重庆武隆五峰组—龙马溪组一段天生剖面特征研究

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2022.01.013

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以页岩储层作为切入点,通过对涪陵、南川、武隆地区构造简单、露头发育好、地层发育全、交通便利区进行踏勘优选,选择天生标准剖面作为研究对象。对天生剖面进行取样分析,结合已有的地震、钻井、测井与分析化验等资料,开展了地层沉积特征、矿物岩石学特征、有机地化特征、储集空间特征等方面研究。研究结果表明,该剖面处于构造相对稳定区,各小层发育特征明显,厚度变化不大,具有良好的横向可对比性,是一条具有代表性、典型性的观察研究剖面,可作为川渝地区页岩科研教学实验参考基地。同时,讨论提出了斑脱岩夹层的发育,对页岩品质及页岩气井压裂改造存在一定的影响,通过地面指示地下,为页岩气井的高效开发具有了一定指导意义。

关键词: 页岩储层, 高效开发, 五峰组—龙马溪组一段, 天生标准剖面, 武隆地区

Abstract:

Taking the shale reservoir as the starting point, Tiansheng standard section is selected as the research object by the survey and optimization of the areas with simple structure, well-developed outcrops, fully developed strata and convenient transportation in Fuling, Nanchuan and Wulong areas. The shale heterogeneity of the outcrop is characterized in the aspect of stratigraphy, mineralogy, petrography, organic geochemistry and storage space, combined with pre-existing seismic, drilling,logging, and laboratory petrophysical and geochemical analyses. The research results show that this section is located in an area of relative stable structure has good horizontal comparability, of which each small layer has typical development characteristics and the thickness changes little. It is a representative and typical observation and research section, which can be used as a reference base for shale scientific research and teaching in Sichuan and Chongqing Region. Meanwhile, it is pointed out that the development of bentonite interlayer has a certain influence on shale quality and shale gas well fracturing. This method of the surface indicating the underground provides a certain guiding significance for the efficient development of shale gas wells.

Key words: shale reservoir, efficient development, Wufeng Formation-1st member of Longmaxi Formation, Tiansheng standard outcrop, Wulong area

中图分类号:

TE132

湛小红,陈学辉,刘超,何文斌,张志平. 重庆武隆五峰组—龙马溪组一段天生剖面特征研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1): 150-159.

ZHAN Xiaohong,CHEN Xuehui,LIU Chao,HE Wenbin,ZHANG Zhiping. Characteristics of Tiansheng Outcrop in Wufeng Formation- 1st Member of Longmaxi Formation, Wulong, Chongqing[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(1): 150-159.

图/表 12

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

图5

表2

表3

表4

表5

图6

图7

参考文献 24

[1]	邹才能, 赵群, 丛连铸, 等. 中国页岩气开发进展、潜力及前景[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(1):1-14.
	ZOU Caineng, ZHAO Qun, CONG Lianzhu, et al. Development progress, potential and prospect of shale gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(1):1-14.
[2]	常隆庆. 重庆南川间地质志[R]. 重庆:中国西部科学院地质研究所, 1933.
	CHANG Longqing. Geological records of Nanchuan, Chongqing[R]. Chongqing: Research Institute of Geology, Western Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1933.
[3]	陈思, 马磊, 李德万, 等. 重庆武隆岩溶国家地质公园古生代—中生代沉积环境与古地理研究[M]. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 2014.
	CHEN Si, MA Lei, LI Dewan, et al. Paleozoic-Mesozoic sedimentary environment and paleogeography of Wulong Karst National Geopark, Chongqing[M]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences Press, 2014.
[4]	陈思, 廖云平, 马斌, 等. 重庆武隆岩溶国家地质公园古生代—中生代构造演化研究[M]. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 2014.
	CHEN Si, LIAO Yunping, MA Bin, et al. Paleozoic-Mesozoic sedimentary tectonic evolution of Wulong Karst National Geopark, Chongqing[M]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences Press, 2014.
[5]	邓传俊. 重庆市1/50万旅游地质图说明书:重庆市城市地质系图之四[R]. 重庆:重庆市地矿局208水文工程地质队, 1987.
	DENG Chuanjun. Description of 1/500 000 tourism geological map of Chongqing: The fourth map of urban geology of Chongqing[R]. Chongqing: 208 hydrological engineering geology team of Chongqing Bureau of Geology and mineral resources, 1987.
[6]	周庆. 重庆龙洞-江口地区矿产地质调查报告[R]. 毕节:贵州省地矿局区调队, 2016.
	ZHOU Qing. Geological survey report of mineral resources in Longdong Jiangkou area, Chongqing[R]. Bijie: Regional survey team of Guizhou bureau of Geology and mineral resources, 2016.
[7]	史文强, 张远海, 陈伟海, 等. 重庆武隆岩溶洞穴地质遗迹图幅示范调查成果及意义[C]// 中国地质学会, 2016.
	SHI Wenqiang, ZHANG Yuanhai, CHEN Weihai, et al. Demonstration survey results and significance of geological relics map of karst caves in Wulong, Chongqing[C]// Geological Society of China, 2016.
[8]	戎嘉余, 陈旭, 王怿, 等. 奥陶—志留纪之交黔中古陆的变迁:证据与启示[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2011, 41(10):1407-1415.
	RONG Jiayu, CHEN Xu, WANG Yi, et al. Northward expansion of Central Guizhou Oldland through the Ordovician and Silurian transition: Evidence and implications[J]. Scientia Sinica(Terrae), 2011, 41(10):1407-1415.
[9]	王淑芳, 董大忠, 王玉满, 等. 四川盆地志留系龙马溪组富气页岩地球化学特征及沉积环境[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2015, 34(6):1203-1212.
	WANG Shufang, DONG Dazhong, WANG Yuman, et al. Geochemical characteristics the sedimentation environment of the gas-enriched shale in the Silurian Longmaxi Formation in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2015, 34(6):1203-1212.
[10]	樊隽轩, MELCHIN M J, 陈旭, 等. 华南奥陶—志留系龙马溪组黑色笔石页岩的生物地层学[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2012, 42(1):130-139.
	FAN Junxuan, MELCHIN M J, CHEN Xu, et al. Biostratigraphy and geography of the Ordovician-Silurian Lungmachi black shales in South China[J]. Scientia Sinica(Terrae), 2012, 42(1):130-139.
[11]	易定鑫, 田景春, 井翠, 等. 五峰组—龙马溪组笔石带划分与沉积环境的意义——以重庆武隆接龙剖面为例[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2019, 43(6):33-43.
	YI Dingxian, TIAN Jingchun, JING Cui, et al. Graptolite biostratigraphy and sedimentary environment significance: A case study from the Wufeng Formation-Longmaxi Formation of Jielong Section in Wulong, Southeastern Chongqing[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2019, 43(6):33-43.
[12]	舒逸, 陆永潮, 刘占红, 等. 海相页岩中斑脱岩发育特征及对页岩储层品质的影响——以涪陵地区五峰组—龙马溪组一段为例[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(12):1371-1380.
	SHU Yi, LU Yongchao, LIU Zhanhong, et al. Development characteristics of bentonite in marine shale and its effect on shale reservoir quality: a casa study of Wufeng Formation to Member 1 of Longmaxi Formation, Fuling area[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(12):1371-1380.
[13]	王玉满, 李新景, 王皓, 等. 四川盆地东部上奥陶统五峰组—下志留统龙马溪组斑脱岩发育特征及地质意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(4):653-665.
	WANG Yuman, LI Xinjing, WANG Hao, et al. Developmental characteristics and geological significance of the bentonite in the Upper Ordovician Wufeng-Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formation in eastern Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(4):653-665.
[14]	王玉满, 李新景, 陈波, 等. 中上扬子地区埃隆阶最厚斑脱岩层分布特征及地质意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018, 29(1):42-54.
	WANG Yuman, LI Xinjing, CHEN Bo, et al. Distribution characteristics and geological significance of the thickest Aeronian bentonite bed in Middle-Upper Yangtze Region[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2018, 29(1):42-54.
[15]	邱振, 卢斌, 陈振宏, 等. 火山灰沉积与页岩有机质富集关系探讨——以五峰组—龙马溪组含气页岩为例[J]. 沉积学报, 2019, 37(6):1296-1308.
	QIU Zhen, LU Bin, CHEN Zhenhong, et al. Discussion of the relationship between volcanic ash layers and organic enrichment of black shale: A case study of the Wufeng-Longmaxi gas shales in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2019, 37(6):1296-1308.
[16]	仰云峰, 鲍芳, 腾格尔, 等. 四川盆地不同成熟度下志留统龙马溪组页岩有机孔特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(3):387-397.
	YANG Yunfeng, BAO Fang, BORJIGIN Tenger, et al. Characteristics of organic matter-hosted pores in Lower Silurian Longmaxi shale with different maturities, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(3):387-397.
[17]	熊德明, 马万云, 张明峰, 等. 干酪根类型及生烃潜力确定新方法[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(6):898-905.
	XIONG Deming, MA Wanyun, ZHANG Mingfeng, et al. New method for determination of kerogen type and the hydrocarbon potential[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(6):898-905.
[18]	李双建, 肖开华, 沃玉进, 等. 南方海相上奥陶统—下志留统优质烃源岩发育的控制因素[J]. 沉积学报, 2008, 26(5):872-880.
	LI Shuangjian, XIAO Kaihua, WO Yujin, et al. Developmental controlling factors of Upper Ordovician-Lower Silurian high quality source rocks in marian sequence, South China[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2008, 26(5):872-880.
[19]	马中良, 申宝剑, 潘安阳, 等. 四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气成因与碳同位素倒转机制——来自热模拟实验的认识[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(3):428-433.
	MA Zhongliang, SHEN Baojian, PAN Anyang, et al. Origin and carbon isotope reversal of shale gas in Wufeng-Longmaxi formations, Sichuan Basin: Implication from pyrolysis experiments[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2020, 42(3):428-433.
[20]	王庆波, 刘若冰, 李春燕, 等. 四川盆地及周缘五峰—龙马溪组页岩气地质条件研究[J]. 重庆科技学院学报(自然科学版), 2012, 14(5):17-21.
	WANG Qingbo, LIU Ruobing, LI Chunyan, et al. Geologic condition of the Upper Ordovician-Lower Silurian shale gas in the Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology(Natural Sciences Edition), 2012, 14(5):17-21.
[21]	刘树根, 王世玉, 孙玮, 等. 四川盆地及其周缘五峰组—龙马溪组黑色页岩特征[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 40(6):621-639.
	LIU Shugen, WANG Shiyu, SUN Wei, et al. Characteristics of black shale in Wufeng Formation and Longmaxi Formation in Sichuan Basin and its peripheral areas[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology(Science & Technology Edition), 2013, 40(6):621-639.
[22]	宋董军, 妥进才, 王晔桐, 等. 富有机质泥页岩纳米级孔隙结构特征研究进展[J]. 沉积学报, 2019, 37(6):1309-1324.
	SONG Dongjun, TUO Jincai, WANG Yetong, et al. Research advances on characteristics of nanopore structure of organic-rich shales[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2019, 37(6):1309-1324.
[23]	朱洪建, 琚宜文, 孙岩, 等. 构造变形作用下页岩孔裂隙结构演化特征及其模式——盆地及其周缘下古生界海相页岩为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(1):186-240.
	ZHU Hongjian, JU Yiwen, SUN Yan, et al. Evolution characteristics and models of shale pores and fractures under tectonic deformation: A case study of the Lower Paleozoic marine shale in the Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(1):186-240.
[24]	王玉杰, 赵迪斐, 卢琪荣, 等. 纹层、夹层沉积构造对海相页岩储集空间和储层脆性的影响——以四川盆地龙马溪组页岩为例[J]. 非常规油气, 2020, 7(6):33-40.
	WANG Yujie, ZHAO Dipei, LU Qirong, et al. Impact of laminae and interlayer sedimentary structure on the storage and brittleness of shale reservoirs: Taking Longmaxi formation shale in Sichuan Basin as an example[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2020, 7(6):33-40.

层位	样品编号	岩性	平均矿物含量（%）
层位	样品编号	岩性	黏土	石英	钾长石	斜长石	菱铁矿	黄铁矿
五峰组	WLJL-02	炭质硅质灰岩	27.00	64.00	0	3.00	0	6.00
	WLJL-03	硅质页岩	28.20	66.60	1.10	3.30	0.80	0
	WLJL-04	硅质页岩	18.90	79.50	0	1.60	0	0
	WLJL-05-1	硅质页岩	34.90	60.60	1.00	3.50	0	0
	WLJL-05-2	硅质页岩	23.00	74.70	0	2.30	0	0
	WLJL-06	硅质页岩	19.00	78.60	0	2.40	0	0
	WLJL-07	硅质页岩	18.40	79.60	0	2.00	0	0
	WLJL-08	硅质页岩	20.50	73.30	0	2.30	0	3.90
	WLJL-09	硅质页岩	24.80	69.80	0	2.50	0	2.90
平均			23.86	71.86	0.23	2.54	0.09	1.42
龙马溪组一段	WLJL-11	硅质页岩	31.00	61.50	2.40	5.10	0	0
	WLJL-12	硅质页岩	22.00	65.50	3.90	5.50	0	3.10
	WLJL-13-1	硅质页岩	31.30	62.20	1.80	4.70	0	0
	WLJL-13-2	硅质页岩	28.90	63.30	2.50	5.30	0	0
	WLJL-14	含泥硅质页岩	28.90	66.40	1.30	3.40	0	0
	WLJL-15	含泥硅质页岩	34.00	60.80	1.70	3.50	0	0
	WLJL-16	含泥硅质页岩	30.40	63.20	2.80	3.60	0	0
	WLJL-17	含硅炭质泥岩	34.80	59.30	4.00	1.90	0	0
平均			30.16	62.78	2.55	4.13	0	0.39

相	亚相	微相	分布小层
滨外陆棚	深水陆棚	深水混积陆棚	9
		深水硅泥质陆棚	2—8、10—11、13、15—16
		深水砂泥质陆棚	1、12、14

层位	样品编号	岩性	厚度（m）	TOC（%）
五峰组	WLJL-02	炭质硅质灰岩	9.66	5.20
	WLJL-03	硅质页岩		3.26
	WLJL-04	硅质页岩		3.58
	WLJL-05-1	硅质页岩		3.75
	WLJL-05-2	硅质页岩		4.00
	WLJL-06	硅质页岩		3.45
	WLJL-07	硅质页岩		3.76
	WLJL-08	硅质页岩		4.90
	WLJL-09	硅质页岩		4.34
龙马溪组一段	WLJL-11	硅质页岩	15.03	5.50
	WLJL-12	硅质页岩		5.94
	WLJL-13-1	硅质页岩		5.59
	WLJL-13-2	硅质页岩		4.07
	WLJL-14	含泥硅质页岩		3.68
	WLJL-15	含泥硅质页岩		4.60
	WLJL-16	含泥硅质页岩		3.73
	WLJL-17	含硅炭质泥岩		1.10

层位	样品编号	岩性	距底深度（m）	样品数量	分组	测点数	R_b （%）	R_o （%）
五峰组	WLJL-05-1	硅质页岩	5.96	1	2.3-3.5	23	2.76	2.19
龙马溪组一段	WLJL-13-1	硅质页岩	14.94	1	2.1-2.7	21	2.44	1.98