提高水井分注测试成功率配套技术研究与应用

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2023.06.008

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为解决苏北复杂断块油田同心分层注水在实际应用中存在测试仪器遇阻、分层注水量调配不到位等问题，创新采用空心杆冲洗清管，研究应用防返吐配水器、化学防砂技术来保持注水管柱清洁；设计聚合物冻胶调剖体系来缓解层间矛盾，避免层间级差影响测调效果。各项配套技术累计应用13井次，矿场试验证明其在避免测试仪器遇阻、降低分层注水量调配难度方面具有良好效果，年度配套措施井测试成功率达100 %，同心分层注水井整体测试成功率由74.4 %提升至84.4 %，做优精细注水工作的同时实现降本增效，具有良好的推广应用前景。

关键词: 同心分层注水, 测试成功率低, 空心杆清洗, 防砂, 防返吐配水器, 聚合物调剖

Abstract:

To address the challenges of test instrument obstruction and the suboptimal deployment of concentric stratified water injection in the Subei complex fracture block oilfields, an innovative approach involving the use of a hollow rod for pipe cleaning was introduced. This method focused on two key areas: the implementation of a flowback preventing water dispenser and the application of chemical sand control technology to maintain the cleanliness of the water injection pipe. In addition, a polymer gel profile control system was designed to mitigate the disparities between layers, aiming to minimize the influence of stratum grade differences on measurement and adjustment processes. This suite of supporting technologies has been applied to testing wells a total of thirteen times. The on-site tests have demonstrated that this approach is effective in preventing the obstruction of testing instruments and in simplifying the deployment process for layered water injection. Notably, the success rate of testing wells for these annual supporting measures reached 100 %, marking a significant achievement. Furthermore, the overall success rate of concentric layered water injection wells increased from 74.4 % to 84.4 %. The implementation of this method offers a dual advantage of reducing costs and enhancing efficiency, particularly in the context of optimizing fine water injection.

Key words: concentric stratified water injection, low testing success rate, hollow rod cleaning, sand control, flowback preventing water dispenser, polymer gel profile control

中图分类号:

TE357

许国晨, 刘晓文. 提高水井分注测试成功率配套技术研究与应用[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(6): 773-780.

XU Guochen, LIU Xiaowen. Research and application of supporting technologies for improving success rate of water injection well testing[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 773-780.

图/表 15

表1

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

表2

图10

图11

图12

图13

参考文献 20

[1]	LIU H, GAO Y, SUN F C, et al. Overview of key zonal water injection technologies in China[C]// Paper IPTC-16868-MS presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Beijing, China, March 2013.
[2]	姚振杰, 赵洋, 李剑, 等. J区块注水开发储层物性变化规律研究[J]. 非常规油气, 2021, (6): 46-51.
	YAO Zhenjie, ZHAO Yang, LI Jian, et al. Study on the change law of physical properties after water flooding in J reservoirs block[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2021, (6): 46-51.
[3]	杨玲智, 刘延青, 胡改星, 等. 长庆油田同心验封测调一体化分层注水技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2020, 48(2): 113-117.
	YANG Lingzhi, LIU Yanqing, HU Gaixing, et al. Technology of integrated stratified water injection in Changqing Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2020, 48(2): 113-117.
[4]	张伟杰, 雷宏, 关竹林, 等. 桥式同心分层注水技术在ZD油田的应用效果分析[J]. 石油工业技术监督, 2022, 38(8): 66-70.
	ZHANG Weijie, LEI Hong, GUAN Zhulin, et al. Application effect analysis of bridge concentric stratified water injection technique in ZD oilfield[J]. Technology Supervision in Petroleum Industry, 2022, 38(8): 66-70.
[5]	杨玲智, 胡改星, 王明, 等. 桥式同心验封测调一体化技术研究与应用[J]. 测井技术, 2019, 43(5): 550-553.
	YANG Lingzhi, HU Gaixing, WANG Ming, et al. Research and application of bridge concentric sealing test and commissioning integration technology[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2019, 43(5): 550-553.
[6]	王琪华. 苏北油田同心分注工艺的应用实践与评价[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2016, 6(1): 67-70.
	WANG Qihua. Application practice and evaluation of concentric injection separation process in Subei oilfield[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2016, 6(1): 67-70.
[7]	李旭, 付振, 刘兴达. 连续油管除垢技术在处理测试问题井中的研究与应用[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2019, 39(8): 250-251.
	LI Xu, FU Zhen, LIU Xingda. Research and application of continuous tubing descaling technology in treating testing wells[J]. China Petroleum and Chemical Standards and Quality, 2019, 39(8): 250-251.
[8]	唐珂, 鞠岳军, 宗晓军. 机械式震击旋转除垢器在乾安采油厂测试的应用[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2018, 38(4): 49.
	TANG Ke, JU Yuejun, ZONG Xiaojun. Application of mechanical shock rotary descaler in Qianan oil production plant[J]. China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality, 2018, 38(4): 49.
[9]	曹力元, 林刚, 刘晓文, 等. 注水井无缆智能分注技术在苏北油田的应用[J]. 新疆石油天然气, 2022, 18(1): 38-41. doi: 10.12388/j.issn.1673-2677.2022.01.006
	CAO Liyuan, LIN Gang, LIU Xiaowen, et al. Application of cableless intelligent separate injection technology for water injection wells in Subei Oilfield[J]. Xinjiang Oil & Gas, 2022, 18(1): 38-41. doi: 10.12388/j.issn.1673-2677.2022.01.006
[10]	李本双, 司远征, 李连群, 等. S井区低渗油藏注水系统优化调整技术[J]. 新疆石油天然气, 2022, 18(4): 62-66.
	LI Benshuang, SI Yuanzheng, LI Lianqun, et al. Optimization and adjustment technology for water injection system in low permeability reservoirs in S well area[J]. Xinjiang Oil & Gas, 2022, 18(4): 62-66.
[11]	雷西俊, 周李乾, 牛斌莉, 等. 油田注水管理方式的研究[J]. 石油工程, 2018, 44(2): 17.
	LEI Xijun, ZHOU Liqian, NIU Binli, et al. Research on water injection management in oilfield[J]. Petroleum Engineering, 2018, 44(2): 17.
[12]	董旭, 李冲, 吴宝路, 等. 油水井出砂套变研究及治理对策[J]. 石油知识, 2022, 38(2): 52-53.
	DONG Xu, LI Chong, WU Baolu, et al. Research on sand casing deformation in oil and water wells and its control measures[J]. Petroleum Knowledge, 2022, 38(2): 52-53.
[13]	彭正强, 华泽君, 李勇, 等. 新型化学固砂技术研究及在渤海油田的应用[J]. 辽宁化工, 2022, 51(7): 1026-1029.
	PENG Zhengqiang, HUA Zejun, LI Yong, et al. Research on new chemical sand consolidation technology and its application in Bohai Oilfield[J]. Liaoning Chemical Industry, 2022, 51(7): 1026-1029.
[14]	符静宇, 何宏, 付平, 等. 渗透率级差对多层非均质油藏水驱油影响规律研究[J]. 能源化工, 2018, 39(5): 31-36.
	FU Jingyu, HE Hong, FU Ping, et al. Study on the effect of permeability stage difference on water displacement of multi-layer heterogeneous reservoirs[J]. Energy and Chemical Industry, 2018, 39(5): 31-36.
[15]	胡俊杰. GD油田聚合物驱调剖技术研究[D]. 东营: 中国石油大学(华东), 2019.
	HU Junjie. Research on polymer flooding and profile control technology in GD Oilfield[D]. Dongying: China University of Petroleum(East China), 2019.
[16]	张昕. 低渗透油藏凝胶调剖体系优选及注入参数优化研究[D]. 大庆: 东北石油大学, 2020.
	ZHANG Xin. Study on optimization of gel profile control system and injection parameters for low permeability reservoirs[D]. Daqing: Northeast Petroleum University, 2020.
[17]	陈玲玲. 聚合物凝胶调剖剂运移特性及封堵效果[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2022, 41(4): 122-130.
	CHEN Lingling. Migration characteristics and plugging effect of polymer gel profile control agent[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2022, 41(4): 122-130.
[18]	CAO W J, XIE K, LU X G, et al. Effect of profile-control oil-displacement agent on increasing oil recovery and its mechanism[J]. Fuel, 2019, 237: 1151-1160. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.10.089
[19]	张娜, 元福卿, 魏翠华, 等. 普通稠油油藏聚合物驱提高采收率研究与实践-以孤岛油田B21单元为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2021, 28(6): 101-106.
	ZHANG Na, YUAN Fuqing, WEI Cuihua, et al. Research and practice of enhanced oil recovery by polymer flooding in ordinary heavy oil reservoirs:Taking Block B21, Gudao Oilfield as an example[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2021, 28(6): 101-106.
[20]	郑昕, 姚秀田, 夏海容, 等. 稠油化学堵调降黏复合驱油体系构建及驱油机理分析[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2021, 28(6): 122-128.
	ZHENG Xin, YAO Xiutian, XIA Hairong, et al. Establishment of combined viscosity reduction flooding system for chemical water shutoff and profile control in heavy oil reservoirs and analysis of its mechanism[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2021, 28(6): 122-128.

测井层号	厚度/ m	相对吸水量/ %	各层吸水量/（m³/d）	分层情况	配注量/（m³/d）
11	3.0	72.7	18.18	上层	10
13	1.7	18.2	4.55	中层	10
14	1.7	0	2.27	下层	5
15—16	6.0	9.1	2.27	下层	5

井号	措施前测吸水		最高施工压力/ MPa	防砂剂用量/ m3	措施后测吸水
井号	测试压力/ MPa	视吸水指数 /[L/（MPa·min）]	最高施工压力/ MPa	防砂剂用量/ m3	测试压力/ MPa	视吸水指数/ [L/（MPa·min）]
C4-3	8	28.75	13.0	18.0	8.0	27.38
NH2-19	17	8.00	20.8	10.5	17.5	7.50