苏北盆地帅垛复杂断块油田地质工程一体化高效开发实践

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2021.03.012

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

苏北盆地帅垛油田戴南组一段油藏为中高渗复杂断块油藏,油藏驱动方式既有天然水驱也有人工水驱。投产后部分井初产高,含水上升速度快,注入水单向突进,层间吸水差异大,平面上部分注采井组无响应,层间和平面开发矛盾突出。针对不同断块和油层开发矛盾,引入地质工程一体化理念,加强基础地质研究,重新认识和落实主体构造,制定和实施加密调整方案,对高含水断块加强微构造和剩余油分布研究,完善注采井网;同时开展适合帅垛油藏的卡堵水和分层注水等一系列配套工艺技术研究应用。经过近几年的开发调整,实现了油田增产稳产,连续8年产量超过6×10⁴t,平均年产油量8.8×10⁴t,采油速度2.2 %,平均含水上升率2.33 %,水驱控制储量达366.2×10⁴t,水驱控制程度86.7 %,水驱动用储量363×10⁴t,水驱动用程度86 %。地质工程一体化理念在帅垛油田剩余油挖潜中的实践经验,对其他同类型油藏效益开发具有借鉴意义。

关键词: 复杂断块, 地质工程一体化, 剩余油, 深部调剖, 帅垛油田, 苏北盆地

Abstract:

The reservoir of the Ed¹ in Shuaiduo Oilfield in Subei Basin is a complex fault block reservoir with medium and high permeability. Both natural water and artifical water are used in the water flooding here. After put into production, some wells have high initial production, and rapid rise in water cut. The injected water bursts in one direction, and the difference in water absorption between layers is large. Some injection and production well groups on the plane have no response. The contradictions between the layers and the plane development are prominent. In view of the development contradictions of different fault blocks and oil layers, the concept of geology-engineering integration has been introduced to strengthen the basic geological research, re-understand and implement the main structure, and then, formulate and implement intensification adjustment plans. The study of micro structure and remaining oil distribution is strengthened, and the injection-production well pattern is improved for the high water-cut fault blocks. At the same time, the research and application of a series of supporting technology such as water blocking and layered water injection suitable for Shuaiduo reservoir are also carried out. Due to the development and adjustment in recent years, the production of the oilfield keeps increasing and is stable. The annual output is above 6×10⁴ t for eight consecutive years, the average annual output is 8.8×10⁴ t, the oil recovery rate is 2.2 %, the average water cut rise rate is 2.33 %, the reserve controlled by water flooding reaches 366.2×10⁴ t, the degree of water drive control is 86.7 %, the reserve for water drive is 363×10⁴ t, and the degree of water drive is 86 %. The practical experience of the concept of geology-engineering integration in tapping the potential of remaining oil in the Shuiduo Oilfield has a good reference significance for other similar oil reservoirs.

Key words: complex fault, geology-engineering integration, residual oil, in-depth profile modification and flooding, Shuaiduo Oilfield, Subei Basin

中图分类号:

TE313

唐建信,钱坤,唐人选. 苏北盆地帅垛复杂断块油田地质工程一体化高效开发实践[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(3): 377-383.

TANG Jianxin,QIAN Kun,TANG Renxuan. Practice of geology-engineering integration development of Shuaiduo Oilfield with complex fault in Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2021, 11(3): 377-383.

图/表 7

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 20

[1]	KOVSCEK A R, CASTANIER L M, GERRITSEN M G. Improved predictability of in-situ-combustion enhanced oil recovery[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2013, 16(2):172-182.
[2]	蒋永平. 复杂断块油藏高含水期化学剂强化CO ₂复合驱提高采收率技术 [J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2018, 40(5):654-658.
	JIANG Yongping. Enhanced oil recovery technology of chemicals & carbon-dioxide combined flooding in high water cut stage of complex fault block reservoir[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2018, 40(5):654-658.
[3]	LIU J S, DING W L, DAI J S, et al. Quantitative prediction of lower order faults based on the finite element method: A case study of the M35 fault block in the western Hanliu fault zone in the Gaoyou sag, East China[J]. Tectonics, 2018, 37(10):3479-3499. doi: 10.1029/2017TC004767
[4]	王伟. 喇嘛甸油田水驱二次开发方法[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2015, 34(2):69-73.
	WANG Wei. Secondary developing methods for the waterflooding of Lamadian Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2015, 34(2):69-73.
[5]	张胜利, 黄咏梅, 牛明超, 等. 埕岛油田跟踪优化注水开发及效果[J]. 西南石油学院学报, 2003, 25(5):46-48.
	ZHANG Shengli, HUANG Yongmei, NIU Mingchao, et al. Tracking optimum development by water injection and achieve effect in Chengdao Oilfield[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum Institute, 2003, 25(5):46-48.
[6]	陈祖华, 吴公益, 钱卫明, 等. 苏北盆地复杂小断块油藏注CO ₂提高采收率技术及应用 [J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2020, 27(1):152-162.
	CHEN Zuhua, WU Gongyi, QIAN Weiming, et al. EOR technology and application of CO ₂ injection for small complex fault block reservoirs in Subei Basin [J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020, 27(1):152-162.
[7]	李留仁, 袁士义, 胡永乐. 合理注采井数比与合理压力保持水平的确定[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 26(3):59-61.
	LI Liuren, YUAN Shiyi, HU Yongle. Determination of reasonable ratio of injectors to producers and reasonable pressure maintenance level[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science), 2011, 26(3):59-61.
[8]	唐人选, 谈士海, 郞春艳. 多油层合采的油井产液及含水特征分析[J]. 中国海上油气(地质), 2003, 17(2):118-122.
	TANG Renxuan, TAN Shihai, LANG Chunyan. An analysis of liquid production and water cut in commingled multiplezone producing wells[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas(Geology), 2003, 17(2):118-122.
[9]	耿娜, 缪飞飞, 刘小鸿, 等. 水驱储量动用程度计算方法研究[J]. 断块油气田, 2014, 21(4):472-475.
	GENG Na, MIAO Feifei, LIU Xiaohong, et al. Calculation method of reserves producing degree of water flooding[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2014, 21(4):472-475.
[10]	万绪新, 谢广龙, 丁余刚. 胜利油田难动用石油储量地质工程一体化探索[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(2):43-50.
	WAN Xuxin, XIE Guanglong, DING Yugang. Exploration on geology-engineering integration of hard-to-recover reserves in Shengli Oilfield[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(2):43-50.
[11]	常少英, 朱永峰, 曹鹏, 等. 地质工程一体化在剩余油高效挖潜中的实践及效果——以塔里木盆地YM32白云岩油藏为例[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2017, 22(1):46-52.
	CHANG Shaoying, ZHU Yongfeng, CAO Peng, et al. Application of geology-engineering integration in high-efficiency remaining oil potential tapping and its results: a case study on YM32 dolomite oil reservoirs in Tarim Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2017, 22(1):46-52.
[12]	殷代印, 项俊辉, 王东琪. 大庆油田长垣外围特低渗透扶杨油层综合分类[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2018, 30(1):150-154.
	YIN Daiyin, XIANG Junhui, WANG Dongqi. Classification of Fuyang oil reservoir with ultra-low permeability around placanticline of Daqing Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2018, 30(1):150-154.
[13]	胡文瑞. 地质工程一体化是实现复杂油气藏效益勘探开发的必由之路[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2017, 22(1):1-5.
	HU Wenrui. Geology-engineering integration-a necessary way to realize profitable exploration and development of complex reservoirs[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2017, 22(1):1-5.
[14]	吴君达, 李治平, 孙妍, 等. 基于神经网络的剩余油分布预测及注采参数优化[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2020, 27(4):85-93.
	WU Junda, LI Zhiping, SUN Yan, et al. Neural network-based prediction of remaining oil distribution and optimization of injection-production parameters[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2020, 27(4):85-93.
[15]	袁春晖, 万玉金, 刘晓华, 等. 龙王庙组气藏X井区储层非均质性精细描述[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(2):121-126.
	YUAN Chunhui, WAN Yujin, LIU Xiaohua, at al. Fine characterization of reservoir heterogeneity in the wellblock X of Longwangmiao Formation[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2019, 26(2):121-126.
[16]	文华, 孙娜. 一种定量描述气藏储层非均质性的新方法[J]. 特种油气藏, 2011, 18(1):51-53.
	WEN Hua, SUN Na. A new quantitative description method of gas reservoir heterogeneity[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2011, 18(1):51-53.
[17]	AHAMADI M A. Connectionist approach estimates gas-oil relative permeability in petroleum reservoirs: Application to reservoir simulation[J]. Fuel, 2015, 140:429-439. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.09.058
[18]	XIAO B Q, FAN J T, DING F. Prediction of relative permeability of unsaturated porous media based on fractal theory and Monte Carlo simulation[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2012, 26(11):6971-6978. doi: 10.1021/ef3013322
[19]	NASVI M C M, RANJITH P G, SANJAYAN J, et al. Sub-and super-critical carbon dioxide permeability of wellbore materials under geological sequestration conditions: An experimental study[J]. Energy, 2013, 54(2):231-239. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.01.049
[20]	ABDELAZIM R. An integrated approach for relative permeability estimation of fractured porous media: Laboratory and numerical simulation studies[J]. Journal of Petroleum Exploration & Production Technology, 2016:1-18.

地层	实验项目	断块	实验参数	实验结果
Ed¹	速敏	帅1	临界流速1.062 m/d	强速敏
	水敏	帅1	水敏伤害指数46 %	中等偏弱水敏
	酸敏	帅1	酸敏伤害指数22 %	弱酸敏
	碱敏	帅1	碱敏伤害指数16 %	弱碱敏