高含水高温油藏W/O型乳化剂OB-2性能评价及驱油研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

针对如何在水驱后进一步开发高含水高温油藏,提出了一种表面活性剂就地乳化驱油技术,对油包水（W/O）型乳化剂OB-2体系进行了乳化特性评价及乳状液驱油研究。研究结果表明,随着乳化剂浓度增大,乳液黏度先增大后减小;对于X油藏原油,乳化剂最佳浓度为0.3wt%,在此浓度下,油水界面张力可降低至10 ^-2 mN/m数量级;在水油体积比低于7∶3时,乳化剂OB-2可促使油水两相完全乳化,形成高黏度的W/O型乳液,其中,水油体积比为7∶3时乳液黏度最大,增黏率高达370 %。岩心驱油实验结果表明,均质条件下,水驱后注入0.3PV乳化剂OB-2体系,可提高原油采收率达26.15 %;非均质条件下,该乳化体系可在级差低于7.6时表现出良好的流度控制及非均质调控能力,扩大波及体积。

关键词: 高温, 高含水, 油包水型乳化剂, 就地乳化驱油, 非均质性调控

Abstract: Aim

ed at how to develop high temperature reservoir after water flooding, we proposed the in-situ emulsion flooding by injecting surfactant solutions to evaluate the emulsifying property and study on the oil displacement by the emulsion of the OB-2 system for the W/O（water in oil）emulsifier. The results showed that the emulsion viscosity firstly increased and then decreased along with emulsifier concentration. For oil in reservoir-X, the optimal emulsifier concentration was 0.3 wt% at which could make the interfacial tension reduce to 10 ^-2 mN/m order of magnitude. When the water-oil ratio was lower than 7∶3, the complete emulsification of oil-water happened and the W/O emulsion with high viscosity would form. The maximum emulsion viscosity appearde when the oil-water ratio was 7∶3, with the viscosity increasing rate of as high as 370 %. The results of emulsion flooding indicated that the recovery factor of the homogeneous core could increase another 26.15 % after water flooding by injecting 0.3PV OB-2 system. On the other hand, when the permeability ratio of parallel cores was lower than 7.6, applying the OB-2 system could achieve good mobility control and heterogeneity regulation.

Key words: high temperature, high water cut, W/O emulsifier, in-situ emulsion flooding, heterogeneous regulation

中图分类号:

TE39

蒲万芬,梅子来,杨洋,王铎,沈超,陈珮. 高含水高温油藏W/O型乳化剂OB-2性能评价及驱油研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2019, 9(1): 38-43.

Pu Wanfen,Mei Zilai,Yang Yang,Wang Duo,Shen Chao,Chen Pei. Evaluation of OB-2 system for W/O emulsifier and displacement experiments research at high temperature reservoir in high water cut period[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(1): 38-43.

图/表 10

表1

表2

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

表3

参考文献 17

[1]	张凤英, 杨光, 刘延彪 , 等. 高温高盐油藏用化学驱油剂的研究[J]. 精细石油化工进展, 2005,6(5):8-12. doi: 10.16640/j.cnki.37-1222/t.2016.19.003
[2]	元福卿, 赵方剑, 夏晞冉 , 等. 胜坨油田二区沙二段3砂组高温高盐油藏低张力氮气泡沫驱单井试验[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2014,21(1):70-73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2014.01.017
[3]	方吉超, 戴彩丽, 由庆 , 等. 塔中402CⅢ高温高盐油藏泡沫驱实验研究[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2014,21(4):84-88. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2014.04.020
[4]	赵国柱, 金仁高, 李圣涛 , 等. 高温高盐油藏甜菜碱型表面活性剂TCJ-5的性能及应用[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2015,39(3):111-117. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2015.03.014
[5]	任朝华, 张先超, 尤万里 , 等. 乳化剂HC-5的性能及驱油效果[J]. 油田化学, 2015,32(4):554-558.
[6]	Mcauliffe C D . Oil-in-water emulsions and their flow properties in porous media[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1973,25(6):727-733. doi: 10.2118/4369-PA
[7]	M S Karambeigi, R Abbassi, E Roayaei , et al. Emulsion flooding for enhanced oil recovery: Interactive optimization of phase behavior, microvisual and core-flood experiments[J]. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2015,29(2):382-391. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2015.04.019
[8]	A Mehranfar, M H Ghazanfari . Investigation of the microscopic displacement mechanisms and macroscopic behavior of alkaline flooding at different wettability conditions in shaly glass micromodels[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2014,122:595-615. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2014.08.027
[9]	L Chen, G Zhang, J Ge , et al. Research of the heavy oil displacement mechanism by using alkaline/surfactant flooding system[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2013,43(19):63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.05.035
[10]	M Dong, Q Liu, A Li . Displacement mechanisms of enhanced heavy oil recovery by alkaline flooding in a micromodel[J]. Particuology, 2012,10(3):298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.partic.2011.09.008
[11]	宣英龙, 杨雪白, 秦笃国 , 等. 扶余原油乳化生成条件与驱油机理[J]. 油田化学, 2016,33(2):300-304. doi: 10.19346/j.cnki.1000-4092.2016.06.023
[12]	周亚洲, 殷代印, 曹睿 . 高含水后期乳状液的驱油效果与作用机理分析[J]. 油田化学, 2016,33(2):285-290. doi: 10.19346/j.cnki.1000-4092.2016.06.0020
[13]	田茂章, 赵新, 宋新民 , 等. 低渗透油藏中油包水乳液的生成及其扩大波及体积的作用[J]. 应用化工, 2015,44(8):1421-1426.
[14]	任朝华, 罗跃, 陈大钧 . 新型表面活性剂体系降低原油/水的界面张力行为[J]. 油田化学, 2011,28(4):423-426.
[15]	Z. H. Ren, Y. Luo . Dynamic interfacial tension behavior of alkyl amino sulfonate in crude oil-brine system[J]. Tenside Surfactants Detergents, 2013,50(5):369-375. doi: 10.3139/113.110269
[16]	蒲万芬, 唐艳丽, 赵田红 . 驱油用表面活性剂的乳化性能研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2017,7(4):41-45.
[17]	孙琳, 蒲万芬, 吴雅丽 , 等. 表面活性剂高温乳化性能研究[J]. 油田化学, 2011,28(3):275-279.

岩心编号	直径/cm	长度/cm	孔隙度,%	渗透率/10^-3μm²
1	2.56	6.03	16.12	159
2	2.53	6.66	13.42	76.4

实验编号	级差	岩心类型	孔隙度,%	含油饱和度,%	渗透率/10^-3μm²	采收率,%
实验编号	级差	岩心类型	孔隙度,%	含油饱和度,%	渗透率/10^-3μm²	水驱	总计	提高
1#	2.3	高渗	18.85	66.88	234.6	52.75	78.05	25.3
1#	2.3	低渗	11.44	64.26	102	39.31	56.81	17.5
2#	3.7	高渗	17.41	68.92	418.84	48.14	74.64	26.5
2#	3.7	低渗	12.42	66.24	113.2	18.4	44	25.6
3#	4.2	高渗	18.34	70.23	405.3	52.14	74.78	22.64
3#	4.2	低渗	13.53	66.23	96.5	0	31.2	31.2
4#	5.5	高渗	19.34	69.65	469.15	52.47	76.23	23.76
4#	5.5	低渗	12.65	67.23	85.3	0	15.4	15.4
5#	7.6	高渗	21.38	67.65	592.8	51.85	81.5	29.65
5#	7.6	低渗	12.85	63.52	78	0	0	0
6#	2.08*	高渗	16.12	62.6	159	72.72	81.92	9.2
6#	2.08*	低渗	13.42	61.1	76.4	26.35	44.85	18.5