区块为例[J]. 煤炭学报, 2016, 41(8): 2041-2049.
  HOU Yuehua, YAO Yanbin, YANG Yanhui, et al. Discriminate method of coal structure based on correspondence analysis technology: A case study in the Anze area, Qinshui Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2016, 41(8): 2041-2049.
[9] 朱庆忠, 李志军, 李宗源, 等. 复杂地质条件下煤层气高效开发实践与认识—以沁水盆地郑庄区块为例[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2023, 51(1): 131-138.
  ZHU Qingzhong, LI Zhijun, LI Zongyuan, et al. Practice and cognition of efficient CBM development under complex geological conditions: A case study of Zhengzhuang Block, Qinshui Basin[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2023, 51(1): 131-138.
[10] 康永尚, 孙良忠, 张兵, 等. 中国煤储层渗透率分级方案探讨[J]. 煤炭学报, 2017, 42(增刊1): 190-192.
  KANG Yongshang, SUN Liangzhong, ZHANG Bing, et al. Discussion on classification of coalbed reservoir permeability in China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2017, 42(Suppl. 1): 190-192.
[11] 唐书恒, 朱宝存, 颜志丰. 地应力对煤层气井水力压裂裂缝发育的影响[J]. 煤炭学报, 2011, 36(1): 65-69.
  TANG Shuheng, ZHU Baocun, YAN Zhifeng. Effect of crustal stress on hydraulic fracturing in coalbed methane wells[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2011, 36(1): 65-69.
[12] 鲁秀芹, 张永平, 周秋成, 等. 郑庄区块地应力场分布规律及其对煤层气开发的影响[J]. 中国煤层气, 2019, 16(5): 14-18.
  LU Xiuqin, ZHANG Yongping, ZHOU Qiucheng, et al. Characteristics of in-situ stress field in Zhengzhuang Block and its influence on CBM development[J]. China Coalbed Methane, 2019, 16(5): 14-18.
[13] 姚艳斌, 刘大锰. 煤储层孔隙系统发育特征与煤层气可采性研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2006, 34(3): 64-68.
  YAO Yanbin, LIU Dameng. Developing features of fissure system in Henan coal reserves seams and research on mining of coal bed methane[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2006, 34(3): 64-68.
[14] 杨延辉, 王玉婷, 陈龙伟, 等. 沁南西—马必东区块煤层气高效建产区优选技术[J]. 煤炭学报, 2018, 43(6): 1620-1626.
  YANG Yanhui, WANG Yuting, CHEN Longwei, et al. Optimization technology of efficient CBM productivity areas in Qinnanxi-Mabidong Block, Qinshui Basin, Shanxi, China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2018, 43(6): 1620-1626.
[15] 赵贤正, 朱庆忠, 孙粉锦, 等. 沁水盆地高阶煤层气勘探开发实践与思考[J]. 煤炭学报, 2015, 40(9): 2131-2136.
  ZHAO Xianzheng, ZHU Qingzhong, SUN Fenjin, et al. Practice and thought of coalbed methane exploration and development in Qinshui Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2015, 40(9): 2131-2136.
[16] 朱庆忠, 鲁秀芹, 杨延辉, 等. 郑庄区块高阶煤层气低效产能区耦合盘活技术[J]. 煤炭学报, 2019, 44(8): 2547-2555.
  ZHU Qingzhong, LU Xiuqin, YANG Yanhui, et al. Coupled activation technology for low-efficiency productivity zones of high-rank coalbed methane in Zhengzhuang block, Shanxi, China[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2019, 44(8): 2547-2555.
[17] 鲁秀芹, 杨延辉, 周睿, 等. 高煤阶煤层气水平井和直井耦合降压开发技术研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2019, 47(7): 221-226.
  LU Xiuqin, YANG Yanhui, ZHOU Rui, et al. Study on technology of horizontal wells and vertical wells coupled depressurization in high-rank coalbed methane[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2019, 47(7): 221-226.
[18] 黄中伟, 李志军, 李根生, 等. 煤层气水平井定向喷射防砂压裂技术及应用[J]. 煤炭学报, 2022, 47(7): 2687-2697.
  HUANG Zhongwei, LI Zhijun, LI Gensheng, et al. Oriented and sand control hydra-jet fracturing in coalbed methane horizontal wells and field applications[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2022, 47(7): 2687-2697.
[19] 谢楠, 姚艳斌, 杨延辉, 等. 郑庄区块煤层气评价井压裂效果影响因素分析[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2016(增刊1): 180-185.
  XIE Nan, YAO Yanbin, YANG Yanhui, et al. Fracturing effect factors analysis of CBM appraisal wells in Zhengzhuang Block[J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2016(Suppl. 1): 180-185.
[20] 姚艳斌, 王辉, 杨延辉, 等. 煤储层可改造性评价: 以郑庄区块为例[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2021, 49(1): 119-129.
  YAO Yanbin, WANG Hui, YANG Yanhui, et al. Evaluation of the hydro-fracturing potential for coalbed methane reservoir: A case study of Zhengzhuang CBM field[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2021, 49(1): 119-129.
文章导航

/