层理性页岩声波各向异性校正方法研究

doi:10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2020.05.007

油气藏评价与开发 ›› 2020, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (5): 49-54.doi: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2020.05.007

层理性页岩声波各向异性校正方法研究

李贤胜¹(),刘向君¹(),梁利喜¹,李玮¹,高阳²,熊健¹

1.西南石油大学油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室,四川成都 610500
2.中国石油新疆油田分公司勘探开发研究院,新疆克拉玛依 834000

收稿日期:2020-02-16 出版日期:2020-10-26 发布日期:2020-09-24
通讯作者: 刘向君 E-mail:CQKZLXS@qq.com;liuxj@swpu.edu.cn
作者简介:李贤胜（1996 —）,男,在读硕士研究生,主要研究方向为岩石物理及工程测井。地址：四川省成都市新都区西南石油大学,邮政编码：610500。E-mail: CQKZLXS@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“水岩作用对硬脆性页岩孔隙结构及声波特性影响的研究”(41872167);国家科技重大专项“准噶尔盆地致密油资源潜力、甜点预测与关键技术应用”(2016ZX05046-006);中国石油重大科技专项“准噶尔盆地二叠系页岩油有效动用技术研究与应用”(2017E-0402)

Correction methods for acoustic anisotropy of bedding shale

LI Xiansheng¹(),LIU Xiangjun¹(),LIANG Lixi¹,LI Wei¹,GAO Yang²,XIONG Jian¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China
2. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Xinjiang Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China

Received:2020-02-16 Online:2020-10-26 Published:2020-09-24
Contact: LIU Xiangjun E-mail:CQKZLXS@qq.com;liuxj@swpu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

层理性页岩的物理、力学性质多表现出较强的各向异性,导致同一地层在直井、水平井中测井响应差异大,造成区域储层评价等困难。基于数值模拟实验方法分析了层理角度、层理密度对页岩纵波各向异性的影响,构建了龙马溪组页岩纵波各向异性校正模型,结合室内纵波实验分析了校正模型的合理性。结果表明,龙马溪组页岩纵波各向异性特征明显,纵波各向异性系数分布在1.088 ~ 1.109;纵波各向异性系数与层理角度正弦值呈二次多项式关系;随着层理密度增加,声波各向异性系数近似线性增加。实例应用表明,利用所构建声波各向异性校正模型能将水平井声波响应合理地校正为直井响应。

关键词: 数值模拟, 页岩, 弹性各向异性, 各向异性校正, 纵波

Abstract:

The physical and mechanical properties of bedding shales show strong anisotropy, which leads to the significant difference in the logging response of the same formation between the vertical wells and the horizontal wells, and bringing the difficulties in regional reservoir evaluation. Based on the numerical simulations, the influence of orientation and density of bedding on the anisotropy of longitudinal wave has been analyzed, and a correction model for longitudinal wave of shale in Longmaxi formation has been built. Then, combined with the indoor compression wave experiment, the rationality of this new model has been analyzed. The results show that, the longitudinal wave anisotropy of shales in Longmaxi formation is obvious, and the coefficient of longitudinal wave is around 1.088 ~ 1.109. The coefficient of longitudinal wave anisotropy has a quadratic polynomial relation with the sine of the bedding angle, and the anisotropic coefficient increases linearly with the increase of bedding density. Application examples show that this new model can reasonably correct the acoustic response of horizontal wells to that of vertical wells.

Key words: numerical simulation, shale, elastic anisotropy, anisotropic correction, longitudinal wave

中图分类号:

TE132

李贤胜,刘向君,梁利喜,李玮,高阳,熊健. 层理性页岩声波各向异性校正方法研究[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2020, 10(5): 49-54.

LI Xiansheng,LIU Xiangjun,LIANG Lixi,LI Wei,GAO Yang,XIONG Jian. Correction methods for acoustic anisotropy of bedding shale[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(5): 49-54.

图/表 10

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

表1

图7

图8

图9

参考文献 21

[1]	邹才能, 杨智, 何东博, 等. 常规-非常规天然气理论、技术及前景[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018,45(4):575-587.
	ZOU C N, YANG Z, HE D B, et al. Theory, technology and prospects of conventional and unconventional natural gas[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018,45(4):575-587.
[2]	戴金星, 秦胜飞, 胡国艺, 等. 新中国天然气勘探开发70年来的重大进展[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019,45(6):1-10.
	DAI J X, QING S F, HU G Y, et al. Major progress in the natural gas exploration and development in the past seven decades in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019,45(6):1-10.
[3]	侯振坤, 杨春和, 郭印同, 等. 单轴压缩下龙马溪组页岩各向异性特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2015,36(9):2541-2550.
	HOU Z K, YANG C H, GUO Y T, et al. Experimental study on anisotropic properties of Longmaxi formation shale under uniaxial compression[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015,36(9):2541-2550.
[4]	LI W, SCHMITT D R, ZOU C C , et al. A program to calculate pulse transmission responses through transversely isotropic media[J]. Computers and Geosciences, 2018,114:59-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2018.02.002
[5]	MOHAMMAD K Z, NAZMUL H M, JAHREN J . Velocity anisotropy of Upper Jurassic organic-rich shales, Norwegian Continental Shelf[J]. Geophysics, 2017,82(2):61-75.
[6]	GONG F, DI B R, WEI J X , et al. Experimental investigation of the effects of clay content and compaction stress on the elastic properties and anisotropy of dry and saturated synthetic shale[J]. Geophysics, 2018,83(5):195-208.
[7]	GONG F, DI B R, WEI J X , et al. Ultrasonic velocity and mechanical anisotropy of synthetic shale with different types of clay minerals[J]. Geophysics, 2018,83(2):57-66.
[8]	艾池, 仇德智, 张军, 等. 页岩力学参数测试及脆性各向异性研究[J]. 断块油气田, 2017,24(5):647-651.
	AI C, QIU D Z, ZHANG J, et al. Measurements of mechanical parameters and brittleness anisotropy of shale[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Filed, 2017,24(5):647-651.
[9]	汪虎, 郭印同, 王磊, 等. 不同深度页岩储层力学各向异性的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2017,38(9):2496-2506.
	WNAG H, GUO Y T, WANG L, et al. An experimental study on mechanical anisotropy of shale reservoirs at different depths[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017,38(9):2496-2506.
[10]	高德利. 大型丛式水平井工程与山区页岩气高效开发模式[J]. 天然气工业, 2018,38(8):1-7.
	GAO D L. A high-efficiency development mode of shale gas reservoirs in mountainous areas based on large cluster horizontal well engineering[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018,38(8):1-7.
[11]	焦方正. 页岩气“体积开发”理论认识、核心技术与实践[J]. 天然气工业, 2019,39(5):1-14.
	JIAO F Z. Theoretical insights, core technologies and practices concerning “volume development” of shale gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019,39(5):1-14.
[12]	耿尊博. 大斜度井与水平井孔隙度测井曲线校正技术研究[D]. 北京:中国石油大学, 2011.
	GENG Z B. Research on correction technique of porosity logging curves in high angle deviated wells and horizontal wells[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum, 2011.
[13]	HORNBY B E, HOWIEZ J M, INCE D W . Anisotropy correction for deviated-well sonic logs: Application to seismic well tie[J]. Geophysics, 2003,68(2):464-471. doi: 10.1190/1.1567212
[14]	乔悦东, 孙建孟, 耿尊博. 斜井泥岩声波速度各向异性校正新方法研究[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2010,32(5):104-108.
	QIAO Y D, SUN J M, GENG Z B. New methods of shale acoustic velocity anisotropy correction in deviated wells[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2010,32(5):104-108.
[15]	刘劲歌, 樊洪海, 沙昱良, 等. 斜井测井声波检测孔隙压力校正方法研究[J]. 钻采工艺, 2015,38(1):25-28.
	LIU J G, FAN H H, SHA Y L, et al. Research on pore pressure detection using deviated well acoustic waves[J]. Drilling and Production Technology, 2015,38(1):25-28.
[16]	时建超, 屈雪峰, 雷启鸿, 等. 致密油水平井声波时差测井影响因素分析及测井响应特征研究——以鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长7储层为例[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,47(4):585-592.
	SHI J C, QU X F, LEI Q H, et al. The influencing factors and response characteristics of acoustic time logging in tight oil horizontal well: A case study of Chang 7 reservoir in logging area of Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition), 2017,47(4):585-592.
[17]	董大忠, 施振生, 管全中, 等. 四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气勘探进展、挑战与前景[J]. 天然气工业, 2018,38(4):67-76.
	DONG D Z, SHI Z S, GUANG Q Z, et al. Progress, challenges and prospects of shale gas exploration in the Wufeng-Longmaxi reservoirs in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018,38(4):67-76.
[18]	汪虎, 何治亮, 张永贵, 等. 四川盆地海相页岩储层微裂缝类型及其对储层物性影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2019,40(1):41-49.
	WANG H, HE Z L, ZHANG Y G, et al. Microfracture types of marine shale reservoir of Sichuan Basin and its influence on reservoir property[J]. Oil and Gas Geology, 2019,40(1):41-49.
[19]	段茜, 刘向君. 实验室尺度下气水两相裂缝型介质弹性波速度的数值模拟分析[J]. 石油物探, 2017,56(3):338-348.
	DUAN X, LIU X J. Numerical simulation of elastic wave velocity in gas-water two-phase rock from fractured model[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2017,56(3):338-348.
[20]	李贤胜, 刘向君, 熊健, 等. 层理对页岩纵波特性的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2019,31(3):152-160.
	LI X S, LIU X J, XIONG J, et al. Influence of bedding on compressional wave characteristics of shales[J]. Lithologic Reservoir, 2019,31(3):152-160.
[21]	陈乔, 徐烽淋, 程亮, 等. 基于黏弹性介质波动理论的页岩超声波数值模拟[J]. 天然气工业, 2019,39(6):63-70.
	CHEN Q, XUN F L, CHENG L, et al. Shale ultrasonic numerical simulation based on the viscoelastic medium wave theory[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019,39(6):63-70.

岩心编号	密度/ （g·cm^-3）	层理角度/ （° ）	层理密度/ （条·mm^-1）	平行层理方向波速/ （m·s^-1）	与层理呈一定角度波速/（m·s^-1）	纵波各向异性系数K_c
L1	2.54	45	0.61	4 352	4 735	1.088
L2	2.52	60	0.60	4 326	4 760	1.101
L3	2.50	75	0.65	4 292	4 760	1.109

层理性页岩声波各向异性校正方法研究

Correction methods for acoustic anisotropy of bedding shale

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 21

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	崔玉东, 陆程, 关子越, 罗万静, 滕柏路, 孟凡璞, 彭越. 南海海域天然气水合物降压开采储层蠕变对气井产能影响 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(6): 809-818.
[2]	何海燕, 刘先山, 耿少阳, 孙军昌, 孙彦春, 贾倩. 基于渗流-温度双场耦合的油藏型储气库数值模拟 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(6): 819-826.
[3]	梁运培, 张怀军, 王礼春, 秦朝中, 田键, 陈强, 史博文. 连续加载应力下真实裂缝流场和渗透率演化规律数值研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(6): 834-843.
[4]	姚红生, 王伟, 何希鹏, 郑永旺, 倪振玉. 南川复杂构造带常压页岩气地质工程一体化开发实践 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 537-547.
[5]	李京昌, 卢婷, 聂海宽, 冯动军, 杜伟, 孙川翔, 李王鹏. 威荣地区WY23平台页岩气层裂缝地震检测可信度评价 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 614-626.
[6]	夏海帮, 韩克宁, 宋文辉, 王伟, 姚军. 页岩气藏多尺度孔缝介质压裂液微观赋存机理研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 627-635.
[7]	侯大力, 韩鑫, 唐洪明, 郭建春, 龚凤鸣, 孙雷, 强贤宇. 龙马溪组页岩干酪根表征初探及干酪根吸附特征研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 636-646.
[8]	韩克宁, 王伟, 樊冬艳, 姚军, 罗飞, 杨灿. 基于产量递减与LSTM耦合的常压页岩气井产量预测 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 647-656.
[9]	薛冈, 熊炜, 张培先. 常压页岩气藏成因分析与有效开发——以四川盆地东南缘地区五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气藏为例 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(5): 668-675.
[10]	施雷庭, 赵启明, 任镇宇, 朱诗杰, 朱珊珊. 煤岩裂隙形态对渗流能力影响数值模拟研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 424-432.
[11]	楼章华, 张欣柯, 吴宇辰, 高玉巧, 张培先, 金爱民, 朱蓉. 四川盆地南川地区及邻区页岩气保存差异的流体响应特征 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 451-458.
[12]	胡之牮, 李树新, 王建君, 周鸿, 赵玉龙, 张烈辉. 复杂人工裂缝产状页岩气藏多段压裂水平井产能评价 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 459-466.
[13]	林魂, 孙新毅, 宋西翔, 蒙春, 熊雯欣, 黄俊和, 刘洪博, 刘成. 基于改进人工神经网络的页岩气井产量预测模型研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 467-473.
[14]	刘洪林,周尚文,李晓波. PCA-OPLS联合法快速评价页岩气井储量动用程度 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(4): 474-483.
[15]	陈秀林, 王秀宇, 许昌民, 张聪. 基于核磁共振与微观数值模拟的CO₂埋存形态及分布特征研究 [J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2023, 13(3): 296-304.