驱油用CO2泡沫体系粒径对其性能影响研究

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2020.03.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

CO₂由于其独特的物理性质和其与原油之间的理化反应,被广泛用作驱替剂应用于原油开采过程中。但纯气体驱油易发生气窜现象,将CO₂用于泡沫驱过程,既能发挥CO₂气体本身的驱油作用,又能够实现流度控制,减少气窜现象发生的可能性。对粒径不同、化学组成相同的CO₂泡沫体系的稳定性、粒径变化、渗流特征等进行了实验研究,得到了粒径对泡沫性能影响的变化规律,并对影响方式进行了分析与讨论。结果显示,气泡粒径越小,泡沫体系的稳定性越好、封堵能力越强,且粒径随时间变化越缓慢。通过改变制备工艺,减小泡沫体系的粒径,有利于驱油用泡沫体系稳定性和原油驱替能力的提升。

关键词: CO₂泡沫, 原油驱替, 粒径, 稳定性, 渗流

Abstract:

CO₂ is widely used as a displacement agent in oil displacement because of its unique physical properties and its chemical reaction with crude oil. But pure CO₂ gas flooding is prone to gas channeling. So the application of CO₂ in the foam flooding process make CO₂ can not only play its own role in oil displacement, but also realize fluidity control and reduce the possibility of gas channeling. In this study, the stability, particle size change and percolation characteristics of CO₂ foam with different particle sizes and the same chemical composition are experimentally studied, the change rule of the influence of particle size on foam performance is obtained, and the influence mode is analyzed and discussed. The results show that the smaller the bubble size, the better the stability of the foam system, the stronger the blocking ability, and the slower the particle size changes over time. Changing the preparation method to reduce the particle size of the foam system can effectively improve the foam’s stability and EOR capacity.

Key words: CO₂ foam, oil displacement, particle size, stability, percolation

中图分类号:

TE355

刘双星,彭勃,刘琦等. 驱油用CO₂泡沫体系粒径对其性能影响研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(3): 33-38.

Shuangxing LIU,Bo PENG,Qi LIU, et al. Study on impact of particle size of CO₂ foam system for flooding on its performance[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(3): 33-38.

图/表 13

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

表2

表3

表4

表5

图5

图6

图7

图8

参考文献 28

[1]	严巡, 刘让龙, 王长权, 等. 盐间油藏原油和CO₂最小混相压力研究[J]. 非常规油气, 2019,6(5):54-56.
	YAN X, LIU R L, WANG C Q, et al. Investgation of the mininum miscibility of crude oil and CO₂ in salt reservoir[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2019,6(5):54-56.
[2]	史胜龙, 王业飞, 周代余, 等. 微泡沫体系直径影响因素及微观稳定性[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2016,40(1):103-110.
	SHI S L, WANG Y F, ZHOU D Y, et al. Bubble size influence factors and microscopic stability of microfoam system[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2016,40(1):103-110.
[3]	王琛, 李天太, 高辉, 等. CO₂驱沥青质沉积量对致密砂岩油藏采收率的影响机理[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2018,25(3):107-111.
	WANG C, LI T T, GAO H, et al. Study on influencing mechanism of asphaltene precipitation on oil recovery during CO₂ flooding in tight sandstone reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2018,25(3):107-111.
[4]	王福顺, 牟珍宝, 刘鹏程, 等. 超稠油油藏CO₂辅助开采作用机理实验与数值模拟研究[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2017,24(6):86-91.
	WANG F S, MOU Z B, LIU P C, et al. Experiment and numerical simulation on mechanism of CO₂ assisted mining in super heavy oil reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2017,24(6):86-91.
[5]	LI C X, WANG W C, WANG Z H. A surface tension model for liquid mixtures based on the Wilson equation[J]. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2000,175(1-2):185-196. doi: 10.1016/S0378-3812(00)00447-7
[6]	孙琳, 赵凡琪, 张芸, 等. 高温高盐底水油藏氮气泡沫压锥实验研究[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2017,24(6):97-102.
	SUN L, ZHAO F Q, ZHANG Y, et al. An experimental study of coning control with nitrogen foam in high-temperature and high-salinity bottom water reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2017,24(6):97-102.
[7]	普劳斯尼茨. 流体相平衡的分子热力学[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2006.
	PRAUSNITZ J M. Molecular thermodynamics of fluid-phase equilibria[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2006.
[8]	方洪波, 宗华, 李维峰, 等. 热力学不稳定体系的稳定性问题探讨[J]. 油田建设设计, 2001,50(1):4-8.
	FANG H B, ZONG H, LI W F, et al. Discussion of the Stability of thermodynamically unstable systems[J]. Journal of Oilfield Construction & Design, 2001,50(1):4-8.
[9]	赵燕, 吴光焕, 孙业恒. 泡沫辅助蒸汽驱矿场试验及效果[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2017,24(5):106-110.
	ZHAO Y, WU G H, SUN Y H. Field test and effect analysis of foam-assisted steam flooding[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2017,24(5):106-110.
[10]	郭烈锦. 两相与多相流动力学[M]. 西安: 西安交通大学出版社, 2002.
	GUO L J. Two-phase and multiphase flow mechanics[M]. Xi'an: Xi'an Jiaotong University Press, 2002.
[11]	XUE Z Q, YAMADA T, MATSUOKA T, et al. Carbon dioxide microbubble injection-Enhanced dissolution in geological sequestration[J]. Energy Procedia, 2011,4:4307-4313. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.381
[12]	KARAKASHEV S I, IVANOVA D S, ANGARSKA Z K, et al. Comparative validation of the analytical models for the Marangoni effect on foam film drainage[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2010,365(1-3):122-136. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.01.054
[13]	OSEI BONSU K, SHOKRI N, GRASSIA P. Foam stability in the presence and absence of hydrocarbons: From bubble-to bulk-scale[J]. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2015,481:514-526. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.06.023
[14]	TAN S N, FORNASIERO D, SEDEV R, et al. Marangoni effects in aqueous polypropylene glycol foams[J]. Journal of colloid and interface science, 2005,286(2):719-729. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.01.028 pmid: 15897090
[15]	TAKAHASHI M, KAWAMURA T, YAMAMOTO Y, et al. Effect of shrinking microbubble on gas hydrate formation[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 2003,107(10):2171-2173. doi: 10.1021/jp022210z
[16]	TAKAHASHI M. Zeta potential of microbubbles in aqueous solutions: electrical properties of the gas-water interface[J]. Journal of Physical Chemistry(B), 2005,109(46):58-64.
[17]	曲海莹, 刘琦, 彭勃, 等. 纳米颗粒对CO₂泡沫体系稳定性的影响[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019,26(5):120-126.
	QU H Y, LIU Q, PENG B, et al. Effect of nanoparticle on stability of CO₂ foam flooding system[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019,26(5):120-126.
[18]	KATAOKA H, NAGASAKA Y, HASEGAWA H. Electrical potential of microbubble generated by shear flow in pipe with slits[J]. Fluid Dynamics Research, 2008,40(7-8):554-564. doi: 10.1016/j.fluiddyn.2007.12.007
[19]	KOIDE H, XUE Z Q. Carbon microbubbles sequestration: A novel technology for stable underground emplacement of greenhouse gases into wide variety of saline aquifers, fractured rocks and tight reservoirs[J]. Energy Procedia, 2009,1(1):3655-3662. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.162
[20]	阮晓博, 杨芳, 顾宁. 微纳气泡制备及其应用于医学超声影像增强与药物载运的发展[J]. 东南大学学报(医学版), 2011,30(1):208-214.
	RUAN X B, YANG F, GU N. Preparation of micro-nano bubbles and their application in medical ultrasound image enhancement and drug transport[J]. Journal OF Southeast University(Medical Science Edition), 2011,30(1):208-214.
[21]	刘观军, 李小瑞, 丁里, 等. 微泡沫酸性清洁压裂液的制备及性能[J]. 精细化工, 2013,30(1):94-98.
	LIU G J, LI X R, DING L, et al. Synjournal of microfoam acid clean fracturing fluid and its properties[J]. Fine Chemicals, 2013,30(1):94-98.
[22]	YAMABE H, NAKAOKA K, XUE Z Q, et al. Simulation study of CO₂ micro-bubble generation through porous media[J]. Energy Procedia, 2013,37:4635-4646. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.372
[23]	姜瑞忠, 张海涛, 张伟, 等. CO₂驱三区复合油藏水平井压力动态分析[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2018,25(6):63-70.
	JIANG R Z, ZHANG H T, ZHANG W, et al. Dynamic pressure analysis of three-zone composite horizontal well in oil reservoirs for CO₂ flooding[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2018,25(6):63-70.
[24]	祝浪涛, 廖新维, 陈志明, 等. 应力敏感性低渗透油藏CO₂混相驱试井模型[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2017,24(4):88-93.
	ZHU L T, LIAO X W, CHENG Z M, et al. Well test model of CO₂ miscible flooding in the low-permeability reservoirs with stress sensitivity[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2017,24(4):88-93.
[25]	曾嘉. 二元泡沫体系在含油多孔介质中的渗流特征研究[J]. 长江大学学报(自然科学版), 2015,12(5):24-26.
	ZENG J. Seepage characteristics of binary foam system in porous media containing oil[J]. Journal of Yangtze University(Natural Science Edition), 2015,12(5):24-26.
[26]	史胜龙, 王业飞, 周代余. 微泡沫体系的制备及在调剖、驱油中的应用进展[J]. 油田化学, 2016,34(4):750-755.
	SHI S L, WANG Y F, ZHOU D Y. Preparation methods and research progress of microbubble in flooding and profile control[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2016,34(4):750-755.
[27]	GROWCOCK F B, KHAN A K, SIMON G A. Application of water-based and oil-based aphrons in drilling fluids[C]// paper SPE-80208-MS presented at the International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, 5-7 February 2003, Houston, Texas, USA.
[28]	耿向飞, 胡星琪, 吉永忠, 等. 可循环微泡沫钻井液的微泡粒径影响因素研究[J]. 油田化学, 2013,30(4):505-508.
	GENG X F, HU X Q, JI Y Z, et al. Effect factors of microbubble size in recirculated micro-foam drilling fluid[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2013,30(4):505-508.

名称	纯度	类型	基本性能
十六烷基三甲基溴化铵（CTAB）	99 %	阳离子型	25 ℃临界胶束浓度为343 mg/L
十二烷基硫酸钠（SDS）	96 %	阴离子型	25 ℃临界胶束浓度为2 307 mg/L
聚山梨酯80 （Tween80）	40 %	聚合物	25 ℃、1 g/L条件下黏度为493 mPa·s
黄原胶（ XC）	USP级	聚合物	25 ℃、1 g/L条件下黏度为9 472 mPa·s

名称	纯度	类型
氯化钠（NaCl）	分析纯	无机盐
氯化钾（KCl）	分析纯	无机盐
二水氯化钙（CaCl₂·2H₂O）	分析纯	无机盐
六水氯化镁（MgCl₂·6H₂O）	分析纯	无机盐
碳酸钠（Na₂CO₃）	分析纯	无机盐
硫酸钠（Na₂SO₄）	分析纯	无机盐
碳酸氢钠（NaHCO₃）	分析纯	无机盐

离子种类	浓度/（mg·L^-1）	离子种类	浓度/（mg·L^-1）
Na⁺+K⁺	4 459	SO₄^2-	539
Ca²⁺	356	Cl^-	2 989
Mg²⁺	116	CO₃^2-	437
HCO₃^-	966

编号	水测渗透率/10^-3 μm²	孔隙度/%	筛板目数
1	109	23.5	50
2	111	23.2	140
3	110	23.7	325
4	1. 2	25.7	50
5	1	25.9	240
6	1	26.1	325

筛板目数	t_1/2/min	t_D/s	d/μm
400	281	216	0.276±0. 069
325	269	215	0.282±0. 077
200	254	203	0.289±0. 085
140	231	178	0.572±0. 133
80	202	163	1.698±0. 452
50	188	147	3.533±0. 701

驱油用CO₂泡沫体系粒径对其性能影响研究

Study on impact of particle size of CO₂ foam system for flooding on its performance

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 13

参考文献 28

相关文章 13

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	何海燕, 刘先山, 耿少阳, 孙军昌, 孙彦春, 贾倩. 基于渗流-温度双场耦合的油藏型储气库数值模拟 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(6): 819-826.
[2]	施雷庭, 赵启明, 任镇宇, 朱诗杰, 朱珊珊. 煤岩裂隙形态对渗流能力影响数值模拟研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 424-432.
[3]	王典林, 杨琼, 魏兵, 戢炳鑫, 辛军, 孙琳. 甜菜碱型表面活性剂结构对CO₂泡沫液膜性质的影响 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(3): 313-321.
[4]	周海燕,张运来,梁潇,张吉磊,许亚南,刘继柱. 考虑多因素的多层合采产液量劈分模式研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(6): 945-950.
[5]	唐波涛,曾冀,陈伟华,陈一鑫,王涛,刘成,冯逢. 川中秋林地区致密砂岩水平井多簇射孔优化设计方法及应用效果 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(2): 337-344.
[6]	徐辉,祝仰文,宋敏,庞雪君,孙秀芝. 温敏型聚合物驱油性能研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(6): 53-57.
[7]	王伟,李阳,陈祖华,姚军,梅俊伟,任建华,马波. 基于复杂渗流机理的页岩气藏压后数值模拟研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(1): 22-29.
[8]	张矿生,张同伍,吴顺林,李年银,何思源,李骏. 不同粒径组合支撑剂在裂缝中运移规律模拟 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2019, 9(6): 72-77.
[9]	汤勇,廖松林,雷欣慧,余光明,康兴妹. 黄3区低渗透裂缝性油藏提高CO₂驱波及对策研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2019, 9(3): 9-13.
[10]	闫坤,韩培慧,曹瑞波,佟卉. 聚驱后优势渗流通道流线数值模拟识别方法的建立及应用 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2019, 9(2): 33-37.
[11]	于倩男,刘义坤,姚迪,刘学,于洋. 精控压裂薄差储层渗流特征实验研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2019, 9(1): 15-22.
[12]	王健,吴松芸,余恒,张作伟,徐鹏. CO₂泡沫改善吸水剖面实验评价研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2018, 8(4): 22-25.
[13]	罗志锋,张楠林,赵立强. 考虑诱导应力的压裂气井出砂预测 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2018, 8(1): 38-43.