塔河强底水砂岩油藏CO2驱机理实验研究

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2020.06.018

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对塔河油田强底水砂岩油藏开发后期井间剩余油难动用,常规提高采收率方法不适用的难题,探索开展了强底水砂岩油藏CO₂驱技术的可行性研究。利用室内实验、数值模拟和常规油藏工程相结合的方法,开展了底水砂岩油藏CO₂驱机理研究,确定了塔河底水砂岩油藏 CO₂的最小混相压力为29.6 MPa,初步明确了CO₂驱具有膨胀作用、扩大横向波及作用等主要机理。CO₂在油水中的溶解分配比为4:1左右,CO₂驱可以提高采收率12.5 %,明确了底水砂岩油藏CO₂驱具有较好的可行性。研究结果为塔河底水砂岩油藏CO₂驱先导试验提供了技术支撑。

关键词: 高耗水条带, 数值模拟, 正交实验, 影响因素分析, 塔河油田, 强底水, 砂岩油藏, CO₂驱, 可行性研究

Abstract:

In the later development stage of strong bottom water sandstone reservoir of Tahe Oilfield, the development effect of remaining oil between wells is poor, and the conventional EOR methods is inapplicable. In order to solve these problems, the feasibility of CO₂ flooding in this type of reservoir has been explored. By combining laboratory experiments, numerical simulation and conventional reservoir engineering, the CO₂ flooding mechanism for sandstone reservoir with strong bottom water has been studied, and the MMP of CO₂ used in Tahe sandstone reservoir with strong bottom water is determined to be 29.6 MPa, the main mechanism of CO₂ flooding is preliminarily defined to be such as swelling of oil and expansion of horizontal swept area, the dissolution and distribution ratio of CO₂ in oil and water is about 4:1, and the CO₂ flooding can increase the recovery by 12.5 %. All these show that CO₂ flooding in Tahe sandstone reservoir with strong bottom water is feasible. The research results lay a theoretical foundation for EOR technology of this kind of reservoir and provide a scientific basis for CO₂ flooding pilot test of Tahe bottom water sandstone reservoir.

Key words: high water consumption strip, numerical simulation, orthogonal experiment, influencing factor analysis, Tahe oilfield, strong bottom water, sandstone reservoir, CO₂ flooding, feasibility research

中图分类号:

TE341

刘学利,郑小杰,谭涛,窦莲,谢爽. 塔河强底水砂岩油藏CO₂驱机理实验研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(6): 115-120.

LIU Xueli,ZHENG Xiaojie,TAN Tao,DOU Lian,XIE Shuang. Experiments on CO₂ flooding mechanism for Tahe sandstone reservoir with strong bottom water[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(6): 115-120.

图/表 14

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表1

图6

图7

图8

表2

图9

表3

表4

参考文献 19

[1]	黄晓东, 黄荣贵, 刘晖, 等. 底水稠油油藏水平井生产特征及产能预测研究——以渤海曹妃甸11-1油田为例[J]. 石油化工应用, 2015,34(9):26-31.
	HUANG X D, HUANG R G, LIU H, et al. Bottom water reservoir with horizontal well production characteristics and productivity prediction of heavy oil——In Bohai Caofeidian 11-1 Oilfield, for example[J]. Petrochemical Industry Application, 2015,34(9):26-31.
[2]	李洪成, 朱义井, 李旭东, 等. 用油藏工程方法确定红南油田天然水体规模[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2003,24(1):62-63.
	LI H C, ZHU Y J, LI X D, et al. Reservoir engineering procedure for defining natural water body volume in Hongnan Oilfield[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2003,24(1):62-63.
[3]	曹亚明, 郑家朋, 孙蓉, 等. 冀东油田浅层非均质油藏CO₂驱数值模拟与方案设计[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2014,36(5):125-130.
	CAO Y M, ZHENG J P, SUN R, et al. Numerical simulation and scheme design of CO₂ flooding in shallow heterogeneous reservoir of Jidong Oilfield[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2014,36(5):125-130.
[4]	聂法健, 毛洪超, 王庆, 等. 中原油田CO₂驱提高采收率技术及现场实践[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2020,27(1):146-151.
	NIE F J, MAO H C, WANG Q, et al. CO₂ flooding for enhanced oil recovery technology and field practice in Zhongyuan Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020,27(1):146-151.
[5]	甘振维. 塔河油田底水砂岩油藏水平井堵水提高采收率技术[J]. 断块油气田, 2010,17(3):373-375.
	GAN Z W. EOR technology by water plugging for horizontal well of bottom water sandstone reservoir in Tahe Oilfield[J]. Faul-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2010,17(3):373-375.
[6]	RABBANI A R, HASSANZADEH G, DEHYADEGARI E. Asphaltene deposition under CO₂ Injection: An experimental study of the Bangestan Reservoir of Ahwaz Oilfield, SW Iran[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology, 2012,30(1):9-15. doi: 10.1080/10916461003752504
[7]	李香玲, 郭睿, 杨学东, 等. 苏丹1/2/4区块状强底水油藏高效开发技术[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2010,32(2):123-127.
	LI X L, GUO R, YANG X D, et al. The high efficient development technologies for strong bottom water driving block shaped reservoir in 1/2/4 oilfields, Sudan[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Seience & Technology Edition), 2010,32(2):123-127.
[8]	郑小杰, 钟伟, 段洪泽, 等. 强底水油藏注水开发可行性研究[J]. 断块油气田, 2015,22(2):234-236.
	ZHENG X J, ZHONG W, DUAN H Z, et al. Feasibility study of waterflooding development for strong bottom water reservoir[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2015,22(2):234-236.
[9]	周彦霞. 吐哈红南底水油藏提高采收率技术研究[D]. 大庆:东北石油大学, 2016.
	ZHOU Y X. Research on EOR technology of Hongnan bottom water reservoir in Tuha[D]. Daqing: Northeast Petroleum University, 2016.
[10]	胡永乐, 郝明强, 陈国利, 等. 中国CO₂驱油与埋存技术及实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019,46(4):716-727.
	HU Y L, HAO M Q, CHEN G L, et al. Technologies and practice of CO₂ flooding and sequestration in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019,46(4):716-727.
[11]	何应付, 赵淑霞, 计秉玉, 等. 砂岩油藏CO₂驱提高采收率油藏筛选与潜力评价[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2020,27(1):140-145.
	HE Y F, ZHAO S X, JI B Y, et al. Screening method and potential evaluation for EOR by CO₂ flooding in sandstone reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020,27(1):140-145.
[12]	贾凯锋, 计董超, 高金栋, 等. 低渗透油藏CO₂驱油提高原油采收率研究现状[J]. 非常规油气, 2019,6(1):107-114.
	JIA K F, JI D C, GAO J D, et al. The exisiting state of enhanced oil recovery by CO₂ flooding in low permeability reservoirs[J]. Unconventional Oil and Gas, 2019,6(1):107-114.
[13]	陈祖华, 吴公益, 钱卫明, 等. 苏北盆地复杂小断块油藏注CO₂提高采收率技术及应用[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2020,27(1):152-162.
	CHEN Z H, WU G Y, QIAN W M, et al. EOR technology and application of CO₂ injection for small complex fault block reservoirs in Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020,27(1):152-162.
[14]	余华杰, 朱国金, 田冀. 海上强边底水油帽稠油油藏注CO₂提高采收率[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2013,32(5):137-142.
	YU H J, ZHU G J, TIAN J. EOR by CO₂ injection into offshore heavy oil-cap reservoir with strong edge and bottom waters[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2013,32(5):137-142.
[15]	刘广燕, 秦飞, 吴文明, 等. 塔河砂岩油藏水平井出水分析及配套堵水工艺[J]. 断块油气田, 2013,20(2):248-251.
	LIU G Y, QIN F, WU W M, et al. Watering analysis and matching water plugging technology for horizontal wells in sandstone reservoir of Tahe Oilfieid[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2013,20(2):248-251.
[16]	李根, 郑海妮, 李雪, 等. 底水砂岩油藏夹层抑制水平井底水锥进作用研究——以塔河油田三叠系砂岩底水油藏的水平井为例[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2013,35(8):127-132.
	LI G, ZHENG H N, LI X, et al. Controlling of bottom water coning in horizontal wells in sandstone reservoirs with bottom water——By taking the Triassic horizontal wells in sandstone reservoirs with bottom water of Tahe Oilfield for example[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2013,35(8):127-132.
[17]	何星, 吴文明, 李亮, 等. 聚合物微球在高温高盐碎屑岩水平井堵水中的应用[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2012,5(4):82-84.
	HE X, WU W M, LI L, et al. Application of polymer microspheres in water plugging of clastic rock horizontal wells with high temperature and high salinity[J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2012,5(4):82-84.
[18]	刘学利, 胡文革, 谭涛, 等. 塔河底水砂岩油藏氮气泡沫驱技术研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016,38(6):105-110.
	LIU X L, HU W G, TAN T, et al. Researches on nitrogen foam flooding technology in the Tahe Triassic Sandstone Reservoir[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Seience & Technology Edition), 2016,38(6):105-110.
[19]	郑小杰, 梁宏刚, 娄大娜, 等. 塔河低幅大底水油藏高含水期剩余油分布[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2015,15(5):86-90.
	ZHENG X J, LIANG H G, LOU D N, et al. Remaining oil distribution of low amplitude with great bottom water reservoir in high water cut stage in Tahe[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2015,15(5):86-90.

注入CO₂比例/ %	饱和压力/ MPa	地层压力下体积系数	溶解系数/ （m³·m^-3）
0	25.15	1.250	2.85
10	38.69	1.372	3.67
15	41.21	1.447	4.33
20	44.45	1.564	4.77
25	46.95	1.630	5.29

组号	试验因素
组号	注入速度A	渗透率级差B	渗透率变异系数C	地层系数D
1	800	3	0.2	k×h
2	1 200	5	0.4	0.5k×2h
3	1 600	7	0.6	0.4k×2.5h
4	2 000	9	0.8	0.2k×5h

试验号	试验因素				采出程度/ %
试验号	A	B	C	D	采出程度/ %
1	800	3	0.2	k×h	45.87
2	800	5	0.4	0.5k×2h	43.24
3	800	7	0.6	0.4k×2.5h	41.26
4	800	9	0.8	0.2k×5h	40.59
5	1 200	3	0.4	0.4k×2.5h	49.81
6	1 200	5	0.2	0.2k×5h	48.64
7	1 200	7	0.8	k×h	41.28
8	1 200	9	0.6	0.5k×2h	42.86
9	1 600	3	0.4	0.2k×5h	49.37
10	1 600	5	0.8	0.4k×2.5h	47.92
11	1 600	7	0.2	0.5k×2h	48.26
12	1 600	9	0.6	k×h	39.57
13	2 000	3	0.8	0.5k×2h	45.65
14	2 000	5	0.4	k×h	42.25
15	2 000	7	0.6	0.2k×5h	45.56
16	2 000	9	0.2	0.4k×2.5h	46.28

计算参数	因素号
计算参数	A	B	C	D
K₁	170.96	189.70	190.05	168.97
K₂	181.59	183.05	176.18	180.01
K₃	186.12	176.36	169.25	183.27
K₄	179.74	169.30	175.44	186.16
m₁	42.74	47.425	47.5125	42.242 5
m₂	45.397 5	45.762 5	44.045	45.002 5
m₃	46.53	44.09	42.312 5	45.817 5
m₄	44.935	42.325	43.86	46.54
级差R	3.79	5.1	5.2	4.297 5
主次顺序	C>B>D>A

塔河强底水砂岩油藏CO₂驱机理实验研究

Experiments on CO₂ flooding mechanism for Tahe sandstone reservoir with strong bottom water

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 14

参考文献 19

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	任宏,李伟奇,虢中春,杨小腾,徐健,王婋. 雅克拉区块潜山储集体类型动态量化表征及自动识别 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(6): 789-800.
[2]	崔玉东, 陆程, 关子越, 罗万静, 滕柏路, 孟凡璞, 彭越. 南海海域天然气水合物降压开采储层蠕变对气井产能影响 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(6): 809-818.
[3]	何海燕, 刘先山, 耿少阳, 孙军昌, 孙彦春, 贾倩. 基于渗流-温度双场耦合的油藏型储气库数值模拟 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(6): 819-826.
[4]	梁运培, 张怀军, 王礼春, 秦朝中, 田键, 陈强, 史博文. 连续加载应力下真实裂缝流场和渗透率演化规律数值研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(6): 834-843.
[5]	施雷庭, 赵启明, 任镇宇, 朱诗杰, 朱珊珊. 煤岩裂隙形态对渗流能力影响数值模拟研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 424-432.
[6]	陈秀林, 王秀宇, 许昌民, 张聪. 基于核磁共振与微观数值模拟的CO₂埋存形态及分布特征研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(3): 296-304.
[7]	候梦如,梁冰,孙维吉,刘奇,赵航. 矿物界面刚度对页岩水力压裂裂缝扩展规律的影响研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(1): 100-107.
[8]	刘叶轩,刘向君,丁乙,周鑫,梁利喜. 考虑隔层影响的页岩油储层可压性评价方法 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(1): 74-82.
[9]	何封,冯强,崔宇诗. W页岩气藏气井控压生产制度数值模拟研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(1): 91-99.
[10]	郭鸿,夏岩,陈雷,金光,刘建强. 废弃油气井改造的地热井换热性能影响因素模拟研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(6): 850-858.
[11]	陈劭颖,王伟,杨清纯,张立松. 干热岩储层多簇缝网压裂热流固顺序耦合模型研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(6): 869-876.
[12]	程晓军. 缝洞型油藏注烃气提高采收率参数优化数值模拟研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(6): 902-909.
[13]	周海燕,张运来,梁潇,张吉磊,许亚南,刘继柱. 考虑多因素的多层合采产液量劈分模式研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(6): 945-950.
[14]	王高峰, 廖广志, 李宏斌, 胡志明, 魏宁, 丛连铸. CO₂驱气机理与提高采收率评价模型 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(5): 734-740.
[15]	崔传智,闫大伟,姚同玉,王建,张传宝,吴忠维. CO₂驱前缘运移规律及气窜时机预测方法——以胜利油田G89-1区块为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(5): 741-747.