基于渗流-温度双场耦合的油藏型储气库数值模拟

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2023.06.013

油气藏评价与开发 ›› 2023, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (6): 819-826.doi: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2023.06.013

基于渗流-温度双场耦合的油藏型储气库数值模拟

何海燕¹(),刘先山²(),耿少阳²,孙军昌³,孙彦春¹,贾倩¹

1.中国石油冀东油田公司，河北唐山 063200
2.成都理工大学能源学院，四川成都 610059
3.东北石油大学环渤海能源研究院，秦皇岛河北 066004

收稿日期:2022-10-31 出版日期:2023-12-26 发布日期:2024-01-03
通讯作者: 刘先山（1993—），男，在读博士研究生，从事储气库数值模拟研究。地址：四川省成都市成华区二仙桥街道东三路1号，邮政编码：610059。E-mail: liuxianshan@stu.cdut.edu.cn
作者简介:何海燕（1982—），女，本科，工程师，主要从事储气库建设研究。地址：河北省唐山市路北区新华西道101号冀东油田第一科研楼，邮政编码：063200。E-mail: 63293886@qq.com
基金资助:
中国石油勘探与生产分公司2022年重点科技项目“冀东堡古2高挥发性油藏气驱采油与储气库协同建设关键技术研究与试验”(2022ZS0903)

Numerical simulation of UGS facilities rebuilt from oil reservoirs based on the coupling of seepage and temperature fields

HE Haiyan¹(),LIU Xianshan²(),GENG Shaoyang²,SUN Junchang³,SUN Yanchun¹,JIA Qian¹

1. PetroChina Jidong Oilfield Company, Tangshan, Hebei 063200, China
2. College of Energy, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China
3. Bohai Rim Energy Research Institute, Northeast Petroleum University, Qinhuangdao, Hebei 066004, China

Received:2022-10-31 Online:2023-12-26 Published:2024-01-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

调峰保供是储气库的职能，建库指标的精确预测，事关新钻井数量和投资。复杂断块油藏改建储气库后，多周期高速注采过程均为油气水三相流动，油、气高压物性参数受温度影响极大，在进行复杂断块油藏型储气库数值模拟时，若忽略冷气注入温度场扰动和高速非达西附加压力损失，可能会导致储气库数值模拟指标预测精度降低。为提高指标预测精度，以复杂断块油藏型储气库为例，结合流体黏温及高速非达西实验，建立了渗流-温度双场耦合数学模型。基于有限体积法（FVM），在空间上采用两点通量近似方案（TPFA），在时间上采用后向（隐式）欧拉格式对模型进行离散求解。高精度拟合了衰竭开发阶段区块、单井物质平衡及压力，实例开展了储气库运行指标敏感性分析。结果表明：冷气注入温度场扰动、高速非达西效应分别是累产油、气量误差的主控因素；井控温度范围随注气速度增加呈对数上升，油气相渗流能力大幅下降时水相渗流能力反而上升，使得采出液量增多、地层压力下降；高速非达西附加压降造成天然气注入后部分采不出，随着储气库多周期运行，天然气储量及压力逐渐增加。

关键词: 油藏型储气库, 高速非达西效应, 温度场扰动, 渗流-温度双场耦合, 数值模拟技术

Abstract:

Peak shaving and supply guarantee are the functions of Underground Gas Storage（UGS）. The accurate prediction of the UGS construction index is related to the number of new wells and investments. When a complex fault block reservoir is transformed into UGS, it encounters three-phase flow（oil, gas, and water） during multi-cycle and high-velocity operations. The petrophysical properties of oil and gas are greatly affected by temperature. Without considering the temperature disturbance after cold gas injection and the additional pressure loss of high-velocity turbulence, the index prediction accuracy of the existing numerical simulation methods for UGS is low. To improve the accuracy of index prediction for a UGS rebuilt from a complex fault block oil reservoir, combined with fluid viscosity-temperature and high-velocity turbulence experiments, a coupled mathematical model of seepage and temperature is established. The model is solved discretely using the Finite Volume Method（FVM）, with a Two-Point Flux Approximation（TPFA） scheme for spatial discretization and a backward （implicit） Euler scheme for temporal discretization. The material balance and pressure of the reservoir and single well in the depletion development stage are matched with high precision. The sensitivity analysis of the UGS operation index is carried out in an example. The results show that the disturbance of the cold gas injection temperature field and high-velocity non-Darcy effect is the main controlling factors of accumulative oil production and gas volume error respectively. The well control temperature range increases logarithmically with the gas injection rate and the water-phase seepage capacity increases when the oil-phase and gas-phase seepage capacity decreases significantly, resulting in the increase of the produced liquid volume and the decrease of formation pressure. The additional pressure drop caused by high-velocity turbulent flow results in some injected natural gas not being produced, leading to an increase in natural gas reserves and pressure over successive cycles.

Key words: UGS facilities rebuilt from oil reservoirs, high-velocity non Darcy effect, temperature disturbance, seepage and temperature coupling, numerical simulation technology

中图分类号:

TE822

何海燕, 刘先山, 耿少阳, 孙军昌, 孙彦春, 贾倩. 基于渗流-温度双场耦合的油藏型储气库数值模拟[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(6): 819-826.

HE Haiyan, LIU Xianshan, GENG Shaoyang, SUN Junchang, SUN Yanchun, JIA Qian. Numerical simulation of UGS facilities rebuilt from oil reservoirs based on the coupling of seepage and temperature fields[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(6): 819-826.

图/表 9

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

参考文献 22

[1]	马新华, 郑得文, 申瑞臣, 等. 中国复杂地质条件气藏型储气库建库关键技术与实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(3): 489-499. doi: 10.11698/PED.2018.03.14
	MA Xinhua, ZHENG Dewen, SHEN Ruichen, et al. Key technologies and practice for gas field storage facility construction of complex geological conditions in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(3): 489-499. doi: 10.11698/PED.2018.03.14
[2]	丁国生, 魏欢. 中国地下储气库建设20年回顾与展望[J]. 油气储运, 2020, 39(1): 25-31.
	DING Guosheng, WEI Huan. Review on 20 years' UGS construction in China and the prospect[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2020, 39(1): 25-31.
[3]	王增林, 张岩, 张全胜, 等. 热采水平井注蒸汽过程中温度场扩展规律[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2021, 50(3): 79-84.
	WANG Zenglin, ZHANG Yan, ZHANG Quansheng, et al. Expansion law of temperature field during steam injection in thermal production horizontal well[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2021, 50(3): 79-84
[4]	郑少婧, 郑得文, 孙军昌, 等. 气藏型储气库温度敏感性及其对气井注采能力的影响[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(2): 365-372.
	ZHENG Shaojing, ZHENG Dewen, SUN Junchang, et al. Temperature-sensitivity of underground gas reservoir storage and its effect on well deliverability[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(2): 365-372
[5]	郭肖, 朱争, 高涛, 等. 温度对低渗透储层应力敏感影响[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2015, 34(4): 82-87.
	GUO Xiao, ZHU Zheng, GAO Tao, et al. Influences of the temperature on the stress-sensitivity in low-permeability reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2015, 34(4): 82-87
[6]	EL-ZEHAIRY A A, NEZHAD M M, JOEKAR-NIASAR V, et al. Pore-network modelling of non-Darcy flow through heterogeneous porous media[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2019, 131(q.): 103378.1-103378.15.
[7]	WANG H, TIAN L, GU D, et al. Method for Calculating Non-Darcy Flow Permeability in Tight Oil Reservoir[J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2020, 133(3): 357-372. doi: 10.1007/s11242-020-01427-8
[8]	NIE R S, FAN X, LI Z, et al. Modeling transient flow behavior with the high velocity non-Darcy effect in composite naturally fractured-homogeneous gas reservoirs[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2021, 96(1): 104269. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104269
[9]	WANG J, XIE J, HAO L, et al. Numerical simulation on oil rim impact on underground gas storage injection and production[J]. Journal of Petroleum Exploration & Production Technology, 2015, 6(3):1-11.
[10]	WU Y S. Numerical simulation of single-phase and multiphase non-Darcy flow in porous and fractured reservoirs[J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2002, 49(2): 209-240. doi: 10.1023/A:1016018020180
[11]	ZHU S, SUN J, WEI G, et al. Numerical simulation-based correction of relative permeability hysteresis in water-invaded underground gas storage during multi-cycle injection and production[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(1): 190-200. doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(21)60015-0
[12]	W. A. Moseley, V. K. Dhir. Capillary pressure-saturation relations in porous media including the effect of wettability[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1996, 178(1): 33-53. doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(95)02823-4
[13]	CHEN J, Xu Z, LEUNG J. Analysis of fracture interference - Coupling of flow and geomechanical computations with discrete fracture modeling using MRST[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 219(1): 111134. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2022.111134
[14]	YAPPAROVA A, B LAMY-CHAPPUIS, SCOTT S W, et al. A Peaceman-type well model for the 3D Control Volume Finite Element Method and numerical simulations of supercritical geothermal resource utilization[J]. Geothermics, 2022, 105(1): 102516. doi: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2022.102516
[15]	ZENG Z, GRIGG R. A Criterion for Non-Darcy Flow in Porous Media[J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2006, 63(1): 57-69. doi: 10.1007/s11242-005-2720-3
[16]	A.Rauf, Z.Abbas, S.A.Shehzad, T.Mushtaq. Thermally Radiative Viscous Fluid Flow Over Curved Moving Surface in Darcy-Forchheimer Porous Space[J]. Communications in Theoretical Physics, 2019, 71(3): 259-266. doi: 10.1088/0253-6102/71/3/259
[17]	李士伦. 天然气工程(第二版)[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2008.
	LI Shilun. Natural Gas Engineering(Second Edition)[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2008.
[18]	张健铭. 原油粘度相关物性数据库与原油粘度预测研究[D]. 中国石油大学(华东), 2021.
	ZHANG Jianming. Research on the Viscosity Related Properties Database of Crude Oil and the Prediction of Crude Oil Viscosity[D]. China University of Petroleum(EastChina), 2021.
[19]	VESOVIC V. Predicting the viscosity of natural gas[J]. International Journal of Thermophysics, 2001, 22(2): 415-426. doi: 10.1023/A:1010718713774
[20]	HUBER M L. NIST 4. Thermophysical Properties of Hydrocarbon Mixtures Database: Version 3.0.
[21]	OSTERMANN R D, BLOORI A, DEHGHANI K. The effect of dissolved gas on reservoir brine viscosity[C]// Paper presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Las Vegas, Nevada, September 1985.
[22]	GONG B, LIANG H, XIN S, et al. Numerical studies on power generation from co-produced geothermal resources in oil fields and change in reservoir temperature[J]. Journal of Endocrinology, 2013, 50: 722-731.

长度/cm	直径/cm	环压/MPa	驱替压力/MPa	测试体积/mL	测试时间/ s	流量/ （mL/s）
5.12	2.53	10	0.95	2	3.47	0.58
			0.90		3.89	0.51
			0.85		4.29	0.47
			0.80		4.72	0.42
			0.75		5.24	0.38
			0.70		5.90	0.34
			0.65		6.68	0.30
			0.60		7.65	0.26
			0.55		8.87	0.23
			0.50		10.31	0.19

基于渗流-温度双场耦合的油藏型储气库数值模拟

Numerical simulation of UGS facilities rebuilt from oil reservoirs based on the coupling of seepage and temperature fields

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 22

相关文章 2

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	游利军,孟森,康毅力,陈明君,邵佳新. 气藏型储气库储层损害机理与保护技术对策 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(3): 395-403.
[2]	胡书勇,胡欣芮,李勇凯,马俊修. 枯竭气藏型储气库CO₂作垫层气的可行性研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2018, 8(5): 56-59.