沁水盆地南部高煤阶煤层气高产区定量评价

油气藏评价与开发 ›› 2019, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (4): 68-72.

沁水盆地南部高煤阶煤层气高产区定量评价

王镜惠¹,梅明华²,梁正中¹,王华军²

^1. 榆林学院化学与化工学院,陕西榆林 719000
^2. 中国石油长庆油田分公司第二采气厂,陕西榆林 719000

收稿日期:2019-01-30 发布日期:2019-08-28 出版日期:2019-08-26
作者简介:王镜惠（1984 —）,男,硕士,讲师,从事油气地质勘探及油气田开发研究。通讯地址：陕西省榆林市榆阳区崇文路185号佳苑2号楼3单元,邮政编码：719000。E-mail： wangjinghui2219@sohu.com
基金资助:
陕西省自然科学基础研究计划“鄂尔多斯盆地东北部异常压力形成与页岩气富集机理研究”(2017JM4017)

Quantitative evaluation of high production areas of CBM with high coal rank in southern Qinshui Basin

WANG Jinghui¹,Mei Minghua²,LIANG Zhengzhong¹,WANG Huajun²

1.School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yulin University, Yulin, Shaaxi 719000, China
^2. No.2 Gas Production Plant, Changqing Oilfield Company, CNPC, Yulin, Shaaxi 719000, China

Received:2019-01-30 Online:2019-08-28 Published:2019-08-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

煤层气高产区的有效预测对提高煤层气单井产量和开发效益具有重要意义。为了实现煤层气储层产气能力的定量评价,基于煤层气开发机理,利用沁水盆地南部煤层气开发数据,通过理论和统计分析,定义了解吸效率指数和产气能力指数,从储层含气性、解吸效率和产出能力3个方面定量评价了各参数预测产气能力的可靠性。结果表明,储层含气性评价中去除含气饱和度,解吸效率指数中增加表征宏观解吸效率的地解压差,使含气性和解吸效率指数与日产气量的相关性大幅提升。煤层气井日产气量随含气量、解吸效率指数、渗透率增加而增加,当含气量大于15 m ³/t,解吸效率指数大于0.11（MPa·d） ^-1,渗透率大于0.03×10 ^-3μm ²时,单井日产气量能够达到800 m ³以上。将含气量、解吸效率指数和渗透率的乘积定义为煤层气产气能力指数能够有效预测煤层气高产区。当产气能力指数分别大于0.05×10 ^-3μm ²·m ³·（t·d·MPa） ^-1和1×10 ^-3μm ²·m ³·（t·d·MPa） ^-1时,单井日产气量分别大于800 m ³和1 500 m ³。

关键词: 沁水盆地, 高煤阶, 煤层气, 储层评价, 定量评价, 产气能力指数

Abstract:

The effective prediction of high production areas of CBM is of great significance to improve the production and the development benefits of single wells. In order to the evaluate the production capacity of CBM formation quantitatively, based on the development mechanism of CBM, the data of CBM in southern Qinshui Basin was used to define the absorption efficiency index and the gas production capacity index through the theory and statistical analysis. And the reliability of gas production capacity was quantitatively evaluated from 3 aspects of gas content ability, desorption efficiency and output capacity of the reservoir. The results showed that, in the evaluation of gas content, to remove gas saturation and increase the differential pressure of formation pressure and desorption pressure—which represented the macroscopic desorption efficiency—in the desorption efficiency index can greatly improve the correlation between daily gas production and gas content, desorption efficiency index respectively. The daily gas production increased with the increasing of gas bearing index, desorption efficiency index and the production capacity index. When the gas content, the desorption efficiency index and the permeability were respectively higher than 15 m ³/t, 0.11 （MPa·d） ^-1 and 0.03×10 ^-3μm ², the daily gas production could be more than 800 m ³. When the gas content, desorption efficiency index and production capacity index were defined as the gas production capacity index of CBM, high production areas of CBM could be effectively predicted. When the gas production capacity index was great than 0.05×10 ^-3μm ²·m ³·（t·d·MPa） ^-1, the daily gas production was more than 800 m ³, while the index was greater than 1×10 ^-3μm ²·m ³·（t·d·MPa） ^-1, the daily gas production was more than 1 500 m ³.

Key words: Qinshui Basin, high coal rank, coalbed methane（CBM）, formation evaluation, quantitative evaluation, gas production capacity index

中图分类号:

TE37

王镜惠,梅明华,梁正中等. 沁水盆地南部高煤阶煤层气高产区定量评价[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2019, 9(4): 68-72.

Jinghui WANG,Minghua Mei,Zhengzhong LIANG, et al. Quantitative evaluation of high production areas of CBM with high coal rank in southern Qinshui Basin[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(4): 68-72.

图/表 7

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

参考文献 18

[1]	赵贤正, 朱庆忠, 孙粉锦 , 等. 沁水盆地高阶煤层气勘探开发实践与思考[J]. 煤炭学报, 2015,40(9):2131-2136.
[2]	王红岩, 万天丰, 李景明 , 等. 区域构造热事件对高煤阶煤层气富集的控制[J]. 地学前缘, 2008,15(5):364-369.
[3]	曹新款, 朱炎铭, 王道华 , 等. 郑庄区块煤层气赋存特征及控气地质因素[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2011,39(1):16-19.
[4]	赵庆波, 陈刚, 李贵中 . 中国煤层气富集高产规律、开采特点及勘探开发适用技术[J]. 天然气工业, 2009,29(9):13-19. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2009.09.004
[5]	王勃, 姚红星, 王红娜 , 等. 沁水盆地成庄区块煤层气成藏优势及富集高产主控地质因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018,39(2):366-372.
[6]	DOU F K, KANG Y S, QIN S F , et al. The coalbed methane production potential method for optimization of wells location selection[J]. Journal of Coal Science Engineering, 2013,19(2):210-218.
[7]	宋岩, 柳少波, 马行陟 , 等. 中高煤阶煤层气富集高产区形成模式与地质评价方法[J]. 地学前缘, 2016,23(3):1-9.
[8]	孙粉锦, 王勃, 李梦溪 , 等. 沁水盆地南部煤层气富集高产主控地质因素[J]. 石油学报, 2014,35(6):1070-1079.
[9]	李喆, 康永尚, 姜杉钰 , 等. 沁水盆地高煤阶煤吸附时间主要影响因素分析[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2017,45(2):115-121.
[10]	娄剑青 . 影响煤层气井产量的因素分析[J]. 天然气工业, 2004,24(4):62-64.
[11]	迟焕鹏, 毕彩芹, 单衍胜 , 等. 黔西都格井田煤层气储层特征及可采性[J]. 煤炭学报, 2018,43(12):3447-3452.
[12]	康永尚, 王金, 姜杉钰 , 等. 量化指标在煤层气开发潜力定量评价中的应用[J]. 石油学报, 2017,38(6):677-686.
[13]	左银卿, 孟庆春, 任严 , 等. 沁水盆地南部高煤阶煤层气富集高产控制因素[J]. 天然气工业, 2011,31(11):11-13. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2011.11.003
[14]	吴见, 姜杉钰, 张守仁 , 等. 利用潜在产气效率指数预测柿庄区块煤层气开发有利区[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2017,38(3):352-357.
[15]	刘洪林, 王红岩, 张建博 . 煤层气吸附时间计算及其影响因素分析[J]. 石油实验地质, 2000,22(4):365-367. doi: 10.11781/sysydz200004365
[16]	万玉金, 曹雯 . 煤层气单井产量影响因素分析[J]. 天然气工业, 2005,25(1):126.
[17]	胡秋嘉, 贾慧敏, 祁空军 , 等. 高煤阶煤层气井单相流段流压精细控制方法—以沁水盆地樊庄—郑庄区块为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2018,38(9):76-81.
[18]	贾慧敏, 胡秋嘉, 刘忠 , 等. 裂缝应力敏感性对煤层气井单相流段产水影响及排采对策[J]. 中国煤层气, 2017,14(5):31-34.