油气藏评价与开发 >
2025 , Vol. 15 >Issue 3: 357 - 372
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025.03.003
苏北盆地深层油气富集机理及勘探关键技术
收稿日期: 2024-09-02
网络出版日期: 2025-05-28
基金资助
中国石化科技攻关项目“苏北盆地邻源地质体成藏条件及勘探关键技术”(P24116)
Oil and gas enrichment mechanisms and key exploration technologies in deep layers of Subei Basin
Received date: 2024-09-02
Online published: 2025-05-28
深层油气勘探领域是苏北盆地重要接替阵地,但深层储层物性整体较差、油气富集机理认识不清及有效储层预测不能满足勘探需求等问题制约了深层领域油气拓展。为了明确深层油气富集机理、攻关勘探关键技术并指明未来攻关方向,从高邮、金湖等油气富集凹陷勘探发展形势及深层领域的油气资源潜力研究入手,结合深层储层物性特征及主控因素分析,开展了深层油气赋存条件、主控因素及成藏模式等研究,建立了异常高压与浮力混合驱动阶梯状输导油气、异常高压驱动断层和砂体输导油气及早期油气充注成藏后期致密型3种深层油气富集成藏模式,明确了深层油气富集机理,并针对储层展布不清、富集区带不明及有效储层识别精度不高等勘探难题,开展了技术攻关,形成了“相控指数法”深层储层分级评价、“油气储层充注势能”油气富集程度判别及“叠前-叠后”多属性有效储层预测等深层勘探关键技术。这些研究成果为深层油气勘探领域拓展提供了理论指导和技术支持,在斜坡带、断裂带及深凹带等深层领域取得了一系列勘探进展,实现了深层油气勘探拓展,在此基础上,明确了深层油气领域勘探攻关方向,继续巩固并扩大深层领域勘探成果,为油田增储上产提供支撑。
朱相羽 , 于雯泉 , 张健伟 , 李储华 , 李鹤永 . 苏北盆地深层油气富集机理及勘探关键技术[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2025 , 15(3) : 357 -372 . DOI: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025.03.003
The deep oil and gas exploration area serves as a crucial position for resource development in Subei Basin. However, challenges including generally poor physical properties of deep reservoirs, insufficient understanding of oil and gas enrichment mechanisms, and ineffective reservoir prediction to meet exploration demands have constrained the expansion of deep oil and gas exploration. To understand the enrichment mechanisms of deep oil and gas, develop key exploration technologies, and indicate future research directions, this paper focuses on the deep layers of Gaoyou and Jinhu Sags, which are rich in oil and gas resources. Firstly, by analyzing the exploration development trends and oil and gas resource potential in oil and gas enrichment Sags such as Gaoyou and Jinhu, along with physical characteristics and main controlling factors of deep reservoirs, it was believed that the deep oil and gas reservoirs in Gaoyou and Jinhu Sags were mainly characterized by low to extra-low porosity and permeability. Secondary pore was the main pore type, while primary pore occurred locally. Overall, as burial depth increased, the proportion of primary pores gradually decreased. Subsequently, based on the relationship between pores and pore throats, deep reservoirs were classified into four types of pore-throat structures: large intergranular pores and wide lamellar throats; small intergranular pores and narrow lamellar throats; intragranular dissolution pores and narrow lamellar throats; and micropores and tubular throats. The physical properties of deep reservoirs were generally poor, with locally developed favorable reservoirs. The factors influencing the physical properties of deep reservoirs were complex. Analysis suggests that sedimentary factors, diagenesis, tectonic activity, oil and gas injection, and abnormal formation pressures all significantly affected the physical properties of deep reservoirs, although the controlling factors and their effects varied across different regions. Secondly, investigations were conducted on the occurrence conditions, main controlling factors, and accumulation models of deep oil and gas. The occurrence conditions of oil and gass suggested that oil and gas migration and accumulation were controlled by the pressure systems and physical properties between source rocks and reservoirs, as well as between different reservoirs. Oil and gas accumulation occurred when migration forces overcame migration resistance. Microscopically, pore-throat structure determined the fluid occurrence state and permeability. Larger throat radii, lower pore-throat radius ratios, and smaller tortuosities led to enhanced pore-throat connectivity and higher reservoir permeability. Macroscopically, pressure increase with oil and gas generation provided the driving force for oil and gas migration and accumulation. The magnitude and direction of source-reservoir pressure difference decided the favorable trends for oil and gas migration and accumulation, controlling their favorable areas. In terms of the main controlling factors for oil and gas enrichment, it was believed that oil and gas accumulation and enrichment in deep reservoirs were jointly controlled by source-reservoir configuration, pressure increase with oil and gas generation, fault-sandstone carrier system, and reservoir physical properties. Three accumulation models for deep oil and gas enrichment were established: stepped accumulation driven by combined abnormal overpressure and buoyancy, accumulation via fault-sandstone carrier system driven by abnormal overpressure, and accumulation of early-stage oil and gas injection followed by later-stage compaction. These models elucidated the enrichment mechanisms of deep oil and gass. Based on the above, to address exploration challenges such as unclear reservoir distribution, undefined enrichment zones, and low identification accuracy of effective reservoirs, three breakthrough technologies were developed: (1) A facies-controlled index method for deep reservoir classification was developed based on “facies-controlled index, porosity-permeability characteristics, pore structures, and diagenetic facies”. Reservoir classification criteria were formulated, categorizing reservoirs into four grades. Effective reservoirs in deep layers were mainly grades Ⅱ and Ⅲ. The distribution of effective reservoirs in the deep layers was evaluated across key stratigraphic intervals, revealing the graded distribution of reservoirs in deep zones of the first and third member of Funing Formation, the third submember in the first member of Dainan Formation in Gaoyou Sag, and the second member of Funing Formation in Jinhu Sag. The favorable areas of effective reservoirs in the deep layers of each stratigraphic system in each Sag were finally determined. (2) Through the analysis of deep oil and gas enrichment mechanisms, and according to the dynamic conditions of oil and gas injection, models for calculating reservoir potential energy, fluid potential, and source-reservoir pressure differences were established. Subsequently, a model for calculating the reservoir injection potential energy index were established based on the above models. Finally, the obtained reservoir injection potential energy index was used to assess the probability of oil and gas accumulation, providing technical support for the selection of favorable oil and gas accumulation zones in deep layers. (3) Subaqueous distributary channels and beach-bar sand bodies were effective reservoirs for deep oil and gass. To address the challenge of effective reservoir prediction in thin sandstone-mudstone interbeds within favorable oil and gas accumulation zones in selected deep layers, an integrated technical suite for effective reservoir prediction was developed. This technique, tailored to different sand body types such as channels and beach bars, integrated pre-stack and post-stack multi-attribute analysis. It leveraged geological, petrophysical, seismic, statistical, and other disciplinary theories to provide a comprehensive approach to reservoir prediction. Based on the distinction between sandstone and mudstone, this suite included six techniques for reservoir prediction: effective reservoir modeling based on petrophysical analysis, post-stack multi-parameter inversion constraint method, pre-stack and post-stack joint inversion method, seismic attribute threshold analysis method, seismic multi-attribute neural network prediction method, and SP curve reconstruction for acoustic curve. These techniques collectively improved the prediction accuracy of effective reservoirs in deep layers. These research findings provide theoretical guidance and technical support for the expansion of deep oil and gas exploration. Significant exploration progress has been made in deep layers such as slope zones, fault zones, and deep sag zones, enabling the expansion of deep oil and gas exploration. In the future, the research directions for addressing challenges in deep oil and gas exploration are clarified, which are continuing to consolidate and expand deep exploration to support the increase in oilfield reserves and production.
1 | 何登发, 贾承造, 赵文智, 等. 中国超深层油气勘探领域研究进展与关键问题[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(6): 1162-1172. |
HE Dengfa, JIA Chengzao, ZHAO Wenzhi, et al. Research progress and key issues of ultra-deep oil and gas exploration in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(6): 1162-1172. | |
2 | 黄福喜, 汪少勇, 李明鹏, 等. 中国石油深层、超深层油气勘探进展与启示[J]. 天然气工业, 2024, 44(1): 86-96. |
HUANG Fuxi, WANG Shaoyong, LI Mingpeng, et al. Progress and implications of deep and ultra-deep oil and gas exploration in PetroChina[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2024, 44(1): 86-96. | |
3 | 何治亮, 马永生, 朱东亚, 等. 深层-超深层碳酸盐岩储层理论技术进展与攻关方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3): 533-546. |
HE Zhiliang, MA Yongsheng, ZHU Dongya, et al. Theoretical and technological progress and research direction of deep and ultra-deep carbonate reservoirs[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(3): 533-546. | |
4 | 关晓东, 郭磊. 深层—超深层油气成藏研究新进展及展望[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(2): 203-209. |
GUAN Xiaodong, GUO Lei. New progress and prospect of oil and gas accumulation research in deep to ultra-deep strata[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(2): 203-209. | |
5 | 邹才能, 张国生, 杨智, 等. 非常规油气概念、特征、潜力及技术: 兼论非常规油气地质学[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(4): 385-399, 454. |
ZOU Caineng, ZHANG Guosheng, YANG Zhi, et al. Geological concepts, characteristics, resource potential and key techniques of unconventional hydrocarbon: On unconventional petroleum geology[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(4): 385-399, 454. | |
6 | 贾承造, 王祖纲, 姜林, 等. 中国油气勘探开发成就与未来潜力: 深层、深水与非常规油气: 专访中国科学院院士、石油地质与构造地质学家贾承造[J]. 世界石油工业, 2023, 30(3): 1-8. |
JIA Chengzhao, WANG Zugang, JIANG Lin, et al. Achievements and future potential for oil&gas exploration and development in China: Deep-formation, deep-water and unconventional reservoirs—Interview with JIA Chengzao, Academician of the CAS, geologist in petroleum geology and structure[J]. World Petroleum Industry, 2023, 30(3): 1-8. | |
7 | 谭伟雄, 谭忠健, 张志虎, 等. 渤中凹陷深层油气勘探录井技术进展及展望[J]. 世界石油工业, 2023, 30(4): 40-47. |
TAN Weixiong, TAN Zhongjian, ZHANG Zhihu, et al. Progress and prospects of mud logging in deep oil & gas exploration in Bozhong Sag[J]. World Petroleum Industry, 2023, 30(4): 40-47. | |
8 | 徐向, 辛志源, 刘超, 等. 深层常压页岩气富集机制研究: 以涪陵页岩气田白马区块为例[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2024, 38(3): 53-60. |
XU Xiang, XIN Zhiyuan, LIU Chao, et al. Enrichment law of deep atmospheric shale gas: A case study of Baima syncline in Fuling shale gas field[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2024, 38(3): 53-60. | |
9 | 朱平, 毛凤鸣, 李亚辉. 复杂断块油藏形成机理和成藏模式[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2008. |
ZHU Ping, MAO Fengming, LI Yahui. Formation mechanism and accumulation model of complex fault block reservoirs[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2008. | |
10 | 邱旭明, 刘玉瑞, 傅强. 苏北盆地上白垩统—第三系层序地层与沉积演化[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2006. |
QIU Xuming, LIU Yurui, FU Qiang. Sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary evolution of Upper Cretaceous-tertiary in Subei Basin[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2006. | |
11 | 毛凤鸣, 戴靖. 复杂小断块石油勘探开发技术[M]. 北京: 中国石化出版社, 2005. |
MAO Fengming, DAI Jing. Oil exploration and development technology of complex small fault block[M]. Beijing: China Petrochemical Press, 2005. | |
12 | 段宏亮, 孙雅雄, 杨保良. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油富集主控因素[J]. 石油实验地质, 2024, 46(3): 441-450. |
DUAN Hongliang, SUN Yaxiong, YANG Baoliang. Main controlling factors of shale oil enrichment in second member of Paleogene Funing Formation in Gaoyou Sag of Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2024, 46(3): 441-450. | |
13 | 严泽宇, 梁兵, 孙雅雄, 等. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷阜宁组二段深层页岩储层地应力方向及主控因素[J]. 石油实验地质, 2024, 46(6): 1187-1197. |
YAN Zeyu, LIANG Bing, SUN Yaxiong, et al. In-situ stress orientation and main controlling factors of deep shale reservoirs in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation in Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2024, 46(6): 1187-1197. | |
14 | 马力, 陈焕疆, 甘克文, 等. 中国南方大地构造和海相油气地质[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2004. |
MA Li, CHEN Huanjiang, GAN Kewen, et al. Tectonics and marine petroleum geology in Southern China[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2004. | |
15 | 邱旭明, 陈伟, 李鹤永, 等. 苏北盆地走滑构造与复杂断块油气成藏[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(3): 393-401. |
QIU Xuming, CHEN Wei, LI Heyong, et al. Strike-slip structures and hydrocarbon accumulation in complex fault blocks in Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(3): 393-401. | |
16 | 邱海峻, 许志琴, 乔德武. 苏北盆地构造演化研究进展[J]. 地质通报, 2006, 25(): 1117-1120. |
QIU Haijun, XU Zhiqin, QIAO Dewu. Progress in the study of the tectonic evolution of the Subei Basin, Jiangsu, China[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2006, 25(): 1117-1120. | |
17 | 于雯泉. 致密砂岩储层成因类型分析: 以苏北盆地高邮凹陷阜一段为例[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2018, 11(4): 1-6. |
YU Wenquan. Analysis of genetic type of tight sandstone reservoirs: A case study of the first member of Funing Formation in Gaoyou Sag[J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2018, 11(4): 1-6. | |
18 | 纪友亮, 王艳艳, 刘玉瑞, 等. 高邮凹陷阜一段差异成岩作用及成因[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 42(3): 474-479. |
JI Youliang, WANG Yanyan, LIU Yurui, et al. Differential diagenesis and its genetic analysis of 1st member of funning formation in Gaoyou depression[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2014, 42(3): 474-479. | |
19 | 宋秋花, 宋全友, 陈刚强, 等. 高邮凹陷北斜坡阜宁组储层成岩作用特征[J]. 断块油气田, 2009, 16(5): 20-22. |
SONG Qiuhua, SONG Quanyou, CHEN Gangqiang, et al. Diagenetic characteristics of Funing Formation reservoir in northern slope of Gaoyou Depression[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2009, 16(5): 20-22. | |
20 | 吴思仪, 司马立强, 袁龙, 等. 高邮凹陷阜一段低渗透储层特征及成因分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(2): 47-53. |
WU Siyi, SIMA Liqiang, YUAN Long, et al. Characteristics and genesis of low permeability reservoir of the first member of Fuyi Formation in Gaoyou Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(2): 47-53. | |
21 | 于雯泉, 王路, 陆梅娟. 高邮凹陷阜一段致密砂岩孔隙演化差异分析[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2017, 10(1): 9-16. |
YU Wenquan, WANG Lu, LU Meijuan. Differences analysis for porosity evolution of tight sandstone in the first member of Funing Formation in Gaoyou Sag[J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2017, 10(1): 9-16. | |
22 | 于雯泉, 李丽, 方涛, 等. 断陷盆地深层低渗透天然气储层孔隙演化定量研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2010, 21(3): 397-405. |
YU Wenquan, LI Li, FANG Tao, et al. Quantitative research for porosity evolution in low permeability deep gas reservoir of rift-subsidence basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2010, 21(3): 397-405. | |
23 | 于雯泉, 陈勇, 杨立干, 等. 酸性环境致密砂岩储层石英的溶蚀作用[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(2): 286-293. |
YU Wenquan, CHEN Yong, YANG Ligan, et al. Dissolution of quartz in tight sandstone reservoirs in an acidic environment[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2014, 35(2): 286-293. | |
24 | 周磊, 王永诗, 于雯泉, 等. 基于物性上、下限计算的致密砂岩储层分级评价: 以苏北盆地高邮凹陷阜宁组一段致密砂岩为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(6): 1308-1316, 1323. |
ZHOU Lei, WANG Yongshi, YU Wenquan, et al. Classification assessment of tight sandstone reservoir based on calculation of lower and upper limits of physical properties: A case study of the tight sandstone reservoir in the 1st member of Funing Formation in Gaoyou Sag, North Jiangsu Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(6): 1308-1316, 1323. | |
25 | 纪友亮, 高崇龙, 刘玉瑞, 等. 高邮凹陷阜一段油气充注对储层物性演化的影响[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 43(1): 133-139. |
JI Youliang, GAO Chonglong, LIU Yurui, et al. Influence of hydrocarbon charging to the reservoir property in 1st member of funning formation in Gaoyou depression[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2015, 43(1): 133-139. | |
26 | 钱诗友, 郑元财, 吴峰, 等. 高邮凹陷北斜坡阜宁组异常高压发育特征[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2018, 11(2): 31-37. |
QIAN Shiyou, ZHENG Yuancai, WU Feng, et al. Development characteristics of abnormal high-pressure in Funing Formation of northern slope in Gaoyou Sag[J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2018, 11(2): 31-37. | |
27 | 吴峰, 钱诗友, 郑元财. 高邮凹陷北斜坡阜宁组异常压力成因机制研究[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2019, 12(3): 23-26, 76. |
WU Feng, QIAN Shiyou, ZHENG Yuancai. Study on forming mechanism of abnormal high-pressure in Funing Formation in northern slope of Gaoyou Sag[J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2019, 12(3): 23-26, 76. | |
28 | 王占国. 异常高压对储层物性的影响[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2005, 12(6): 31-33, 83-84. |
WANG Zhanguo. Influence of abnormal high pressure on physical properties of reservoirs[J]. Oil & Gas Recovery Technology, 2005, 12(6): 31-33, 83-84. | |
29 | 缪欢, 郑洪扬, 范文龙, 等. 四川盆地龙马溪组深层页岩储层压力与含气量动态演化过程[J]. 世界石油工业, 2024, 31(5): 19-29. |
MIAO Huan, ZHENG Hongyang, FAN Wenlong, et al. Dynamic evolution process of pressure and gas content in the Longmaxi Formation deep shale reservoir of Sichuan Basin[J]. World Petroleum Industry, 2024, 31(5): 19-29. | |
30 | 薛一帆, 文志刚, 黄亚浩, 等. 深层—超深层走滑断裂带储层流体来源与油气成藏过程研究: 以塔里木盆地富满油田为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(4): 549-559. |
XUE Yifan, WEN Zhigang, HUANG Yahao, et al. Study on reservoir fluid source and hydrocarbon accumulation process in deep to ultra-deep strike-slip fault zone: A case study of Fuman Oilfield, Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(4): 549-559. | |
31 | 夏祥, 马晓东, 胡文瑄, 等. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷沙垛1井侵入岩岩石学特征及其储集性与含油性研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2024, 46(1): 87-97. |
XIA Xiang, MA Xiaodong, HU Wenxuan, et al. Petrological characteristics, reservoir property and oil-bearing potential of intrusive rocks in well Shaduo 1, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2024, 46(1): 87-97. | |
32 | 严焕榕, 詹泽东, 李亚晶, 等. 致密砂岩气藏高产富集规律研究: 以川西坳陷新场: 合兴场须家河组二段气藏为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(4): 541-548, 576. |
YAN Huanrong, ZHAN Zedong, LI Yajing, et al. High yield enrichment law for tight sandstone gas reservoir: A case study of the second member of Xujiahe Formation gas reservoir in Xinchang-Hexinchang gas field of western Sichuan Depression[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(4): 541-548, 576. | |
33 | 李储华, 于雯泉, 丁建荣. 加权断层泥比率法(WSGR)定量判别断层封闭性: 以苏北盆地高邮凹陷永安地区为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2024, 46(1): 158-165. |
LI Chuhua, YU Wenquan, DING Jianrong. Quantitative evaluation of fault sealing by weighted shale gouge ratio(WSGR): A case study of Yongan area in Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2024, 46(1): 158-165. | |
34 | 李超, 罗涛, 黄亚浩, 等. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷花页1井古近系阜宁组裂缝脉体流体演化及其对页岩油充注过程的指示意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2024, 46(2): 228-237. |
LI Chao, LUO Tao, HUANG Yahao, et al. Fluid evolution of fracture veins of Paleogene Funing Formation in well HY1 in Subei Basin and implications for shale oil filling[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2024, 46(2): 228-237. | |
35 | 赖未蓉, 杨国鹏, 宋沛东, 等. 相控叠前地质统计学反演在储层预测中的应用: 以四川盆地川西坳陷须家河组二段致密砂岩储层为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(4): 586-592. |
LAI Weirong, YANG Guopeng, SONG Peidong, et al. Application of facies-controlled prestack geostatistical inversion in reservoir prediction: A case study of tight sandstone reservoir in the second member of Xujiahe Formation in western Sichuan Depression, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(4): 586-592. |
/
〈 |
|
〉 |