顶板致密砂岩气对深部煤层气井产气效果的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地神府区块为例

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025.06.009

油气藏评价与开发 ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (6): 1034-1045.doi: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025.06.009

顶板致密砂岩气对深部煤层气井产气效果的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地神府区块为例

王小东¹^,²(), 王宇川¹^,², 梁萧磊¹^,², 康丽芳¹^,², 晁巍巍¹^,², 刘世奇³, 皇凡生⁴^,⁵, 王文楷³, 梁渝³

1.中联煤层气有限责任公司，北京 100015
2.三气共采省技术创新中心，山西太原 030000
3.中国矿业大学资源与地球科学学院，江苏徐州 221116
4.中国矿业大学碳中和研究院，江苏徐州 221008
5.中国矿业大学江苏省煤基温室气体减排与资源化利用重点实验室，江苏徐州 221008

收稿日期:2024-10-10 发布日期:2025-10-24 出版日期:2025-12-26
作者简介:王小东（1988—），男，硕士，工程师，从事煤层气勘探开发研究。地址：山西省太原市综改示范区科技创新城汇智街5号中海油山西三气共采研发中心，邮政编码：030000。E-mail：wangxd44@cnooc.com.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“煤系气高效勘探开发的岩石力学地层理论方法体系研究”(42030810);中海石油（中国）有限公司科技项目“煤层气增储上产技术研究”(CNOOC-KJ135ZDXM40ZL01)

Influence of tight sandstone gas in roof on gas production in deep coalbed methane wells: A case study of Shenfu block in Ordos Basin

WANG Xiaodong¹^,²(), WANG Yuchuan¹^,², LIANG Xiaolei¹^,², KANG Lifang¹^,², CHAO Weiwei¹^,², LIU Shiqi³, HUANG Fansheng⁴^,⁵, WANG Wenkai³, LIANG Yu³

1. China United Coalbed Methane Company, Beijing 100015, China
2. Technology Innovation Center of Coal Measure Gas Co-production, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030000, China
3. School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China
4. Carbon Neutrality Institute, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221008, China
5. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Coal-based Greenhouse Gas Control and Utilization, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221008, China

Received:2024-10-10 Online:2025-10-24 Published:2025-12-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

鄂尔多斯盆地东缘神府区块深部煤层与致密砂岩层紧密叠合，深部煤层气开发过程中存在顶板致密砂岩气向煤层运移的现象。迄今，关于顶板致密砂岩气对深部煤层气开发影响的研究仍然较为匮乏。以神府区块8+9号煤及其顶底板为研究对象，开展了不同砂岩覆盖比例（井控范围内顶板砂岩对煤层的覆盖比例）的深部煤层气直井排采数值模拟研究，并从储层压力传导、气体解吸与扩散和渗透率动态变化3个方面，探究了顶板致密砂岩气运移对煤层气井产气效果的影响及其作用机制。结果表明：深部煤层气开发过程中，顶板致密砂岩气向煤层运移并贡献了深部煤层气井部分产气量，且随顶板砂岩覆盖范围增加，致密砂岩气的产气贡献增高，相较于顶板为泥岩的情况，砂岩覆盖比例为40%、60%和80%时，致密砂岩气对累计产气量的贡献依次提高了11.43%、23.54%和29.35%；在压裂裂缝控制范围外，砂岩层中气、水产出更快，扩大了砂岩层压降幅度与压降范围，间接促进了压裂裂缝控制范围外的煤层卸压，提高了煤层气解吸与扩散速率，进而增强煤基质收缩效应，并促进煤储层渗透率比率回升，而煤储层渗透率比率的回升将进一步促进储层压力传导和气体解吸与扩散，从而提升煤层气井产气效果。

关键词: 神府区块, 深部煤层气, 致密砂岩气, 储层压力, 渗透率

Abstract:

In the Shenfu block located on the eastern margin of the Ordos Basin, the deep coal seam is intimately interlayered with the tight sandstone layer. During the development of deep coalbed methane, a notable phenomenon has been observed whereby tight sandstone gas from the roof migrates into the coal seam. To date, studies on the impact of roof tight sandstone gas migration on deep coalbed methane production remain scarce. Taking the No.8+9 coal seam and its roof and floor in the Shenfu block as the study object, a numerical simulation of vertical well drainage was conducted for deep coalbed methane under different sandstone coverage ratios (i.e., the proportion of roof sandstone covering the coal seam within the well control range). This study investigated the roles of reservoir pressure conduction, gas desorption/diffusion, and dynamic changes in permeability in governing the influence of roof tight sandstone gas migration on the gas production performance of deep coalbed methane wells and explored its underlying mechanism. The results show that during the development of deep coalbed methane, the migration of roof-tight sandstone gas into the coal seam contributes to the gas output of deep coalbed methane wells. With the increase of roof sandstone coverage, the contribution of tight sandstone gas to cumulative gas production correspondingly increases by 11.43%, 23.54%, and 29.35% at sandstone coverage ratios of 40%, 60%, and 80%, respectively, In comparison to cases with a mudstone roof. Outside the control range of hydraulic fracturing, gas and water production from the sandstone layer occurs more rapidly. This enlarges both the magnitude and spatial extent of the pressure drop within the sandstone layer. As a result, pressure relief is indirectly facilitated in the coal seam, enhancing the rates of gas desorption and diffusion. Additionally, it strengthens the shrinkage effect of the coal matrix and promotes the recovery of permeability ratio. The improvement in permeability further augments the reservoir pressure conduction and gas desorption/diffusion, thereby improving the gas production performance of coalbed methane wells.

Key words: Shenfu block, deep coalbed methane, tight sandstone gas, reservoir pressure, permeability

中图分类号:

TE37

王小东,王宇川,梁萧磊, 等. 顶板致密砂岩气对深部煤层气井产气效果的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地神府区块为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2025, 15(6): 1034-1045.

WANG Xiaodong,WANG Yuchuan,LIANG Xiaolei, et al. Influence of tight sandstone gas in roof on gas production in deep coalbed methane wells: A case study of Shenfu block in Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2025, 15(6): 1034-1045.

图/表 11

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

参考文献 36

[1]	米立军, 朱光辉. 鄂尔多斯盆地东北缘临兴—神府致密气田成藏地质特征及勘探突破[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2021, 26(3): 53-67.
	MI Lijun, ZHU Guanghui. Geological characteristics and exploration breakthrough in Linxing-Shenfu tight gas field, northeastern Ordos Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2021, 26(3): 53-67.
[2]	朱光辉, 季洪泉, 米洪刚, 等. 神府深部煤层气大气田的发现与启示[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2024, 52(8): 12-21.
	ZHU Guanghui, JI Hongquan, MI Honggang, et al. Discovery of a large gas field of deep coalbed methane in the Shenfu block and its implications[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2024, 52(8): 12-21.
[3]	毕彩芹, 胡志方, 汤达祯, 等. 煤系气研究进展与待解决的重要科学问题[J]. 中国地质, 2021, 48(2): 402-423.
	BI Caiqin, HU Zhifang, TANG Dazhen, et al. Research progress of coal measure gas and some important scientific problems[J]. Geology in China, 2021, 48(2): 402-423.
[4]	贾慧敏, 胡秋嘉, 张聪, 等. 煤层气双层合采直井产能预测及排采试验: 以沁水盆地郑庄西南部为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(4): 657-665.
	JIA Huimin, HU Qiujia, ZHANG Cong, et al. Prediction of productivity and co-drainage trial of bilayer vertical coalbed methane wells: Cases study of the southwest of Zhengzhuang Block, Qinshui Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(4): 657-665.
[5]	桑树勋, 韩思杰, 周效志, 等. 华东地区深部煤层气资源与勘探开发前景[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 403-415.
	SANG Shuxun, HAN Sijie, ZHOU Xiaozhi, et al. Deep coalbed methane resource and its exploration and development prospect in East China[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(4): 403-415.
[6]	邹才能, 林敏捷, 马锋, 等. 碳中和目标下中国天然气工业进展、挑战及对策[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2024, 51(2): 418-435.
	ZOU Caineng, LIN Minjie, MA Feng, et al. Development, challenges and strategies of natural gas industry under carbon neutral target in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2024, 51(2): 418-435.
[7]	钟诚, 杜鹏, 刘自亮, 等. 碳中和与中国海洋油气发展的内在联结性[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2023, 52(4): 32-40.
	ZHONG Cheng, DU Peng, LIU Ziliang, et al. Interconnection between carbon neutrality and development of offshore oil and gas in China[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2023, 52(4): 32-40.
[8]	桑树勋, 刘世奇, 陆诗建, 等. 工程化CCUS全流程技术及其进展[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(5): 711-725.
	SANG Shuxun, LIU Shiqi, LU Shijian, et al. Engineered full flowsheet technology of CCUS and its research progress[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(5): 711-725.
[9]	张兵, 杜丰丰, 张海锋, 等. 基于经济效益评价的煤层气开发有利区优选: 以鄂尔多斯盆地东缘杨家坡区块为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(6): 933-941.
	ZHANG Bing, DU Fengfeng, ZHANG Haifeng, et al. Selection of favorable areas for coalbed methane development based on economic benefit evaluation: A case study of Yangjiapo block in eastern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(6): 933-941.
[10]	张健, 申建, 朱苏阳, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘煤系气合采接替方案优化[J]. 煤炭学报, 2022, 47(11): 3965-3974.
	ZHANG Jian, SHEN Jian, ZHU Suyang, et al. Productivity prediction and gas production technology of superimposed coal measure gas in the eastern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2022, 47(11): 3965-3974.
[11]	申建, 张春杰, 秦勇, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地临兴地区煤系砂岩气与煤层气共采影响因素和参数门限[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2017, 28(3): 479-487.
	SHEN Jian, ZHANG Chunjie, QIN Yong, et al. Effect factors on co-mining of sandstone gas and coalbed methane in coal series and threshold of parameter in Linxing block, Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(3): 479-487.
[12]	MENG S Z, LI Y, WANG L, et al. A mathematical model for gas and water production from overlapping fractured coalbed methane and tight gas reservoirs[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018, 171: 959-973.
[13]	孟尚志, 李勇, 吴翔, 等. 煤层气和致密气合采产能方程及影响因素[J]. 煤炭学报, 2018, 43(6): 1709-1715.
	MENG Shangzhi, LI Yong, WU Xiang, et al. Productivity equation and influencing factors of co-producing coalbed methane and tight gas[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2018, 43(6): 1709-1715.
[14]	CUI G L, CHENG W X, XIONG W, et al. Influence of well types on optimizing the co-production of gas from coal and tight formations[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2022, 36(13): 6736-6754.
[15]	PAN Z J, CONNELL L D. Reservoir simulation of free and adsorbed gas production from shale[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 22(22): 359-370.
[16]	LIANG W, WANG J G, LEUNG C F, et al. Impact of crossflow and two-phase flow on gas production from stacked deposits[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2023, 37(13): 8935-8948.
[17]	WANG W K, LIU S Q, SANG S X, et al. A study on the production simulation of coal-shale interbedded coal measure superimposed gas reservoirs under different drainage methods[J]. Processes, 2023, 11: 3424.
[18]	郭肖, 汪志明, 曾泉树. 煤层气/砂岩气混合气藏合采产能预测及排采优化[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2019, 19(17): 162-167.
	GUO Xiao, WANG Zhiming, ZENG Quanshu. Production prediction of hybrid gas reservoirs including coal seams and sandstone seams and development optimization[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2019, 19(17): 162-167.
[19]	李国璋. 煤系气合采产层贡献及其预测模型: 以鄂尔多斯盆地临兴—神府地区为例[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2020.
	LI Guozhang. Contribution and its prediction model of production strata for joint CMG mining: A case from Linxing-Shenfu area in Ordos Basin, China[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2020.
[20]	米洪刚, 吴见, 彭文春, 等. 神府区块深部煤储层力学特性及裂缝扩展机制[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2024, 52(8): 32-43.
	MI Honggang, WU Jian, PENG Wenchun, et al. Mechanical characteristics and fracture propagation mechanism of deep coal reservoirs in the Shenfu block[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2024, 52(8): 32-43.
[21]	孔祥伟, 万雄, 郭照越, 等. 致密砂岩油藏体积压裂技术适应性评价及压裂参数优化[J]. 石油与天然气化工, 2023, 52(2): 81-86.
	KONG Xiangwei, WAN Xiong, GUO Zhaoyue, et al. Adaptive evaluation and optimization of volumetric fracturing parameters in tight sandstone reservoirs[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas, 2023, 52(2): 81-86.
[22]	莫有新. 中阶煤储层气水流动特征与合层排采模拟研究: 以黔西大河边区块为例[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2022.
	MO Youxin. Characteristics of gas-water flow and simulation of combined layer drainage in medium rank coal reservoirs: A case study of Dahebian block in western Guizhou[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2022.
[23]	FAN Y P, DENG C B, ZHANG X, et al. Numerical study of CO₂-enhanced coalbed methane recovery[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2018, 76: 12-23.
[24]	ZHU W C, WEI C H, LIU J, et al. A model of coal-gas interaction under variable temperatures[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2011, 86(3): 213-221.
[25]	LIU S Q, FANG H H, SANG S X, et al. CO₂ injectability and CH₄ recovery of the engineering test in Qinshui Basin, China, based on numerical simulation[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2020, 95: 102980.
[26]	FANG H H, LI A, SANG S X, et al. Numerical analysis of permeability rebound and recovery evolution with THM multi-physical field models during CBM extraction in crushed soft coal with low permeability and its indicative significance to CO₂ geological sequestration[J]. Energy, 2023, 262: 125395.
[27]	SHU Y, SANG S X, ZHOU X Z, et al. A coupled hydraulic-mechanical model with two-phase flow for fracturing development of undersaturated coalbed methane reservoirs considering permeability velocity-sensitive damage[J]. Natural Resources Research, 2023, 32(5), 2053-2076.
[28]	刘世奇, 方辉煌, 桑树勋, 等. 沁水盆地南部煤层气直井合层排采产气效果数值模拟[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2022, 50(6): 20-31.
	LIU Shiqi, FANG Huihuang, SANG Shuxun, et al. Numerical simulation of gas production for multilayer drainage coalbed methane vertical wells in southern Qinshui Basin[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2022, 50(6): 20-31.
[29]	LIU X D, SANG S X, ZHOU X Z, et al. Coupled adsorption-hydro-thermo-mechanical-chemical modeling for CO₂ sequestration and well production during CO₂-ECBM[J]. Energy, 2023, 262: 125306.
[30]	LI S, FAN C J, HAN J, et al. A fully coupled thermal-hydraulic-mechanical model with two-phase flow for coalbed methane extraction[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 33: 324-336.
[31]	MU Y L, FAN Y P, WANG J R, et al. Numerical study on injection of flue gas as a heat carrier into coal reservoir to enhance CBM recovery[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2019, 72: 103017.
[32]	吴蒙. 临兴—神府地区煤系致密砂岩润湿性[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2019.
	WU Meng. Wettability of tight sandstones in coal measures from Linxing-Shenfu area, Shanxi, China[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2019.
[33]	周龙刚, 万欢, 金力钻, 等. 致密砂岩储层含水性预测方法: 以临兴地区上、下石盒子组为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2023, 30(3): 381-388.
	ZHOU Longgang, WAN Huan, JIN Lizuan, et al. Water content prediction method of tight sandstone reservoir: a case study of Upper & Lower Shihezi Formation of Linxing area[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2023, 30(3): 381-388.
[34]	张天文. 鄂尔多斯神府南地区太原组致密气藏储层特征研究[D]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2023.
	ZHANG Tianwen. Research on tight gas reservoir characteristics of Taiyuan Formation in Shenfunan area, Ordos Basin[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 2023.
[35]	付强, 肖冬生. 胜北洼陷三间房组致密砂岩气藏有利储层特征与成岩相[J]. 断块油气田, 2023, 30(1): 9-16.
	FU Qiang, XIAO Dongsheng. Favorable reservoir characteristics and diagenetic facies of tight sandstone gas reservoir of Sanjianfang Formation in Shengbei Subsag[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2023, 30(1): 9-16.
[36]	高计县, 孙文举, 吴鹏, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东北缘神府区块上古生界致密砂岩成藏特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2021, 33(1): 121-130.
	GAO Jixian, SUN Wenju, WU Peng, et al. Accumulation characteristics of Upper Paleozoic tight sandstone in Shenfu block, northeastern margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2021, 33(1): 121-130.

参数	数值	参数	数值
煤裂隙孔隙度/%	2.20	煤层密度/（kg/m³）	1 470
煤基质孔隙度/%	3.10	砂岩密度/（kg/m³）	2 950
砂岩孔隙度/%	8.50	水黏度系数/（Pa·s）	1×10^-3
煤裂隙渗透率/10^-3 μm²	0.230	CH₄黏度系数/（Pa·s）	1.84×10^-5
砂岩裂隙渗透率/10^-3 μm²	0.310	煤Langmuir压力/MPa	2.95
压裂区渗透率/10^-3 μm²	45.5	煤Langmuir体积/（m³/kg）	0.027 6
煤的弹性模量/GPa	3.0	克林肯伯格因子/MPa	0.76
砂岩的弹性模量/GPa	11.480	煤基质弹性模量/GPa	7.340
煤泊松比	0.350	CH₄比热容/[J/(kg·K)]	2 220
砂岩泊松比	0.12	CH₄热导率/[W/(m·K)]	0.031
水比热容/[J/(kg·K)]	4 190	等量吸附热/（kJ/mol）	33.4
水热导率/[W/(m·K)]	0.598	原始地层温度/K	325
水的端点相对渗透率	1.0	气体的端点相对渗透率	0.756

顶板致密砂岩气对深部煤层气井产气效果的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地神府区块为例

Influence of tight sandstone gas in roof on gas production in deep coalbed methane wells: A case study of Shenfu block in Ordos Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 11

参考文献 36

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	陈明君, 唐星宇, 王玉斌, 康毅力, 郭智栋, 颜茂凌, 陈雪妮. 鄂尔多斯盆地东缘低压致密砂岩气储层敏感性实验研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2025, 15(6): 983-994.
[2]	姜永, 罗宪波, 张祺轩, 吴金涛, 杨晨旭. 深埋潜山凝析气藏反凝析伤害评价及注气提高采收率研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2025, 15(5): 807-814.
[3]	王鹏翔, 张洲, 余婉莹, 邹强, 杨正滔. 深/浅部煤储层孔裂隙结构及三维空间分布差异特征 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2025, 15(2): 227-236.
[4]	赵崇胜, 王波, 苟波, 罗鹏飞, 陈国军, 巫国全. 深部煤层气油电混驱压裂设备配置与工艺技术 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2025, 15(2): 292-299.
[5]	马晓丽, 毕永斌, 蒋明洁, 李丹, 顾潇. 中低渗油藏高倍数水驱过程中水相渗透率变化特征 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2025, 15(1): 103-109.
[6]	严焕榕, 詹泽东, 李亚晶, 毕有益, 邓美洲, 冯英. 致密砂岩气藏高产富集规律研究——以川西坳陷新场—合兴场须家河组二段气藏为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(4): 541-548.
[7]	汤勇, 唐凯, 夏光, 徐笛. BZ19-6低渗透储层反凝析污染及解除方法实验研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(1): 102-107.
[8]	梁运培, 张怀军, 王礼春, 秦朝中, 田键, 陈强, 史博文. 连续加载应力下真实裂缝流场和渗透率演化规律数值研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(6): 834-843.
[9]	桑树勋,韩思杰,周效志,刘世奇,王月江. 华东地区深部煤层气资源与勘探开发前景 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 403-415.
[10]	胡之牮, 李树新, 王建君, 周鸿, 赵玉龙, 张烈辉. 复杂人工裂缝产状页岩气藏多段压裂水平井产能评价 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 459-466.
[11]	李颖, 马寒松, 李海涛, GANZER Leonhard, 唐政, 李可, 罗红文. 超临界CO₂对碳酸盐岩储层的溶蚀作用研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(3): 288-295.
[12]	姚红生,肖翠,陈贞龙,郭涛,李鑫. 延川南深部煤层气高效开发调整对策研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(4): 545-555.
[13]	石军太,李文斌,张龙龙,季长江,李国富,张遂安. 压裂过程数据对原始煤储层压力反演方法研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(4): 564-571.
[14]	杨兆中,袁健峰,朱静怡,李小刚,李扬,王浩. 煤层气注热增产研究进展 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(4): 617-625.
[15]	赵兰. 致密砂岩储层微裂缝发育特征及对物性的影响——以杭锦旗地区十里加汗区带为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(2): 285-291.