威荣深层页岩气井油管最优参数设计研究

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2022.03.015

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

深层页岩气井投产初期能量充足,大多采用套管快速排液,当井口压力降至带压作业能力范围内或气井出现携液困难时再下入油管生产,油管下入时机、下入深度及油管尺寸等参数设计基本依据作业进度或现场经验而定。目前,下入时机对气井产能的影响鲜有研究材料供参考,因此,基于川南深层页岩气在套管生产阶段的53井次井筒动态监测资料,优选了井筒压降计算模型。通过分析气井生命周期内井筒流型、井底流动压力、临界携液能力的变化规律,确定油管最佳下入时机;基于探明的不同油管深度下的井筒压降变化规律,提出了以井筒最小压降为目标的油管最优下入深度;综合携液、压力损耗敏感性研究,得到最优管柱尺寸。结果表明：川南深层页岩气井在井口压力降至15~25 MPa时,为油管最佳下入时机,油管最优下深井斜介于70°~85°,最优管径为62 mm。该设计在现场应用良好,通过油管参数设定,气井压降速度降低了50 %,单位压降产量增长2倍,对有效地指导川南深层页岩气水平井油管设计及实施具有重要意义。

关键词: 管柱尺寸, 油管下深, 井筒流型, 压降模型, 深层页岩气

Abstract:

At the early stage of production, deep shale gas wells in southern Sichuan have sufficient energy. Most of the wells use casing to discharge fluid quickly. When the wellhead pressure drops to the capacity of the pressurized operation or the gas well is difficult to carry fluid, tubing production is run. The tubing installation time typically depends on the wellhead pressure drawdown to the capability of the snubbing unit or the onset time of liquid loading. Tubing depth and diameter are commonly determined based on the production progress according to operators’ field experience. So far, the influence between the tubing installation time and gas well deliverability is still unclear. Based on the well performance monitoring data of 53 times of deep shale gas wells in Southern Sichuan at the casing production stage, the calculation model of wellbore pressure drop and the variation law of wellbore flow pattern are analyzed, besides, the bottom hole flow pressure and critical liquid carrying capacity is also determined the best running time of tubing. In this work, the variation of wellbore pressure drop under different tubing depth is analyzed, and a method to determine the optimal tubing running depth is proposed by aiming at minimizing wellbore pressure drop. Finally, the optimal string size is obtained, and field verification is carried out based on the sensitivity analysis of liquid carrying and pressure loss. The results suggested that the optimum tubing installation time is when wellhead pressure drops to 15~25 MPa. The proper tubing depth is at 70° to 85° of well deviation and the suitable tubing inner diameter is 62 mm. By running tubing in time, the pressure drop rate of the gas well is reduced by 50 %, and the unit pressure drop production is increased by twice times, which effectively guides the tubing design and implementation of deep shale gas horizontal wells in Southern Sichuan.

Key words: tubing diameter, tubing depth, wellbore flow regime, pressure dorp model, deep shale gas

中图分类号:

TE37

杜洋,倪杰,雷炜,周兴付,李莉,卜淘. 威荣深层页岩气井油管最优参数设计研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(3): 526-533.

DU Yang,NI Jie,LEI Wei,ZHOU Xingfu,LI Li,BU Tao. Optimum time of tubing installation in deep shale gas wells of Weirong[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(3): 526-533.

图/表 14

表1

表2

图1

表3

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

图11

参考文献 24

[1]	马新华. 四川盆地南部页岩气富集规律与规模有效开发探索[J]. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(10):1-10.
	MA Xinhua. Enrichment laws and scale effective development of shale gas in the southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(10): 1-10.
[2]	谢军. 长宁—威远国家级页岩气示范区建设实践与成效[J]. 天然气工业, 2018, 38(2):1-7.
	XIE Jun. Practices and achievements of the Changning-Weiyuan shale gas national demonstration project construction[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(2): 1-7.
[3]	位云生, 齐亚东, 贾成业, 等. 四川盆地威远区块典型平台页岩气水平井动态特征及开发建议[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(1):81-86.
	WEI Yunsheng, QI Yadong, JIA Chengye, et al. Production performance of and development measures for typical platform horizontal wells in the Weiyuan Shale Gas Field, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(1): 81-86.
[4]	DINATA R, SARICA C, PEREYRA E. End of tubing (EOT) placement effects on the two-phase flow behavior in horizontal wells: Experimental study[C]// Paper SPE-181302-MS presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dubai, U.A.E., September 2016.
[5]	范宇, 岳圣杰, 李武广, 等. 长宁页岩气田采气工艺实践与效果[J]. 天然气与石油, 2020, 38(2):54-60.
	FAN Yu, YUE Shengjie, LI Wuguang, et al. Practice and effect of gas production technology in Changning Shale Gas Field[J]. Natural Gas and Oil, 2020, 38(2): 54-60.
[6]	张宏录, 刘海蓉. 中国页岩气排采工艺的技术现状及效果分析[J]. 天然气工业, 2012, 32(12):49-51.
	ZHANG Honglu, LIU Hairong. State and effects of dewatering and recovery techniques of shale gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2012, 32(12): 49-51.
[7]	李牧. 下倾型页岩气水平井连续油管排水采气工艺[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2020, 42(3):329-333.
	LI Mu. Coiled tubing of drainage gas recovery technology used in shale-gas downdip horizontal wells[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2020, 42(3): 329-333.
[8]	曹孟京, 吴晓东, 安永生, 等. 页岩气井连续油管采气管柱优化设计[J]. 断块油气田, 2018, 25(6):811-814.
	CAO Mengjing, WU Xiaodong, AN Yongsheng, et al. Optimal design of coiled tubing for production string of gas well in shale gas field[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2018, 25(6): 811-814.
[9]	吴武超, 李治平, 赖枫鹏, 等. 致密气藏水平井速度管下入时间确定方法[J]. 断块油气田, 2015, 22(4):522-525.
	WU Wuchao, LI Zhiping, LAI Fengpeng, et al. Method to determine time of installing velocity string for horizontal well in tight gas reservoirs[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2015, 22(4): 522-525.
[10]	王琦. 水平井井筒气液两相流动模拟实验研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2014.
	WANG Qi. Experiment study on gas-liquid in the wellbore of horizontal well[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2014.
[11]	李颖川, 朱家富, 秦勇. 排水采气井油管和环空两相流压降优化模型[J]. 石油学报, 1999, 20(2):87-92.
	LI Yingchuan, ZHU Jiafu, QIN Yong, et al. An optimal model for two-phase flow in tubing and annulus of gas wells[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 1999, 20(2): 87-92.
[12]	TAITEL Y. Stability of severe slugging[J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1986, 12(2): 203-217. doi: 10.1016/0301-9322(86)90026-1
[13]	陈德春, 徐悦新, 孟红霞, 等. 气井气液两相管流压降计算模型评价与优选[J]. 断块油气田, 2017, 24(6):840-843.
	CHEN Dechun, XU Yuexin, MENG Hongxia, et al. Evaluation and optimization of pressure drop calculation models for gas-liquid two-phase pipe flow in gas well[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2017, 24(6): 840-843.
[14]	LEA J, NICKENS H, WELLS M. Gas well deliquification[M]. Oxford: Gulf Professional Publishing, 2003.
[15]	张鹏, 李鹏辉, 蒲春生. 致密油水平井分段注采一体化管柱研究[J]. 石油机械, 2022, 50(3):86-92.
	ZHANG Peng, LI Penghui, PU Chunsheng. Research on integrated sectional injection-production string in horizontal well of tight oil reservoir[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2022, 50(3): 86-92.
[16]	KAYA A S, CHEN X T, SARICA C, et al. Investigation of transition from annular to intermittent flow in pipes[J]. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 2000, 122(1): 22-28. doi: 10.1115/1.483157
[17]	BELFROID S, SCHIFERLI W, ALBERTS G, et al. Predicting onset and dynamic behavior of liquid loading gas wells[C]// Paper SPE-115567-MS presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, USA, September 2008.
[18]	肖高棉, 李颖川, 喻欣. 气藏水平井连续携液理论与实验[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 32(3):122-125.
	XIAO Gaomian, LI Yingchuan, YU Xin. Theory and experiment research on the liquid continuous removal of horizontal gas well[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2010, 32(3): 122-125.
[19]	刘永辉, 艾先婷, 罗程程, 等. 预测水平井携液临界气流速的新模型[J]. 深圳大学学报(理工版), 2018, 35(6):551-557.
	LIU Yonghui, AI Xianting, LUO Chengcheng, et al. A new model for predicting critical gas velocity of liquid loading in horizontal well[J]. Journal of Shenzhen University(Science & Engineering), 2018, 35(6): 551-557.
[20]	王庆蓉, 陈家晓, 向建华, 等. 页岩气井积液诊断及排水采气工艺技术探讨[J]. 天然气与石油, 2020, 38(5):83-87.
	WANG Qingrong, CHEN Jiaxiao, XIANG Jianhua, et al. Discussion on shale gas well effusion diagnosis and drainage gas production technique[J]. Natural Gas and Oil, 2020, 38(5): 83-87.
[21]	陈元千, 傅礼兵, 徐佳倩. 两类产量递减模型在预测页岩气井和致密气井中的应用与对比[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2021, 28(3):84-89.
	CHEN Yuanqian, FU Libing, XU Jiaqian. Application and comparison of two production decline models in shale gas wells and tight gas wells[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2021, 28(3): 84-89.
[22]	徐中一, 方思冬, 张彬, 等. 页岩气体积压裂水平井试井解释新模型[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2020, 27(3):120-128.
	XU Zhongyi, FANG Sidong, ZHANG Bin, et al. A new well test model for horizontal wells by stimulated reservoir volume in shale gas reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020, 27(3): 120-128.
[23]	胡苗, 冯利军, 王军锋, 等. 延北113-133致密气藏水平井速度管柱安装策略研究[J]. 非常规油气, 2022, 9(2):85-93.
	HU Miao, FENG Lijun, WANG Junfeng, et al. Study on velocity string installation strategy of horizontal well in Yanbei 113-133 tight gas reservoir[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2022, 9(2): 85-93.
[24]	李紫晗, 刘宇沛, 张滨海, 等. 临兴区块致密气井动态携液规律研究[J]. 非常规油气, 2021, 8(2):80-87.
	LI Zihan, LIU Yupei, ZHANG Binhai, et al. Study on dynamic liquid carrying law of tight gas wells in Linxing block[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2021, 8(2): 80-87.

监测项目	套管内径（mm）	井口压力（MPa）	井口温度（℃）	产气量（10⁴m³/d）	产液量（m³/d）	测点压力（MPa）	测点温度（℃）
最小值	114.3	9.2	30	2.13	9	20.6	123
最大值	118.6	48.0	96	31.29	384	69.5	138
平均值		27.7	55	10.56	116	44.7	132

直井段					斜井段
计算模型	E₁（%）	E₂（%）	E₃（%）	R_RPF	计算模型	E₁（%）	E₂（%）	E₃（%）	R_RPF
ANSARI	11.71	11.82	11.33	0.74	BB	-2.02	3.99	5.33	0
BB	29.71	29.71	19.29	3.00	BJ	-9.03	24.30	29.42	2.65
DR	13.53	13.63	11.50	0.94	DUKLER	-5.97	17.39	20.16	1.64
GRAY	-5.73	7.25	7.78	0	MB	11.62	11.62	5.49	1.34
HB	-6.69	7.61	7.72	0.06	NO SLIP	-2.44	4.68	5.60	0.10
MB	11.91	12.21	10.30	0.70	XIAO	11.75	25.85	27.98	1.94
NO SLIP	-9.71	10.63	9.17	0.44

井段	推荐模型
直井段	GRAY
斜井段	Beggs-Brills
水平段	TAITEL