溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段泥页岩含油性及页岩油富集层段分布

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2024.05.003

油气藏评价与开发 ›› 2024, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (5): 688-698.doi: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2024.05.003

溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段泥页岩含油性及页岩油富集层段分布

余文端¹(), 高玉巧¹, 昝灵¹(), 马晓东¹, 余麒麟²^,³, 李志鹏²^,⁴, 张枝焕²^,³

1.中国石化华东油气分公司，江苏南京 210019
2.中国石油大学（北京）地球科学学院，北京 102249
3.中国石油大学（北京）油气资源与工程全国重点实验室，北京 102249
4.中国石油大学（华东）地球科学与技术学院，山东青岛 266580

收稿日期:2024-01-11 发布日期:2024-10-11 出版日期:2024-10-26
通讯作者: 昝灵（1984—），男，博士，研究员，主要从事页岩油、常规油地质研究。地址：江苏省南京市建邺区江东中路375号金融城9号楼，邮政编码：210019。E-mail: zanl.hdsj@sinopec.com
作者简介:余文端（1972—），男，本科，高级工程师，主要从事油气勘探研究与管理工作。地址：江苏省南京市建邺区江东中路375号金融城9号楼，邮政编码：210019。E-mail: yuwd.hdsj@sinopec.com
基金资助:
中国石化科技部项目“苏北盆地页岩油地质工程一体化关键技术研究”(P21112);中国石化科技部项目“溱潼凹陷低TOC陆相页岩油勘探开发关键技术”(P23190)

Distribution of oil bearing and shale oil-rich strata in the second member of Funing Formation in Qintong Sag

YU Wenduan¹(), GAO Yuqiao¹, ZAN Ling¹(), MA Xiaodong¹, YU Qilin²^,³, LI Zhipeng²^,⁴, ZHANG Zhihuan²^,³

1. Sinopec East China Oil & Gas Company, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210019, China
2. College of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum （Beijing）, Beijing 102249, China
3. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Engineering, China University of Petroleum （Beijing）, Beijing 102249, China
4. School of Geosciences, China University of Petroleum（East China）, Qingdao, Shandong 266580, China

Received:2024-01-11 Online:2024-10-11 Published:2024-10-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探讨苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组二段（以下简称阜二段）不同亚段和不同岩性泥页岩的生烃潜力及其含油性，以及页岩油富集层段的分布特征。采用了地球化学分析与模拟实验相结合的研究方法，提出了适合于研究区地质特点的泥页岩含油率表征方法，确定了阜二段泥页岩的含油率和页岩油赋存状态，揭示了页岩油富集层段的分布特征。结果表明：研究区阜二段泥脖子亚段和龟背亚段的泥页岩的总含油率较高，但游离烃含量较低，吸附烃含量中等—较高，可动性较差；七尖峰亚段、四尖峰亚段和山字形亚段的含灰云页岩、灰云质页岩等的总含油率和游离烃含量均较高，吸附烃含量较低，可动性较好，而含灰云泥岩、灰云质泥岩的总含油率和吸附烃含量中等，游离烃含量相对较低，泥灰岩总含油率、游离烃和吸附烃含量均较低。研究区深凹带阜二段一、二类页岩油富集层段主要分布在四尖峰亚段和山字形亚段的中下部；斜坡带页岩油富集段不发育，局部分布有二类和三类页岩油有利层段。

关键词: 苏北盆地, 溱潼凹陷, 阜二段, 页岩油, 含油性, 富集层段

Abstract:

The objective of this study is to delve deeper into the hydrocarbon generation potential and oil-bearing characteristics of various source rocks within the second section of the Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin, and to assess the degree of shale oil enrichment. Through geochemical analysis and simulation experiment research, this investigation proposes a method for characterizing shale oil content that is adapted to the geological features of the second section of the Funing Formation. The study establishes the oil content, occurrence state, and distribution characteristics of shale oil within this section. Findings indicate that the mudstone and calcium mudstone of the fourth and fifth sub-members demonstrate higher total oil content, lower free hydrocarbon content, medium to high adsorbed hydrocarbon content, and limited mobility. Meanwhile, the calcium shale, calcareous shale, and laminated marlstone of the first to third sub-members exhibit higher total oil content and free hydrocarbon content, but lower adsorbed hydrocarbon content, which enhances their mobility. The calcium mudstone and calcareous mudstone of the first to third sub-members display a moderate level of total oil content and adsorbed hydrocarbon content but relatively low free hydrocarbon content. The marlstone from these sub-members shows comparatively low levels of total oil content as well as free and adsorbed hydrocarbon contents. The study also reveals the distribution of shale oil enrichment intervals. Class Ⅰ and Class Ⅱ shale oil enrichment intervals are primarily located in the middle and lower sections of the first and second sub-members in the deep depression zone. In contrast, the slope zone features limited development of shale oil enrichment strata but contains Class Ⅱ and Class Ⅲ shale oil.

Key words: Subei Basin, Qintong Sag, the second member of Funing Formation, shale oil, oil-bearing, enrichment section

中图分类号:

TE122

余文端,高玉巧,昝灵等. 溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段泥页岩含油性及页岩油富集层段分布[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(5): 688-698.

YU Wenduan,GAO Yuqiao,ZAN Ling, et al. Distribution of oil bearing and shale oil-rich strata in the second member of Funing Formation in Qintong Sag[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(5): 688-698.

图/表 9

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

表1

图8

参考文献 35

[1]	张航国, 昝灵. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷西斜坡阜宁组三段油气富集规律[J]. 长江大学学报(自科版), 2016, 13(35): 13-17.
	ZHANG Hangguo, ZAN Ling. The rules of hydrocarbon enrichment in the 3^rd member of Funing Formation on the west steep slope of Qintong Depression of Subei Basin[J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 35(13): 13-17.
[2]	昝灵, 柴方园, 印燕铃. 溱潼凹陷斜坡带原油物性和地化特征及成因[J]. 沉积学报, 2021, 39(5): 1068-1077.
	ZAN Ling, CHAI Fangyuan, YIN Yanling. Physical properties, geochemical characteristics and origins of crude oils in the Qintong Sag Slope[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2021, 39(5): 1068-1077.
[3]	昝灵, 骆卫峰, 印燕铃, 等. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油形成条件及有利区评价[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(2): 233-241.
	ZAN Lin, LUO Weifeng, YIN Yanling, et al. Formation conditions of shale oil and favorable targets in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(2): 233-241.
[4]	芮晓庆, 周圆圆, 李志明, 等. 苏北盆地阜宁组源储特征及页岩油勘探方向探讨[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2020, 40(6): 133-145.
	RUI Xiaoqing, ZHOU Yuanyuan, LI Zhiming, et al. Characteristics of source rocks and reservoirs of the Funing Formation in the Subei Basin and their bearing on future shale oil exploration[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2020, 40(6): 133-145.
[5]	龙海岑, 李绍鹏. 泥页岩层系非均质性及其控制因素研究: 以苏北盆地阜二段为例[J]. 非常规油气, 2022, 9(4): 78-90.
	LONG Haicen, LI Shaopeng. The research on the heterogeneity of shale formations and its controlling factors: A case study of the second member of Funing Formation in Subei Basin[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2022, 9(4): 78-90.
[6]	方朝合, 张枝焕, 王义凤, 等. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷第三系烃源岩地球化学特征[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 23(6): 1-5.
	FANG Chaohe, ZHANG Zhihuan, WANG Yifeng, et al. Geochemical characteristics of the lower tertiary source rock in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science Edition), 2008, 23(6): 1-5.
[7]	姚红生, 昝灵, 高玉巧, 等. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油富集高产主控因素与勘探重大突破[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(5): 776-783.
	YAO Hongsheng, ZAN Ling, GAO Yuqiao, et al. Main controlling factors for the enrichment of shale oil and significant discovery in second member of Paleogene Funing Formation, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(5): 776-783.
[8]	臧素华, 骆卫峰, 马晓东, 等. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷戴一段沉积-层序特征及其对岩性勘探的指示意义[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2018, 38(3): 107-115.
	ZANG Suhua, LUO Weifeng, MA Xiaodong, et al. Depositional characteristics of the first member of Dainan Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin and their significance to lithological exploration[J]. Marine Geology ＆ Quaternary Geology, 2018, 38(3): 107-115.
[9]	刘伟, 游有光, 杨皋. 苏北溱潼箕状凹陷的形成演化机制及油气成藏特征[J]. 断块油气田, 1999(6): 10-12.
	LIU Wei, YOU Youguang, YANG Gao. The formation and evolution mechanism of Qintong half graden in Subei Basin and its reservoir formation features[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 1999(6): 10-12.
[10]	云露, 何希鹏, 花彩霞, 等. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系陆相页岩油成藏地质特征及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(1): 176-187. doi: 10.7623/syxb202301011
	YUN Lu, HE Xipeng, HUA Caixia, et al. Accumulation characteristics and resource potential of Paleogene continental shale oil in Qintong sag of Subei Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(1): 176-186.
[11]	程浩, 金振奎, 余文端, 等. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜三段浅水三角洲沉积古地貌、古环境恢复[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(3): 368-378.
	CHENG Hao, JIN Zhenkui, YU Wenduan, et al. Sedimentary palaeogeomorphology and palaeo-environment reconstructions of shallow water delta in the 3rd member of Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2023, 13(3): 368-378.
[12]	李志鹏, 余麒麟, 昝灵, 等. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜二段不同岩性烃源岩的地球化学特征及生烃潜力对比[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(5): 1345-1357.
	LI Zhipeng, YU Qilin, ZAN Ling, et al. Geochemical characteristics and hydrocarbon generation potential of different lithologic source rocks in the second member of Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(5): 1345-1357.
[13]	马晓东. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷地震资料解释与构造特征研究[D]. 南京: 南京大学, 2013.
	MA Xiaodong. Seismic data interpretation and research on structural features in Qintong Depreesion of Subei Basin[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University, 2013.
[14]	王凌. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜宁组阜三段岩相古地理研究[D]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2021.
	WANG Ling. Lithofacies paleogeography of the third member of Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum(Beijing), 2021.
[15]	蒋启贵, 黎茂稳, 马媛媛, 等. 页岩油可动性分子地球化学评价方法: 以济阳坳陷页岩油为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40(6): 849-854.
	JIANG Qigui, LI Maowen, MA Yuanyuan, et al. Molecular geochemical evaluation of shale oil mobility: A case study of shale oil in Jiyang Depression[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2018, 40(6): 849-854.
[16]	钱门辉, 黎茂稳, 蒋启贵, 等. 页岩岩心样品烃类散失特征与地质意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(3): 497-504.
	QIAN Menhui, LI Maowen, JIANG Qigui, et al. Evaluation of evaporative loss of hydrocarbon in shale samples and its geological implications[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(3): 497-504.
[17]	王娟. 轻质烃组分的低温密闭抽提技术及其在页岩油资源评价中的应用[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2015, 20(3): 58-63.
	WANG Juan. Low-temperature closed extraction technology of light hydrocarbons and its application in evaluation of shale oil resource[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2015, 20(3): 58-63.
[18]	潘银华, 黎茂稳, 孙永革, 等. 低熟湖相泥质烃源岩中不同赋存状态可溶有机质的地球化学特征[J]. 地球化学, 2018, 47(4): 335-344.
	PAN Yinhua, LI Maowen, SUN Yongge, et al. Geochemical characterization of soluble organic matter with different existing states in low-maturity argillaceous source rocks of lacustrine facies[J]. Geochimica, 2018, 47(4): 335-344.
[19]	LIU B, BAI L H, CHI Y A, et al. Geochemical characterization and quantitative evaluation of shale oil reservoir by two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance and quantitative grain fluorescence on extract: A case study from the Qingshankou Formation in Southern Songliao Basin, northeast China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2019, 109: 561-573.
[20]	蔺敬旗, 曹志锋, 王先虎, 等. 混积页岩油甜点富集机理与含油性评价方法[J]. 测井技术, 2022, 46(6): 750-756.
	LIN Jingqi, CAO Zhifeng, WANG Xianhu, et al. Enrichment mechanism and oil-bearing evaluation method of mixed shale oil sweet spot[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2022, 46(6): 750-756.
[21]	LIU C L, WANG Z L, GUO Z Q, et al. Enrichment and distribution of shale oil in the Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation, Songliao Basin, Northeast China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2017, 86: 751-770.
[22]	刘雅慧, 王才志, 刘忠华, 等. 一种评价页岩油含油性的测井方法: 以准噶尔盆地吉木萨尔凹陷为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(7): 1084-1091. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2021.02.007
	LIU Yahui, WANG Caizhi, LIU Zhonghua, et al. A logging method for evaluating oil-bearing property of Jimsar shale oil: Case study of sag in Junggar Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2021, 32(7): 1084-1091. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2021.02.007
[23]	李水福, 胡守志, 张冬梅, 等. 自由烃差值法评价页岩含油性的思想、方法与应用[J]. 地球科学, 2019, 44(3): 929-938.
	LI Shuifu, HU Shouzhi, ZHANG Dongmei, et al. Idea, method and application of evaluating shale oil potential by free hydrocarbon difference[J]. Earth Science, 2019, 44(3): 929-938.
[24]	李进步, 卢双舫, 陈国辉, 等. 热解参数S₁的轻烃与重烃校正及其意义: 以渤海湾盆地大民屯凹陷E₂S⁴⁽²⁾段为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(4): 538-545.
	LI Jinbu, LU Shuangfang, CHEN Guohui, et al. Correction of light and heavy hydrocarbon loss for residual hydrocarbon S₁ and its significance to assessing resource potential of E₂s⁴⁽²⁾ member in Damintun Sag, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37(4): 538-545.
[25]	马晓潇, 黎茂稳, 蒋启贵, 等. 陆相页岩含油性的化学动力学定量评价方法[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(1): 137-152.
	MA Xiaoxiao, LI Maowen, JIANG Qigui, et al. Chemical kinetic model for quantitative evaluation on oil-bearing property of lacustrine shale[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(1): 137-152.
[26]	JARVIE D M. Shale resource systems for oil and gas: Part 2—Shale-oil resource systems[M]// BREYER IA. Shale Reservoirs:Giant Resources for the 21st Century. Tulsa: AAPG Memori, 2012: 89-119.
[27]	薛海涛, 田善思, 卢双舫, 等. 页岩油资源定量评价中关键参数的选取与校正: 以松辽盆地北部青山口组为例[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2015, 34(1): 70-78.
	XUE Haitao, TIAN Shansi, LU Shuangfang, et al. Selection and verification of key parameters in the quantitative evaluation of shale oil: A case study at the Qingshankou Formation, Northern Songliao Basin[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2015, 34(1): 70-78.
[28]	卢双舫, 薛海涛, 王民, 等. 页岩油评价中的若干关键问题及研究趋势[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(10): 1309-1322. doi: 10.7623/syxb201610012
	LU Shuangfang, XUE Haitao, WANG Min, et al. Several key issues and research trends in evaluation of shale oil[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(10): 1309-1322. doi: 10.7623/syxb201610012
[29]	蒋启贵, 黎茂稳, 钱门辉, 等. 不同赋存状态页岩油定量表征技术与应用研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38(6): 842-849.
	JIANG Qigui, LI Maowen, QIAN Menhui, et al. Quantitative characterization of shale oil in different occurrence states and its application[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2016, 38(6): 842-849.
[30]	LARTER S R, HUANG H P, LLOYD S, et al. What we do not know about self sourced oil reservoirs: Challenges and potential solutions[C]// Paper SPE-162777-MS prepared for presentation at the SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference held in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, November 2012.
[31]	黎茂稳, 马晓潇, 蒋启贵, 等. 北美海相页岩油形成条件、富集特征与启示[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(1): 13-28.
	LI Maowen, MA Xiaoxiao, JIANG Qigui, et al. Enlightenment from formation conditions and enrichment characteristics of marine shale oil in North America[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(1): 13-28.
[32]	杨智, 唐振兴, 李国会, 等. 陆相页岩层系石油富集区带优选、甜点区段评价与关键技术应用[J]. 地质学报, 2021, 95(8): 2257-2272.
	YANG Zhi, TANG Zhenxing, LI Guohui, et al. Optimization of enrichment plays, evaluation of sweet area & section and application of key technologies for the continental shale strata oil in China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2021, 95(8): 2257-2272.
[33]	匡立春, 侯连华, 杨智, 等. 陆相页岩油储层评价关键参数及方法[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(1): 1-14. doi: 10.7623/syxb202101001
	KUANG Lichun, HOU Lianhua, YANG Zhi, et al. Key parameters and methods of lacustrine shale oil reservoir characterization[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(1): 1-14. doi: 10.7623/syxb202101001
[34]	马永生, 蔡勋育, 赵培荣, 等. 中国陆相页岩油地质特征与勘探实践[J]. 地质学报, 2022, 96(1): 155-171.
	MA Yongsheng, CAI Xunyu, ZHAO Peirong, et al. Geological characteristics and exploration practices of continental shale oil in China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2022, 96(1): 155-171.
[35]	黄振凯, 郝运轻, 李双建, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7段泥页岩层系含油气性与页岩油可动性评价: 以H317井为例[J]. 中国地质, 2020, 47(1): 210-219.
	HUANG Zhenkai, HAO Yunqing, LI Shuangjian, et al. Oil-bearing potential, mobility evaluation and significance of shale oil in Chang 7 shale system in the Ordos Basin: A case study of well H317[J]. Geology in China, 2020, 47(1): 210-219.

有利层段类别	ω（TOC）/ %	S₁/ （mg/g）	有机质类型	R_o/ %	含油饱和指数/ （mg/g）
一	≥1.0	≥1.4	Ⅰ—Ⅱ₁	≥0.9	≥100
二	0.7~<1.0	1.0~<1.4	Ⅱ₁为主	0.7~<0.9	70~<100
三	<0.7	<1.0	Ⅱ₂为主	0.5~<0.7	50~<70

溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段泥页岩含油性及页岩油富集层段分布

Distribution of oil bearing and shale oil-rich strata in the second member of Funing Formation in Qintong Sag

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 35

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	王心乾, 余文端, 马晓东, 周韬, 邰浩, 崔钦宇, 邓空, 陆永潮, 刘占红. 基于常规测井曲线的页岩岩相识别与应用——以苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(5): 699-706.
[2]	张菲, 李秋政, 蒋阿明, 邓辞. 高邮凹陷花庄地区页岩油二维核磁测井评价应用 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(5): 707-713.
[3]	曹小朋, 刘海成, 李忠新, 陈先超, 江朋宇, 樊浩. 基于EDFM的页岩油水平井注水吞吐优化研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(5): 734-740.
[4]	廖凯, 张士诚, 谢勃勃. 页岩油体积压裂后合理焖井时间模拟研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(5): 749-755.
[5]	刘绪钢, 李国锋, 李雷, 王锐霞, 方彦明. 页岩油储层压裂液渗吸驱油机理研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(5): 756-763.
[6]	刘巍, 曹小朋, 胡慧芳, 程紫燕, 卜亚辉. 页岩油水平井产量影响因素分析及压裂参数优化决策 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(5): 764-770.
[7]	王维恒, 郭鑫, 张斌, 夏巍巍. 页岩油用压驱一体剂的研制及性能评价——以苏北盆地阜宁组二段为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(5): 771-778.
[8]	朱子恒, 任众鑫, 王照周, 郭尚涛, 王朝国, 柳誉剑, 杨涛, 魏兵. 苏北盆地刘庄储气库密封性评价研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(5): 805-813.
[9]	段宏亮,谌廷姗,孙敬,洪亚飞,李思辰,卢显荣,张正阳. 苏北盆地页岩油基质与裂缝流动能力实验研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(3): 333-342.
[10]	王欣,韩建强,昝灵,李小龙,彭兴平. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜宁组二段页岩油测井评价研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(3): 364-372.
[11]	孙雅雄,朱相羽,邱旭明,刘启东,段宏亮,仇永峰,巩磊. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷阜宁组二段页岩裂缝特征分析 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(3): 414-424.
[12]	臧素华,荆晓明,刘志华,印燕铃. 金坛盆地始新统阜宁组四段页岩油地质条件 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(3): 425-434.
[13]	管倩倩,蒋龙,程紫燕,张典栋,王云鹤,张帆. 东营凹陷页岩油岩相要素测井评价新方法及其应用 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(3): 435-445.
[14]	许国晨,杜娟,祝铭辰. 苏北盆地页岩油注水吞吐增产实践与认识 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(2): 256-266.
[15]	张志超,柏明星,杜思宇. 页岩油藏注CO₂驱孔隙动用特征研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(1): 42-47.