基于模糊逻辑控制的页岩气井智能化调产预警

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025.01.019

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在大数据技术不断发展的背景下，对油气田进行数字化、智能化生产管理已成为一种必然趋势。页岩气井存在积液、出砂和强应力敏感等问题，产量调整中需要考虑诸多因素。传统的方法存在人工工作量大、调产预警效率偏低等问题，无法综合考虑多重因素实施最优化调产。为解决这一问题，结合页岩气井典型生命周期特征，将其划分为排液输气、稳产降压和定压降产3个阶段，明确气井全生命周期差异化的调产规则，设定稳产期压降法、单位压降产气法、临界出砂流量法、临界携液流量法、经验图版法和间歇开关井法6项调产指标。根据调产规则、调产指标与现场经验建立了基于模糊逻辑控制的页岩气井智能化调产预警模型，并采用Python编程实现所有调产指标随气井生产动态变化的实时计算和模糊逻辑控制算法。该方法在威荣页岩气田百余口井调产预警时间仅需30 s，而传统方法至少需要5 d，气井的调产需求被及时预警，取得了较好的应用效果。未来可结合远程控制的油嘴或节流阀实现生产制度调节，为智能化油气田提供技术支撑。

关键词: 页岩气井, 模糊逻辑, 智能化, 调产预警, Python

Abstract:

Against the backdrop of continuously advancing big data technology, digitization and intelligent production management of oil and gas fields have become an inevitable trend. Shale gas wells face challenges such as liquid accumulation, sand production, and high stress sensitivity, necessitating the consideration of numerous factors during production adjustment. Traditional methods, which require extensive manual labor and exhibit low efficiency in production adjustment warnings, fail to consider multiple factors for optimal adjustment. To address this issue, considering the typical lifecycle characteristics of shale gas wells, the study divided the lifecycle into three stages: liquid unloading and gas transportation, stable production and pressure reduction, and fixed pressure and production reduction. Specific production adjustment rules tailored to different lifecycle stages were defined and six types of production adjustment indicators were proposed, including pressure drop method in stable production period, gas production per unit pressure drop method, critical sand-carrying flow rate method, critical liquid-carrying flow rate method, empirical chart method, and intermittent well-switching method. Based on these production adjustment rules and indicators, combined with field experience, an intelligent production adjustment early warning model for shale gas wells using fuzzy logic control was established. Implemented in Python, this model allows for real-time calculation of all production adjustment indicators and the fuzzy logic control algorithm as the well production dynamics change. This method has been applied in over a hundred wells in the Weirong shale gas field, reducing early warning times for production adjustments to just 30 seconds, compared to the traditional methods that require at least 5 days. The timely early warning of production adjustment needs has achieved good application results. In the future, combining remote control of oil nozzles or choke valves to adjust the production regime can provide technical support for intelligent oil and gas fields.

Key words: shale gas wells, fuzzy logic, intelligent, early warning production adjustment, Python

中图分类号:

TE33.2

何春艳,赵勇,李南颖等. 基于模糊逻辑控制的页岩气井智能化调产预警[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2025, 15(1): 152-160.

HE Chunyan,ZHAO Yong,LI Nanying, et al. Intelligent production adjustment early warning for shale gas wells based on fuzzy logic control[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2025, 15(1): 152-160.

图/表 8

图1

表1

表2

图2

图3

图4

表3

图5

参考文献 25

[1]	房大志, 曾辉, 王宁, 等. 从Haynesville页岩气开发数据研究高压页岩气高产因素[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2015(2): 58-62.
	FANG Dazhi, ZENG Hui, WANG Ning, et al. Study on high production factors of high-pressure shale gas from Haynesville Shale Gas development data[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2015(2): 58-62.
[2]	刘华, 王卫红, 陈明君, 等. 涪陵龙马溪组页岩储层应力敏感实验研究[J]. 石化技术, 2019, 26(5): 155-158.
	LIU Hua, WANG Weihong, CHEN Mingjun, et al. Research on the stress sensitivity experiment of Fuling Longmaxi shale reservoirs[J]. Petrochemical Industry Technology, 2019, 26(5): 155-158.
[3]	KAINZ S, SNYDER J, MCCULLAGH A, et al. Haynesville midstream: Capacity constraints and differential pressures[C]// Paper URTEC-2019-607-MS presented at the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver, Colorado, USA, July 2019.
[4]	湛小红. 涪陵页岩气田合理配产方法对比优选研究[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2019, 33(1): 67-71.
	ZHAN Xiaohong. Comparative optimization of reasonable production allocation methods in Fuling shale gas field[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2019, 33(1): 67-71.
[5]	胡浩, 汪敏, 隆辉, 等. 一种页岩气井全生命周期合理配产新方法: 以泸州地区页岩气为例[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2023, 16(2): 137-143.
	HU Hao, WANG Min, LONG Hui, et al. A new method of rational production allocation in the whole life cycle of shale gas wells: A case from shale gas in Luzhou[J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2023, 16(2): 137-143.
[6]	祝启康, 林伯韬, 杨光, 等. 低压低产页岩气井智能生产优化方法[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2022, 49(4): 770-777.
	ZHU Qikang, LIN Botao, YANG Guang, et al. Intelligent production optimization method for a low pressure and low productivity shale gas well[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49(4): 770-777.
[7]	WANG L X. A course in fuzzy systems and control[M]. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall International, Inc, 1996.
[8]	BELYADI H. Machine learning guide for oil and gas using python[M]. Cambridge, United States: Gulf Professional Publishing, 2021.
[9]	FROTA R A, RICARDO T, MARLEY V. Fuzzy logic for control of injector wells flow rates under produced water reinjection[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 215: 110574.
[10]	GORJIZADEH H, GHALEHNOIE M, NEGAHBAN S, et al. Fuzzy controller design for constant bottomhole pressure drilling under operational/physical constraints[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 212: 110335.
[11]	熊亮, 赵勇, 魏力民, 等. 威荣海相页岩气田页岩气富集机理及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(8): 1365-1381.
	XIONG Liang, ZHAO Yong, WEI Limin, et al. Enrichment mechanisms and key exploration and development technologies of shale gas in Weirong marine shale gas field[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(8): 1365-1381.
[12]	唐建明, 何建华, 魏力民, 等. 川东南林滩场地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气藏压力演化及其地质意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(4): 739-750.
	TANG Jianming, HE Jianhua, WEI Limin, et al. Pressure evolution of shale gas reservoirs in Wufeng-Longmaxi formations, Lintanchang area, southeast Sichuan Basin and its geological significance[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(4): 739-750.
[13]	沈金才, 董长新, 常振. 涪陵页岩气田气井生产阶段划分及动态特征描述[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2021, 44(1): 111-117.
	SHEN Jincai, DONG Changxin, CHANG Zhen. Classifying and describing the production stage and dynamic characteristics of gas wells, Fuling shale gas field[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2021, 44(1): 111-117.
[14]	刘莉, 郑爱维, 包汉勇, 等. 涪陵气田焦石坝区块页岩气持续稳产技术政策优化[J]. 天然气工业, 2023, 43(6): 96-104.
	LIU Li, ZHENG Aiwei, BAO Hanyong, et al. Optimization of strategies for sustainable and stable gas production in the Jiaoshiba Block of the Fuling Shale Gas Field[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2023, 43(6): 96-104.
[15]	杨永华, 宋燕高, 王兴文, 等. 威荣页岩气田压裂实践与认识[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(6): 1143-1150.
	YANG Yonghua, SONG Yangao, WANG Xingwen, et al. Practice and understanding of fracturing in Weirong shale gas field[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(6): 1143-1150.
[16]	郭建林, 贾爱林, 贾成业, 等. 页岩气水平井生产规律[J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(10): 53-58.
	GUO Jianlin, JIA Ailin, JIA Chengye, et al. Production laws of shale-gas horizontal wells[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(10): 53-58.
[17]	陈学忠, 郑健, 刘梦云, 等. 页岩气井精细控压生产技术可行性研究与现场试验[J]. 钻采工艺, 2022, 45(3): 79-83.
	CHEN Xuezhong, ZHENG Jian, LIU Mengyun, et al. Feasibility study and field trail of precise managed pressure production technology for shale gas wells[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2022, 45(3): 79-83.
[18]	王兴文, 缪尉杰, 何新星, 等. 川南威荣气田深层页岩气工程技术进展[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(6): 1170-1177.
	WANG Xingwen, MIAO Weijie, HE Xinxing, et al. Progress in deep shale gas engineering technology in Weirong gas field in southern Sichuan[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(6): 1170-1177.
[19]	陆奎, 汤培榕, 杨为民. 用简化模糊规则数的方法设计模糊PID控制系统[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 28(5): 126-130.
	LU Kui, TANG Peirong, YANG Weiming. Design of fuzzy proportional-integral-derivative control system by simplifying fuzzy rules[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum(Edition of Natural Science), 2004, 28(5):126-130.
[20]	赵胜兰, 刘承佚. 涪陵气田页岩气井临界携液流量计算新模型[J]. 云南化工, 2019, 46(5): 167-170.
	ZHAO Shenglan, LIU Chengyi. The new calculation model of critical liquid carrying flow rate in Fuling Gas Field[J]. Yunnan Chemical Technology, 2019, 46(5): 167-170.
[21]	李小益. 涪陵页岩气井出砂机理研究及合理工作制度确定[J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2020, 40(11): 153-154.
	LI Xiaoyi. Study on sanding mechanism of shale gas wells in Fuling District and determination of reasonable working system[J]. China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality, 2020, 40(11): 153-154.
[22]	张修明, 李晓平, 张健涛, 等. 靖边古潜台东侧气田气藏产能评价方法研究[J]. 海洋石油, 2009, 29(2): 65-68.
	ZHANG Xiuming, LI Xiaoping, ZHANG Jiantao, et al. Productivity evaluating methods for gas reservoir in eastern part of Jingbian Paleozoic buried platform gas field[J]. Offshore Oil, 2009, 29(2): 65-68.
[23]	岳三琪, 付玉, 伍勇, 等. 地下储气库注采井井底压力计算研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2017, 7(3): 28-33.
	YUE Sanqi, FU Yu, WU Yong, et al. Bottom hole pressure calculation of injection and production wells of underground gas storage[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2017, 7(3): 28-33.
[24]	谭聪. 焦石坝区块页岩气井井底流压计算方法评价[J]. 江汉石油职工大学学报, 2022, 35(4): 14-17.
	TAN Cong. Evaluation of calculation methods of bottomhole flow pressure in shale gas wells: A case study of Jiaoshiba block[J]. Journal of Jianghan Petroleum University of Staff and Workers, 2022, 35(4): 14-17.
[25]	袁力, 姜琴. 隶属函数确定方法探讨[J]. 郧阳师范高等专科学校学报, 2009, 29(6): 44-46.
	YUAN Li, JIANG Qin. A study on the determination of membership function[J]. Journal of Yunyang Teachers College, 2009, 29(6): 44-46.

参数	低配	中低配	合适	中高配	高配
临界携液流量法（排液输气阶段）	S(-0.7,-40.0)	G(0.2,5.0,-0.6)	S(-0.4,40.0)
临界携液流量法（其他阶段）	S(-0.4,-100.0)	G(0.2,15.0,-0.2)	S(0,100.0)
临界出砂流量法			S(0,-100.0)	G(0.2,15.0,0.2)	S(0.4,100.0)
稳产期压降法（排液输气阶段）	S(-0.9,-40.0)	G(0.3,5.0,-0.6)	G(0.3,5.0,0)	G(0.3,5.0,0.6)	S(0.9,40.0)
稳产期压降法（其他阶段）	S(-0.5,-60.0)	G(0.2,5.0,-0.3)	G(0.2,5.0,0)	G(0.2,5.0,0.3)	S(0.5,60.0)
单位压降产气法	S(-0.5,-60.0)	G(0.2,5.0,-0.3)	G(0.2,5.0,0)	G(0.2,5.0,0.3)	S(0.5,60.0)
经验图版法	S(-0.5,-60.0)	G(0.2,5.0,-0.3)	G(0.2,5.0,0)	G(0.2,5.0,0.3)	S(0.5,60.0)
间歇开关井法	S(-0.2,-10.0)		G(0.2,20.0,0)		S(0.2,10.0)
调产预警输出	S(-0.5,-60.0)	G(0.2,5.0,-0.3)	G(0.2,5.0,0)	G(0.2,5.0,0.3)	S(0.5,60.0)

生产阶段	稳产期压降法	临界携液流量法	临界出砂流量法	间歇开关井法	调产结论
排液输气		低配			大幅上调
		中低配			小幅上调
		合适	高配		大幅下调
		合适	中高配		小幅下调
	高配	合适	合适		大幅下调
	中高配	合适	合适		小幅下调
	合适	合适	合适		不调
	中低配	合适	合适		小幅上调
	低配	合适	合适		大幅上调
稳产降压		低配			大幅上调
		中低配			小幅上调
		合适	高配		大幅下调
		合适	中高配		小幅下调
	2个及以上高配	合适	合适		小幅下调
	2个及以上中高配	合适	合适		大幅下调
	2个及以上合适	合适	合适		不调
	2个及以上中低配	合适	合适		小幅上调
	2个及以上低配	合适	合适		大幅上调
间歇开关井		合适	合适	合适	不调
				关井	大幅下调（关井）
				开井	大幅上调（开井）

生产天数/ d	经验图版法	临界携液流量法	临界出砂流量法	稳产期压降法	单位压降产气法	间歇开关井法	模型输出值	调产输出	目前产气量/ （10⁴m³/d）	调产幅度参考值
45		-0.12	-0.71	-0.31	0.57		-0.17	小幅上调	10	10%
90	0.86	0.04	-0.62	0.32	0.07		0.20	小幅下调	12	-10%
200	0.69	-0.25	-0.65	-0.03	-0.09		0	不调	9	0
2 340		0.04	-0.63			0.5	0.68	大幅下调	1	关井