油气藏评价与开发 >
2025 , Vol. 15 >Issue 3: 455 - 462
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025.03.012
苏北盆地高邮凹陷深层戴南组一段三亚段油气富集特征
收稿日期: 2024-09-06
网络出版日期: 2025-05-28
基金资助
中国石化科研项目“高邮凹陷深层油气富集规律与目标评价”(P25061)
Oil and gas accumulation characteristics of the third submember of the first member of Dainan Formation in deep layers of Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin
Received date: 2024-09-06
Online published: 2025-05-28
苏北盆地高邮凹陷深层戴南组一段(以下简称戴一段)三亚段下方为阜四段优质烃源岩,是极具潜力的资源接替层系,但其埋藏深、失利井多、构造储备圈闭少,长期以来形成了“难成藏、没潜力、没效益”的传统认识。为了明确戴一段三亚段的成藏关键和勘探潜力,综合钻井、测井、录井、实验、地震等资料,开展了层序地层、沉积体系、储盖组合、圈闭类型、成藏主控因素等多方面的基础研究。研究表明:戴一段三亚段是高邮凹陷断坳—断陷转换初期沉积的首套地层,特殊的地层发育位置使其具有“近源区盖、北洲南扇、孔缝双储、二元控藏”的油气富集特征。具体表现为6个方面:①戴一段三亚段顶部发育稳定的湖侵域泥岩,是独立的成藏单元;②戴一段三亚段下方为阜宁组四段烃源岩,位于阜宁组四段成熟烃源岩范围内,是戴南组供烃最充足的亚段;③北部缓坡带发育大型三角洲,南部陡坡带发育各类扇体,砂体发育程度呈东高西低的特征;④除构造圈闭外,还发育4种隐蔽圈闭类型,隐蔽圈闭个数多、规模大;⑤发育孔隙和裂缝两类储集空间;⑥侧向封堵和有效储层是成藏主控因素。研究新认识带来了该层系勘探思路的两大转变,指明了勘探方向,部署一批探井获得成功,推动高邮凹陷戴一段三亚段成为苏北盆地重要的资源接替阵地。
李书瑜 , 范立新 , 夏连军 , 张娟 , 何俊卿 , 张昊 , 李越哲 . 苏北盆地高邮凹陷深层戴南组一段三亚段油气富集特征[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2025 , 15(3) : 455 -462 . DOI: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025.03.012
The third submember of the first member of Dainan Formation in the deep layers of Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin, which overlies high-quality source rocks of the fourth member of Funing Formation, serves as a potential replacement for oil and gas resources. However, due to its deep burial depth, numerous failed wells, and limited structural reservoir traps, it has long been perceived as “difficult for accumulation, unpromising, and unprofitable”. To clarify the key factors for oil and gas accumulation and the exploration potential of the third submember of the first member of Dainan Formation, using drilling, well logging, mud logging, experimental data, and seismic data, fundamental studies were conducted on multiple aspects, including sequence stratigraphy, sedimentary systems, reservoir-seal combination, trap types, and main controlling factors of oil and gas accumulation. The results showed that the third submember of the first member of Dainan Formation was the first sedimentary strata at the early stage of the transition from fault sag to fault subsidence in Gaoyou Sag. Its unique stratigraphic development position endowed it with oil and gas accumulation characteristics of “near-source sealing, northern delta and southern fan, dual pore-fracture reservoirs, and dual control on reservoirs”. Specifically, it was manifested in six aspects: (1) The top of the third submember of the first member of Dainan Formation was characterized by stable transgressive lacustrine mudstone, serving as an independent oil and gas accumulation unit. (2) Underlying the third submember of the first member of Dainan Formation, the fourth member of Funing Formation was located within the mature source rock zone, making it the most oil and gas-rich submember in Dainan Formation. (3) A large delta developed in the northern gentle slope and various types of fan bodies in the southern steep slope. The sand body development showed an east-high-west-low distribution pattern. (4) In addition to structural traps, four types of subtle traps developed abundantly in large scale. (5) Two types of reservoir spaces—porosity and fractures—developed. (6) Lateral sealing and effective reservoirs were the main controlling factors for reservoir formation. The findings from the research brought two major shifts in exploration strategies for this stratigraphic sequence, identified exploration directions, and led to successful drilling of multiple exploration wells. This promotes the third submember of the first member of Dainan Formation in Gaoyou Sag to become an important resource replacement area in Subei Basin.
1 | 黄福喜, 汪少勇, 李明鹏, 等. 中国石油深层、超深层油气勘探进展与启示[J]. 天然气工业, 2024, 44(1): 86-96. |
HUANG Fuxi, WANG Shaoyong, LI Mingpeng, et al. Progress and implications of deep and ultra-deep oil and gas exploration in PetroChina[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2024, 44(1): 86-96. | |
2 | 何登发, 贾承造, 赵文智, 等. 中国超深层油气勘探领域研究进展与关键问题[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(6): 1162-1172. |
HE Dengfa, JIA Chengzao, ZHAO Wenzhi, et al. Research progress and key issues of ultra-deep oil and gas exploration in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(6): 1162-1172. | |
3 | ZHOU N W, LU S F, WANG M, et al. Limits and grading evaluation criteria of tight oil reservoirs in typical continental basins of China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(5): 1089-1100. |
4 | 徐春春, 邹伟宏, 杨跃明, 等. 中国陆上深层油气资源勘探开发现状及展望[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(8): 1139-1153. |
XU Chunchun, ZOU Weihong, YANG Yueming, et al. Status and prospects of exploration and exploitation of the deep oil & gas resources onshore China[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(8): 1139-1153. | |
5 | 李剑, 佘源琦, 高阳, 等. 中国陆上深层—超深层天然气勘探领域及潜力[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(4): 403-417. |
LI Jian, SHE Yuanqi, GAO Yang, et al. Onshore deep and ultra-deep natural gas exploration fields and potentials in China[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(4): 403-417. | |
6 | 张光亚, 马锋, 梁英波, 等. 全球深层油气勘探领域及理论技术进展[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(9): 1156-1166. |
ZHANG Guangya, MA Feng, LIANG Yingbo, et al. Domain and theory-technology progress of global deep oil & gas exploration[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(9): 1156-1166. | |
7 | 申艳, 施延生, 刘耘, 等. 超深层复杂岩溶型底水气藏高产稳产主控因素: 以安岳气田GS1井区灯二段气藏为例[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2023, 46(3): 59-66. |
SHEN Yan, SHI Yansheng, LIU Yun, et al. Main factors controlling high and stable production of ultra-deep complex karst bottom-water gas reservoirs: A case study of gas reservoir of Deng 2 Member, GS1 well block, Anyue gas field[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2023, 46(3): 59-66. | |
8 | 张晴, 任重阳, 张然舜, 等. 基于文献计量特征的我国深层页岩研究进展及趋势(2012—2022)[J]. 非常规油气, 2023, 10(1): 21-26. |
ZHANG Qing, REN Chongyang, ZHANG Ranshun, et al. Progress and trends of China’s deep shale gas research based on bibliometric analysis(2012—2022)[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2023, 10(1): 21-26. | |
9 | 王永诗, 张鹏飞, 王学军, 等. 济阳坳陷成熟探区油气精细勘探理论进展与实践[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2024, 31(4): 13-23. |
WANG Yongshi, ZHANG Pengfei, WANG Xuejun, et al. Theoretical progress and practice of refined oil and gas exploration in mature exploration area of Jiyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2024, 31(4): 13-23. | |
10 | 朱士波. 济阳坳陷热液流体活动特征及其油气地质意义[J]. 非常规油气, 2024, 11(2) : 21-28. |
ZHU Shibo. Characteristics of hydrothermal fluid activity and its petroleum geological significance in Jiyang Depression[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2024, 11(2): 21-28. | |
11 | 金凤鸣, 张凯逊, 王权, 等. 断陷盆地深层优质碎屑岩储集层发育机理: 以渤海湾盆地饶阳凹陷为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(2): 247-256. |
JIN Fengming, ZHANG Kaixun, WANG Quan, et al. Formation mechanisms of good-quality clastic reservoirs in deep formations in rifted basins: A case study of Raoyang sag in Bohai Bay Basin, East China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(2): 247-256. | |
12 | 陈昌, 邱楠生, 高荣锦, 等. 渤海湾盆地辽河坳陷西部冷家—雷家地区中-深层超压成因及其对油气成藏的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2024, 45(1): 130-141. |
CHEN Chang, QIU Nansheng, GAO Rongjin, et al. Overpressure in moderately deep to deep strata in the Lengjia-Leijia area, western Liaohe Depression, Bohai Bay Basin: Origin and effects on hydrocarbon accumulation[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2024, 45(1): 130-141. | |
13 | LIU Y, CHEN Q, WANG X, et al. Influence of normal fault growth and linkage on the evolution of a rift basin: A case from the Gaoyou depression of the Subei Basin, eastern China[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2017, 101(2): 265-288. |
14 | 吴林, 陈清华. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷基底断裂构造特征及成因演化[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(4): 689-699. |
WU Lin, CHEN Qinghua. Structural characteristics and evolution of basement faults in Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(4): 689-699. | |
15 | 唐旭, 余一欣, 于雯泉, 等. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷断裂系统发育特征及其控藏作用[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(2): 316-327. |
TANG Xu, YU Yixin, YU Wenquan, et al. Characteristics of fault system and its influence on hydrocarbon accumulation in Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(2): 316-327. | |
16 | 束宁凯, 吴林, 汪新文, 等. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷基底先存断裂成因及其对新生断裂的控制[J]. 石油实验地质, 2017, 39(1): 8-14. |
SHU Ningkai, WU Lin, WANG Xinwen, et al. Origin of pre-existing basement faults and their controls on new fault formation in Gaoyou Sag,Subei Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2017, 39(1): 8-14. | |
17 | 荆晓明. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜二段页岩油甜点评价[J]. 非常规油气, 2023, 10(3): 31-38. |
JING Xiaoming. Evaluation of shale oil sweet spots in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2023, 10(3): 31-38. | |
18 | 陈清华, 吴林, 周宇成. 高邮凹陷环邵伯次凹地区油气成藏条件及成藏模式[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2015, 44(2): 282-291. |
CHEN Qinghua, WU Lin, ZHOU Yucheng. Hydrocarbon accumulation conditions and modes in the area around Shaobo sub-sag, Gaoyou Sag[J]. Journal of China University of Mining &Technology, 2015, 44(2): 282-291. | |
19 | 范立新, 季红军, 郭新安, 等. 高邮凹陷缓坡带戴南组隐蔽油藏成藏特征及主控因素分析[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2013, 6(2): 18-22. |
FAN Lixin, JI Hongjun, GUO Xin’an, et al. Analysis of accumulation characteristics and key control factors of Dainan Formation subtle oil reservoir in the gentle slope belt of Gaoyou Sag[J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2013, 6(2): 18-22. | |
20 | 董才源, 刘震, 刘启东, 等.高邮凹陷戴南组断层—岩性油藏成藏体系及主控因素研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2013, 35(4): 395-400. |
DONG Caiyuan, LIU Zhen, LIU Qidong, et al. Accumulation system and controlling factors of fault-lithologic reservoirs of Dainan Formation in Gaoyou Sag, Northern Jiangsu Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment, 2013, 35(4): 395-400. | |
21 | 纪友亮, 李清山, 王勇, 等. 高邮凹陷古近系戴南组扇三角洲沉积体系及其沉积相模式[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2012, 34(1): 9-19. |
JI Youliang, LI Qingshan, WANG Yong, et al. Fan delta sedimentary system and facies models of Dainan Formation of Paleogene in Gaoyou Sag[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 2012, 34(1): 9-19. | |
22 | 张喜林, 朱筱敏, 钟大康, 等. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷古近系戴南组沉积相及其对隐蔽油气藏的控制[J]. 古地理学报, 2005, 7(2): 207-218. |
ZHANG Xilin, ZHU Xiaomin, ZHONG Dakang, et al. Sedimentary facies and its controlling on subtle oil and gas reservoirs of the Dainan Formation of Paleogene in Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2005, 7(2): 207-218. | |
23 | 袁静, 董道涛, 宋璠, 等. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷深凹带古近系戴南组一段沉积格局与时空演化[J]. 古地理学报, 2016, 18(2): 147-160. |
YUAN Jing, DONG Daotao, SONG Fan, et al. Sedimentary patterns and spatiotemporal evolution of the member 1 of Paleogene Dainan Formation in deep sag of Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2016, 18(2): 147-160. | |
24 | 高丽坤, 林春明, 姚玉来, 等. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷古近系戴南组沉积相及沉积演化[J]. 沉积学报, 2010, 28(4): 706-716. |
GAO Likun, LIN Chunming, YAO Yulai, et al. Sedimentary facies and evolution of Paleogene Dainan Formation in Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2010, 28 (4): 706-716. | |
25 | 周健, 林春明, 张霞, 等. 江苏高邮凹陷古近系戴南组一段物源体系和沉积相[J]. 古地理学报, 2011, 13(2): 161-174. |
ZHOU Jian, LIN Chunming, ZHANG Xia, et al. Provenance system and sedimentary facies of the member 1 of Paleogene Dainan Formation in Gaoyou Sag, Jiangsu Province[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2011, 13(2): 161-174. | |
26 | 袁静, 梁绘媛, 梁兵, 等. 湖相重力流沉积特征及发育模式: 以苏北盆地高邮凹陷深凹带戴南组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(3): 348-359. |
YUAN Jing, LIANG Huiyuan, LIANG Bing, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and development model of lacustrine gravity flow: A case study of Dainan Formation in deep sag belt of Gaoyou Depression, Northern Jiangsu Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(3): 348-359. | |
27 | 姚玉来, 林春明, 高丽坤, 等. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷深凹带东部古近系戴南组二段沉积相及沉积演化[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质, 2010, 30(2): 1-10. |
YAO Yulai, LIN Chunming, GAO Likun, et al. Sedimentary facies and evolution of the second member of the Palaeogene Dainan Formation in the deep area of eastern Gaoyou Depression, North Jiangsu Basin[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2010, 30(2): 1-10. | |
28 | 张妮, 林春明, 周健, 等. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷始新统戴南组一段稀土元素特征及其物源指示意义[J]. 地质论评, 2012, 58(2): 369-378. |
ZHANG Ni, LIN Chunming, ZHOU Jian, et al. REE characteristics of the 1st member of Eocene Dainan Formation in Gaoyou Depression of North Jiangsu Basin, and its significance in provenance instruction[J]. Geological Review, 2012, 58(2): 369-378. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |