油气藏评价与开发 ›› 2025, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (3): 357-372.doi: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2025.03.003
收稿日期:
2024-09-02
发布日期:
2025-05-28
出版日期:
2025-06-26
通讯作者:
李储华
E-mail:zhuxyu.jsyt@sinopec.com;lich.jsyt@sinopec.com
作者简介:
朱相羽(1970—),男,教授级高级工程师,主要从事油气勘探与管理工作。地址:江苏省扬州市邗江区维扬路188号,邮政编码:225009。E-mail:zhuxyu.jsyt@sinopec.com
基金资助:
ZHU Xiangyu(), YU Wenquan, ZHANG Jianwei, LI Chuhua(
), LI Heyong
Received:
2024-09-02
Online:
2025-05-28
Published:
2025-06-26
Contact:
LI Chuhua
E-mail:zhuxyu.jsyt@sinopec.com;lich.jsyt@sinopec.com
摘要:
深层油气勘探领域是苏北盆地重要接替阵地,但深层储层物性整体较差、油气富集机理认识不清及有效储层预测不能满足勘探需求等问题制约了深层领域油气拓展。为了明确深层油气富集机理、攻关勘探关键技术并指明未来攻关方向,从高邮、金湖等油气富集凹陷勘探发展形势及深层领域的油气资源潜力研究入手,结合深层储层物性特征及主控因素分析,开展了深层油气赋存条件、主控因素及成藏模式等研究,建立了异常高压与浮力混合驱动阶梯状输导油气、异常高压驱动断层和砂体输导油气及早期油气充注成藏后期致密型3种深层油气富集成藏模式,明确了深层油气富集机理,并针对储层展布不清、富集区带不明及有效储层识别精度不高等勘探难题,开展了技术攻关,形成了“相控指数法”深层储层分级评价、“油气储层充注势能”油气富集程度判别及“叠前-叠后”多属性有效储层预测等深层勘探关键技术。这些研究成果为深层油气勘探领域拓展提供了理论指导和技术支持,在斜坡带、断裂带及深凹带等深层领域取得了一系列勘探进展,实现了深层油气勘探拓展,在此基础上,明确了深层油气领域勘探攻关方向,继续巩固并扩大深层领域勘探成果,为油田增储上产提供支撑。
中图分类号:
ZHU Xiangyu,YU Wenquan,ZHANG Jianwei, et al. Oil and gas enrichment mechanisms and key exploration technologies in deep layers of Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2025, 15(3): 357-372.
表2
苏北盆地高邮凹陷X15-1井、LL2井恒速压汞参数"
井号 | 深度/m | 孔隙度/ % | 渗透率/ 10-3 μm2 | 喉道半径 平均值/μm | 孔隙半径 平均值/μm | 主流喉道半径/μm | 最大连通 喉道半径/μm | 总孔隙进汞 饱和度/% | 总喉道进汞 饱和度/% | 总孔喉体积比 | 迂曲度 | 排驱压力/MPa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X15-1 | 3 090.46 | 13.36 | 44.587 | 10.688 | 204.533 | 12.000 | 10.809 | 43.348 | 35.763 | 1.212 | 2.134 | 0.068 |
X15-1 | 3 088.60 | 11.75 | 9.089 | 4.831 | 163.627 | 4.500 | 5.833 | 34.860 | 45.385 | 0.768 | 4.465 | 0.126 |
X15-1 | 3 750.63 | 10.26 | 5.663 | 3.781 | 193.076 | 3.000 | 4.868 | 34.132 | 34.139 | 1.000 | 4.028 | 0.151 |
X15-1 | 3 756.42 | 11.35 | 4.104 | 3.167 | 187.425 | 3.000 | 4.298 | 30.573 | 37.951 | 0.806 | 5.327 | 0.171 |
LL2 | 2 967.18 | 19.31 | 1.711 | 1.225 | 176.969 | 1.000 | 3.075 | 10.972 | 34.954 | 0.314 | 6.624 | 0.239 |
LL2 | 2 984.60 | 17.88 | 1.366 | 1.653 | 180.455 | 1.400 | 2.816 | 10.969 | 37.781 | 0.290 | 8.101 | 0.261 |
LL2 | 2 981.53 | 18.22 | 0.447 | 0.904 | 176.334 | 0.600 | 1.833 | 7.952 | 43.680 | 0.182 | 14.032 | 0.401 |
表3
基于“相控指数、物性特征、孔隙结构、成岩相、沉积特征”的储层分级标准"
储层类型 | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | Ⅳ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
相控指数 | [0.7,1] | [0.5,0.7) | [0.3,0.5) | [0,0.3) | |
物性特征 | 孔隙度/% | [15,20) | [10,15) | <10 | |
渗透率/10-3 μm2 | [10,50) | [1,10) | <1 | ||
孔隙结构 | 平均孔喉半径/μm | [2,10) | [0.5,2) | <0.5 | |
孔隙类型 | 粒间孔、粒间扩溶孔 | 粒间孔、粒间-粒内溶孔 | 粒间-粒内溶孔 | 微孔 | |
孔喉结构 | 大粒间孔-缩颈型喉道 | 小粒间孔-窄片状喉道 | 粒内孔-窄片状喉道 | 微孔-管束状喉道 | |
成岩相 | 强溶蚀成岩相 | 中压实中溶蚀相 | 中压实弱溶蚀相、中压实中胶结相 | 强压实相、强胶结相 | |
沉积 特征 | 沉积微相 | 分流河道主体 | 分流河道侧缘、滩坝 | 河口坝、前缘席状砂 | 前缘席状砂 |
粒度 | 中-细砂岩 | 细砂岩 | 粉细砂岩 | 粉砂岩 | |
砂体厚度/m | [6,10) | [2,6) | <2 |
1 | 何登发, 贾承造, 赵文智, 等. 中国超深层油气勘探领域研究进展与关键问题[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(6): 1162-1172. |
HE Dengfa, JIA Chengzao, ZHAO Wenzhi, et al. Research progress and key issues of ultra-deep oil and gas exploration in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(6): 1162-1172. | |
2 | 黄福喜, 汪少勇, 李明鹏, 等. 中国石油深层、超深层油气勘探进展与启示[J]. 天然气工业, 2024, 44(1): 86-96. |
HUANG Fuxi, WANG Shaoyong, LI Mingpeng, et al. Progress and implications of deep and ultra-deep oil and gas exploration in PetroChina[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2024, 44(1): 86-96. | |
3 | 何治亮, 马永生, 朱东亚, 等. 深层-超深层碳酸盐岩储层理论技术进展与攻关方向[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2021, 42(3): 533-546. |
HE Zhiliang, MA Yongsheng, ZHU Dongya, et al. Theoretical and technological progress and research direction of deep and ultra-deep carbonate reservoirs[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(3): 533-546. | |
4 | 关晓东, 郭磊. 深层—超深层油气成藏研究新进展及展望[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(2): 203-209. |
GUAN Xiaodong, GUO Lei. New progress and prospect of oil and gas accumulation research in deep to ultra-deep strata[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(2): 203-209. | |
5 | 邹才能, 张国生, 杨智, 等. 非常规油气概念、特征、潜力及技术: 兼论非常规油气地质学[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(4): 385-399, 454. |
ZOU Caineng, ZHANG Guosheng, YANG Zhi, et al. Geological concepts, characteristics, resource potential and key techniques of unconventional hydrocarbon: On unconventional petroleum geology[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(4): 385-399, 454. | |
6 | 贾承造, 王祖纲, 姜林, 等. 中国油气勘探开发成就与未来潜力: 深层、深水与非常规油气: 专访中国科学院院士、石油地质与构造地质学家贾承造[J]. 世界石油工业, 2023, 30(3): 1-8. |
JIA Chengzhao, WANG Zugang, JIANG Lin, et al. Achievements and future potential for oil&gas exploration and development in China: Deep-formation, deep-water and unconventional reservoirs—Interview with JIA Chengzao, Academician of the CAS, geologist in petroleum geology and structure[J]. World Petroleum Industry, 2023, 30(3): 1-8. | |
7 | 谭伟雄, 谭忠健, 张志虎, 等. 渤中凹陷深层油气勘探录井技术进展及展望[J]. 世界石油工业, 2023, 30(4): 40-47. |
TAN Weixiong, TAN Zhongjian, ZHANG Zhihu, et al. Progress and prospects of mud logging in deep oil & gas exploration in Bozhong Sag[J]. World Petroleum Industry, 2023, 30(4): 40-47. | |
8 | 徐向, 辛志源, 刘超, 等. 深层常压页岩气富集机制研究: 以涪陵页岩气田白马区块为例[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2024, 38(3): 53-60. |
XU Xiang, XIN Zhiyuan, LIU Chao, et al. Enrichment law of deep atmospheric shale gas: A case study of Baima syncline in Fuling shale gas field[J]. Petroleum Geology & Engineering, 2024, 38(3): 53-60. | |
9 | 朱平, 毛凤鸣, 李亚辉. 复杂断块油藏形成机理和成藏模式[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2008. |
ZHU Ping, MAO Fengming, LI Yahui. Formation mechanism and accumulation model of complex fault block reservoirs[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2008. | |
10 | 邱旭明, 刘玉瑞, 傅强. 苏北盆地上白垩统—第三系层序地层与沉积演化[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2006. |
QIU Xuming, LIU Yurui, FU Qiang. Sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary evolution of Upper Cretaceous-tertiary in Subei Basin[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2006. | |
11 | 毛凤鸣, 戴靖. 复杂小断块石油勘探开发技术[M]. 北京: 中国石化出版社, 2005. |
MAO Fengming, DAI Jing. Oil exploration and development technology of complex small fault block[M]. Beijing: China Petrochemical Press, 2005. | |
12 | 段宏亮, 孙雅雄, 杨保良. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷古近系阜宁组二段页岩油富集主控因素[J]. 石油实验地质, 2024, 46(3): 441-450. |
DUAN Hongliang, SUN Yaxiong, YANG Baoliang. Main controlling factors of shale oil enrichment in second member of Paleogene Funing Formation in Gaoyou Sag of Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2024, 46(3): 441-450. | |
13 | 严泽宇, 梁兵, 孙雅雄, 等. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷阜宁组二段深层页岩储层地应力方向及主控因素[J]. 石油实验地质, 2024, 46(6): 1187-1197. |
YAN Zeyu, LIANG Bing, SUN Yaxiong, et al. In-situ stress orientation and main controlling factors of deep shale reservoirs in the second member of Paleogene Funing Formation in Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2024, 46(6): 1187-1197. | |
14 | 马力, 陈焕疆, 甘克文, 等. 中国南方大地构造和海相油气地质[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2004. |
MA Li, CHEN Huanjiang, GAN Kewen, et al. Tectonics and marine petroleum geology in Southern China[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2004. | |
15 | 邱旭明, 陈伟, 李鹤永, 等. 苏北盆地走滑构造与复杂断块油气成藏[J]. 石油实验地质, 2023, 45(3): 393-401. |
QIU Xuming, CHEN Wei, LI Heyong, et al. Strike-slip structures and hydrocarbon accumulation in complex fault blocks in Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(3): 393-401. | |
16 | 邱海峻, 许志琴, 乔德武. 苏北盆地构造演化研究进展[J]. 地质通报, 2006, 25(): 1117-1120. |
QIU Haijun, XU Zhiqin, QIAO Dewu. Progress in the study of the tectonic evolution of the Subei Basin, Jiangsu, China[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2006, 25(): 1117-1120. | |
17 | 于雯泉. 致密砂岩储层成因类型分析: 以苏北盆地高邮凹陷阜一段为例[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2018, 11(4): 1-6. |
YU Wenquan. Analysis of genetic type of tight sandstone reservoirs: A case study of the first member of Funing Formation in Gaoyou Sag[J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2018, 11(4): 1-6. | |
18 | 纪友亮, 王艳艳, 刘玉瑞, 等. 高邮凹陷阜一段差异成岩作用及成因[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 42(3): 474-479. |
JI Youliang, WANG Yanyan, LIU Yurui, et al. Differential diagenesis and its genetic analysis of 1st member of funning formation in Gaoyou depression[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2014, 42(3): 474-479. | |
19 | 宋秋花, 宋全友, 陈刚强, 等. 高邮凹陷北斜坡阜宁组储层成岩作用特征[J]. 断块油气田, 2009, 16(5): 20-22. |
SONG Qiuhua, SONG Quanyou, CHEN Gangqiang, et al. Diagenetic characteristics of Funing Formation reservoir in northern slope of Gaoyou Depression[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2009, 16(5): 20-22. | |
20 | 吴思仪, 司马立强, 袁龙, 等. 高邮凹陷阜一段低渗透储层特征及成因分析[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(2): 47-53. |
WU Siyi, SIMA Liqiang, YUAN Long, et al. Characteristics and genesis of low permeability reservoir of the first member of Fuyi Formation in Gaoyou Sag[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014, 26(2): 47-53. | |
21 | 于雯泉, 王路, 陆梅娟. 高邮凹陷阜一段致密砂岩孔隙演化差异分析[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2017, 10(1): 9-16. |
YU Wenquan, WANG Lu, LU Meijuan. Differences analysis for porosity evolution of tight sandstone in the first member of Funing Formation in Gaoyou Sag[J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2017, 10(1): 9-16. | |
22 | 于雯泉, 李丽, 方涛, 等. 断陷盆地深层低渗透天然气储层孔隙演化定量研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2010, 21(3): 397-405. |
YU Wenquan, LI Li, FANG Tao, et al. Quantitative research for porosity evolution in low permeability deep gas reservoir of rift-subsidence basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2010, 21(3): 397-405. | |
23 | 于雯泉, 陈勇, 杨立干, 等. 酸性环境致密砂岩储层石英的溶蚀作用[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(2): 286-293. |
YU Wenquan, CHEN Yong, YANG Ligan, et al. Dissolution of quartz in tight sandstone reservoirs in an acidic environment[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2014, 35(2): 286-293. | |
24 | 周磊, 王永诗, 于雯泉, 等. 基于物性上、下限计算的致密砂岩储层分级评价: 以苏北盆地高邮凹陷阜宁组一段致密砂岩为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019, 40(6): 1308-1316, 1323. |
ZHOU Lei, WANG Yongshi, YU Wenquan, et al. Classification assessment of tight sandstone reservoir based on calculation of lower and upper limits of physical properties: A case study of the tight sandstone reservoir in the 1st member of Funing Formation in Gaoyou Sag, North Jiangsu Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(6): 1308-1316, 1323. | |
25 | 纪友亮, 高崇龙, 刘玉瑞, 等. 高邮凹陷阜一段油气充注对储层物性演化的影响[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 43(1): 133-139. |
JI Youliang, GAO Chonglong, LIU Yurui, et al. Influence of hydrocarbon charging to the reservoir property in 1st member of funning formation in Gaoyou depression[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2015, 43(1): 133-139. | |
26 | 钱诗友, 郑元财, 吴峰, 等. 高邮凹陷北斜坡阜宁组异常高压发育特征[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2018, 11(2): 31-37. |
QIAN Shiyou, ZHENG Yuancai, WU Feng, et al. Development characteristics of abnormal high-pressure in Funing Formation of northern slope in Gaoyou Sag[J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2018, 11(2): 31-37. | |
27 | 吴峰, 钱诗友, 郑元财. 高邮凹陷北斜坡阜宁组异常压力成因机制研究[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2019, 12(3): 23-26, 76. |
WU Feng, QIAN Shiyou, ZHENG Yuancai. Study on forming mechanism of abnormal high-pressure in Funing Formation in northern slope of Gaoyou Sag[J]. Complex Hydrocarbon Reservoirs, 2019, 12(3): 23-26, 76. | |
28 | 王占国. 异常高压对储层物性的影响[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2005, 12(6): 31-33, 83-84. |
WANG Zhanguo. Influence of abnormal high pressure on physical properties of reservoirs[J]. Oil & Gas Recovery Technology, 2005, 12(6): 31-33, 83-84. | |
29 | 缪欢, 郑洪扬, 范文龙, 等. 四川盆地龙马溪组深层页岩储层压力与含气量动态演化过程[J]. 世界石油工业, 2024, 31(5): 19-29. |
MIAO Huan, ZHENG Hongyang, FAN Wenlong, et al. Dynamic evolution process of pressure and gas content in the Longmaxi Formation deep shale reservoir of Sichuan Basin[J]. World Petroleum Industry, 2024, 31(5): 19-29. | |
30 | 薛一帆, 文志刚, 黄亚浩, 等. 深层—超深层走滑断裂带储层流体来源与油气成藏过程研究: 以塔里木盆地富满油田为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(4): 549-559. |
XUE Yifan, WEN Zhigang, HUANG Yahao, et al. Study on reservoir fluid source and hydrocarbon accumulation process in deep to ultra-deep strike-slip fault zone: A case study of Fuman Oilfield, Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(4): 549-559. | |
31 | 夏祥, 马晓东, 胡文瑄, 等. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷沙垛1井侵入岩岩石学特征及其储集性与含油性研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2024, 46(1): 87-97. |
XIA Xiang, MA Xiaodong, HU Wenxuan, et al. Petrological characteristics, reservoir property and oil-bearing potential of intrusive rocks in well Shaduo 1, Qintong Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2024, 46(1): 87-97. | |
32 | 严焕榕, 詹泽东, 李亚晶, 等. 致密砂岩气藏高产富集规律研究: 以川西坳陷新场: 合兴场须家河组二段气藏为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(4): 541-548, 576. |
YAN Huanrong, ZHAN Zedong, LI Yajing, et al. High yield enrichment law for tight sandstone gas reservoir: A case study of the second member of Xujiahe Formation gas reservoir in Xinchang-Hexinchang gas field of western Sichuan Depression[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(4): 541-548, 576. | |
33 | 李储华, 于雯泉, 丁建荣. 加权断层泥比率法(WSGR)定量判别断层封闭性: 以苏北盆地高邮凹陷永安地区为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2024, 46(1): 158-165. |
LI Chuhua, YU Wenquan, DING Jianrong. Quantitative evaluation of fault sealing by weighted shale gouge ratio(WSGR): A case study of Yongan area in Gaoyou Sag, Subei Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2024, 46(1): 158-165. | |
34 | 李超, 罗涛, 黄亚浩, 等. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷花页1井古近系阜宁组裂缝脉体流体演化及其对页岩油充注过程的指示意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2024, 46(2): 228-237. |
LI Chao, LUO Tao, HUANG Yahao, et al. Fluid evolution of fracture veins of Paleogene Funing Formation in well HY1 in Subei Basin and implications for shale oil filling[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2024, 46(2): 228-237. | |
35 | 赖未蓉, 杨国鹏, 宋沛东, 等. 相控叠前地质统计学反演在储层预测中的应用: 以四川盆地川西坳陷须家河组二段致密砂岩储层为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2024, 14(4): 586-592. |
LAI Weirong, YANG Guopeng, SONG Peidong, et al. Application of facies-controlled prestack geostatistical inversion in reservoir prediction: A case study of tight sandstone reservoir in the second member of Xujiahe Formation in western Sichuan Depression, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2024, 14(4): 586-592. |
[1] | 张瑾, 张凤奇, 邹彦荣, 任小庆, 陈红果, 王鹏涛, 茹荣, 张文. 地热水溶型和天然气伴生型氦气来源特征对比——以渭河盆地和鄂尔多斯盆地北部为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2025, 15(3): 463-470. |
[2] | 王鹏翔, 张洲, 余婉莹, 邹强, 杨正滔. 深/浅部煤储层孔裂隙结构及三维空间分布差异特征 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2025, 15(2): 227-236. |
[3] | 钟志国, 于雯泉, 段宏亮, 杨保良. 苏北盆地中低TOC复杂断块页岩油勘探进展与攻关方向 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2025, 15(1): 11-18. |
[4] | 薛宇泽, 张玉贵, 麻银娟, 薛超. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南缘岩溶热储对井回灌示踪试验 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(6): 757-764. |
[5] | 糜利栋,曾大乾,刘华,张广权,张俊法. 中国石化地下储气库一体化综合平台研发与应用 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(6): 781-788. |
[6] | 聂云丽, 高国忠. 基于随机森林的页岩气“甜点”分类方法 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(3): 358-367. |
[7] | 刘叶轩,刘向君,丁乙,周鑫,梁利喜. 考虑隔层影响的页岩油储层可压性评价方法 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(1): 74-82. |
[8] | 陈倩倩. 南华北盆地海陆过渡相页岩特征及勘探层位优选——以通许地区上古生界为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(4): 690-697. |
[9] | 马林,蒋夏妮,龚劲松. 优质页岩气储层测井特征分析 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(3): 445-454. |
[10] | 何发岐,徐兵威,邵隆坎. 再论油气勘探开发哲学和创新性思维——纪念“中国陆上第一口油井”延1井 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(2): 265-273. |
[11] | 王永诗,唐东. 咸化断陷湖盆典型页岩剖面地质特征——以东营凹陷为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1): 181-191. |
[12] | 李浩涵,包书景,张焱林,段轲,陈科,周志,宋腾,李飞. 鄂西地区下震旦统陡山沱组二段剖面特征及页岩气地质意义 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1): 171-180. |
[13] | 湛小红,陈学辉,刘超,何文斌,张志平. 重庆武隆五峰组—龙马溪组一段天生剖面特征研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1): 150-159. |
[14] | 高玉巧,刘娜娜,张培先,何贵松,高全芳. 重庆市綦江区页岩地质特征及其对页岩气勘探的启示 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2022, 12(1): 119-129. |
[15] | 区舫,杨辉廷,黄晓兵. X气田飞仙关组礁滩相储层测井解释方法应用 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2021, 11(5): 744-752. |
|